Rust

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti combination delivers a robust performance profile for Rust, with benchmark data showing playable frame rates across most tested configurations. The CPU, based on the Zen 3 architecture, posts an average benchmark score of 29879, placing it in the 81st percentile among all processors. The GPU, built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, achieves an average benchmark score of 44795, ranking in the 84th percentile among all graphics cards. Together, this pairing ranks 471st out of 3723 tested combos for Rust, placing it in the top 12.7% of all configurations evaluated.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT sits in a tight cluster of processors with nearly identical average scores. The closest rival is the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H, which scores 29868, a delta of 0% against the 5800XT. The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS and AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS both score 29955, putting them 0.3% ahead of the 5800XT. The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X trails slightly with a score of 29713, 0.6% behind. For gaming workloads, any of these CPUs would deliver nearly interchangeable performance in Rust, given the sub-1% score differences.

On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is bracketed by several interesting alternatives. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile scores 45152, 0.8% ahead of the 4070 Ti, while the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT scores 45384, 1.3% ahead. The NVIDIA RTX A6000 scores 44075, 1.6% behind, and the Intel Arc A730M scores 45592, 1.7% ahead. These deltas are all within 2%, meaning users coming from any of these graphics cards would experience remarkably similar performance in Rust. The RTX A6000, despite being a workstation card, would behave almost identically to the 4070 Ti in this game based on the aggregate score data.

The benchmark results indicate that the 5800XT's nearest rivals are predominantly mobile processors, which suggests the desktop 5800XT provides comparable compute throughput to high-end laptop chips. The 8845HS and 7840HS being 0.3% ahead is negligible for real-world gaming, and the 9600X's 0.6% deficit is equally imperceptible. For Rust specifically, any of these CPUs paired with the RTX 4070 Ti would produce nearly identical frame rates.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Ryzen 7 5800XT and RTX 4070 Ti achieves a rank of 471 out of 3723 tested combos for Rust. This places the pairing in the top 12.7% of all configurations in the database, indicating strong overall performance. The percentile ranking of the individual components corroborates this: the CPU's 81st percentile and the GPU's 84th percentile both point to hardware that sits comfortably above the median.

The rank demonstrates that this combo outperforms the vast majority of tested systems in Rust, though it is not at the absolute top tier. The data shows that the GPU's higher percentile ranking compared to the CPU suggests the graphics card is the stronger component in this pairing. However, the overall combo rank of 471 out of 3723 indicates that the system is well-balanced for this game, with neither component severely bottlenecking the other.

The measured FPS data reinforces the combo's strong positioning. At 1080p, even the most demanding Ultra preset delivers 115.6 average FPS, which is nearly double the playable threshold of 60 FPS. At 1440p, the Ultra preset still maintains 81.1 average FPS, comfortably above the threshold. Only at 4K with the Ultra preset does the combo dip below 60 FPS, achieving 49.1 average FPS. This pattern of performance across resolutions and settings confirms that the rank of 471 reflects a system capable of high-refresh-rate gaming at mainstream resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive picture of how this combo handles Rust across three resolutions and four quality presets. At 1920x1080, the lowest resolution tested, the system delivers 206.1 average FPS on Low settings. Medium settings yield 175 average FPS, High settings achieve 152.2 average FPS, and Ultra settings produce 115.6 average FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p shows a 44% reduction in frame rate, indicating that the GPU is the primary driver of performance at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates remain strong but show the expected drop from 1080p. Low settings deliver 181.2 average FPS, Medium settings achieve 124.7 average FPS, High settings produce 101.7 average FPS, and Ultra settings maintain 81.1 average FPS. The drop from 1080p to 1440p at Ultra settings is 34.5 FPS, a 30% reduction, which is consistent with the increased pixel count taxing the GPU more heavily.

At 3840x2160, the system begins to show its limits. Low settings still deliver a very playable 110.2 average FPS, and Medium settings achieve 74.5 average FPS. High settings barely cross the 60 FPS threshold at 60.4 average FPS, while Ultra settings fall below it at 49.1 average FPS. The scaling from 1440p to 4K at Ultra settings shows a 32 FPS drop, a 39.5% reduction, highlighting the significant GPU load increase at 4K.

The data reveals that the frame rate drop from Low to Ultra is more pronounced at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 90.5 FPS, at 1440p it is 100.1 FPS, and at 4K it is 61.1 FPS. This pattern suggests that at lower resolutions, the CPU has more headroom to feed frames to the GPU, while at 4K the GPU becomes more saturated and the absolute differences narrow.

The Verdict

The benchmark data clearly indicates that this PC can run Rust with playable performance at all three tested resolutions, though the settings ceiling varies. At 1920x1080, all four presets — Low, Medium, High, and Ultra — clear the 60 FPS threshold, with the Ultra preset achieving 115.6 average FPS. This makes 1080p the resolution where the system has the most headroom, allowing users to max out settings while maintaining frame rates nearly double the playable threshold.

