Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

74%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
174 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
75 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
120 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
52 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
71 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
30 FPS
10.1ms Frame Time
15ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 24,709
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 26,331

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 30 40 47 71
1440p QHD 52 68 80 120
1080p Full HD 75 99 117 174

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 99
1920x1080 Low 174
1920x1080 Medium 117
1920x1080 Ultra 75
2560x1440 High 68
2560x1440 Low 120
2560x1440 Medium 80
2560x1440 Ultra 52
3840x2160 High 40
3840x2160 Low 71
3840x2160 Medium 47
3840x2160 Ultra 30

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 delivers a wide spread of performance in Rust, ranging from 30 FPS at 4K Ultra to 174 FPS at 1080p Low. The data shows a system that is clearly capable of smooth gameplay across most common configurations, with the primary limitation emerging only at the highest resolution and preset combination. Benchmark results indicate that the most demanding settings at 4K are the only scenario where this combo falls below the 60 FPS playability threshold, while every other tested configuration meets or exceeds that mark.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the measured frame rates demonstrate a steep curve as settings increase. The Low preset produces an average of 71 FPS, which is the only playable result at this resolution. Moving to Medium drops the average to 47 FPS, with a minimum of 40 FPS and a maximum of 55 FPS, showing a 24 FPS loss compared to Low. The High preset averages 40 FPS, and the Ultra preset bottoms out at 30 FPS. These figures reveal that 4K demands significant compromises, as the gap between Low and Medium alone is nearly 34%, and the Ultra preset delivers less than half the frame rate of Low.

At 2560x1440, the picture improves considerably. The Low preset reaches an average of 120 FPS, while Medium averages 80 FPS with a minimum of 68 FPS and a maximum of 92 FPS. The High preset averages 68 FPS, which remains comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset drops to 52 FPS, indicating that even at 1440p, the highest settings are not viable for a locked 60 FPS experience. The scaling from Low to Ultra at this resolution is a 68 FPS reduction, or roughly 57% lower performance.

At 1920x1080, the system shows its strongest results. The Low preset averages 174 FPS, making it the highest frame rate recorded in the entire dataset. Medium averages 117 FPS with a minimum of 99 FPS and a maximum of 134 FPS, while High averages 99 FPS. The Ultra preset averages 75 FPS, which still clears the 60 FPS threshold with a 15 FPS margin. The spread from Low to Ultra at 1080p is 99 FPS, demonstrating that even the most demanding settings remain playable at this resolution.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the only preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Low, which averages 71 FPS. This is the recommended configuration for 4K, as every other preset falls below the playability threshold. The data shows that Medium, High, and Ultra all fail to reach 60 FPS, with averages of 47, 40, and 30 FPS respectively.

At 2560x1440, the most demanding preset that maintains 60 FPS or higher is High, which averages 68 FPS. This provides a significant visual improvement over Low's 120 FPS while still keeping the frame rate above the playable mark. Medium also qualifies at 80 FPS, but High offers better visual fidelity for a modest 12 FPS cost. The Ultra preset at 52 FPS is not recommended for 60 FPS gameplay.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the best choice, averaging 75 FPS. This is the highest settings tier available, and it still clears the 60 FPS threshold. The data confirms that at 1080p, the RTX 5060 has enough headroom to run Rust at maximum visual quality without sacrificing smoothness. High at 99 FPS and Medium at 117 FPS remain viable alternatives for users prioritizing higher frame rates over visual fidelity.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance scaling across resolutions and presets indicates that the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions, while the CPU's role is more pronounced at lower resolutions. At 1920x1080, the difference between Low at 174 FPS and Ultra at 75 FPS is 99 FPS, showing that settings have a massive impact on GPU load. The minimum FPS at 1080p Medium is 99, which is identical to the average FPS at 1080p High, suggesting that the CPU can keep up with the GPU's output even at high frame rates.

At 2560x1440, the scaling from Low to Ultra is 68 FPS, a smaller absolute drop than at 1080p but still significant. The Medium preset's minimum of 68 FPS matches the High preset's average of 68 FPS, indicating that the GPU is starting to become the limiting factor around this performance level. At 3840x2160, the scaling from Low to Ultra is 41 FPS, and even the Low preset only reaches 71 FPS, which is substantially lower than the 174 FPS seen at 1080p Low. This confirms that the GPU is the dominant constraint at 4K.

