Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

65%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
163 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
70 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
112 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
48 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
66 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
29 FPS
10.9ms Frame Time
16ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 27,578
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 17,639

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 29 38 44 66
1440p QHD 48 64 75 112
1080p Full HD 70 92 110 163

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 92
1920x1080 Low 163
1920x1080 Medium 110
1920x1080 Ultra 70
2560x1440 High 64
2560x1440 Low 112
2560x1440 Medium 75
2560x1440 Ultra 48
3840x2160 High 38
3840x2160 Low 66
3840x2160 Medium 44
3840x2160 Ultra 29

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 combination presents a balanced mid-range platform for Rust, a survival title known for its demanding rendering and simulation loads. The benchmark data, measured directly from this specific hardware pairing, indicates that performance scales predictably with resolution and settings, with the system comfortably handling the game at standard high-refresh-rate resolutions. The following analysis breaks down the measured frames per second (FPS) across all tested configurations, examines the role of each component, and provides clear guidance on the optimal settings for a smooth experience.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for Rust reveals a clear performance hierarchy across the three tested resolutions. At 3840x2160 (4K), the system is heavily taxed. With the "Ultra" preset, the average FPS drops to 29, which is below the playable threshold of 60 FPS. The "High" preset at 4K yields an average of 38 FPS, while "Medium" provides a more playable 44 FPS, though with a minimum FPS of 38 and a maximum of 51, indicating noticeable frame-time variance. The only 4K setting that clears the 60 FPS bar is "Low," which achieves an average of 66 FPS. This resolution clearly pushes the hardware to its limits, with only the lowest fidelity settings providing a fluid experience.

Moving to 2560x1440 (1440p), the performance picture improves significantly. The "Low" preset delivers an impressive 112 FPS average, while "Medium" maintains a solid 75 FPS, with a minimum of 64 and a maximum of 87. The "High" preset at 1440p achieves an average of 64 FPS, just above the 60 FPS threshold. However, the "Ultra" preset falls to an average of 48 FPS, making it unsuitable for smooth gameplay at this resolution. The data shows that 1440p is a sweet spot for this combo, allowing for high visual quality while maintaining playable frame rates.

At 1920x1080 (1080p), the system demonstrates its full potential. The "Low" preset hits an average of 163 FPS, providing an extremely high refresh rate experience. The "Medium" preset delivers 110 FPS on average, with a minimum of 93 and a maximum of 126, ensuring consistent performance. The "High" preset achieves a robust 92 FPS average. Even the most demanding "Ultra" preset at 1080p manages to hold an average of 70 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold. This resolution is clearly where this hardware shines, offering exceptional performance across all settings.

The data shows that the FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p is not linear. For instance, the "High" preset drops from 92 FPS at 1080p to 64 FPS at 1440p, a reduction of approximately 30%. Similarly, the "Low" preset drops from 163 FPS to 112 FPS, a 31% decrease. This substantial drop indicates that the GPU is becoming a more significant bottleneck as pixel count increases, though the CPU still has enough headroom to keep frame rates high.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark results indicate that the CPU and GPU roles shift depending on the resolution and preset. At 1080p, the system is likely more CPU-bound in Rust, as the game's simulation and entity update logic can be demanding. The high FPS numbers at this resolution, particularly the 163 FPS on "Low" settings, suggest that the Ryzen 7 5700X's 8-core, 16-thread architecture is providing ample processing power. The scaling from "Low" to "Ultra" at 1080p—from 163 to 70 FPS—shows that the GPU's workload increases significantly with visual fidelity, but the CPU can still feed it enough data to maintain high frame rates.

As the resolution increases to 1440p, the GPU's role becomes more pronounced. The frame rate drop from 1080p to 1440p is steep, indicating that the RTX 4060 is now working closer to its limits. The difference between "Low" (112 FPS) and "Ultra" (48 FPS) at 1440p is 64 FPS, a larger absolute gap than at 1080p. This suggests that the GPU's pixel throughput and shading capabilities are becoming the primary constraint, while the CPU still has performance in reserve.

At 4K, the GPU is unequivocally the dominant bottleneck. The average FPS across all presets is significantly lower than at 1440p, with the "Ultra" preset hitting just 29 FPS. The RTX 4060's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 128-bit bus width are likely insufficient to handle the massive pixel workload of 4K rendering in a game like Rust. The scaling from 4K "Low" (66 FPS) to 4K "Ultra" (29 FPS) is a 56% reduction, which is a much larger relative drop than at lower resolutions, confirming that the GPU is fully saturated.

The data suggests that the Ryzen 7 5700X is more than capable of feeding the RTX 4060 at 1080p and 1440p. The CPU's benchmark scores, such as the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13184 and single-core score of 1499, indicate strong performance. This is corroborated by its percentile rank of 79 among all CPUs. The GPU's passmark G3D score of 19545 and its 61st percentile rank show it is a competent mid-range card, but its limits are clearly visible at higher resolutions.

