Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Rust
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 31 | 40 | 46 | 66 |
| 1440p QHD | 50 | 64 | 76 | 112 |
| 1080p Full HD | 72 | 96 | 113 | 165 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System
This PC configuration, pairing the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, demonstrates a clear capability for running Rust, though performance varies significantly across resolution and quality presets. The data indicates a system that can comfortably handle competitive settings at standard resolutions but requires careful adjustments to maintain smooth gameplay at higher pixel counts.
How This Combo Ranks
The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 combination secures a rank of 1925 out of 3723 tested combos for Rust, placing it in the 48th percentile of all systems evaluated. This mid-pack positioning suggests that while the setup is far from the top tier, it sits above a substantial portion of the tested configurations, indicating solid baseline performance for the game. The ranking reflects a balance between the CPU's 78th percentile standing among all processors and the GPU's 61st percentile among all graphics cards, with the overall system performance landing in the middle of the distribution.
The gap between the CPU's strong relative ranking and the GPU's more modest one hints that the graphics card is likely the limiting factor in this pairing, a hypothesis supported by the FPS measurements that show larger performance drops when settings are increased. The rank of 1925 is a statistical summary of the system's overall capability, but the actual gameplay experience will be heavily dependent on the user's choice of resolution and graphical fidelity, as the measured FPS demonstrates a wide performance envelope from 30.9 FPS at 4K Ultra to 164.5 FPS at 1080p Low.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Rust at 60 FPS on a 4K monitor?
A: The data shows that at 3840x2160 resolution, the only setting that achieves an average FPS above the 60 FPS playable threshold is Low, with an average of 66 FPS. Medium and High settings fall short at 46.2 and 39.5 FPS respectively, while Ultra dips to 30.9 FPS.
Q: What is the best quality setting for 1440p gameplay?
A: At 2560x1440, the system can maintain an average of 63.8 FPS on High settings, which is the most demanding preset that clears the 60 FPS threshold. Lower settings yield higher frame rates, with Medium at 76.1 FPS and Low at 112.4 FPS, but High offers the best balance of visual fidelity and performance.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The Ryzen 7 5700's average benchmark score of 25517 is nearly identical to its closest competitors. The Intel Xeon D-2752TER and AMD Ryzen 5 6600H are both within 0.1% of its score, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U is 0.1% ahead, and the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U trails by 0.3%. These differences are negligible in real-world gaming.
Q: Is the RTX 4060 significantly faster than its nearest GPU rivals?
A: The benchmark data indicates the RTX 4060's average score of 17639 is within a 0.7% margin of its listed rivals. The AMD Radeon HD 7790 is 0.2% ahead, the AMD Radeon 780M is 0.3% behind, and the AMD Radeon Pro 560 and Pro 460 are 0.5% and 0.7% slower respectively. These are all essentially performance parity results.
Q: What frame rate can be expected at 1080p on Ultra settings?
A: At the most common gaming resolution of 1920x1080, the system delivers an average of 72.4 FPS on Ultra settings, which comfortably exceeds the 60 FPS playable threshold and suggests that the game can be played at maximum visual quality without sacrificing smoothness.
Q: Does the system show a significant performance drop between 1080p and 4K?
A: The data reveals a substantial scaling penalty. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 164.5 at 1080p to 112.4 at 1440p, and further to 66 at 4K. This represents a 60% performance reduction from 1080p to 4K at the lowest settings, and the gap widens at higher presets, with Ultra dropping from 72.4 FPS at 1080p to 49.6 FPS at 1440p and 30.9 FPS at 4K.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark results indicate that the GPU is the primary bottleneck for this game at higher resolutions and settings, while the CPU becomes more relevant at lower resolutions and graphics presets. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the system achieves 164.5 FPS, a figure that suggests the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU with enough data to reach very high frame rates. However, as resolution increases to 2560x1440 and 3840x2160, the average FPS at Low settings drops to 112.4 and 66 respectively, which is a pattern consistent with the GPU's rendering load increasing and becoming the limiting factor.
The scaling between presets at a fixed resolution further clarifies the GPU's dominance. At 1080p, moving from Low to Ultra reduces performance by 56%, from 164.5 to 72.4 FPS. At 1440p, the same preset change results in a 56% drop as well, from 112.4 to 49.6 FPS. At 4K, the reduction from Low to Ultra is 53%, from 66 to 30.9 FPS. This consistent percentage drop across resolutions points to the graphics card being the sole performance limiter when settings are increased, as the CPU workload remains relatively constant while the GPU workload scales with pixel count and shader complexity.
