Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

70%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
74 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
32 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
51 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
22 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
30 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
13 FPS
23.8ms Frame Time
36ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 40,081
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 12,928

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 13 17 20 30
1440p QHD 22 29 34 51
1080p Full HD 32 42 49 74

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 42
1920x1080 Low 74
1920x1080 Medium 49
1920x1080 Ultra 32
2560x1440 High 29
2560x1440 Low 51
2560x1440 Medium 34
2560x1440 Ultra 22
3840x2160 High 17
3840x2160 Low 30
3840x2160 Medium 20
3840x2160 Ultra 13

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

Measured FPS Breakdown

The recorded data for Rust with the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and AMD Radeon RX 580 covers three resolutions and four settings presets. At 3840x2160, the results are uniformly below the 60 FPS playability threshold. The Low preset averages 30 FPS, Medium averages 20 FPS with a minimum of 17 FPS and a maximum of 23 FPS, High averages 17 FPS, and Ultra averages 13 FPS. None of these numbers approach a fluid experience, and the gap between Low and Ultra is 17 FPS, indicating that even dropping to the lowest settings leaves the system far from playable at 4K.

Moving to 2560x1440, the situation improves but remains well short of the 60 FPS target. Low preset delivers an average of 51 FPS, which is the strongest result at this resolution. Medium averages 34 FPS with a minimum of 29 FPS and a maximum of 39 FPS. High averages 29 FPS, and Ultra averages 22 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1440p is a 29 FPS drop, showing that the preset choice has a substantial impact, yet even the best case falls 9 FPS short of the playability threshold.

At 1920x1080, the data finally shows a playable configuration. The Low preset averages 74 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS bar with a 14 FPS margin. Medium averages 49 FPS with a minimum of 42 FPS and a maximum of 57 FPS, so it stays below the threshold but is closer than any non-Low preset. High averages 42 FPS, and Ultra averages 32 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is 42 FPS, the largest across all resolutions, which underscores how sensitive Rust is to graphics settings at this resolution.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark results indicate that the RX 580 is the primary limiting factor in this combination. The Ryzen 7 7700 is a strong 8-core, 16-thread processor with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18760 and a single-core score of 1930, placing it in the 87th percentile among all CPUs. The RX 580, by contrast, sits in the 53rd percentile among all GPUs with a Passmark G3D score of 8813. This disparity is evident in the FPS data: as resolution increases, the average FPS drops consistently across all presets, which is the classic signature of a GPU-bound scenario.

At 3840x2160, the average FPS does not exceed 30 even on Low, meaning the GPU is overwhelmed by the pixel count. The scaling from 1080p Low (74 FPS) to 1440p Low (51 FPS) is a 23 FPS drop, and from 1440p Low to 4K Low (30 FPS) is another 21 FPS drop. This steep decline is directly attributable to the RX 580's 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 6.175 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, which are insufficient for 4K workloads in Rust.

At 1920x1080, the CPU's headroom becomes more relevant. The Ryzen 7 7700's multi-threaded performance, including a Passmark multi-thread score of 34470, ensures that the game does not become CPU-limited at lower resolutions. However, the data shows that even at 1080p, the Medium preset (49 FPS) and High preset (42 FPS) fall below 60 FPS, indicating that the GPU still governs the outcome. The CPU would likely sustain higher frame rates if paired with a more powerful GPU, but with the RX 580, the graphics card is the bottleneck at every resolution tested.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, no preset achieves the 60 FPS threshold. The highest average FPS is 30 on Low, which is half the required rate. Therefore, no recommended settings exist for this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the best result is also on Low, with an average of 51 FPS. This stays below the 60 FPS target, so no playable configuration is available at this resolution either. The Medium preset yields 34 FPS, High yields 29 FPS, and Ultra yields 22 FPS, all of which are further from the threshold.

