Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

87%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
217 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
92 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
149 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
67 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
87 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
36 FPS
8.1ms Frame Time
12ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 40,081
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 23,172

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 36 49 59 87
1440p QHD 67 85 103 149
1080p Full HD 92 123 144 217

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 123
1920x1080 Low 217
1920x1080 Medium 144
1920x1080 Ultra 92
2560x1440 High 85
2560x1440 Low 149
2560x1440 Medium 103
2560x1440 Ultra 67
3840x2160 High 49
3840x2160 Low 87
3840x2160 Medium 59
3840x2160 Ultra 36

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 combination delivers a highly playable Rust experience at 1080p and 1440p, but struggles to maintain smooth frame rates at 4K on higher presets. The measured data shows a clear scaling pattern: performance drops significantly as resolution increases, with the gap between Low and Ultra settings widening at higher pixel counts. This pairing is ranked in the top quarter of tested configurations for Rust, though the RTX 3080's diminishing returns at 4K Ultra suggest the CPU has more headroom than the GPU at that extreme.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160 (4K), the RTX 3080 shows its limits. The Ultra preset yields an average of 35.9 FPS, which falls well below the 60 FPS playability threshold. Dropping to High improves the average to 48.6 FPS — still not enough for smooth gameplay. The Medium preset reaches 59.4 FPS, just shy of the 60 FPS target. Only the Low preset delivers acceptable performance at 4K, with an average of 87 FPS. The jump from Ultra to Low represents a 51.1 FPS improvement, demonstrating how heavily this game's visual settings impact GPU load at 4K.

Moving to 2560x1440 (1440p), the picture improves substantially. The Ultra preset averages 67.2 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS threshold with a small margin. High settings produce 85.2 FPS, Medium reaches 102.7 FPS, and Low hits 149.1 FPS. The scaling here is more gradual: from Ultra to Low, the frame rate increases by 81.9 FPS. Notably, the difference between Medium and Low (46.4 FPS) is larger than the gap between Ultra and High (18 FPS), suggesting diminishing returns at the higher end of the settings spectrum.

At 1920x1080 (1080p), this combo excels. The Ultra preset averages 91.9 FPS, High reaches 123.4 FPS, Medium hits 144.1 FPS, and Low peaks at 216.9 FPS. The performance spread across presets is dramatic: Low delivers 125 FPS more than Ultra. Even at the most demanding setting, the frame rate remains comfortably above 60 FPS, indicating that 1080p is where this pairing truly shines. The data shows no min or max FPS values recorded, so the analysis relies on averages, but the consistency across resolutions suggests stable performance.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the only preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Low, with an average of 87 FPS. The Medium preset comes close at 59.4 FPS, but it fails the 60 FPS playability test. Given that High and Ultra both fall further behind (48.6 and 35.9 FPS respectively), Low is the only viable option for 4K gaming with this hardware. The 87 FPS average provides enough headroom for dips during intense gameplay, though the visual quality will be significantly reduced.

At 2560x1440, the best preset that maintains 60+ FPS is Ultra, averaging 67.2 FPS. This is a narrow margin — only 7.2 FPS above the threshold — so players who prefer consistent frame rates might opt for High at 85.2 FPS instead. However, the data confirms that Ultra is technically playable at 1440p. All four presets (Low at 149.1, Medium at 102.7, High at 85.2, Ultra at 67.2) clear the 60 FPS bar, giving users full flexibility in visual quality.

At 1920x1080, the best preset is Ultra, with an average of 91.9 FPS. This leaves ample headroom above the 60 FPS threshold. Every preset at 1080p exceeds 90 FPS, with Low reaching 216.9 FPS. The Ultra setting here provides the full visual experience without sacrificing smoothness, making 1080p the optimal resolution for this combo in Rust.

How This Combo Ranks

This CPU-GPU pairing ranks 985th out of 3,723 tested combos in Rust, placing it in the top 26.5% of all configurations. The percentile rank reflects a strong but not elite position — the hardware handles the game well at most resolutions but falls short of the highest-tier setups. The Ryzen 7 7700's individual percentile is 87 against all CPUs, while the RTX 3080 sits at 68 against all GPUs, indicating the CPU is relatively stronger than the GPU in this pairing.

