Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

98%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
247 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
110 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
170 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
74 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
102 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
45 FPS
7ms Frame Time
11ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 35,909
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 43,223

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 45 56 67 102
1440p QHD 74 97 114 170
1080p Full HD 110 143 170 247

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 143
1920x1080 Low 247
1920x1080 Medium 170
1920x1080 Ultra 110
2560x1440 High 97
2560x1440 Low 170
2560x1440 Medium 114
2560x1440 Ultra 74
3840x2160 High 56
3840x2160 Low 102
3840x2160 Medium 67
3840x2160 Ultra 45

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER combination delivers a strong performance profile in Rust, with benchmark data indicating that the system is highly capable across most popular gaming resolutions. The measured frame rates show a clear pattern: the hardware scales effectively from 1080p up to 1440p, while 4K requires some settings adjustments to maintain smooth gameplay.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Medium, which produces an average of 67.1 FPS. This sits comfortably above the playability threshold, though it is worth remembering High settings drop to 56.1 FPS and Ultra falls to 45.4 FPS, both below the 60 FPS target. Low settings at 4K reach 101.9 FPS, but the visual compromise is significant for a survival game where spotting distant players matters.

Moving to 2560x1440, the system can handle the maximum Ultra preset while maintaining an average of 73.7 FPS. This is the sweet spot for this combination, as it provides the full visual experience without dipping below the playability threshold. High settings at this resolution yield 97.4 FPS, Medium delivers 114.2 FPS, and Low reaches 169.7 FPS, but Ultra remains the recommended choice for image quality.

At 1920x1080, the story is even more favorable. The Ultra preset runs at 109.7 FPS on average, which is well above the 60 FPS target and leaves substantial headroom for demanding scenes or background applications. High settings produce 143 FPS, Medium reaches 169.7 FPS, and Low hits 247.3 FPS. For competitive play, this resolution offers exceptional flexibility, but the data suggests that even the most demanding preset is entirely playable.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark results reveal a clear division of labor between the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER. At 1920x1080, the frame rates scale dramatically with settings: Low produces 247.3 FPS, but Ultra still manages 109.7 FPS. This indicates that the CPU, with its 8 cores and 16 threads based on Zen 4 architecture, is sufficiently powerful to feed the GPU at lower settings, where the RTX 4070 SUPER becomes the primary bottleneck. The large gap between Low and Ultra at this resolution suggests that pixel throughput and shading complexity are the limiting factors, not processor throughput.

As resolution increases to 2560x1440, the scaling pattern changes. Ultra delivers 73.7 FPS while Low reaches 169.7 FPS, a ratio of roughly 2.3x. This is a smaller relative gap compared to 1080p, where the same settings differ by a factor of 2.25x. The consistency of these ratios indicates that the GPU is increasingly dominant at higher resolutions, while the CPU maintains adequate headroom. The Ryzen 7 7700X, with its 32 MB of shared L3 cache and boost clock of 5.40 GHz, appears well-suited to Rust's single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads.

At 3840x2160, the GPU role becomes even more pronounced. Ultra drops to 45.4 FPS while Low reaches 101.9 FPS, a 2.24x difference that mirrors the lower resolutions. The fact that Ultra cannot maintain 60 FPS at 4K, despite the CPU's strong single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 1090), points directly to the RTX 4070 SUPER's 12 GB of GDDR6X memory and 192-bit bus being the limiting factor. The CPU's 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth is ample for this workload, but the GPU's 504.2 GB/s bandwidth is insufficient for 4K Ultra in Rust.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the nearest rivals for the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X sits very close to several alternatives. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 has an average benchmark score of 35802, just 0.3% lower than the 7700X's 35909. The Intel Core 7 250H scores 35728, a 0.5% difference, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 achieves 35719, also 0.5% behind. The Intel Core Ultra 9 185H rounds out the group with 35670, a 0.7% delta. In practical gaming terms, these differences are negligible, meaning any of these CPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates in Rust when paired with the RTX 4070 SUPER.

On the GPU side, the RTX 4070 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 43223, with rivals clustered tightly around it. The NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB scores 43262, just 0.1% higher, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile achieves 43268, also 0.1% ahead. The NVIDIA Quadro M6000 (non-24 GB variant) scores 43301, 0.2% higher, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile leads the group with 43667, a 1% advantage. These deltas are small enough that in Rust, users would not perceive meaningful differences in average FPS, though the desktop RTX 4070 SUPER has the advantage of higher sustained clocks and dedicated cooling compared to mobile variants.

The Verdict

The data clearly indicates that this PC can run Rust effectively at most settings and resolutions. At 1920x1080, every preset from Low to Ultra clears the 60 FPS threshold, with Ultra achieving 109.7 FPS on average. This makes 1080p gaming entirely comfortable, with enough headroom for streaming or background tasks. At 2560x1440, all four presets also remain playable, with Ultra at 73.7 FPS being the standout choice for visual fidelity without sacrificing smoothness.

At 3840x2160, the system requires some compromise. The Medium preset at 67.1 FPS is the highest playable option, while Low runs at 101.9 FPS for those prioritizing frame rate over visuals. High and Ultra both fall below the 60 FPS threshold, at 56.1 FPS and 45.4 FPS respectively, making them unsuitable for consistent competitive play. The verdict by resolution is clear: 1080p and 1440p are fully playable at maximum settings, while 4K users should stick to Medium or Low for a reliable experience.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured performance data provides a comprehensive view of how this combination behaves across all tested configurations. At 3840x2160, the settings ladder shows 56.1 FPS on High, 101.9 FPS on Low, 67.1 FPS on Medium, and 45.4 FPS on Ultra. The step from Medium to High costs roughly 11 FPS, while the jump from High to Ultra costs another 10.7 FPS, illustrating the diminishing returns of higher presets at 4K.

At 2560x1440, the numbers improve substantially: High delivers 97.4 FPS, Low reaches 169.7 FPS, Medium produces 114.2 FPS, and Ultra achieves 73.7 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 96 FPS, showing that the GPU has significant headroom at this resolution. The progression from Ultra to High to Medium to Low is consistent, with each step adding roughly 24 FPS, suggesting a predictable scaling curve.

At 1920x1080, the performance is exceptional across the board. High runs at 143 FPS, Low hits 247.3 FPS, Medium manages 169.7 FPS, and Ultra achieves 109.7 FPS. The Low setting nearly reaches 250 FPS, which is impressive for a survival game with complex world interactions. The data reveals that even at Ultra, the system maintains over 100 FPS, making 1080p the most forgiving resolution for this hardware combination. The min and max FPS values were not recorded in the benchmark data, so the averages alone represent the full picture available.

How This Combo Ranks

In the broader context of tested combinations, this pairing of the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER ranks 545th out of 3723 tested combos for Rust. This places it in the top 15% of all configurations, which is a strong showing given the game's demanding nature and the wide variety of hardware tested. The percentile ranking aligns with the individual component scores: the CPU sits in the 85th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 83rd percentile among all GPUs.

The rank reflects the balanced nature of this setup. Rust benefits from both strong single-thread performance for game logic and robust multi-thread capabilities for rendering and physics, both of which the Ryzen 7 7700X provides with its 16 threads and high boost clock. The RTX 4070 SUPER complements this with its 7168 shading units and 56 RT cores, though Rust does not heavily utilize ray tracing. The combination's position at 545 out of 3723 suggests that while there are faster configurations, this system delivers consistent, playable performance at mainstream resolutions without requiring extreme hardware investments.