Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Rust
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 61 | 80 | 95 | 141 |
| 1440p QHD | 103 | 136 | 151 | 175 |
| 1080p Full HD | 145 | 161 | 171 | 199 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D delivers a dominant performance profile in Rust, with measured data indicating that every preset tested at every resolution remains comfortably above the 60 FPS playability threshold. The combination ranks 145th out of 3,723 tested combos in this game, placing it in the top percentile of all systems evaluated. The data shows a system that is heavily GPU-limited at higher resolutions, but the CPU’s 8-core, 16-thread Zen 3 architecture ensures that even at 1080p, where the graphics card is less stressed, the frame rates remain exceptionally high.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data reveals a clear performance hierarchy across resolutions and presets. At 3840x2160, the average frame rates range from 61 FPS on Ultra to 141 FPS on Low. The Medium preset at this resolution delivers an average of 95 FPS, with a minimum of 81 FPS and a maximum of 109 FPS, showing a stable experience even when the frame rate drops. The High preset averages 80 FPS, while Ultra drops to 61 FPS, which is still exactly at the playable threshold. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 4K shows a drop of 80 FPS, indicating that the RTX 5090 D’s raw compute is being heavily taxed by the highest quality settings.
Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates rise substantially. Low settings average 175 FPS, Medium averages 151 FPS with a minimum of 128 FPS and a maximum of 173 FPS, High averages 136 FPS, and Ultra averages 103 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at this resolution is 72 FPS, which is a smaller absolute difference than at 4K, suggesting that the GPU has more headroom as pixel count decreases. The minimum FPS at Medium (128 FPS) is higher than the average FPS at Ultra (103 FPS), which is a useful data point for players who prioritize frame time consistency over maximum visual fidelity.
At 1920x1080, the system produces its highest frame rates. Low settings average 199 FPS, Medium averages 171 FPS with a minimum of 145 FPS and a maximum of 196 FPS, High averages 161 FPS, and Ultra averages 145 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 54 FPS, the smallest delta across all resolutions. This narrowing gap indicates that at 1080p, the CPU begins to play a more significant role in limiting performance, as the GPU has enough headroom to render frames quickly but the processor must keep up with game logic and physics.
The average FPS data shows that the RTX 5090 D scales almost linearly with resolution. At Low settings, the system delivers 141 FPS at 4K, 175 FPS at 1440p, and 199 FPS at 1080p. This represents a 24% increase from 4K to 1440p and a 14% increase from 1440p to 1080p. At Ultra settings, the numbers are 61 FPS, 103 FPS, and 145 FPS respectively, showing a 69% increase from 4K to 1440p and a 41% increase from 1440p to 1080p. The larger percentage gains at Ultra settings confirm that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at higher quality presets.
Best Settings per Resolution
The verdict data identifies the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS for each resolution. At 3840x2160, the best settings are Ultra, which achieves an average of 61 FPS. This is a marginal pass over the 60 FPS threshold, but it is still playable. Players who want a safety margin at 4K might consider High settings, which average 80 FPS, but the data confirms that Ultra is technically viable. The minimum FPS at 4K Medium is 81 FPS, which is higher than the Ultra average, so those seeking frame time consistency might prefer Medium or High.
At 2560x1440, the best settings are also Ultra, with an average of 103 FPS. This provides a comfortable 43 FPS buffer above the playability threshold, meaning that even significant frame drops would likely keep the experience smooth. The Medium preset at 1440p has a minimum FPS of 128, which exceeds the Ultra average by 25 FPS, reinforcing that the GPU has substantial headroom at this resolution.
At 1920x1080, the best settings are Ultra, averaging 145 FPS. This is more than double the playable threshold, offering an extremely smooth experience. The High preset at 1080p averages 161 FPS, and even Medium averages 171 FPS, so players have flexibility to choose between higher frame rates and visual quality without ever approaching the 60 FPS limit. The data shows that this combo can run Rust at maximum settings at all three tested resolutions, with 4K being the only resolution where the frame rate approaches the playable threshold.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data reveals a clear shift in bottleneck behavior as resolution changes. At 3840x2160, the GPU is the dominant factor. The frame rate difference between Low and Ultra is 80 FPS, which is the largest spread across all resolutions. This indicates that the RTX 5090 D’s rendering workload is the primary constraint, and the Ryzen 7 5700X provides sufficient headroom to feed the GPU with data. The 4K Ultra average of 61 FPS shows that the GPU is nearly maxed out, as pushing the resolution higher would likely require lowering settings to maintain playability.
At 2560x1440, the balance shifts somewhat toward the CPU. The frame rate spread between Low and Ultra narrows to 72 FPS, and the average FPS at all presets is high enough to suggest that the GPU is no longer the sole limiting factor. The Medium preset’s minimum FPS of 128 indicates that even in demanding scenes, the system maintains high performance. The Ryzen 7 5700X, with its 32 MB of shared L3 cache and 16 threads, is able to keep pace with the GPU’s output at this resolution.
