Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Rust
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 40 | 51 | 58 | 86 |
| 1440p QHD | 67 | 87 | 99 | 151 |
| 1080p Full HD | 91 | 123 | 146 | 214 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 combination delivers a highly capable Rust experience, with performance varying sharply across resolutions. At 1080p, this system is far beyond what the game demands, while 1440p remains excellent and 4K requires a settings compromise to stay smooth. The data shows a clear pattern: Rust is demanding at high resolutions, but this pairing has enough headroom to handle it well at all but the most extreme settings.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data covers four settings presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) at three resolutions. At 1920x1080, the RTX 3080 with the 7800X3D produces outstanding frame rates across the board. Low settings average 213.5 FPS, which is more than triple the 60 FPS playable threshold. Medium settings drop to 146.1 FPS, High settings hit 122.8 FPS, and even the most demanding Ultra preset maintains an average of 91.4 FPS. This means every preset at 1080p is not just playable, but comfortably above the threshold with significant headroom for frame drops.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but begins to show the game's load. Low settings average 151.1 FPS, which is still far above the threshold. Medium settings average 99.3 FPS, and High settings average 86.6 FPS. The Ultra preset at 1440p averages 66.9 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS line but leaves less margin for demanding scenes. The jump from 1080p to 1440p costs about 24% of the average FPS at Ultra (from 91.4 to 66.9), indicating a substantial GPU load increase.
At 3840x2160, the picture changes dramatically. Ultra settings average only 39.6 FPS, which is well below the playable threshold. High settings average 51.4 FPS, still short of 60 FPS. Medium settings average 58.3 FPS, narrowly missing the mark. Only Low settings at 4K average 86 FPS, which is comfortably playable. The scaling from 1440p Ultra to 4K Ultra shows a 41% drop in average FPS (66.9 to 39.6), highlighting how resolution scaling hits the GPU hard in Rust.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The nearestRivals data for the CPU and GPU provides context for what other hardware would behave similarly. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D has an average benchmark score of 33079, with the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G and Intel Core i7-13650HX both matching at 33089 (a 0% delta). The AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX also scores 33091 (0% delta), while the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H scores 33201, which is 0.4% lower. These CPUs would all deliver essentially identical CPU-bound performance in Rust, meaning the choice between them would not meaningfully affect frame rates at any resolution.
For the GPU, the RTX 3080 has an average benchmark score of 23172. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA P106-100 at 23249 (-0.3% delta), the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 at 23250 (-0.3% delta), the AMD Radeon RX 6600M at 23273 (-0.4% delta), and the AMD Radeon R9 M290X at 23276 (-0.4% delta). These GPUs are all within 0.4% of the RTX 3080's average score, so they would produce nearly identical FPS in Rust. However, it is important to note that these rivals are not direct replacements in terms of features like ray tracing or VRAM capacity — the RTX 3080 has 10 GB of GDDR6X memory, while the rivals listed may have different memory configurations.
In practice, a system with any of these rival CPUs paired with the RTX 3080 would show the same measured FPS in Rust, since the game at these settings is likely GPU-bound at higher resolutions. Conversely, pairing the 7800X3D with any of the rival GPUs would yield similar results at 1080p where the CPU matters more, but at 4K the GPU performance gap would become more apparent.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, averaging 91.4 FPS. This is the obvious recommendation for 1080p users, as it provides the full visual experience with a 31.4 FPS margin above the threshold. There is no reason to lower settings at this resolution, as even the heaviest preset is far beyond playable.
At 2560x1440, the best settings are also Ultra, averaging 66.9 FPS. This clears the 60 FPS line by nearly 7 FPS, which is acceptable but not a huge margin. For users who prefer a larger safety buffer, High at 86.6 FPS would be a more conservative choice, but the data shows Ultra is technically playable. The trade-off is between maximum visual fidelity and headroom for scene complexity.
At 3840x2160, the only settings that clear 60 FPS are Low, averaging 86 FPS. Medium averages 58.3 FPS, which is below the threshold, and High and Ultra are far behind at 51.4 and 39.6 FPS respectively. For 4K users, Low is the recommended preset, though it sacrifices significant visual quality. A more balanced alternative would be Medium at 58.3 FPS, which is close to the threshold but not quite there, so the data does not support it as a "best" setting.
