Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

100%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
238 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
150 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
210 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
103 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
141 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
61 FPS
5.2ms Frame Time
8ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 40,081
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 77,712

Recommendations

Excellent!

Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 61 80 95 141
1440p QHD 103 136 161 210
1080p Full HD 150 192 204 238

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 192
1920x1080 Low 238
1920x1080 Medium 204
1920x1080 Ultra 150
2560x1440 High 136
2560x1440 Low 210
2560x1440 Medium 161
2560x1440 Ultra 103
3840x2160 High 80
3840x2160 Low 141
3840x2160 Medium 95
3840x2160 Ultra 61

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D combination delivers exceptional performance in Rust, clearing the 60 FPS threshold at every resolution and preset tested. The data shows a system that is heavily overqualified for this survival title, with even the most demanding 4K Ultra settings maintaining an average of 61 FPS. This pairing ranks 40th out of 3723 tested combinations, placing it in the top 1.1% of all systems for Rust.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the system demonstrates a wide performance envelope across presets. The Low preset produces an average of 141 FPS, which is 135% above the 60 FPS playable threshold. Moving to Medium, the average drops to 95 FPS with a minimum of 81 and a maximum of 109, showing a 33% reduction from Low. High settings yield an average of 80 FPS, a 16% decrease from Medium. The Ultra preset delivers an average of 61 FPS, which is just 1.7% above the playable threshold, making it the only setting at 4K where the system approaches its limit.

At 2560x1440, performance scales impressively. The Low preset hits an average of 210 FPS, which is 49% higher than the 4K Low result. Medium produces 161 FPS average, with a minimum of 136 and maximum of 185. High settings reach 136 FPS average, a 15% reduction from Medium. Ultra at 1440p averages 103 FPS, representing a 69% improvement over the same preset at 4K. Every preset at this resolution maintains a comfortable margin above 60 FPS, with the lowest recorded minimum (136 FPS at Medium) still more than double the playable threshold.

At 1920x1080, the system becomes nearly unconstrained. Low settings produce a staggering 238 FPS average, while Medium achieves 204 FPS with a minimum of 174 and maximum of 235. High settings average 192 FPS, and Ultra delivers 150 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 88 FPS, or 37%, which is the smallest relative spread across all resolutions. The minimum FPS recorded at 1080p Medium (174 FPS) exceeds the maximum FPS recorded at 4K Ultra (109 FPS), highlighting the dramatic performance headroom at lower resolutions.

CPU and GPU Roles

The scaling patterns across resolutions reveal a system that transitions from GPU-bound at 4K to increasingly CPU-influenced at 1080p. Between 4K and 1440p, the average FPS across all presets improves by approximately 48%, while the jump from 1440p to 1080p yields an additional 38% improvement. This non-linear scaling suggests the GPU remains the primary bottleneck at all tested resolutions, but its dominance diminishes as resolution drops.

Evidence for GPU-bound behavior appears in the preset scaling at 4K. The difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is 80 FPS (from 141 to 61), which represents a 57% performance penalty for maximum quality. At 1440p, the same preset spread costs 107 FPS (from 210 to 103), a 51% penalty. At 1080p, the Low-to-Ultra gap is 88 FPS (from 238 to 150), a 37% penalty. The shrinking percentage penalty at lower resolutions indicates that the CPU begins to cap performance as resolution decreases, preventing the GPU from fully expressing its capabilities.

The Ryzen 7 7700's 8-core, 16-thread configuration with a 5.30 GHz boost clock provides substantial single-thread headroom, as evidenced by its 3DMark single-thread score of 1049 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1930. The CPU's 87th percentile ranking among all processors suggests it is well above average for gaming workloads, but the data indicates that even this capable processor becomes a limiting factor at 1080p Ultra, where the 150 FPS result is likely CPU-constrained rather than GPU-limited.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that maintains 60 FPS or higher is Ultra, which averages exactly 61 FPS. This is the only resolution where the system's performance margin is thin, and users seeking consistent frame rates above 60 FPS should consider High settings (80 FPS average) for additional headroom.

