Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

64%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
162 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
68 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
111 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
47 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
66 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
32 FPS
10.9ms Frame Time
16ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 27,051
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 17,639

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 32 36 43 66
1440p QHD 47 62 77 111
1080p Full HD 68 92 113 162

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 92
1920x1080 Low 162
1920x1080 Medium 113
1920x1080 Ultra 68
2560x1440 High 62
2560x1440 Low 111
2560x1440 Medium 77
2560x1440 Ultra 47
3840x2160 High 36
3840x2160 Low 66
3840x2160 Medium 43
3840x2160 Ultra 32

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 pairing delivers a solid 1080p and 1440p experience in Rust, with 4K reserved for lower presets. The data shows a clear pattern: the GPU is the primary driver of performance scaling, while the CPU provides ample headroom. This combination ranks in the 55th percentile of tested combos, indicating a capable but not top-tier setup for this survival title.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Rust at 60 FPS on Ultra settings at 1920x1080?

A: Yes. Benchmark results show an average of 68 FPS at 1920x1080 on Ultra, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold. This is the highest preset that maintains playability at this resolution.

Q: What is the best playable setting at 2560x1440?

A: High is the best preset that stays above 60 FPS, with an average of 62.2 FPS. Medium runs at 77.4 FPS, but High offers better visual quality while still meeting the threshold.

Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this combo?

A: Only at Low settings, which averages 65.6 FPS. Medium drops to 43.3 FPS, High to 35.7 FPS, and Ultra to 31.8 FPS, all below the 60 FPS target.

Q: How does the RTX 4060 compare to its nearest rival in general GPU benchmarks?

A: The RTX 4060’s average benchmark score of 17639 is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (17666, 0.2% lower) and the AMD Radeon 780M (17588, 0.3% higher). Performance differences are within measurement noise.

Q: What is the CPU’s multithreaded performance relative to its closest competitor?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700G scores 27051 on average, essentially matching the Intel Core i9-9900K (27097, 0.2% faster). It also edges out the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 by 0.4% and trails the Intel Core i5-14400T by 0.4%.

Q: Does the RTX 4060’s 8 GB VRAM become a limitation at higher resolutions?

A: The benchmark data suggests a significant drop from 1440p to 4K. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS falls to 31.8, while 1440p Ultra maintains 47.1 FPS. This indicates the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions, though the data does not isolate VRAM capacity as the sole cause.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance scaling across resolutions clearly shows the GPU dominating Rust’s framerate. Moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 at High settings reduces the average FPS from 91.8 to 62.2, a drop of roughly 32%. The further jump to 3840x2160 at High plunges performance to 35.7 FPS, a 43% reduction from 1440p. This pattern holds across all presets: at Medium, the transition from 1080p (112.7 FPS) to 1440p (77.4 FPS) to 4K (43.3 FPS) shows consistent GPU-bound scaling. The RTX 4060’s 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 272.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are the key factors here.

The CPU’s role is less pronounced but still relevant. The Ryzen 7 5700G’s 8 cores and 16 threads, with a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, provide sufficient headroom at lower resolutions. At 1920x1080 Low, the system reaches 162.2 FPS, which suggests the CPU can feed the GPU well beyond the 60 FPS target. However, the data does not show a CPU bottleneck at any tested setting, as even the most demanding 4K Ultra scenario (31.8 FPS) is clearly GPU-limited. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12830.5 and single-core score of 1494 indicate it can handle Rust’s simulation and physics threads without becoming the primary constraint.

The gap between presets narrows as resolution increases, which is typical of GPU-bound scenarios. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 94.2 FPS (162.2 vs 68). At 1440p, that gap shrinks to 63.4 FPS, and at 4K it is only 33.8 FPS. This compression indicates that at 4K, the GPU is saturated regardless of preset, while at 1080p, the CPU has more influence on the upper framerate ceiling.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 combination ranks 2053 out of 3723 tested combos for Rust, placing it in the 55th percentile. This means roughly 45% of tested systems perform better, while 55% perform worse. This mid-pack ranking suggests the combo is adequate for mainstream gaming but not exceptional for Rust specifically.

