Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

72%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
133 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
57 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
92 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
39 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
54 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
23 FPS
13.3ms Frame Time
20ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 27,051
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 23,021

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 23 31 36 54
1440p QHD 39 52 61 92
1080p Full HD 57 75 89 133

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 75
1920x1080 Low 133
1920x1080 Medium 89
1920x1080 Ultra 57
2560x1440 High 52
2560x1440 Low 92
2560x1440 Medium 61
2560x1440 Ultra 39
3840x2160 High 31
3840x2160 Low 54
3840x2160 Medium 36
3840x2160 Ultra 23

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G paired with the Intel Arc B580 delivers a playable Rust experience at 1080p and 1440p, but it falls short of the 60 FPS target at 4K. The data shows this combination is best suited for 1080p High and 1440p Medium settings, where it maintains smooth frame rates. At 4K, the system cannot achieve playable performance at any tested preset, with even Low settings averaging only 54 FPS.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured performance data for this CPU-GPU combination in Rust reveals a clear pattern of diminishing returns as resolution increases. At 1920x1080, the system delivers its strongest results, with Low settings producing an average of 133 FPS, Medium averaging 89 FPS with a minimum of 76 and maximum of 103, and High averaging 75 FPS. Ultra settings at 1080p drop to an average of 57 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS playability threshold.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance scales down predictably. Low settings still manage a solid 92 FPS average, while Medium settings hit exactly 61 FPS on average, with a minimum of 52 and maximum of 71. High settings at 1440p average 52 FPS, and Ultra drops further to 39 FPS. The step from 1080p to 1440p costs roughly 30-40% of the average frame rate across most settings, indicating that the Arc B580's 12 GB frame buffer and 456.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are sufficient for the resolution, but the GPU's raw compute power becomes the limiting factor.

At 3840x2160, the system struggles significantly. Low settings average 54 FPS, which is just below the 60 FPS target. Medium settings average 36 FPS with a minimum of 31 and maximum of 42, High settings average 31 FPS, and Ultra settings average only 23 FPS. The 4K results show a dramatic performance cliff, with the gap between Low and Medium representing a 33% drop in average frame rate. This suggests that memory bandwidth and pixel throughput constraints at 4K are severe for this GPU, which has a pixel rate of 213.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 427.2 GTexel/s.

The minimum FPS data, where available, reinforces the average figures. At 1080p Medium, the minimum of 76 FPS indicates that even the most demanding scenes stay comfortably above the playability threshold. At 1440p Medium, the minimum of 52 FPS shows that while the average is playable, there are moments where the frame rate dips below 60 FPS. At 4K Medium, the minimum of 31 FPS confirms that this resolution is not viable for smooth gameplay.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that maintains an average of at least 60 FPS is High, which delivers 75 FPS. This represents the best visual quality while keeping the frame rate well above the playability threshold. Low settings offer 133 FPS and Medium offers 89 FPS, but High provides the optimal balance of visual fidelity and performance. Ultra settings at 57 FPS are not recommended, as they fall short of the 60 FPS target.

At 2560x1440, the best playable setting is Medium, which averages exactly 61 FPS. This just clears the 60 FPS threshold, but the minimum of 52 FPS means that some scenes will dip below the target. Low settings at 92 FPS are also playable and offer a larger performance margin, but Medium is the highest preset that achieves the target average. High settings at 52 FPS and Ultra at 39 FPS are both below the playability threshold.

At 3840x2160, no settings are playable. The closest option is Low at 54 FPS, which falls short of the 60 FPS threshold. Medium at 36 FPS, High at 31 FPS, and Ultra at 23 FPS are all far from playable. The verdict data confirms this, listing no playable settings for 4K and no best settings with a corresponding average FPS.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark results indicate that the GPU is the dominant performance factor at higher resolutions, while the CPU's capabilities become more relevant at 1080p. The Ryzen 7 5700G, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, has a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12830.5 and a single-core score of 1494. This places it in the 79th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 27051. The GPU, meanwhile, sits in the 68th percentile of all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 23021.

The scaling between resolutions provides evidence for this division of labor. From 1080p Low to 1440p Low, the average FPS drops from 133 to 92, a 31% reduction. From 1440p Low to 4K Low, the average drops from 92 to 54, a 41% reduction. This accelerating decline with resolution is typical of a GPU-bound scenario, where the Arc B580's 13.67 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth are increasingly taxed by the pixel workload.

