Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

78%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
209 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
89 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
147 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
64 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
86 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
39 FPS
8.2ms Frame Time
12ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 29,879
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 23,877

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 39 47 57 86
1440p QHD 64 86 97 147
1080p Full HD 89 122 145 209

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 122
1920x1080 Low 209
1920x1080 Medium 145
1920x1080 Ultra 89
2560x1440 High 86
2560x1440 Low 147
2560x1440 Medium 97
2560x1440 Ultra 64
3840x2160 High 47
3840x2160 Low 86
3840x2160 Medium 57
3840x2160 Ultra 39

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9070 delivers a wide spread of performance across Rust’s four presets and three resolutions. The measured data shows a system that is heavily playable at 1080p and 1440p, but which hits a hard wall at 4K Ultra. The benchmark results indicate that the combination of an 8-core Zen 3 CPU and a 16 GB RDNA 4 GPU is sufficient to push frame rates far above the 60 FPS threshold at lower resolutions, while 4K remains a challenge except at the lowest settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the data shows a clear hierarchy across the four presets. Low settings produce an average of 208.5 FPS, which is the highest figure recorded for this combo in any configuration. Medium settings drop to 144.7 FPS, still a very comfortable margin above the 60 FPS playable threshold. High settings yield 122.4 FPS, and Ultra settings bring the average down to 89.4 FPS. The scaling between Low and Ultra is substantial, with a drop of 119.1 FPS from the lowest to the highest preset. This indicates that the GPU is the primary limiter when moving from Low to Medium, but the CPU still has enough headroom to keep frame rates high even at Ultra.

Stepping up to 2560x1440, the pattern remains similar but with lower absolute numbers. Low settings average 147.2 FPS, which is a reduction of 61.3 FPS compared to the same preset at 1080p. Medium settings average 97.1 FPS, High settings average 85.7 FPS, and Ultra settings average 64.2 FPS. Notably, the gap between Medium and High at 1440p is only 11.4 FPS, while the gap between High and Ultra is 21.5 FPS. The Ultra preset at 1440p still clears the 60 FPS threshold, but only by a margin of 4.2 FPS. This suggests that the GPU is becoming more stressed at this resolution, particularly on the most demanding preset.

At 3840x2160, the performance drops significantly. Low settings average 85.8 FPS, which is the only preset at 4K that stays above 60 FPS. Medium settings average 57.4 FPS, which falls below the threshold by 2.6 FPS. High settings average 47.1 FPS, and Ultra settings average 38.5 FPS. The scaling from 1440p to 4K is steep: for example, High settings go from 85.7 FPS to 47.1 FPS, a reduction of 38.6 FPS. The data shows that the RX 9070 cannot maintain playable frame rates at 4K for Medium or higher presets, and even Low settings only manage a 25.8 FPS margin over the threshold.

The measured FPS values include no min or max figures, so the analysis relies solely on average frame rates. Across all resolutions, the delta between Low and Ultra is consistent: 119.1 FPS at 1080p, 83.0 FPS at 1440p, and 47.3 FPS at 4K. This narrowing delta at higher resolutions further confirms that the GPU becomes the dominant bottleneck as pixel count increases.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS this combo achieves in Rust?

A: The highest recorded average is 208.5 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings.

Q: Can this system run Rust at 4K with Medium settings?

A: No. At 3840x2160 with Medium settings, the average FPS is 57.4, which is 2.6 FPS below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: Which preset at 2560x1440 provides the best visual quality while staying above 60 FPS?

A: Ultra settings at 2560x1440 average 64.2 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold. This is the most demanding preset that remains playable at that resolution.

Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1080p to 1440p at High settings?

A: At High settings, the average FPS drops from 122.4 at 1920x1080 to 85.7 at 2560x1440, a reduction of 36.7 FPS.

Q: Is the 4K Ultra preset playable with this hardware?

A: No. At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average FPS is 38.5, which is 21.5 FPS below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Medium settings at 1080p?

A: Low settings average 208.5 FPS, while Medium settings average 144.7 FPS. The difference is 63.8 FPS in favor of Low.

Best Settings per Resolution

For 1920x1080, the best preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which averages 89.4 FPS. This provides the highest visual fidelity available while maintaining a comfortable margin over the threshold.