The Verdict
The verdictByResolution data makes the situation clear. At 1920x1080, all four settings presets are playable, with Ultra averaging 91.4 FPS. This system is overkill for 1080p Rust, offering triple the threshold performance at Low and nearly 1.5x the threshold at Ultra. For 1080p users, there is no compromise needed — max everything.
At 2560x1440, all four presets are also playable, including Ultra at 66.9 FPS. This is the sweet spot for this hardware. The 7800X3D and RTX 3080 combination provides a high-refresh experience at High (86.6 FPS) and a solid 60+ FPS experience at Ultra. Users with 144Hz monitors would likely prefer High or Medium (99.3 FPS) to stay above 80 FPS consistently.
At 3840x2160, only Low is playable, averaging 86 FPS. Ultra at 4K is effectively unplayable at 39.6 FPS, and High and Medium are marginal. The data indicates that 4K users must accept Low settings or drop to 1440p for a better experience. The overall verdict is that this PC runs Rust very well at 1080p and 1440p, but is only partially capable at 4K.
CPU and GPU Roles
The scaling between resolutions and presets reveals which component matters more. At 1080p, the CPU is the primary driver. The difference between Low (213.5 FPS) and Ultra (91.4 FPS) shows a 57% drop, which is large but not as severe as at higher resolutions. The fact that 1080p Low reaches 213.5 FPS suggests the CPU and GPU are both working hard, but the 7800X3D's strong single-thread performance (959 in 3dmark_single_thread, 3759 in passmark_single_thread) supports high frame rates.
At 1440p, the GPU starts to take over. The gap between Low (151.1 FPS) and Ultra (66.9 FPS) is a 56% drop, similar to 1080p, but the absolute numbers are lower. The RTX 3080 is the limiting factor here, as the resolution increase from 1080p to 1440p requires 1.78x the pixel throughput. The fact that 1440p Ultra still clears 60 FPS indicates the GPU has enough headroom, but the CPU is no longer the bottleneck.
At 4K, the GPU is clearly the dominant component. The drop from Low (86 FPS) to Ultra (39.6 FPS) is a 54% reduction, but the absolute FPS is far lower. The RTX 3080's 10 GB of GDDR6X memory and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth are being taxed heavily. The CPU's role at 4K is minimal — even a weaker CPU would likely produce the same FPS, as the GPU is saturated. The data shows that resolution scaling hurts the GPU far more than preset scaling, confirming that the RTX 3080 is the bottleneck at 4K while the 7800X3D is more than sufficient at all resolutions.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Rust at 1080p with max settings?
A: Yes. At 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the system averages 91.4 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold. All four presets at 1080p exceed 60 FPS.
Q: What is the best resolution for this hardware?
A: 2560x1440 is the best balance. At 1440p, Ultra settings average 66.9 FPS, and High settings average 86.6 FPS, providing a high-quality experience with solid frame rates. 4K requires Low settings (86 FPS) to stay playable.
Q: Is the RTX 3080 the bottleneck at 4K?
A: The data suggests yes. At 3840x2160, the average FPS drops from 86 at Low to 39.6 at Ultra, indicating the GPU is heavily loaded. The CPU's performance is less relevant at this resolution, as the GPU is the limiting factor.
Q: How does this system compare to similar hardware?
A: The CPU's nearest rivals (AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, Intel Core i7-13650HX, AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX) are within 0% of its average benchmark score, so they would produce nearly identical results. The GPU's nearest rivals are within 0.4% of the RTX 3080's score, meaning similar frame rates.
Q: What settings should I use at 1440p to stay above 60 FPS?
A: All presets at 1440p clear 60 FPS. For the best visuals, use Ultra at 66.9 FPS. For a larger safety margin, use High at 86.6 FPS or Medium at 99.3 FPS.
Q: Is 4K playable with this setup?
A: Only at Low settings, which average 86 FPS. Medium (58.3 FPS), High (51.4 FPS), and Ultra (39.6 FPS) all fall below the 60 FPS threshold. Users wanting 4K with higher settings would need a more powerful GPU.