Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Rust
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 48 | 64 | 79 | 118 |
| 1440p QHD | 88 | 109 | 129 | 198 |
| 1080p Full HD | 122 | 160 | 189 | 248 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER delivers a commanding performance profile in Rust, with benchmark data showing that this combination handles the survival title with substantial headroom across most settings and resolutions. The measured frame rates reveal a system that is consistently above the 60 FPS playable threshold, with the only exception being the most demanding preset at 4K, where the data shows a dip below that mark. This analysis breaks down the measured performance, component roles, and what the numbers imply for gaming sessions.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that maintains an average of at least 60 FPS is High, with a measured average of 63.8 FPS. The data shows that stepping up to Ultra at this resolution drops the average to 48 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The Medium preset averages 79 FPS, and Low reaches 117.7 FPS, but High is the optimal choice for visual fidelity while staying above the target.
For 2560x1440, the system can push to the Ultra preset while keeping the average at 87.6 FPS. This is the best visual option that clears the 60 FPS bar, with High at 109.4 FPS, Medium at 129.4 FPS, and Low reaching 198.4 FPS. The scaling from 4K to 1440p is substantial, allowing the Ultra preset to become viable.
At 1920x1080, Ultra is again the best settings choice, delivering an average of 122.4 FPS. This resolution provides the most headroom, with High at 160.4 FPS, Medium at 189.3 FPS, and Low soaring to 248.2 FPS. The 1080p results indicate that the combo is rarely stressed, with even the heaviest preset maintaining a frame rate well above the playable threshold.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data reveals an interesting dynamic between CPU and GPU influence depending on the resolution. At 3840x2160, the GPU is the primary bottleneck, as evidenced by the steep drop from High at 63.8 FPS to Ultra at 48 FPS — a 15.8 FPS decrease that suggests the rendering load at 4K strains the RTX 4080 SUPER. The CPU's role is less pronounced here, since the frame rates are lower and the GPU is likely waiting on pixel throughput rather than draw calls.
Moving to 2560x1440, the balance shifts. The Ultra preset averages 87.6 FPS, which is 23.8 FPS higher than the 4K Ultra result, indicating that the GPU has more headroom at this resolution. The CPU begins to matter more, as the frame rate ceiling rises and the Ryzen 7 7700X's 8 cores and 16 threads can feed the GPU with more frames. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1440p is 110.8 FPS (198.4 vs 87.6), showing that settings scaling is still largely GPU-bound, but the CPU is no longer idle.
At 1920x1080, the CPU becomes the more significant factor. The Ultra preset averages 122.4 FPS, which is only 34.8 FPS lower than the 4K Low result of 117.7 FPS — a surprisingly small difference given the resolution change. This suggests that at 1080p, the CPU's ability to process game logic and draw calls is the limiting factor, not the GPU. The Low preset at 248.2 FPS versus Ultra at 122.4 FPS shows a 125.8 FPS spread, which is the largest of any resolution, confirming that settings scaling is more impactful when the CPU is the bottleneck.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 3840x2160, the measured averages are as follows: Low delivers 117.7 FPS, Medium 79 FPS, High 63.8 FPS, and Ultra 48 FPS. The progression shows a consistent drop as settings increase, with the largest single-step decline occurring between Medium and High at 15.2 FPS. The Ultra preset is the only one that fails to meet the 60 FPS threshold, and the 4K results overall indicate that this resolution demands significant GPU resources.
For 2560x1440, the averages are: Low 198.4 FPS, Medium 129.4 FPS, High 109.4 FPS, and Ultra 87.6 FPS. Every preset clears the 60 FPS mark, with the lowest performer (Ultra) maintaining a 27.6 FPS buffer above the threshold. The gap between Low and Ultra is 110.8 FPS, which shows that Rust's settings have a major impact on performance at this resolution.
