Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Rust
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 41 | 55 | 68 | 100 |
| 1440p QHD | 72 | 97 | 114 | 169 |
| 1080p Full HD | 106 | 140 | 165 | 191 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 delivers a broad range of performance in Rust, scaling from playable at 4K with reduced settings to exceptionally smooth at 1080p on maximum quality. Measured data shows the combo handles the survival title’s demanding environments, with average frame rates spanning from 41 FPS at 4K Ultra to 190.9 FPS at 1080p Low. The system’s capability is defined by the resolution and preset, with the 60 FPS playability threshold being the critical divider between settings that are fluid and those that are not.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 3840x2160, the RTX 5070 and Ryzen 7 5800X3D combination shows its limits under maximum load. The Ultra preset delivers an average of 41 FPS, which falls well below the 60 FPS playability threshold and indicates a stutter-prone experience in busy scenes. Dropping to High raises the average to 54.7 FPS, still short of the target but a noticeable improvement. The Medium preset produces a solid 67.6 FPS average, clearing the 60 FPS bar with a modest margin for dips. The Low preset provides the headroom needed for high refresh rate 4K gaming, averaging 99.7 FPS, which is more than double the Ultra figure and indicates the CPU-GPU combo is capable of far more when graphical load is reduced.
Moving to 2560x1440, the system becomes much more versatile. The Ultra preset averages 71.8 FPS, comfortably surpassing the 60 FPS threshold and making maximum settings viable at this resolution. The High preset achieves 97.4 FPS, offering a significant cushion above the minimum requirement. Medium reaches 114.3 FPS, and Low hits 169.1 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1440p shows a reduction of approximately 57%, from 169.1 down to 71.8 FPS, illustrating how graphical fidelity directly impacts the frame rate.
At 1920x1080, the hardware is clearly not the bottleneck for most settings. The Ultra preset averages 105.8 FPS, which is nearly double the 60 FPS target and indicates a smooth experience even with all visual features enabled. The High preset achieves 139.5 FPS, and Medium reaches 164.9 FPS. The Low preset peaks at 190.9 FPS, which is the highest average recorded across all tested configurations. This data suggests that at 1080p, the frame rate is limited more by the game engine’s single-thread performance than by the GPU, as the gap between Medium and Low is relatively small compared to the jump from Ultra to High.
Across all resolutions, the performance delta between presets follows a consistent pattern, though the magnitude varies. At 4K, the difference between Low and Ultra is 58.7 FPS (from 99.7 to 41), while at 1440p it is 97.3 FPS (from 169.1 to 71.8), and at 1080p it is 85.1 FPS (from 190.9 to 105.8). This indicates that the GPU’s rendering load at 4K compresses the performance range, while at lower resolutions, the CPU’s capability allows for greater frame rate variation.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Rust at 4K with maximum settings?
A: No. At 3840x2160 with the Ultra preset, the measured average FPS is 41, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The highest playable setting at 4K is Medium, which averages 67.6 FPS.
Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gaming?
A: The data indicates that the Ultra preset is playable at 2560x1440, with an average of 71.8 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that maintains an average above 60 FPS at this resolution.
Q: How much performance is gained by lowering settings from Ultra to Low at 1080p?
A: At 1920x1080, the average FPS increases from 105.8 on Ultra to 190.9 on Low, a gain of 85.1 FPS. This represents a substantial boost for competitive play or high refresh rate monitors.
Q: Is the 60 FPS threshold met at all resolutions?
A: No. At 3840x2160, only the Low (99.7 FPS) and Medium (67.6 FPS) presets meet the threshold. At 2560x1440 and 1920x1080, all four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) exceed 60 FPS.
Q: Which resolution provides the highest average frame rate?
A: The highest average frame rate recorded is 190.9 FPS at 1920x1080 with the Low preset. This is followed by 169.1 FPS at 2560x1440 Low and 164.9 FPS at 1920x1080 Medium.
Q: Does the performance gap between presets widen at lower resolutions?
A: Yes. The difference between Low and Ultra averages is 58.7 FPS at 4K, 97.3 FPS at 1440p, and 85.1 FPS at 1080p. The 1440p gap is the largest, indicating the CPU and GPU have more headroom to express scaling at this resolution.
Best Settings per Resolution
For 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Medium, which achieves an average of 67.6 FPS. This provides a playable experience while retaining some visual quality, though the margin above the threshold is relatively slim. The Low preset at 99.7 FPS is also viable but sacrifices more graphical features.
At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset is the best choice, averaging 71.8 FPS. This clears the 60 FPS bar by nearly 12 frames, allowing for full visual fidelity without compromising fluidity. All lower presets also exceed the threshold, with High at 97.4 FPS, Medium at 114.3 FPS, and Low at 169.1 FPS.