At 1920x1080, the Low preset is the only playable option, delivering an average of 74 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that remains at or above 60 FPS, and it does so with a comfortable margin. The Medium preset averages 49 FPS, which is 11 FPS short of the target, so it cannot be recommended for a consistent 60 FPS experience. High and Ultra are progressively lower at 42 FPS and 32 FPS respectively.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the Ryzen 7 7700's nearest rivals in the database include the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 with an average score of 40048 and a delta of 0.1%, the Intel Core 5 221E with a score of 40144 and a delta of -0.2%, the AMD Ryzen 9 270 with a score of 40246 and a delta of -0.4%, and the Intel Core i9-13905H with a score of 40313 and a delta of -0.6%. These processors are all within 0.6% of the Ryzen 7 7700's average benchmark score of 40081, meaning any of them would behave nearly identically in Rust when paired with the same GPU. The differences are negligible for gaming purposes, as the bottleneck lies with the graphics card.

For the GPU, the RX 580's nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile with an average score of 12940 and a delta of -0.1%, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER with a score of 12986 and a delta of -0.4%, the AMD Radeon 740M with a score of 12870 and a delta of 0.5%, and the AMD FirePro W5100 with a score of 12847 and a delta of 0.6%. The RX 580's average benchmark score is 12928, so these alternatives are all within 0.6% of its performance. In practical terms, swapping the RX 580 for any of these GPUs would produce nearly the same FPS results in Rust, meaning the 1080p Low preset at 74 FPS would remain the only playable configuration, and the same resolution-based limitations would persist.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Rust at 1920x1080 with the Low preset?

A: Yes, the measured average FPS is 74, which is above the 60 FPS playability threshold.

Q: What is the highest preset that stays at or above 60 FPS at any resolution?

A: The only preset that clears 60 FPS is Low at 1920x1080, with an average of 74 FPS.

Q: How does the RX 580 compare to the GTX 1660 SUPER in overall GPU benchmarks?

A: The RX 580 has an average benchmark score of 12928, while the GTX 1660 SUPER scores 12986, a delta of -0.4%, meaning they are effectively equivalent.

Q: Is the Ryzen 7 7700 a strong CPU relative to other processors in the database?

A: The Ryzen 7 7700 ranks in the 87th percentile among all CPUs, with a multi-threaded Passmark score of 34470 and a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18760.

Q: What average FPS does the Medium preset produce at 2560x1440?

A: The Medium preset at 2560x1440 averages 34 FPS, with a minimum of 29 FPS and a maximum of 39 FPS.

Q: Does the combination achieve 60 FPS at 3840x2160 on any settings?

A: No, the best result at 4K is 30 FPS on Low, which is far below the 60 FPS threshold.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and AMD Radeon RX 580 ranks 3397 out of 3723 tested combos in Rust. This places it in the lower portion of the database, roughly in the 9th percentile of all tested configurations. The rank reflects the GPU's limited capability in this game, as the RX 580's 53rd percentile standing among all GPUs drags down the overall result despite the CPU's strong 87th percentile ranking.

The data shows that the combo is only marginally above the bottom of the tested pool, and its ranking is consistent with the FPS measurements: it can handle Rust at 1080p Low, but nothing more demanding. Combos ranked higher in the database would typically feature GPUs with greater memory bandwidth and compute throughput, allowing for higher presets or resolutions to clear the 60 FPS threshold. The Ryzen 7 7700 is not the limiting factor here, as its nearest CPU rivals all perform within 0.6% of it, and the ranking would likely improve substantially with a more capable graphics card.

The Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and AMD Radeon RX 580 can run Rust, but only under specific conditions. At 1920x1080, the Low preset achieves an average of 74 FPS, clearing the 60 FPS playability threshold. This is the sole playable configuration in the measured data. At 2560x1440, the best average is 51 FPS on Low, which falls short of 60 FPS, and at 3840x2160, no preset reaches even half the target rate.

The verdict by resolution is clear: 1080p Low is the only option for a smooth experience. Users who want to play at higher resolutions or with higher presets would need a more powerful GPU, as the RX 580 is the bottleneck. The Ryzen 7 7700 provides ample CPU headroom, but it cannot compensate for the graphics card's limitations in Rust. If 60 FPS is the goal, stick to 1080p Low; anything beyond that will require hardware with greater GPU performance.