Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

84%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
194 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
125 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
170 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
86 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
117 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
49 FPS
6.4ms Frame Time
10ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 25,517
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 54,209

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 49 66 77 117
1440p QHD 86 113 130 170
1080p Full HD 125 157 164 194

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 157
1920x1080 Low 194
1920x1080 Medium 164
1920x1080 Ultra 125
2560x1440 High 113
2560x1440 Low 170
2560x1440 Medium 130
2560x1440 Ultra 86
3840x2160 High 66
3840x2160 Low 117
3840x2160 Medium 77
3840x2160 Ultra 49

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER delivers a robust Rust experience, with the data indicating that the combination is capable of clearing the 60 FPS playable threshold at every tested resolution under most settings. The benchmark results show a system that scales predictably with resolution, though the relationship between CPU and GPU load shifts significantly as pixel count increases, revealing where each component's influence is strongest.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is High, which produces an average of 65.5 FPS. While the system can run Medium at 77 FPS and Low at 117.2 FPS, High represents the highest visual quality that maintains the 60 FPS target. Ultra at this resolution falls short, averaging 49.4 FPS, which is below the playable threshold.

Moving to 2560x1440, the headroom expands considerably. The best settings are Ultra, delivering 86 FPS on average. This is a significant jump from the 4K result, showing that the RTX 4080 SUPER has ample room to push higher graphical fidelity at this resolution. High runs at 113.1 FPS, Medium at 130.2 FPS, and Low at 169.9 FPS, all well above the threshold.

At 1920x1080, the system is clearly CPU-bound at higher presets, but the best settings remain Ultra with an average of 124.8 FPS. The frame rate at Ultra here is nearly three times the 4K Ultra result, underscoring how resolution scaling affects the GPU load. High hits 156.9 FPS, Medium reaches 163.9 FPS, and Low tops out at 194 FPS. The data shows that Ultra at 1080p is not only playable but also provides a high-refresh-rate experience.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data reveals a clear shift in component dominance as resolution changes. At 1920x1080, the frame rates across presets are remarkably close: Low achieves 194 FPS, Medium 163.9 FPS, High 156.9 FPS, and Ultra 124.8 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is only about 69 FPS, and even the lowest preset does not double the Ultra score. This compression suggests that the AMD Ryzen 7 5700's 8-core, 16-thread configuration is the limiting factor at 1080p, as the GPU has spare capacity that cannot be fully utilized due to CPU throughput constraints.

At 2560x1440, the gap between presets widens. Low runs at 169.9 FPS while Ultra drops to 86 FPS, a difference of roughly 84 FPS. This indicates that the GPU is beginning to take on a more significant role, though the CPU still exerts influence. The fact that Ultra at 1440p (86 FPS) is still higher than Ultra at 4K (49.4 FPS) shows that the RTX 4080 SUPER is not yet saturated at this resolution.

The picture changes dramatically at 3840x2160. Here, the GPU becomes the dominant factor. Low runs at 117.2 FPS, but Medium drops to 77 FPS, High to 65.5 FPS, and Ultra to 49.4 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra is a steep 68 FPS decline, reflecting the massive pixel throughput demand on the RTX 4080 SUPER's 10240 shading units and 736.3 GB/s memory bandwidth. At 4K, the CPU's role diminishes; the Ryzen 7 5700 can feed frames fast enough, but the GPU's compute and memory resources determine the final output.

The data implies that for competitive play at lower resolutions, the CPU is the bottleneck, while for visual fidelity at 4K, the GPU is the decisive component. Users targeting high refresh rates at 1080p would benefit more from a CPU upgrade than a GPU swap, whereas 4K users are getting the full measure of the RTX 4080 SUPER's capability.

Measured FPS Breakdown

1920x1080:

  • Low: 194 FPS average
  • Medium: 163.9 FPS average
  • High: 156.9 FPS average
  • Ultra: 124.8 FPS average

At 1080p, all presets deliver far above the 60 FPS threshold. The minimum and maximum values were not recorded in the data, but the averages alone show a system that never struggles at this resolution. The step from High to Ultra costs about 32 FPS, which is the largest single-preset drop, indicating that Ultra settings introduce a significant GPU workload increase.

2560x1440:

  • Low: 169.9 FPS average
  • Medium: 130.2 FPS average
  • High: 113.1 FPS average
  • Ultra: 86 FPS average

The 1440p results show a more pronounced scaling curve. Low to Medium drops 39.7 FPS, Medium to High drops 17.1 FPS, and High to Ultra drops 27.1 FPS. The system remains comfortably playable at all settings, with Ultra still 26 FPS above the 60 FPS threshold. The data suggests that 1440p Ultra is a sweet spot for this combo, offering high fidelity without sacrificing smoothness.

