Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

69%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
118 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
51 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
81 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
35 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
48 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
21 FPS
14.9ms Frame Time
22ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 27,578
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 20,556

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 21 27 32 48
1440p QHD 35 46 54 81
1080p Full HD 51 67 79 118

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 67
1920x1080 Low 118
1920x1080 Medium 79
1920x1080 Ultra 51
2560x1440 High 46
2560x1440 Low 81
2560x1440 Medium 54
2560x1440 Ultra 35
3840x2160 High 27
3840x2160 Low 48
3840x2160 Medium 32
3840x2160 Ultra 21

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and Intel Arc B570 combination delivers a playable Rust experience at 1080p and 1440p, but it falls short of the 60 FPS threshold at 4K. At 1920x1080, the combo averages 67 FPS on High settings, while 2560x1440 requires dropping to Low to hit 81 FPS. The data shows clear scaling limits: as resolution increases, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, and the performance gap between presets narrows significantly.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Rust at 60 FPS on 1920x1080?

A: Yes. The measured FPS shows 67 FPS at High settings, 79 FPS at Medium, and 118 FPS at Low. The verdictByResolution confirms High, Medium, and Low are all playable at 1080p, with High being the best preset that stays above 60 FPS.

Q: What is the best settings preset at 2560x1440?

A: Only Low settings clear the 60 FPS threshold, averaging 81 FPS. Medium drops to 54 FPS, High falls to 46 FPS, and Ultra sits at 35 FPS. The verdict lists Low as the only playable setting at 1440p.

Q: Is 4K resolution playable with this hardware?

A: No. At 3840x2160, the best average FPS is 48 on Low settings, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Medium averages 32 FPS, High averages 27 FPS, and Ultra averages 21 FPS. The verdictByResolution returns no playable settings at 4K.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 5700X compare to similar CPUs?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 27578, placing it in the 79th percentile of all CPUs. It matches the Intel Core i5-12600K exactly (0% delta), sits 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 5800, and trails the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X by 0.2%.

Q: What GPU performance tier does the Intel Arc B570 belong to?

A: The Arc B570 has an average benchmark score of 20556, placing it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. It performs within 0.1% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, within 0.1% of the Intel Arc A750, and 0.4% ahead of the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M.

Q: What is the FPS range at 1920x1080 Medium settings?

A: The measured average is 79 FPS, with a minimum of 67 FPS and a maximum of 91 FPS. This gives a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold, though the minimum dips close to the playable line.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU's nearest rivals from the database provide a clear picture of its performance class. The Intel Core i5-12600K scores identically at 27578, meaning a system built around that chip would behave nearly the same in CPU-bound scenarios. The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X scores 27636, just 0.2% higher, while the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 scores 27535, 0.2% lower. These four processors cluster tightly within a 0.5% performance band, so swapping between them would produce no meaningful difference in Rust's frame rates. The Intel Core Ultra 5 125H also falls in this group at 27507, 0.3% below the 5700X, though it is a mobile part.

On the GPU side, the Intel Arc B570's average score of 20556 places it alongside the Intel Arc A750, which scores 20582 (0.1% higher). The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20534, effectively tied at 0.1% lower. The AMD Radeon R9 M390X is the closest at 20662, sitting 0.5% above the Arc B570. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M trails by 0.4% with a score of 20480. These alternatives would deliver nearly identical FPS numbers in Rust at the same settings and resolutions, though driver-specific quirks could shift real-world performance slightly.

For a builder looking at this pairing, the practical takeaway is that the CPU and GPU both sit in established mid-range territory. The 5700X holds its own against newer and older rivals, while the Arc B570 trades blows with a mix of desktop and mobile GPUs from NVIDIA and AMD. None of the nearby alternatives would change the verdict for Rust: 1080p and 1440p are playable, 4K is not.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data reveals how the balance of CPU and GPU load shifts across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system produces 118 FPS on Low settings, which suggests the CPU is feeding frames quickly enough that the GPU becomes the limiting factor as settings rise. The jump from Low to High at 1080p costs 51 FPS (from 118 to 67), while the jump from High to Ultra costs 16 FPS (from 67 to 51). This pattern indicates the GPU is handling most of the visual scaling, with the CPU maintaining a sufficient frame supply.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance drops are steeper. Low settings yield 81 FPS, but Medium falls to 54 FPS, a 27 FPS loss. High drops further to 46 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 35 FPS. The scaling between Low and Medium shows the GPU struggling with the added pixel count and visual complexity. At 1440p, the CPU still has headroom, but the Arc B570's 10 GB of memory and 160-bit bus become more significant constraints.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly the dominant bottleneck. Low settings produce just 48 FPS, and the gap between presets shrinks: Medium averages 32 FPS, High averages 27 FPS, and Ultra averages 21 FPS. The total spread from Low to Ultra is only 27 FPS, compared to 67 FPS at 1080p. This compression indicates that the GPU is saturated at all settings, and the CPU's role diminishes to the point where it cannot compensate for the graphics workload.

The Ryzen 7 5700X's 8 cores and 16 threads provide sufficient processing power for Rust's simulation and entity logic at 1080p and 1440p, but the data shows no scenario where the CPU rescues the GPU at 4K. The Arc B570's 11.52 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 380.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are simply insufficient for 4K at playable frame rates in this title.

The Verdict

This PC can run Rust, but the playable range depends heavily on resolution. At 1920x1080, the system clears the 60 FPS threshold on High, Medium, and Low settings. High averages 67 FPS, Medium averages 79 FPS, and Low averages 118 FPS. Ultra falls short at 51 FPS. The verdictByResolution confirms High as the best playable preset at 1080p.

At 2560x1440, only Low settings maintain 60 FPS or better, with an average of 81 FPS. Medium drops to 54 FPS, High to 46 FPS, and Ultra to 35 FPS. The 1440p verdict lists Low as the sole playable setting. At 3840x2160, no preset reaches the playable threshold. Low tops out at 48 FPS, and the verdictByResolution returns no playable settings.

For a practical recommendation: run Rust at 1080p with High settings for the best balance of visual quality and frame rate. If you prefer higher resolutions, 1440p Low is the only option that maintains smooth gameplay. 4K is not viable with this hardware.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and Intel Arc B570 ranks 2996 out of 3723 tested combos for Rust. This places the pairing in the lower-mid range of the database, indicating that roughly 80% of tested systems deliver better performance in this specific game. The rank reflects the GPU's limitations at higher resolutions, as the CPU alone would rank higher based on its 79th percentile standing among all CPUs.

The GPU's 65th percentile ranking among all GPUs pulls the combo down, especially considering Rust's demanding nature at higher presets. The measured FPS data corroborates this: the system only achieves playable frame rates at 1080p and 1440p Low, which is a modest result compared to what higher-ranked combos would deliver. The rank of 2996 out of 3723 suggests that most other pairings in the database offer better Rust performance, likely due to more powerful GPUs or CPUs with higher single-thread performance.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is High, with an average of 67 FPS. Medium follows at 79 FPS, and Low at 118 FPS. Ultra does not meet the threshold, averaging 51 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the only preset that clears 60 FPS is Low, averaging 81 FPS. Medium falls to 54 FPS, High to 46 FPS, and Ultra to 35 FPS. The verdictByResolution lists Low as the best setting at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, no preset reaches the 60 FPS threshold. Low averages 48 FPS, Medium averages 32 FPS, High averages 27 FPS, and Ultra averages 21 FPS. The verdictByResolution returns no playable settings at 4K, so there is no recommended preset for this resolution.