At 2560x1440, the verdict is equally positive. All four presets maintain average FPS above 60, with the Ultra preset delivering 81.1 average FPS. The system can run Rust at 1440p with maximum settings and still maintain smooth performance, though the margin above the threshold is narrower than at 1080p. The High preset at 1440p achieves 101.7 average FPS, providing additional headroom for users who prefer higher frame rates over maximum visual quality.

At 3840x2160, the system's capabilities are more constrained. Three presets — Low, Medium, and High — clear the 60 FPS threshold, but the Ultra preset falls short at 49.1 average FPS. The High preset barely crosses the threshold at 60.4 average FPS, leaving little margin for frame rate drops during demanding scenes. Users targeting 4K should stick to Medium or lower settings for a more comfortable performance buffer.

The verdict by resolution is clear: this combo is fully playable at 1080p and 1440p with all settings, and at 4K with settings up to High. The playable threshold of 60 FPS is exceeded in 11 out of 12 tested configurations, with only 4K Ultra failing to meet the mark.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Rust at 4K with maximum settings?

A: No. At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the combo achieves 49.1 average FPS, which falls below the playable threshold of 60 FPS. The High preset at 4K delivers 60.4 average FPS, barely meeting the threshold.

Q: What is the highest preset that stays above 60 FPS at 1440p?

A: The Ultra preset at 2560x1440 achieves 81.1 average FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold. All four presets at 1440p — Low, Medium, High, and Ultra — maintain average FPS above 60.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 7 5800XT scores 29879 on average. The AMD Ryzen 7 7840H scores 29868 with a 0% delta, the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS and AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS both score 29955 with a -0.3% delta, and the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X scores 29713 with a 0.6% delta. All are within 1% of each other.

Q: What frame rate does the system achieve at 1080p with High settings?

A: At 1920x1080 with High settings, the combo delivers 152.2 average FPS. This is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold and represents strong performance for high-refresh-rate monitors.

Q: How much performance drops when moving from 1080p to 4K at Ultra settings?

A: At 1080p Ultra, the system achieves 115.6 average FPS. At 4K Ultra, it drops to 49.1 average FPS, a reduction of 66.5 FPS or approximately 57.5% lower performance.

Q: Is the GPU or CPU more likely to limit performance at 4K?

A: The data shows the GPU becomes the limiting factor at 4K. The frame rate drops from 110.2 average FPS at Low settings to 49.1 average FPS at Ultra settings, a 55.5% reduction, indicating the graphics card is heavily taxed at this resolution.

Best Settings per Resolution

For users seeking the most demanding preset that maintains at least 60 FPS, the data provides clear guidance for each resolution. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the best choice, delivering 115.6 average FPS. This provides both maximum visual quality and a frame rate nearly double the playable threshold, leaving substantial headroom for demanding scenes or competitive play.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset again offers the highest visual quality while maintaining playable performance. The 81.1 average FPS at this setting is above 60 FPS, though the margin is narrower than at 1080p. Users who prioritize higher frame rates could drop to High settings for 101.7 average FPS, but Ultra remains viable for those wanting maximum fidelity.

At 3840x2160, the High preset is the most demanding option that stays at or above 60 FPS, achieving 60.4 average FPS. This is a razor-thin margin above the threshold, so users may prefer Medium settings at 74.5 average FPS for additional stability. The Ultra preset at 49.1 average FPS is not recommended for playable performance at 4K.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data reveals how the CPU and GPU each contribute to performance in Rust across different resolutions. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are exceptionally high, with Low settings achieving 206.1 average FPS. The relatively small drop from Low to Ultra at 1080p — 90.5 FPS — combined with the high absolute numbers suggests both components have ample headroom at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the GPU begins to take on a larger role. The frame rate at Low settings drops from 206.1 at 1080p to 181.2 at 1440p, a 12% reduction, while the Ultra preset drops from 115.6 to 81.1, a 30% reduction. The larger percentage drop at Ultra settings indicates the GPU is being pushed harder as resolution increases, while the CPU maintains sufficient throughput to feed frames.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the dominant factor. The Low preset at 4K achieves 110.2 average FPS, which is roughly half the 206.1 FPS seen at 1080p Low. The Ultra preset drops to 49.1 average FPS, falling below the playable threshold. The scaling from 1440p to 4K at Ultra shows a 39.5% reduction in frame rate, confirming that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at 4K.

The scaling between presets at each resolution further illuminates component roles. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 90.5 FPS, at 1440p it is 100.1 FPS, and at 4K it is 61.1 FPS. The smaller absolute difference at 4K indicates the GPU is approaching its performance ceiling, making preset choices less impactful at higher resolutions. Conversely, the CPU's influence is most apparent at 1080p, where high frame rates require strong single-thread performance to keep up with the GPU.