At 1920x1080, the numbers are: Low 248.2 FPS, Medium 189.3 FPS, High 160.4 FPS, and Ultra 122.4 FPS. This resolution offers the highest overall frame rates, with even the Ultra preset delivering more than double the playable threshold. The difference between Low and Ultra is 125.8 FPS, the largest absolute spread across all resolutions, indicating that CPU limits become apparent at lower resolutions.
The Verdict
The data shows that this PC can run Rust with clear success at most settings and resolutions. At 3840x2160, the system is playable on High, Low, and Medium presets, with High being the best visual option at 63.8 FPS. The Ultra preset at 4K is not playable, averaging 48 FPS below the 60 FPS threshold.
At 2560x1440, all four presets — Low, Medium, High, and Ultra — are playable, with Ultra averaging 87.6 FPS. This resolution offers the best balance of visual quality and performance, as the system can run the highest settings while maintaining a comfortable frame rate.
At 1920x1080, every preset is playable, with Ultra averaging 122.4 FPS. This is the most versatile resolution for this combo, providing high frame rates even under maximum load. The verdict is clear: this system is fully capable of running Rust at 1080p and 1440p with any settings, and at 4K with High settings or lower, though Ultra at 4K requires a reduction in quality.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Looking at the nearest rivals for the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is the closest match, with an average benchmark score of 35802 compared to the Ryzen 7 7700X's 35909, a negligible 0.3% difference. This means the PRO 5845 would behave nearly identically in Rust, delivering similar frame rates across all resolutions and settings.
The Intel Core 7 250H follows closely with a score of 35728, a 0.5% delta. This mobile-oriented chip would show slightly lower performance, but the difference is small enough that it would be imperceptible in gameplay. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 at 35719 and the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H at 35670 round out the CPU rivals, both with 0.5% and 0.7% deltas respectively, all within a tight performance band.
For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is the nearest rival with an average score of 54247 versus the RTX 4080 SUPER's 54209, a -0.1% delta. This means the non-SUPER variant would perform almost exactly the same in Rust, with frame rates within a fraction of a percent. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54828 with a -1.1% delta, while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB at 55698 and the AMD Radeon 8060S at 55757 show -2.7% and -2.8% deltas respectively, indicating slightly higher benchmark scores but similar real-world behavior in this game.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER ranks 238th out of 3723 tested combos in this database for Rust. This places the system in the top 6.4% of all configurations tested, which is a strong showing for a desktop pairing. The rank reflects the measured frame rates across all resolutions and presets, with the only sub-60 FPS result being at 4K Ultra.
This ranking suggests that the combo is well above average for Rust performance, but it is not at the absolute top tier. The data indicates that there are 237 other combos that perform better, likely featuring more powerful CPUs or GPUs, but the 7700X and 4080 SUPER combination still delivers excellent playability across the vast majority of settings and resolutions.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Rust at 4K with Ultra settings?
A: No, the measured average at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 48 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The best playable setting at 4K is High, averaging 63.8 FPS.
Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gaming?
A: At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset is the best option, maintaining an average of 87.6 FPS. This is the highest visual quality that still clears the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: How much faster is 1080p Ultra compared to 4K Ultra?
A: The 1920x1080 Ultra preset averages 122.4 FPS, which is 74.4 FPS higher than the 4K Ultra result of 48 FPS. This shows a substantial performance gain when lowering resolution.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important at 1080p?
A: At 1920x1080, the CPU becomes more significant, as the frame rates are high enough that the Ryzen 7 7700X's processing power is the limiting factor. The data shows a 125.8 FPS spread between Low and Ultra at this resolution, indicating that settings scaling is CPU-bound.
Q: How does this combo compare to the nearest GPU rival?
A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is the closest GPU rival, with a benchmark score of 54247 versus the RTX 4080 SUPER's 54209, a -0.1% delta. The two cards would perform nearly identically in Rust.
Q: What is the highest frame rate measured for this combo?
A: The highest average FPS is 248.2 at 1920x1080 with Low settings. This represents the absolute ceiling for this configuration in Rust, with all other settings and resolutions producing lower averages.