3840x2160:

  • Low: 117.2 FPS average
  • Medium: 77 FPS average
  • High: 65.5 FPS average
  • Ultra: 49.4 FPS average

At 4K, the limits become apparent. Low is the only setting that provides a high-refresh-rate experience, while Medium and High remain above 60 FPS. Ultra falls below the threshold by 10.6 FPS, making it unsuitable for smooth play. The scaling from Low to Medium is a sharp 40.2 FPS drop, highlighting the GPU's heavy load at this resolution.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Rust at 4K with maximum settings?

A: No. At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average FPS is 49.4, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The best playable setting at 4K is High, averaging 65.5 FPS.

Q: What is the highest quality preset that stays above 60 FPS at 1440p?

A: Ultra settings at 2560x1440 produce an average of 86 FPS, which is 26 FPS above the threshold. This is the most demanding preset that remains playable at this resolution.

Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1080p Ultra to 4K Ultra?

A: At 1920x1080 Ultra, the average FPS is 124.8, while at 3840x2160 Ultra, it drops to 49.4. This represents a decline of 75.4 FPS, or roughly 60% lower performance.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for Rust at 1080p?

A: The data shows that at 1920x1080, frame rates across presets are relatively close (Low at 194 FPS, Ultra at 124.8 FPS), suggesting the AMD Ryzen 7 5700's 8-core, 16-thread design is the primary limiter. The GPU has enough headroom to render all presets well above 60 FPS.

Q: Which settings at 4K are recommended for a 60 FPS experience?

A: The playable settings at 3840x2160 are Low (117.2 FPS), Medium (77 FPS), and High (65.5 FPS). Ultra is not playable, so High is the recommended preset for the best visual quality while maintaining the 60 FPS target.

Q: Does the system ever dip below 60 FPS at 1440p?

A: No. All tested presets at 2560x1440 exceed the threshold, with the lowest being Ultra at 86 FPS. The data shows no risk of dropping below 60 FPS at this resolution.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER ranks 436th out of 3723 tested combos for Rust, placing it in the top 11.7% of all configurations. This percentile position is notable given that the CPU sits at the 78th percentile against all processors and the GPU at the 86th percentile against all graphics cards. The rank suggests that Rust's specific workload characteristics do not perfectly align with this pairing's strengths; the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20655) is partially offset by the game's apparent sensitivity to single-thread performance, where the CPU scores 2916 in Cinebench R23 single-core.

The combo rank of 436 implies that many other pairings achieve higher frame rates in Rust, likely due to CPUs with stronger single-core performance. The RTX 4080 SUPER's raw compute power (52.22 TFLOPS FP32) is evident in the 4K results, but the overall ranking shows that Rust rewards CPU efficiency more than raw GPU throughput at lower resolutions. The data indicates that this combo is well-balanced for 1440p and 4K gaming, but it is not optimized for maximum 1080p performance.

The Verdict

Yes, this PC can run Rust effectively across most resolutions and settings. The verdict by resolution is clear:

  • 3840x2160: Playable at Low, Medium, and High presets, with High being the best setting at 65.5 FPS. Ultra is not playable at 49.4 FPS.
  • 2560x1440: All four presets are playable, with Ultra delivering 86 FPS. This is the optimal resolution for this combo, balancing visual quality and performance.
  • 1920x1080: All presets are playable, with Ultra at 124.8 FPS. The system offers high-refresh-rate capability at this resolution.

The data shows that the only configuration that fails to meet the 60 FPS threshold is 4K Ultra. For users prioritizing maximum visual fidelity at 4K, this combo requires a settings reduction to High. For everyone else, the system provides a smooth experience, with 1440p Ultra being the standout sweet spot where the GPU's 16 GB of GDDR6X memory and 10240 shading units are fully utilized without hitting the CPU bottleneck seen at 1080p.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Based on the nearest rivals for the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 7 5700's closest peers in benchmark scores are the Intel Xeon D-2752TER (avg score 25530, delta -0.1%), the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U (avg score 25485, delta 0.1%), the AMD Ryzen 5 6600H (avg score 25550, delta -0.1%), and the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (avg score 25446, delta 0.3%). These processors would likely produce nearly identical frame rates in Rust, given the negligible score differences. Users with these CPUs can expect similar CPU-bound performance at 1080p.

For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is the closest rival, with an avg score of 54247 and a delta of -0.1% versus the RTX 4080 SUPER's 54209. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (avg 54828, delta -1.1%), AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (avg 55698, delta -2.7%), and AMD Radeon 8060S (avg 55757, delta -2.8%) are also within a small margin. These GPUs would deliver comparable 4K and 1440p performance in Rust, with the RTX 4080 being virtually indistinguishable from the SUPER variant. The Radeon options show slightly higher average scores, but the deltas are small enough that in-game FPS differences would be minimal. Users with these GPUs can expect similar scaling behavior across resolutions and presets.