Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Rust
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 44 | 56 | 71 | 105 |
| 1440p QHD | 72 | 96 | 116 | 172 |
| 1080p Full HD | 108 | 144 | 170 | 235 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER combination delivers a robust Rust experience, but the data reveals that performance is heavily dependent on resolution and graphics preset. This pairing demonstrates a clear capability for high-refresh-rate play at 1080p and 1440p, while 4K requires a compromise on visual fidelity to maintain smooth frame rates. The measured results indicate that this system is best suited for players who prioritize competitive frame rates over maximum graphical detail.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The benchmark data for Rust provides a comprehensive look at how the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER handle the game across three resolutions and four quality presets. The frame rates are measured as averages, with the data indicating a strong scaling pattern that favors lower resolutions and less demanding settings.
At 3840x2160 (4K), the system shows its limitations. With the Ultra preset, the average frame rate drops to 44.3 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Dropping to High settings improves performance to 55.9 FPS, still marginally under the ideal mark. The Medium preset, however, pushes the average to 70.9 FPS, providing a comfortable playable experience. For players seeking the highest frame rates at 4K, the Low preset yields an average of 104.9 FPS, demonstrating that the hardware has substantial headroom when graphical load is reduced.
Moving to 2560x1440 (1440p), the system performs significantly better. The Ultra preset achieves an average of 71.8 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS threshold with room to spare. The High preset delivers 95.7 FPS, offering a smooth experience with improved visual quality. For competitive play, the Low preset hits an impressive 171.8 FPS, and the Medium preset sits at 116.4 FPS. All four presets at 1440p are fully playable, making this resolution the sweet spot for balancing visual fidelity and performance.
At 1920x1080 (1080p), the combination is exceptionally powerful. The Ultra preset achieves 108.1 FPS, which is not only playable but ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors. The High preset reaches 144.1 FPS, while Medium hits 170.4 FPS. The Low preset produces a staggering 235.4 FPS, indicating that the CPU and GPU are not the limiting factors at this resolution. This data suggests that 1080p is where the system truly shines, providing frame rates that far exceed the playable threshold across all settings.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Rust at 4K with the Ultra preset?
A: No. The measured average frame rate at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 44.3 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The best playable setting at this resolution is Medium, which achieves an average of 70.9 FPS.
Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gaming on this system?
A: The verdict data indicates that all four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable at 2560x1440. The "best" setting is Ultra, which provides an average of 71.8 FPS, offering the highest visual quality while maintaining a smooth frame rate above the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: How does the system perform at 1080p for esports or competitive play?
A: Exceptionally well. At 1920x1080, even the Ultra preset delivers an average of 108.1 FPS. For maximum frame rates, the Low preset achieves 235.4 FPS, ensuring the display is the only limiting factor for high-refresh-rate monitors.
Q: Between the CPU and GPU, which component is more likely to bottleneck at lower resolutions?
A: The data shows that at 1080p Low, the average FPS is 235.4, which suggests the system is well-balanced. However, the scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p (235.4 to 108.1 FPS) is primarily driven by the GPU’s workload, indicating the graphics card is the main performance lever at this resolution.
Q: Is the RTX 4070 SUPER's 12 GB VRAM a concern for Rust at high settings?
A: The measured performance data does not indicate any VRAM-related issues. The system achieves playable frame rates at 1440p Ultra (71.8 FPS) and 1080p Ultra (108.1 FPS), suggesting the memory capacity is sufficient for the game's requirements at these settings.
Q: What is the overall ranking of this hardware combination for Rust?
A: The combination ranks at position 552 out of 3723 tested configurations. This places it in the top 15% of all tested combos, indicating a strong performance level for this specific game.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Looking at the nearest rivals for both components provides context for what other hardware might deliver similar performance. For the AMD Ryzen 7 7700, the closest competitors in terms of average benchmark score are the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 with a deltaPct of 0.1, meaning it scores essentially the same. The Intel Core 5 221E is just 0.2% behind, while the AMD Ryzen 9 270 is 0.4% slower. The Intel Core i9-13905H is 0.6% behind the 7700. In practical terms, any of these CPUs would yield nearly identical CPU-bound performance in Rust, making the choice between them a matter of platform or power considerations rather than gaming frame rates.