For 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is again the most demanding option that remains playable, with an average of 105.8 FPS. The substantial margin above 60 FPS means users can enable all settings without concern. The High preset at 139.5 FPS and Medium at 164.9 FPS offer even more headroom, while Low at 190.9 FPS is ideal for maximum frame rates.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The CPU’s nearest rivals, based on average benchmark scores, include the AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, which scores 27887 with a 0% delta, and the Intel Core i9-10900K at 27872 with a 0.1% delta. These processors would deliver nearly identical frame pacing in Rust, as the Ryzen 7 5800X3D’s score of 27896 is within 0.3% of the Intel Core i5-12600KF (27799). The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 scores 27932, representing a 0.1% higher score.
On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070’s nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon Pro 580, which scores 40318 with a 0.1% delta, and the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 at 40063 with a 0.8% delta. The AMD Radeon Pro 5300 scores 40870, which is 1.2% higher, while the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile scores 39568, 2% lower. These alternatives would produce similar average frame rates in Rust, with the RTX 5070’s score of 40377 sitting centrally among them.
The combination of the Ryzen 7 5800X3D and RTX 5070 appears well-balanced for this title, as neither component’s closest rivals would create a significant bottleneck. Systems using the Intel Core i9-10900K or the AMD Radeon Pro 580 would likely show comparable FPS figures across the tested resolutions and presets, making them reasonable substitutes for users seeking similar performance.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data reveals distinct scaling patterns that indicate which component is more influential at each resolution. At 3840x2160, the performance drop from Low (99.7 FPS) to Ultra (41 FPS) is a 58.7 FPS reduction, which is the smallest absolute gap across all resolutions. This compression suggests the GPU is the primary limiter at 4K, as the higher pixel count increases rendering load, and the CPU’s frame generation capability is not fully utilized.
At 2560x1440, the gap between Low (169.1 FPS) and Ultra (71.8 FPS) expands to 97.3 FPS. This wider range indicates that the GPU is still significant, but the CPU begins to show its strength at lower resolutions. The 1440p results show the largest delta, meaning both components are more evenly matched in their contribution to frame rate.
At 1920x1080, the gap between Low (190.9 FPS) and Ultra (105.8 FPS) is 85.1 FPS, which is smaller than at 1440p but larger than at 4K. The high frame rates at 1080p, particularly the 190.9 FPS Low figure, suggest the CPU is capable of generating frames faster than the GPU can render at lower settings. The Ryzen 7 5800X3D’s 96 MB of shared L3 cache and 8-core, 16-thread configuration likely contribute to this, as Rust’s simulation and physics systems benefit from strong multi-threaded performance.
The scaling between resolutions at the same preset further clarifies the roles. For example, at Ultra settings, the average FPS drops from 105.8 at 1080p to 71.8 at 1440p (a 32% reduction) and then to 41 at 4K (a 43% reduction from 1440p). This progressive decline points to the GPU becoming the dominant factor as resolution increases, while the CPU maintains consistent frame generation. At Low settings, the drop from 190.9 at 1080p to 169.1 at 1440p (11%) and then to 99.7 at 4K (41%) shows a steeper decline at 4K, reinforcing that the GPU is the bottleneck at higher resolutions regardless of preset.
The Verdict
The data confirms that this system can run Rust effectively, but the experience varies significantly by resolution and settings. At 3840x2160, the playable settings are Low (99.7 FPS) and Medium (67.6 FPS). The High preset at 54.7 FPS and Ultra at 41 FPS do not meet the 60 FPS threshold and should be avoided for smooth gameplay.
At 2560x1440, all four presets are playable, with Ultra being the best option at 71.8 FPS. This allows for maximum visual quality while maintaining a fluid experience. The High preset at 97.4 FPS, Medium at 114.3 FPS, and Low at 169.1 FPS all provide additional headroom for demanding scenes.
At 1920x1080, the system excels, with Ultra averaging 105.8 FPS. This is more than sufficient for standard 60 Hz displays and provides a comfortable margin for high refresh rate monitors. The High preset at 139.5 FPS, Medium at 164.9 FPS, and Low at 190.9 FPS offer even greater performance for competitive play.
In summary, the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 combination is capable of running Rust at 60 FPS or higher at 1080p and 1440p on any preset, and at 4K only on Low or Medium settings. Users prioritizing visual fidelity at 4K will need to accept reduced frame rates, while those at lower resolutions can enjoy the game at maximum quality.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 ranks 712th out of 3723 tested combos in Rust. This places the system in the top 19% of all configurations tested, indicating it performs above the median. The ranking reflects the balanced nature of the CPU and GPU, with neither component significantly holding back the other.
The percentile data supports this assessment: the CPU is in the 80th percentile among all processors, and the GPU is in the 82nd percentile among all graphics cards. This alignment suggests the system is well-matched, with both components contributing comparably to the overall frame rate. The high ranking is consistent with the measured FPS data, which shows strong performance at 1080p and 1440p, and acceptable results at 4K with reduced settings.
Given the large pool of 3723 combos, a rank of 712 indicates that the Ryzen 7 5800X3D and RTX 5070 combination outperforms the vast majority of systems tested. The data shows no major weaknesses, and the system’s ability to exceed 60 FPS at 1440p Ultra and 1080p Ultra makes it a strong choice for Rust players who prioritize smooth gameplay at high resolutions.