The CPU's role is more apparent when examining the performance ceiling at low settings. The Ryzen 7 5700, with its 16 threads and Zen 3 architecture, appears sufficient to push frame rates well above 100 FPS at 1080p, but the system is not able to maintain those frame rates at higher resolutions. This indicates that while the CPU is not a weak point for this game, it also cannot compensate for the GPU's limitations at 4K, where even the lowest settings only produce an average of 66 FPS. The data suggests that for players targeting high refresh rates at 1080p, the CPU is adequately matched, but for higher resolutions, the RTX 4060's performance ceiling is the deciding factor.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Looking at the CPU's nearest rivals, the Ryzen 7 5700's performance is effectively mirrored by several other processors, making them viable substitutes in this system. The Intel Xeon D-2752TER, AMD Ryzen 5 7640U, AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, and AMD Ryzen 7 5825U all have average benchmark scores within 0.3% of the Ryzen 7 5700, meaning they would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Rust when paired with the same GPU. This is particularly relevant for users considering different platform options, as the Xeon D-2752TER comes from Intel's server lineup, while the Ryzen 5 7640U and Ryzen 7 5825U are mobile processors that might be found in laptops or compact systems.
For the GPU, the RTX 4060's nearest rivals present a more interesting comparison. The AMD Radeon HD 7790, Radeon 780M, Radeon Pro 560, and Radeon Pro 460 all post average scores within 0.7% of the RTX 4060, suggesting they would produce very similar FPS results in Rust. The inclusion of the Radeon 780M, which is an integrated graphics solution, is notable because it implies that some high-end APUs could match the discrete RTX 4060's performance in this game, at least according to the synthetic benchmark data. However, the measured FPS for this system shows 39.5 FPS at 4K High, and these rival GPUs would likely produce similar results, meaning they would also struggle to maintain 60 FPS at 4K except on the lowest settings.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the system demonstrates its strongest performance across all presets. The Low setting produces an average of 164.5 FPS, which is more than double the 60 FPS playable threshold. Medium yields 113.1 FPS, High achieves 95.7 FPS, and even the most demanding Ultra preset maintains a solid 72.4 FPS. All four settings at this resolution deliver a smooth gaming experience, with the lowest margin above 60 FPS being 12.4 FPS at Ultra.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance drops become more pronounced. Low settings still deliver a very high 112.4 FPS, but Medium falls to 76.1 FPS, which remains above 60. High settings produce an average of 63.8 FPS, just barely clearing the playable threshold. Ultra, however, drops to 49.6 FPS, which falls short of the 60 FPS target and would result in noticeable stutter during gameplay.
At 3840x2160, the system's limitations are clearly exposed. Low settings are the only playable option, with an average of 66 FPS, which is just 6 FPS above the threshold. Medium drops to 46.2 FPS, High to 39.5 FPS, and Ultra to 30.9 FPS. The performance degradation from 1080p to 4K is severe, with even the Low preset at 4K being 98.5 FPS slower than the same preset at 1080p, representing a 60% reduction in frame rate.
The Verdict
The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 + RTX 4060 system can run Rust, but the playable experience is highly dependent on resolution and settings. At 1920x1080, the system is fully capable, with all presets, including Ultra, averaging above 60 FPS. The 72.4 FPS at Ultra and 95.7 FPS at High provide a smooth experience for players who prioritize visual quality. At 2560x1440, the system remains playable on High settings with 63.8 FPS, and the Medium preset offers a more comfortable margin at 76.1 FPS, but Ultra settings are not viable at this resolution. At 3840x2160, the situation is more restrictive, with only the Low preset achieving an average of 66 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS threshold but offers limited visual fidelity.
The verdict is clear: this system is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it can deliver solid frame rates at high or ultra settings. For 4K, users would need to compromise significantly on graphical quality to maintain playable performance, as the data shows that High and Ultra settings at this resolution produce averages far below 60 FPS. The system's overall ranking of 1925 out of 3723 combos reflects this mixed capability, excelling at lower resolutions but struggling at the highest pixel counts.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which achieves an average of 72.4 FPS. This provides the maximum visual quality while still maintaining a comfortable margin above the playable threshold.
At 2560x1440, the best playable setting is High, with an average of 63.8 FPS. This preset offers a good balance of visual fidelity and performance, though it is close to the 60 FPS boundary, so players may prefer Medium at 76.1 FPS for a more stable experience.
At 3840x2160, the only setting that remains at or above 60 FPS is Low, with an average of 66 FPS. This requires significant visual compromises, but it is the sole option for achieving smooth gameplay at 4K resolution with this hardware configuration.