At 1920x1080, the CPU becomes more influential. The frame rate spread between Low and Ultra shrinks to 54 FPS, and the absolute frame rates are high enough that the GPU is likely waiting on the CPU in some scenarios. The 199 FPS average at Low settings suggests that the CPU is nearing its limit for Rust’s game logic, as the GPU could theoretically render more frames but the processor cannot issue draw calls fast enough. This is a common pattern in CPU-bound scenarios, where lowering graphical settings yields diminishing returns because the processor becomes the bottleneck.
The scaling between resolutions reinforces this analysis. At Low settings, the frame rate drops by 24% from 1080p to 1440p and by 19% from 1440p to 4K. At Ultra settings, the drops are 29% and 41% respectively. The larger percentage drops at Ultra settings indicate that the GPU is more heavily taxed at higher quality presets, while the smaller drops at Low settings suggest that the CPU is playing a larger role in limiting performance. The Ryzen 7 5700X’s 3DMark single-thread score of 921 and multi-thread score of 6,850 provide context for its ability to handle Rust’s simulation-heavy workload, which benefits from strong single-core performance.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Rust at 4K with maximum settings?
A: Yes, the measured data shows that the Ultra preset at 3840x2160 achieves an average of 61 FPS, which is exactly at the playable threshold of 60 FPS. This is a marginal pass, so players who prefer a larger frame rate buffer might opt for High settings, which average 80 FPS.
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Rust?
A: The data indicates that 2560x1440 offers the best balance of visual quality and performance. At this resolution, the Ultra preset averages 103 FPS, providing a 43 FPS buffer above the playable threshold while still delivering high-quality visuals.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for Rust at 1080p?
A: At 1920x1080, the CPU becomes more influential. The frame rate difference between Low and Ultra settings is only 54 FPS, compared to 80 FPS at 4K. This suggests that the Ryzen 7 5700X is approaching its limit for Rust’s game logic, and the GPU has more headroom at this resolution.
Q: How does the RTX 5090 D compare to other GPUs in Rust?
A: The GPU’s nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT (1.1% slower), the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT (1.6% faster), and the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB (2.1% faster). These deltas are small, indicating that the RTX 5090 D performs similarly to these cards in benchmark tests, though the actual in-game performance may vary based on driver support and game optimization.
Q: What are the minimum FPS values for the Medium preset?
A: The Medium preset has recorded minimum FPS values of 81 FPS at 3840x2160, 128 FPS at 2560x1440, and 145 FPS at 1920x1080. These values represent the lowest frame rates observed during testing and indicate that the system maintains smooth performance even in demanding scenes.
Q: How does the Ryzen 7 5700X compare to similar CPUs?
A: The CPU’s nearest rivals are the Intel Core i5-12600K (0% difference), the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 (0.2% faster), and the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X (0.2% slower). These CPUs offer nearly identical benchmark scores, suggesting that they would provide similar performance in CPU-bound scenarios.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The nearest rivals for the Ryzen 7 5700X include the Intel Core i5-12600K, which has an identical average benchmark score of 27,578, and the AMD Ryzen 7 5800, which is 0.2% faster with a score of 27,535. The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X is 0.2% slower with a score of 27,636, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H is 0.3% faster with a score of 27,507. These CPUs would behave similarly in Rust, meaning that the system’s frame rates at 1080p, where the CPU is more influential, would likely be within a few FPS of the measured values.
For the GPU, the nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT (1.1% slower), the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT (1.6% faster), and the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB (2.1% faster). The NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB is 2.4% faster. These GPUs would deliver nearly identical performance in Rust, with the frame rate differences being small enough that they would not be noticeable in practice. Players who own any of these GPUs and the Ryzen 7 5700X would expect similar results to the measured data, with the RTX 5090 D providing a slight performance edge over the slower rivals.
The small delta percentages among both CPU and GPU rivals indicate that this combo sits in a performance cluster where hardware choices have minimal impact on Rust’s frame rates. The measured FPS data would likely change by only a few percentage points if any of these rivals were substituted, making them viable alternatives for players who have budget or availability constraints.
How This Combo Ranks
The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D combination ranks 145th out of 3,723 tested combos in Rust, placing it in the top 4% of all systems evaluated. This high rank is consistent with the measured FPS data, which shows the system exceeding 60 FPS at every preset and resolution tested. The rank reflects the GPU’s strong 92nd percentile performance among all GPUs and the CPU’s 79th percentile performance among all CPUs, indicating that the system is well-balanced for this game.
The combination’s rank is particularly impressive given that the CPU is not a top-tier part in synthetic benchmarks. The Ryzen 7 5700X’s average benchmark score of 27,578 places it in the 79th percentile, while the RTX 5090 D’s average score of 77,712 places it in the 92nd percentile. The high ranking in Rust suggests that the game’s engine is well-optimized for this hardware pairing, with the GPU’s massive 32 GB of GDDR7 memory and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth providing ample resources for Rust’s large maps and texture data.
The data shows that this combo is capable of delivering a playable experience at 4K Ultra, with exactly 61 FPS. At 1440p and 1080p, the system far exceeds the playable threshold, making it an excellent choice for players who want maximum visual quality without sacrificing frame rate. The 145th rank out of 3,723 combos indicates that only a small fraction of tested systems outperform this configuration, and those systems likely feature newer or higher-end CPUs that provide marginal gains in CPU-bound scenarios at lower resolutions.