The Ryzen 7 5700X3D's 96 MB of shared L3 cache and 8-core, 16-thread configuration provide ample compute for Rust's simulation-heavy gameplay. The CPU's benchmarks, including a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22366 and a single-core score of 3157, suggest it can feed the RTX 5060 effectively at 1080p, where frame rates exceed 170 FPS. At higher resolutions, the GPU's rendering load increases, and the CPU's role diminishes relative to the GPU's output.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Rust at 4K with 60 FPS?

A: Only with the Low preset, which averages 71 FPS. Medium averages 47 FPS, High averages 40 FPS, and Ultra averages 30 FPS, all below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gaming?

A: The High preset is the most demanding option that stays at or above 60 FPS, averaging 68 FPS. Ultra drops to 52 FPS and is not playable at 60 FPS.

Q: Does the RTX 5060 handle 1080p Ultra settings?

A: Yes, the Ultra preset averages 75 FPS at 1920x1080, which clears the 60 FPS threshold with a 15 FPS margin.

Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1080p to 4K?

A: At the Low preset, frame rates drop from 174 FPS at 1080p to 71 FPS at 4K, a reduction of 103 FPS. At the High preset, the drop is from 99 FPS to 40 FPS, a 59 FPS reduction.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded in the dataset?

A: The lowest minimum FPS is 40, recorded at 4K Medium. At 1440p Medium, the minimum is 68 FPS, and at 1080p Medium, the minimum is 99 FPS.

Q: Is the Ultra preset ever playable at 60 FPS?

A: Yes, but only at 1920x1080, where it averages 75 FPS. At 2560x1440, Ultra averages 52 FPS, and at 3840x2160, it averages 30 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 combination ranks 1657 out of 3723 tested combos for Rust. This places it in the 55th percentile of all tested systems, meaning it outperforms more than half of the configurations in the database. The CPU itself sits at the 77th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs, indicating that both components are above average individually.

The combo's ranking is influenced by the GPU's 8 GB of GDDR7 memory, which may limit performance at 4K Ultra where the 30 FPS result is recorded. The 128-bit memory bus and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth provide sufficient throughput for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the 4K results show a clear ceiling. The CPU's 8-core, 16-thread configuration with 96 MB of L3 cache is well-suited for Rust's CPU-intensive simulation, as evidenced by the high frame rates at 1080p.

The Verdict

This PC can run Rust, and it does so well across most configurations. At 1920x1080, all four presets are playable, with Ultra averaging 75 FPS and Low reaching 174 FPS. At 2560x1440, the High preset is the best playable option at 68 FPS, with Low and Medium also exceeding 60 FPS. At 3840x2160, only the Low preset clears 60 FPS, averaging 71 FPS. The verdict by resolution confirms that 1080p and 1440p users have flexibility in choosing settings, while 4K users must stick to Low for a smooth experience. The 60 FPS threshold is met at all resolutions with the appropriate settings, making this a versatile system for Rust.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the nearest rivals for the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D scores an average of 24728, which is just 0.1% lower than the Ryzen 7 5700X3D's 24709 average. This means the 7600X3D would behave nearly identically in Rust, offering essentially the same frame rates. The AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX scores 24822, a 0.5% difference, while the Intel Core i5-12450HX scores 24576, a 0.5% difference, and the Intel Core i5-11600 scores 24563, a 0.6% difference. All four alternatives would produce frame rates within 1% of the 5700X3D, making them suitable substitutes.

For the GPU, the AMD Radeon 860M scores 26401, which is 0.3% lower than the RTX 5060's 26331 average. The NVIDIA GeForce MX550 scores 26421, also 0.3% lower, while the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary scores 26553, a 0.8% difference. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT scores 26011, which is 1.2% higher than the RTX 5060. These GPUs would deliver similar performance in Rust, with the RX 6750 XT potentially offering slightly better frame rates at the same settings.