Best Settings per Resolution

Based on the measured data, the most demanding preset that maintains an average FPS at or above 60 is as follows:

  • 3840x2160: The best playable setting is Low, which achieves an average of 66 FPS. While the "Medium" preset offers a higher visual quality at 44 FPS, it does not meet the 60 FPS threshold. Therefore, users at 4K must choose between lower fidelity for smoothness or higher fidelity for a less fluid experience.
  • 2560x1440: The best playable setting is High, which delivers an average of 64 FPS. This is the highest quality preset that stays above the 60 FPS line. The "Ultra" preset at 48 FPS is not recommended for consistent play. Users seeking a higher refresh rate could drop to "Medium" for 75 FPS or "Low" for 112 FPS.
  • 1920x1080: The best playable setting is Ultra, which achieves an average of 70 FPS. This allows for the maximum visual fidelity the game offers while still maintaining a playable frame rate. For users with high refresh rate monitors, the "Medium" preset at 110 FPS or "Low" at 163 FPS offer even smoother experiences.

These findings align perfectly with the `verdictByResolution` data, which lists "Low" as the best setting for 4K, "High" for 1440p, and "Ultra" for 1080p.

The Verdict

The data confirms that this PC can run Rust, but the experience varies significantly by resolution. At 1920x1080, the system clears the 60 FPS threshold on all presets, including "Ultra" with an average of 70 FPS. This makes 1080p the ideal resolution for a fully maxed-out experience. At 2560x1440, the system is also capable, with "High" settings providing a 64 FPS average, which is just above the playable threshold. The "Low" and "Medium" presets also clear 60 FPS, offering options for higher refresh rates.

At 3840x2160, the system is only playable on the "Low" preset, which achieves a 66 FPS average. All other presets at 4K fall below 60 FPS, with "Ultra" dropping to a 29 FPS average. Therefore, the verdict is that this combo is a solid 1080p and acceptable 1440p machine for Rust, but it is not suitable for 4K gaming at high settings. Users targeting 4K will need to significantly reduce visual quality to achieve a smooth frame rate.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Based on the nearestRivals data for both components, several other hardware combinations would likely produce similar benchmark results in Rust.

For the CPU, the Intel Core i5-12600K has an identical average benchmark score of 27578, with a deltaPct of 0%. This indicates it would offer nearly the same CPU-bound performance. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800 is also very close, with a score of 27535 and a deltaPct of 0.2%, meaning it is slightly faster. The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X has a score of 27636 and a deltaPct of -0.2%, making it marginally slower. These CPUs would all behave similarly in feeding the GPU.

For the GPU, the AMD Radeon HD 7790 has an average score of 17666, which is 0.2% higher than the RTX 4060's 17639. This suggests it would offer nearly identical graphics performance. The AMD Radeon 780M and AMD Radeon Pro 560 are also close, with scores of 17588 and 17551, respectively, representing 0.3% and 0.5% lower performance. A system pairing any of these CPUs with any of these GPUs would likely produce FPS numbers very close to those measured for this combo.

FAQ

Q: Can the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and RTX 4060 run Rust at 60 FPS on 1080p with all settings maxed out?

A: Yes. The data shows the "Ultra" preset at 1920x1080 achieves an average of 70 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the best resolution to play Rust with this hardware for a high refresh rate monitor?

A: For the highest frame rates, 1920x1080 is the best choice. The "Low" preset delivers 163 FPS, while "Medium" provides 110 FPS, both suitable for 144Hz displays.

Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this combination?

A: Only on the "Low" preset, which achieves an average of 66 FPS. All other presets at 3840x2160 fall below 60 FPS, with "Ultra" dropping to 29 FPS.

Q: How much performance is lost when going from 1080p to 1440p on the "High" preset?

A: The average FPS drops from 92 at 1080p to 64 at 1440p, representing a 30% reduction in performance.

Q: Which component is more important for Rust at 4K resolution?

A: The data indicates the GPU is the primary bottleneck. The RTX 4060's performance limits are clearly visible at 4K, as the frame rates across all presets are significantly lower than at 1440p.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded for this combo at any tested setting?

A: The minimum FPS recorded is 38, which occurs on the "Medium" preset at 3840x2160.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 holds a rank of 2008 out of 3723 tested combos for Rust. This places it in the upper-middle tier of all possible hardware pairings. While it is not a top-tier performer, its position indicates it is more capable than a majority of systems tested. The rank reflects its strong performance at 1080p and 1440p, where it can deliver high frame rates, but its struggles at 4K prevent it from climbing higher. This ranking is consistent with the hardware's individual percentiles: the CPU is in the 79th percentile, while the GPU is in the 61st percentile, suggesting the CPU is relatively stronger than the GPU in this pairing.