At 2560x1440, Ultra settings are fully viable with an average of 103 FPS. This provides a 72% safety margin above the 60 FPS threshold, making it the recommended choice for high-refresh-rate monitors at this resolution. The minimum FPS recorded at 1440p Medium (136 FPS) suggests that even the most demanding scenes will not drop below the playable threshold at Ultra.

At 1920x1080, Ultra settings deliver an average of 150 FPS, which is 150% above the playable threshold. This makes 1080p Ultra the best choice for competitive play or high-refresh-rate displays, as the system maintains triple-digit frame rates even in the most demanding preset. The 238 FPS Low preset result indicates that esports-focused players could push frame rates toward 240 Hz territory at this resolution.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Rust at 4K Ultra settings?

A: Yes, the measured average FPS at 3840x2160 Ultra is 61 FPS, which is just above the 60 FPS playable threshold. This is the most demanding configuration tested, and performance is sufficient but leaves minimal headroom.

Q: What is the best preset for 1440p gaming?

A: Ultra settings at 2560x1440 produce an average of 103 FPS, making it the best choice. This provides a comfortable margin above 60 FPS while delivering maximum visual quality.

Q: How does the system perform at 1080p for competitive play?

A: At 1920x1080, Low settings achieve 238 FPS average, while Ultra reaches 150 FPS. Both are well above 144 Hz refresh rates, making the system suitable for high-refresh competitive gaming.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for Rust performance?

A: The GPU dominates at 4K, where preset changes cause up to 57% performance differences. At 1080p, the CPU becomes more influential, as the preset penalty shrinks to 37%, indicating the Ryzen 7 7700 begins to limit frame rates.

Q: What are the minimum FPS values recorded?

A: The only presets with recorded minimum FPS are Medium at each resolution: 81 FPS at 4K, 136 FPS at 1440p, and 174 FPS at 1080p. All other presets did not report minimum values in the data.

Q: How does this system rank among all tested configurations for Rust?

A: The combination ranks 40th out of 3723 tested systems, placing it in the top 1.1% of all configurations for this game.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the nearest rivals in benchmark scores are extremely close. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 scores 40,048, which is 0.1% below the Ryzen 7 7700's 40,081 average benchmark score. The Intel Core 5 221E scores 40,144, representing a 0.2% advantage over the 7700. The AMD Ryzen 9 270 scores 40,246, a 0.4% edge, while the Intel Core i9-13905H scores 40,313, a 0.6% lead. These four processors would behave nearly identically in Rust, with performance differences well within measurement noise.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals show more variance. The AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT scores 76,904, which is 1.1% below the RTX 5090 D's 77,712 average. The AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT scores 78,940, a 1.6% advantage. The NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB scores 79,396, a 2.1% edge, and the Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB scores 79,605, a 2.4% lead. These GPUs would deliver similar frame rates in Rust, with the Tesla cards offering slightly higher performance despite being data-center products.

The practical implication is that users considering this build could swap to any of these nearby components without significantly changing Rust performance. The CPU alternatives are effectively interchangeable, while the GPU alternatives offer between 1.1% less and 2.4% more performance. None of these differences would push the system below the 60 FPS threshold at any tested resolution and preset combination.

The Verdict

This system can run Rust exceptionally well. At 1920x1080, every preset clears 60 FPS, with Ultra averaging 150 FPS and Low reaching 238 FPS. At 2560x1440, all presets remain well above the threshold, with Ultra at 103 FPS and the lowest recorded minimum at 136 FPS. At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset averages 61 FPS, which barely clears the playable threshold, while High (80 FPS), Medium (95 FPS), and Low (141 FPS) provide successively larger safety margins.

The verdict is unambiguous: this PC is fully capable of running Rust at maximum settings across all tested resolutions. The only caveat is 4K Ultra, where the 61 FPS average offers no room for frame drops below 60 FPS. For users prioritizing consistent frame rates at 4K, dropping to High settings doubles the safety margin while maintaining an 80 FPS average. At 1440p and below, the system is effectively overkill, delivering 103 FPS or higher at Ultra with substantial headroom for any future game updates or modded servers that might increase CPU load. The combination of the Ryzen 7 7700's strong single-thread performance and the RTX 5090 D's massive 32 GB GDDR7 memory pool ensures Rust's demanding world streaming and draw distance requirements are comfortably met.