For 2560x1440, Ultra is again the best playable preset, averaging 64.2 FPS. This is a close call, as the margin is only 4.2 FPS, but the data confirms that it clears the threshold.

For 3840x2160, the best playable preset is Low, which averages 85.8 FPS. Medium settings fall short at 57.4 FPS, so Low is the only option that maintains playability at this resolution.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the CPU’s nearest rivals, the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT has an average benchmark score of 29879. The AMD Ryzen 7 7840H scores 29868, a delta of 0%, meaning the two are effectively identical in performance. The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS and AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS both score 29955, which is 0.3% higher than the 5800XT. The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X scores 29713, which is 0.6% lower. In practice, any of these CPUs would deliver nearly the same frame rates in Rust when paired with the same GPU, since the differences are within a fraction of a percent.

On the GPU side, the AMD Radeon RX 9070 has an average benchmark score of 23877. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z scores 23736, which is 0.6% lower. The AMD Radeon RX 6800S scores 24063, which is 0.8% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile scores 23628, which is 1.1% lower. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER scores 24170, which is 1.2% higher. These deltas are all small, so a system with any of these GPUs would produce nearly identical FPS numbers in Rust. The RTX 2080 SUPER and RX 6800S would be marginally faster, while the GTX TITAN Z and RTX 3080 Mobile would be marginally slower, but the differences are negligible for gameplay.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT and AMD Radeon RX 9070 ranks 1059 out of 3723 tested combos in Rust. This places it in the top 28.4% of all configurations tested for this game. The rank reflects the strong performance at 1080p and 1440p, where the combo easily clears 60 FPS on all presets, but it is held back by the 4K results, where only Low settings are playable. A rank of 1059 out of 3723 suggests that there are many faster combos, but also a large majority of slower ones. The data indicates that this is a solid mid-to-upper tier setup for Rust, particularly for gamers targeting 1440p or high refresh rate 1080p.

The Verdict

This PC can run Rust, but the playable experience depends heavily on the chosen resolution. At 1920x1080, all four presets clear the 60 FPS threshold, with Ultra averaging 89.4 FPS. At 2560x1440, all four presets also clear the threshold, with Ultra averaging 64.2 FPS. At 3840x2160, only Low settings are playable, averaging 85.8 FPS. Medium settings at 4K fall short at 57.4 FPS, and High and Ultra are not viable at 47.1 and 38.5 FPS respectively. The verdict is clear: this system is fully playable at 1080p and 1440p on any preset, but at 4K the user must drop to Low settings to maintain 60 FPS.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data shows a clear shift in bottleneck behavior across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the CPU has more influence on performance, particularly at lower presets. The jump from Low (208.5 FPS) to Medium (144.7 FPS) is 63.8 FPS, which suggests that the GPU is being tasked more heavily as settings increase. However, the fact that even Ultra stays above 89 FPS indicates that the Ryzen 7 5800XT is not limiting the system at 1080p. The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads, running at a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, provide ample headroom for Rust’s simulation and physics workloads.

At 2560x1440, the GPU becomes more prominent. The drop from Low (147.2 FPS) to Medium (97.1 FPS) is 50.1 FPS, but the drop from Medium to High is only 11.4 FPS, and from High to Ultra is 21.5 FPS. This non-linear scaling suggests that the GPU is approaching its limits at higher presets. The RX 9070’s 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1440p, but the rendering load at Ultra pushes the average down to 64.2 FPS, narrowly above the threshold.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly the dominant constraint. The performance gap between Low (85.8 FPS) and Medium (57.4 FPS) is 28.4 FPS, and the gap between Medium and High is 10.3 FPS. The Ultra preset at 38.5 FPS shows that the GPU cannot handle the pixel throughput required at 4K with high settings. The CPU’s role diminishes at this resolution, as the frame rate is limited by the GPU’s rendering capabilities rather than the CPU’s processing power. The scaling from 1440p Ultra (64.2 FPS) to 4K Ultra (38.5 FPS) is a 25.7 FPS drop, which is entirely attributable to the GPU’s workload increase. In summary, the Ryzen 7 5800XT is sufficient for Rust at all tested settings, while the RX 9070 is the limiting factor at 4K and above Medium presets.