Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

67%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
137 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
61 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
96 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
42 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
59 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
26 FPS
13.2ms Frame Time
20ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 29,123
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 18,093

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 26 31 41 59
1440p QHD 42 53 64 96
1080p Full HD 61 76 90 137

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 76
1920x1080 Low 137
1920x1080 Medium 90
1920x1080 Ultra 61
2560x1440 High 53
2560x1440 Low 96
2560x1440 Medium 64
2560x1440 Ultra 42
3840x2160 High 31
3840x2160 Low 59
3840x2160 Medium 41
3840x2160 Ultra 26

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER is a classic mid-to-high-range desktop combination. For Rust, a game known for its demanding procedural world generation and heavy CPU load, this pairing produces a clear performance hierarchy across resolutions. The recorded data shows that 1920x1080 is the only resolution where the most demanding preset clears the playable threshold, while 2560x1440 offers a solid balance if you are willing to step down from Ultra. At 4K, the hardware is not sufficient for smooth gameplay at any preset, as even Low settings fail to reach the 60 FPS target.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the data shows no playable settings exist. The highest average FPS recorded is 58.6 at Low, which is just below the 60 FPS threshold. Medium drops to 41.0, High falls to 30.9, and Ultra bottoms out at 25.6. You would have to accept sub-60 FPS performance, which is not recommended for a competitive survival game where reaction time matters. The verdict for this resolution is clear: no settings achieve the playable mark.

At 2560x1440, the best playable setting is Medium, which delivers an average of 64.4 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS. Low runs at 95.6 FPS, but it is not the "best" because Medium provides significantly better visuals while still clearing the threshold. High drops to 52.8 FPS and Ultra falls to 41.8 FPS, both of which are below the 60 FPS target. If you prioritize visual fidelity over raw frame rate, you could argue for High, but the data indicates that Medium is the optimal choice for maintaining smooth gameplay.

At 1920x1080, the situation is much more favorable. Ultra settings run at an average of 60.5 FPS, which just clears the 60 FPS threshold. This is the best setting you can use, as it provides the highest visual quality while maintaining playable performance. Medium runs at 89.9 FPS, High at 75.9 FPS, and Low at 137.4 FPS. While Low offers the highest frame rate, Ultra is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS, making it the clear recommendation for this resolution.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals a significant shift in workload distribution depending on resolution. At 1920x1080, the CPU is the primary bottleneck. The Ryzen 7 5800X, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, is handling the game's simulation and physics calculations, while the RTX 2060 SUPER is not fully taxed. This is evident from the scaling: going from Medium to Ultra at 1080p only drops the frame rate from 89.9 to 60.5 FPS, a 33% reduction, which suggests the GPU is still capable of pushing more frames if the CPU allows it. The CPU's high single-thread performance, as shown by its 3dmark_single_thread score of 943 and passmark_single_thread score of 3445, is crucial for Rust's frame pacing.

At 2560x1440, the balance shifts toward the GPU. The frame rate drops from 95.6 at Low to 64.4 at Medium, a 33% reduction, and then to 52.8 at High, another 18% drop. This steeper decline indicates that the RTX 2060 SUPER, with its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth, is becoming the limiting factor as pixel count increases. The GPU's passmark_g3d score of 16462 and its 62nd percentile ranking among all GPUs show it is a mid-range card that struggles with higher resolutions when paired with a strong CPU.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is almost entirely the bottleneck. The frame rate at Low (58.6) is less than half of what you get at 1080p Low (137.4), despite the CPU being identical. This 57% drop in performance from 1080p to 4K at the same settings is a clear indicator that the RTX 2060 SUPER's 7.181 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power is insufficient for 4K rendering in Rust. The CPU's role diminishes at this resolution, as the GPU is fully saturated and cannot keep up with the demand. The data shows that the CPU's 3dmark_max_threads score of 7578 does not translate to higher frame rates at 4K, because the GPU is the limiting factor.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the nearest rivals for the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X has an average benchmark score of 29123, which is very close to several other processors. The Intel Core Ultra 5 135H scores 29093, a delta of 0.1% slower, meaning it would perform nearly identically in Rust. The Intel Xeon Phi 7210 scores 29245, which is 0.4% faster, but that chip is a legacy many-core part that may not have the same single-thread performance. The Intel Core i5-13500HX scores 29270, 0.5% faster, and the AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT scores 28940, 0.6% slower. For gaming, the Intel Core i5-13500HX is the most relevant rival, as it offers similar multi-threaded performance (cinebench_r23_multicore of 15476 for the 5800X) and would produce nearly the same frame rates in Rust.