The rank of 985 suggests that many other combinations outperform this one, likely due to more powerful GPUs that can handle 4K Ultra settings. However, the measured FPS data shows this combo outperforms its rank might suggest at 1080p and 1440p, where it delivers excellent frame rates. The discrepancy between the CPU and GPU percentiles (87 vs 68) hints that upgrading the GPU would yield larger gains than upgrading the CPU for Rust specifically.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the nearest rivals for the AMD Ryzen 7 7700, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 has an average benchmark score of 40,048, which is 0.1% higher than the Ryzen 7 7700's 40,081. The Intel Core 5 221E scores 40,144 (0.2% higher), the AMD Ryzen 9 270 reaches 40,246 (0.4% higher), and the Intel Core i9-13905H posts 40,313 (0.6% higher). These CPUs would deliver nearly identical performance in Rust, with differences of less than 1% in synthetic benchmarks. Any of these alternatives paired with the RTX 3080 would produce similar FPS numbers.

For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, the nearest rivals include the NVIDIA P106-100 with an average score of 23,249 (0.3% lower than the RTX 3080's 23,172), the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 at 23,250 (0.3% lower), the AMD Radeon RX 6600M at 23,273 (0.4% higher), and the AMD Radeon R9 M290X at 23,276 (0.4% higher). All of these GPUs fall within 0.4% of the RTX 3080's benchmark score, meaning they would deliver virtually identical frame rates in Rust. Notably, the RX 6600M is a mobile GPU, suggesting that this performance tier is achievable in laptops as well.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals a clear division of labor between the CPU and GPU across resolutions. At 3840x2160, the GPU is the primary bottleneck. The average FPS drops from 87 at Low to 35.9 at Ultra — a 51.1 FPS swing driven entirely by GPU load. The Ryzen 7 7700's strong single-thread performance (1,049 in 3DMark single-thread) ensures the CPU isn't holding back even at 4K, where pixel throughput dominates. The RTX 3080's 10 GB GDDR6X memory and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for Low settings but get saturated at higher presets.

At 2560x1440, the balance shifts. The CPU's role becomes more significant as the GPU load decreases. The 149.1 FPS at Low settings suggests the CPU can feed the GPU quickly enough, but the 67.2 FPS at Ultra indicates the GPU still limits performance. The scaling from Low to Ultra (81.9 FPS difference) is less pronounced than at 4K, implying the GPU has more headroom at this resolution. The Ryzen 7 7700's 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with its 32 MB L3 cache, handle Rust's simulation and world-generation tasks without becoming a constraint.

At 1920x1080, the CPU becomes the more critical component. The 216.9 FPS at Low settings approaches the CPU's practical limit for Rust's game logic, while the GPU can easily keep up at this resolution. The 91.9 FPS at Ultra suggests the GPU is still the bottleneck, but the gap between presets (125 FPS from Low to Ultra) shows that CPU performance matters more at 1080p. The Ryzen 7 7700's 5.30 GHz boost clock and Zen 4 architecture give it an edge over older CPUs in this scenario.

The verdict by resolution confirms this: at 4K, only Low is playable (87 FPS); at 1440p, Ultra becomes playable (67.2 FPS); at 1080p, Ultra is easily playable (91.9 FPS). This progression indicates that the RTX 3080 is the limiting factor at 4K, while the Ryzen 7 7700 has sufficient headroom to support higher frame rates at lower resolutions.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo run Rust at 4K with playable frame rates?

A: Only at Low settings, which averages 87 FPS. Medium comes close at 59.4 FPS but falls just below the 60 FPS threshold. High and Ultra are not playable at 4K, averaging 48.6 and 35.9 FPS respectively.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p?

A: Ultra is the best playable preset at 2560x1440, averaging 67.2 FPS. All four presets — Low (149.1), Medium (102.7), High (85.2), and Ultra (67.2) — exceed the 60 FPS playability threshold.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations for Rust?

A: It ranks 985th out of 3,723 tested combos, placing it in the top 26.5% of all configurations. The CPU ranks at the 87th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 68th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: Which component is the bottleneck at 4K resolution?

A: The GPU is the primary bottleneck at 3840x2160. The frame rate drops by 51.1 FPS when moving from Low (87 FPS) to Ultra (35.9 FPS), indicating the RTX 3080 cannot handle the increased pixel load at higher presets.

Q: Are there GPUs that perform similarly to the RTX 3080 for Rust?

A: Yes. The NVIDIA P106-100, AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16, AMD Radeon RX 6600M, and AMD Radeon R9 M290X all have average benchmark scores within 0.4% of the RTX 3080, suggesting nearly identical performance in Rust.

Q: Does the Ryzen 7 7700 hold back the RTX 3080 at 1080p?

A: The data suggests the CPU is well-suited for 1080p gaming, with Low settings reaching 216.9 FPS. The 5.30 GHz boost clock and 8-core/16-thread configuration provide ample processing power, and the CPU's 87th percentile ranking indicates it outperforms most CPUs in this scenario.