The CPU's role is more apparent at 1080p, where the frame rates are high enough that the processor's single-thread performance can influence the ceiling. The Ryzen 7 5700G's 3dmark single-thread score of 899 and Geekbench single-core score of 1894 suggest it can keep up with the GPU at this resolution. However, the data does not show a scenario where the CPU becomes the bottleneck, as even the lowest GPU-bound frame rates at 4K are well above what would indicate CPU limitation.

The memory bandwidth of the CPU, at 51.2 GB/s with dual-channel DDR4 support, is a potential constraint in a game like Rust that relies on procedural world generation and large data sets. However, the benchmark results suggest that this is not a limiting factor in practice, as the frame rates scale consistently with GPU load rather than showing CPU-related stutters or inconsistencies.

The Verdict

This PC can run Rust, but only at specific resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the system delivers playable performance on High settings with an average of 75 FPS, and it also handles Low at 133 FPS and Medium at 89 FPS. Ultra settings at 57 FPS are not recommended, as they fall below the 60 FPS playability threshold.

At 2560x1440, the system is playable on Low at 92 FPS and Medium at 61 FPS. The Medium setting is the best playable option, but its 52 FPS minimum means that frame rate drops can be noticeable during intense moments. High at 52 FPS and Ultra at 39 FPS are not playable.

At 3840x2160, the system is not playable at any setting. The best result is Low at 54 FPS, which is close to but below the 60 FPS target. Medium at 36 FPS, High at 31 FPS, and Ultra at 23 FPS are all far from playable.

The overall combination rank of 2815 out of 3723 combinations places this system in the lower-middle tier for Rust specifically. This ranking reflects the 4K deficiency and the marginal 1440p Medium performance, while acknowledging the solid 1080p results.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The Ryzen 7 5700G's nearest rivals, based on average benchmark scores, include the Intel Core i9-9900K with an average score of 27097 and a delta of -0.2%, meaning it performs nearly identically. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 scores 26936 with a delta of 0.4%, while the Intel Core i5-14400T scores 27166 with a delta of -0.4%. The Intel Core i7-1370P scores 26900 with a delta of 0.6%. These CPUs would produce very similar frame rates in Rust, as their benchmark scores are within 1% of the Ryzen 7 5700G.

For the GPU, the Intel Arc B580's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP with an average score of 23061 and a delta of -0.2%, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 with a score of 22895 and a delta of 0.6%, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 with a score of 23172 and a delta of -0.7%, and the NVIDIA P106-100 with a score of 23249 and a delta of -1%. A system with the Ryzen 7 5700G paired with any of these GPUs would likely produce comparable Rust performance, although the RTX 3080's higher score of 23172 suggests it might edge out the Arc B580 by a small margin in GPU-bound scenarios.

The practical implication is that users considering this specific CPU-GPU combination could expect similar results with these alternative parts. The deltas are all under 1%, which is within the margin of measurement variance for a game like Rust.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Rust at 4K?

A: No. The benchmark data shows no playable settings at 3840x2160. The best result is Low settings at 54 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playability threshold. Medium averages 36 FPS, High averages 31 FPS, and Ultra averages 23 FPS.

Q: What is the best setting for 1440p gameplay?

A: Medium settings at 2560x1440 produce an average of 61 FPS, which is the highest preset that clears the 60 FPS threshold. Low settings average 92 FPS for a larger performance margin, but Medium offers the best visual quality that remains playable.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 5700G compare to the Intel Core i9-9900K for this game?

A: The two CPUs have nearly identical average benchmark scores, with the Ryzen 7 5700G at 27051 and the Core i9-9900K at 27097. The delta of -0.2% indicates that performance in Rust would be effectively the same with either processor.

Q: Is the Intel Arc B580 a capable GPU for Rust at 1080p?

A: Yes. At 1920x1080, the Arc B580 delivers playable performance on High settings with an average of 75 FPS. Low and Medium settings produce even higher frame rates at 133 FPS and 89 FPS respectively, showing the GPU has ample headroom at this resolution.

Q: What causes the performance drop between 1440p and 4K?

A: The data shows a 41% reduction in average FPS from 1440p Low to 4K Low, and an even larger drop at higher presets. This indicates the Arc B580's compute resources and memory bandwidth are saturated at 4K, making the GPU the primary bottleneck.

Q: What settings should be avoided for consistent 60 FPS gameplay?

A: At 1080p, avoid Ultra settings, which average 57 FPS. At 1440p, avoid High and Ultra, which average 52 FPS and 39 FPS respectively. At 4K, all settings are below the 60 FPS target, with Low being the closest at 54 FPS.