For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER has an average score of 18093, with its nearest rivals all being within 1.6% performance. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile scores 18159, which is 0.4% faster. This is interesting because the 3060 Mobile is a laptop part, but its performance is essentially identical to the desktop 2060 SUPER. The AMD Radeon Pro 5700 scores 18189, 0.5% faster, and the AMD Radeon RX 460 scores 18373, 1.5% faster. The Intel Arc A770M scores 18383, 1.6% faster. In practical terms, all of these GPUs would deliver nearly the same frame rates in Rust at the same settings. If you have a system with any of these GPUs, you can expect similar performance to the RTX 2060 SUPER.

The Verdict

Yes, this PC can run Rust, but the experience depends heavily on your resolution and settings. At 1920x1080, the verdict is fully positive. The data shows that Ultra settings run at 60.5 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS threshold. This is the ideal way to play, as you get the best visuals without sacrificing smoothness. If you prefer higher frame rates, Low runs at 137.4 FPS, which is excellent for competitive play.

At 2560x1440, the verdict is conditional. Medium settings run at 64.4 FPS, which is playable, but you cannot use High or Ultra without dropping below 60 FPS. Low runs at 95.6 FPS, so if you are willing to sacrifice visual quality, you can get a very smooth experience. The data clearly states that Medium is the best playable setting at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the verdict is negative. No settings achieve 60 FPS. Even Low runs at 58.6 FPS, which is below the threshold, and Ultra runs at 25.6 FPS, which is unplayable. If you own a 4K monitor, you would need to lower the resolution to 1440p to get a playable experience. The combo rank of 2586 out of 3723 combos (the 69th percentile) confirms that this is a mid-tier pairing, not a high-end one.

FAQ

Q: What is the best setting for 1920x1080?

A: The best setting is Ultra, which runs at an average of 60.5 FPS, just above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: Can I play at 1440p with this setup?

A: Yes, but only at Low or Medium settings. Medium runs at 64.4 FPS, which is playable, while High and Ultra fall below 60 FPS.

Q: Is 4K playable with this combination?

A: No. Even at Low settings, the average FPS is 58.6, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. Ultra runs at 25.6 FPS.

Q: Which component is more important for Rust at 1080p?

A: The CPU is the primary bottleneck at 1080p. The Ryzen 7 5800X's single-thread performance is critical, as frame rates are high (137.4 FPS at Low) and the GPU is not fully utilized.

Q: How does this GPU compare to the RTX 3060 Mobile?

A: The RTX 2060 SUPER has an average score of 18093, while the RTX 3060 Mobile scores 18159, which is 0.4% faster. They are essentially identical in performance.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra at 1440p?

A: Low runs at 95.6 FPS, while Ultra runs at 41.8 FPS. This is a 129% difference, indicating the GPU is heavily taxed at higher settings.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER combination ranks 2586 out of 3723 tested combos in Rust. This places it in the 69th percentile, meaning it outperforms roughly two-thirds of all tested systems. The ranking reflects a balanced mid-range setup: the CPU is strong (81st percentile among all CPUs), but the GPU is only in the 62nd percentile. This mismatch is why 1080p Ultra is the ceiling for smooth gameplay. The data shows that this combo is not competitive with high-end systems that have top-tier GPUs, but it is well above entry-level hardware. In practical terms, you are getting a system that can handle Rust at 1080p with all settings maxed out, and at 1440p with medium settings. If you want to improve performance, the data suggests upgrading the GPU would yield the biggest gains, as the CPU has headroom to push more frames if paired with a stronger graphics card.