For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, the GPU's nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB (0.1% slower), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile (0.1% slower), the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 (0.2% slower), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile (1% slower). It is notable that the RTX 4070 SUPER outperforms a mobile flagship like the RTX 4090 Mobile, though the delta is small. For a desktop user, the professional Quadro cards are not typical gaming choices, but the data shows they would provide similar compute performance. The RTX 5050 Mobile being a laptop part, the comparison highlights how well the desktop 4070 SUPER handles this game relative to mobile solutions.
The Verdict
The data provides a clear verdict on the playability of Rust with this hardware combination. The playableThresholdFps is set at 60 FPS, and the verdict by resolution is definitive.
At 3840x2160, the system is playable on Low and Medium settings. The best playable setting is Medium, which achieves an average of 70.9 FPS. This indicates that 4K gaming is possible, but users must sacrifice Ultra and High presets to maintain fluid motion.
At 2560x1440, the system is fully playable across all settings. The verdict lists High, Low, Medium, and Ultra as playable, with Ultra being the best setting at 71.8 FPS. This makes 1440p the recommended resolution for a balance of visual quality and performance, as it clears the 60 FPS threshold at maximum settings.
At 1920x1080, the system is also fully playable on all presets. The best setting is Ultra, which achieves an average of 108.1 FPS. This resolution is ideal for high-refresh-rate displays, as the frame rates are more than double the playable threshold even at the highest quality settings. In summary, this PC can run Rust exceptionally well at 1080p and 1440p, while 4K requires a reduction in settings to Medium for a solid experience.
CPU and GPU Roles
The measured frame rate data across resolutions and presets reveals the distinct roles of the CPU and GPU in Rust. By examining the scaling between 1080p and 4K, we can infer which component is more stressed at each setting.
At 1920x1080, the frame rate scaling from Low (235.4 FPS) to Ultra (108.1 FPS) shows a 127.3 FPS drop. This significant reduction when increasing graphical load suggests that the GPU is the primary factor in frame rate changes. The CPU, with its high single-thread performance (3dmark_single_thread score of 1049), is capable of feeding the GPU at these lower resolutions, as evidenced by the very high Low preset frame rate.
At 2560x1440, the scaling is similar but less dramatic. The Low preset hits 171.8 FPS, dropping to 71.8 FPS on Ultra. The 100 FPS difference indicates the GPU is still the dominant factor, but the CPU's role becomes more pronounced as the resolution increases, reducing the absolute frame rates.
At 3840x2160, the trend continues. The Low preset achieves 104.9 FPS, while Ultra drops to 44.3 FPS. The frame rate difference of 60.6 FPS is smaller in absolute terms but represents a larger percentage drop. At this resolution, the GPU is overwhelmingly the bottleneck, as the pixel fill rate and shading requirements (554.4 GTexel/s texture rate and 198.0 GPixel/s pixel rate) become the limiting factor. The CPU, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, has less impact on performance at 4K, as the workload shifts heavily to the graphics card. The data suggests that for Rust, the GPU is the primary driver of frame rate at all resolutions, but the CPU's headroom is most evident at 1080p where it allows for extremely high frame rates.
How This Combo Ranks
The overall performance of this CPU and GPU pairing in Rust is strong. The comboRankInGame places this configuration at rank 552 out of 3723 tested combos. This percentile placement (top 14.8%) confirms that the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER are a well-matched pair for this game. The ranking reflects the system's ability to handle Rust at high settings across multiple resolutions, as demonstrated by the measured FPS data.
This rank is consistent with the individual component performance percentiles. The CPU sits in the 87th percentile of all processors, and the GPU is in the 83rd percentile of all graphics cards, indicating that this system is built from high-performing parts. The combination rank of 552 suggests that while there are more powerful configurations, this setup offers a balanced and capable experience for Rust. The data shows that this combo is significantly ahead of lower-tier hardware, providing a smooth gaming experience at 1440p and 1080p, which is the primary target for most gamers. For users seeking a high-refresh-rate 1080p or a high-quality 1440p experience, this ranking confirms that the system is more than adequate, with the only compromise being at 4K Ultra settings.