Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Rust
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 21 | 27 | 32 | 48 |
| 1440p QHD | 35 | 46 | 54 | 81 |
| 1080p Full HD | 51 | 67 | 79 | 118 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X paired with the Intel Arc B570 delivers a highly resolution-dependent experience in Rust. At 1920x1080, the combination is capable of smooth gameplay across multiple presets, but performance degrades sharply as resolution increases, rendering 4K unplayable. The data indicates a system that is well-suited for 1080p gaming, acceptable for 1440p only at the lowest settings, and not viable for 4K with this title.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data shows a clear performance hierarchy across resolutions and presets. At 3840x2160, the system struggles to maintain playable frame rates. The High preset averages 27 FPS, while the Medium preset averages 32 FPS with a minimum of 27 FPS and a maximum of 37 FPS. The Low preset averages 48 FPS, and the Ultra preset drops to an average of 21 FPS. None of these averages reach the 60 FPS playable threshold.
At 2560x1440, performance improves but remains limited. The Low preset is the only configuration that exceeds 60 FPS, averaging 81 FPS. The Medium preset averages 54 FPS, with a minimum of 46 FPS and a maximum of 62 FPS. The High preset averages 46 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 35 FPS. The data shows that 1440p is only playable at the lowest graphical fidelity.
At 1920x1080, the system performs much more competitively. The Low preset achieves an average of 118 FPS. The Medium preset averages 79 FPS, with a minimum of 67 FPS and a maximum of 91 FPS. The High preset averages 67 FPS. The Ultra preset falls below the threshold, averaging 51 FPS. This resolution provides the most flexibility, with three presets clearing the 60 FPS mark.
CPU and GPU Roles
The performance scaling across resolutions indicates that the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck as resolution increases. The Ryzen 7 5800X, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, provides strong multi-threaded capability, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15476 and Passmark multi-thread score of 27732. However, the Arc B570’s GPU throughput is the limiting factor at higher resolutions.
Comparing the 1920x1080 High preset (67 FPS) to the 2560x1440 High preset (46 FPS), there is a 31.3% drop in average FPS. This significant decline is characteristic of GPU-bound workloads, as the pixel count increases by roughly 78% between these resolutions. The CPU, which is relatively constant in its workload, cannot compensate for the GPU’s reduced throughput at higher pixel counts.
The difference between Low and Ultra presets at the same resolution further clarifies the GPU’s role. At 1920x1080, the Low preset averages 118 FPS versus 51 FPS on Ultra, a 56.8% reduction. This gap is driven by the increased GPU load from higher graphical effects. The CPU, even at its maximum multi-thread performance, does not govern these swings. At 3840x2160, the gap between Low (48 FPS) and Ultra (21 FPS) is even more pronounced, confirming that the Arc B570 is the dominant performance constraint.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The nearest rivals for the CPU and GPU provide context for what other hardware would behave similarly in this configuration. For the Ryzen 7 5800X, the closest alternatives are the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H, with an average benchmark score of 29093 and a delta of 0.1% versus the 5800X’s 29123. The Intel Xeon Phi 7210 scores 29245, a -0.4% delta, while the Intel Core i5-13500HX scores 29270, a -0.5% delta. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT scores 28940, a 0.6% delta. These processors would be expected to yield very similar CPU-side performance in Rust.
For the Intel Arc B570, the nearest GPU rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, which scores 20534 against the Arc’s 20556, a 0.1% delta. The Intel Arc A750 scores 20582, a -0.1% delta, and would likely produce nearly identical frame rates. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M scores 20480, a 0.4% delta, and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X scores 20662, a -0.5% delta. These GPUs represent the performance envelope within which the Arc B570 operates, meaning systems built with these alternatives would deliver comparable FPS in Rust.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the Ryzen 7 5800X and Intel Arc B570 ranks at 2996 out of 3723 tested combinations in Rust. This places the system in the lower portion of the benchmark database, roughly in the 19.5th percentile of all tested combos. The rank reflects the GPU’s limitations at higher resolutions, as the CPU’s benchmark percentile (81st percentile versus all CPUs) is substantially higher than the GPU’s (65th percentile versus all GPUs).
The rank of 2996 indicates that while the CPU is competitive, the overall combo is dragged down by the GPU’s inability to sustain high frame rates at demanding settings. For a game like Rust, which can be heavily CPU-bound in complex scenes, the 5800X’s strong multi-threaded scores help, but the Arc B570’s 10 GB of GDDR6 memory and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth are not sufficient for 4K or high-fidelity 1440p gameplay. This ranking is consistent with the measured FPS data, which shows playable performance only at 1080p and 1440p Low.
The Verdict
The data shows that this PC can run Rust, but the playable experience is strictly limited by resolution and settings. At 1920x1080, the system clears the 60 FPS threshold on the High, Medium, and Low presets, with the High preset averaging 67 FPS. At 2560x1440, only the Low preset achieves playable frame rates, averaging 81 FPS. At 3840x2160, no preset reaches 60 FPS, with the best average being 48 FPS on Low.
For gamers targeting 1080p, this combination is a solid performer, offering a smooth experience on High settings. For 1440p, the system is only viable on Low settings, which may not be acceptable for users seeking higher visual fidelity. 4K is not a practical option, as even the lowest settings fail to hit the playable threshold. The verdict by resolution is clear: 1080p is the only resolution where multiple presets are playable, and 1440p is borderline.
Best Settings per Resolution
Based on the measured FPS data, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS at each resolution is as follows.
At 1920x1080, the High preset is the best choice, averaging 67 FPS. This provides a balance of visual quality and performance, exceeding the threshold by 7 FPS. The Medium preset averages 79 FPS, but High is the most demanding setting that remains playable.
At 2560x1440, the Low preset is the only option that clears the threshold, averaging 81 FPS. This is the best settings choice, as all other presets fall below 60 FPS. The Medium preset, averaging 54 FPS, is too demanding for this resolution.
At 3840x2160, no preset achieves playable frame rates. The best average is 48 FPS on Low, which is below the 60 FPS threshold, so no recommended settings exist for this resolution.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Rust at 1920x1080 on High settings?
A: Yes, the measured average FPS at 1920x1080 High is 67 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: What is the best preset for 2560x1440?
A: The Low preset is the only playable option at 2560x1440, averaging 81 FPS. All other presets, including Medium (54 FPS), fall below the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: Is 4K gameplay possible with this combination?
A: No. At 3840x2160, the highest average FPS is 48 on the Low preset, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset averages only 21 FPS.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The Ryzen 7 5800X has an average benchmark score of 29123. Its closest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H, scores 29093, a 0.1% delta. The Intel Xeon Phi 7210 scores 29245, a -0.4% delta.
Q: What GPU is closest in performance to the Intel Arc B570?
A: The Intel Arc A750 is the nearest rival, with an average benchmark score of 20582 versus the Arc B570’s 20556, a -0.1% delta. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20534, a 0.1% delta.
Q: What is the maximum FPS observed at 1080p?
A: The maximum FPS recorded is 91 FPS, observed on the Medium preset at 1920x1080. The Low preset averages 118 FPS, but no max FPS data is provided for that setting.