The ranking reflects the balance between the CPU and GPU. The Ryzen 7 5700G, with an average benchmark score of 27051, sits at the 79th percentile against all CPUs. The RTX 4060, with an average score of 17639, is at the 61st percentile against all GPUs. The combination’s in-game rank is lower than either component’s individual percentile, indicating that Rust’s performance is more sensitive to the GPU than the CPU. This is consistent with the framerate data showing GPU-bound scaling across resolutions.

For context, a system ranking in the top 10% would likely require a significantly stronger GPU, as Rust’s large open world and dynamic lighting place heavy demands on rasterization. The 2053rd position out of 3723 is a solid but unremarkable result. It means the system will handle Rust at competitive settings, but users seeking maximum framerates at 4K or with heavy modding may need more GPU headroom.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU’s nearest rivals provide insight into what other processors would behave similarly. The Intel Core i9-9900K scores 27097, a 0.2% difference from the Ryzen 7 5700G’s 27051. This means the 9900K would deliver nearly identical CPU-bound performance in Rust. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 (26936, 0.4% slower) and Intel Core i7-1370P (26900, 0.6% slower) are also close equivalents. The Intel Core i5-14400T (27166, 0.4% faster) would offer a marginal improvement. None of these alternatives would change the system’s in-game ranking meaningfully, as Rust’s bottleneck is clearly the GPU.

On the GPU side, the RTX 4060’s nearest rivals are surprising: the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (17666, 0.2% faster), AMD Radeon 780M (17588, 0.3% slower), AMD Radeon Pro 560 (17551, 0.5% slower), and AMD Radeon Pro 460 (17509, 0.7% slower). These deltaPct values are all within 1%, meaning any of these GPUs would produce nearly identical framerates in Rust. The Radeon 780M is particularly interesting as an integrated solution, but its performance parity with the RTX 4060 in general benchmarks does not account for driver optimizations or feature support like DLSS, which Rust does not explicitly require per the data.

For a builder considering alternatives, swapping the CPU for any of these rivals would have negligible impact on Rust’s framerate. Swapping the GPU for a 780M would theoretically match the RTX 4060’s average score, but the RTX 4060’s dedicated 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth provide a more consistent experience in demanding titles like Rust.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 68 FPS. This is the full visual experience. High runs at 91.8 FPS, Medium at 112.7 FPS, and Low at 162.2 FPS, all comfortably above the threshold.

At 2560x1440, High is the best playable preset, averaging 62.2 FPS. This is close to the 60 FPS threshold, so users sensitive to framerate dips may prefer Medium at 77.4 FPS. Low runs at 110.5 FPS, while Ultra drops below the threshold at 47.1 FPS.

At 3840x2160, only Low is playable, with an average of 65.6 FPS. Medium (43.3 FPS), High (35.7 FPS), and Ultra (31.8 FPS) all fall short. For 4K users, Low is the only viable option for maintaining 60 FPS, and even then, the margin is slim.

These settings recommendations assume a 60 FPS target. Users with 144 Hz monitors at 1080p can achieve 162.2 FPS on Low or 112.7 FPS on Medium, which are more suitable for high refresh rate displays.

The Verdict

This PC can run Rust, but the playable experience depends heavily on resolution. At 1920x1080, the system clears 60 FPS on all presets, including Ultra at 68 FPS. This is the sweet spot for this combo, offering full visual fidelity with a comfortable margin above the threshold. At 2560x1440, High settings average 62.2 FPS, which is playable but close to the limit; Medium at 77.4 FPS provides a safer buffer. At 3840x2160, only Low settings achieve 60 FPS (65.6 FPS), so 4K users must accept significant visual compromises.

The verdict by resolution is clear: 1080p Ultra is the best experience, 1440p High is viable, and 4K is limited to Low. The RTX 4060 is the determining factor, as the Ryzen 7 5700G provides ample CPU headroom even at the lowest settings. For most players, this system will deliver a smooth Rust experience at 1080p or 1440p with adjusted presets. The 2053rd rank out of 3723 combos confirms it is a mainstream setup that handles the game competently, though enthusiasts seeking maximum 4K performance should look to stronger GPUs.