Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Rust
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 49 | 64 | 80 | 115 |
| 1440p QHD | 83 | 111 | 121 | 138 |
| 1080p Full HD | 114 | 126 | 136 | 156 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System
Similar Performance Alternatives
The AMD Ryzen 7 3700X sits in a tightly contested segment of the database. Its average benchmark score of 34,260 places it within 0.5% of several other processors. The closest match is the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, which scores 34,222, a delta of just 0.1% ahead. The AMD EPYC 4244P is virtually identical at 34,220, also 0.1% ahead. The Intel Core i5-13450HX scores 34,333, which is 0.2% higher, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 165H trails slightly at 34,083, a 0.5% gap. In practical terms, any of these CPUs would deliver nearly indistinguishable frame pacing in CPU-bound scenarios. The Ryzen 7 3700X holds the 84th percentile among all CPUs tested, meaning it outperforms most processors in the database but is not at the very top tier.
For the graphics side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER posts an average score of 54,209. Its nearest rival, the standard RTX 4080, scores 54,247, a negligible 0.1% difference. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X is 1.1% ahead at 54,828, while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB and AMD Radeon 8060S are 2.7% and 2.8% ahead respectively, scoring 55,698 and 55,757. The RTX 4080 SUPER ranks in the 86th percentile among all GPUs. The data indicates that swapping to any of these near-identical alternatives would produce almost no measurable change in Rust's average FPS. The GPU's 16 GB of GDDR6X memory and 256-bit bus provide ample bandwidth for high-resolution textures, though the card is marked as end-of-life production status.
CPU and GPU Roles
Rust demonstrates a clear pattern of GPU-bound behavior at higher resolutions, but the CPU still exerts influence at lower settings. The measured FPS scaling across resolutions reveals the balance. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo reaches 156.2 FPS average. Moving to 2560x1440 Low drops this to 138 FPS, a decline of 11.6%. At 3840x2160 Low, the average falls to 114.7 FPS, another 16.9% reduction. This gradual decline suggests that even at Low settings, the GPU is doing meaningful work, but the CPU is keeping pace adequately.
The CPU's role becomes more apparent when examining preset scaling at a fixed resolution. At 1920x1080, going from Low (156.2 FPS) to Medium (136.3 FPS) drops 12.7%, then to High (125.7 FPS) drops another 7.8%, and finally to Ultra (113.6 FPS) drops 9.6%. The total reduction from Low to Ultra is 27.3%. At 2560x1440, the same progression goes from 138 FPS to 121 FPS to 110.5 FPS to 82.6 FPS, a total drop of 40.1%. At 3840x2160, the Low to Ultra range spans from 114.7 FPS down to 49.2 FPS, a 57.1% reduction. The larger percentage drops at higher resolutions confirm that the GPU becomes the dominant bottleneck as pixel count and preset complexity increase.
The Ryzen 7 3700X, with 8 cores and 16 threads, has sufficient headroom to keep the RTX 4080 SUPER fed at 1080p and 1440p. The single-thread score of 2,656 in Passmark and 204 in Cinebench R15 single-core indicates adequate per-core performance for Rust's game logic. Multi-threaded results (22,458 Passmark multi-thread, 2,092 Cinebench R15 multi-core) suggest the CPU is not the limiting factor even in complex scenes. However, at 4K Ultra, the GPU's workload becomes so heavy that the CPU's role diminishes almost entirely.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combination delivers consistently high frame rates. Low settings produce an average of 156.2 FPS. Medium settings yield 136.3 FPS. High settings reach 125.7 FPS. Ultra settings still maintain a solid 113.6 FPS average. All four presets clear the 60 FPS playable threshold with substantial margin. The gap between Low and Ultra is 42.6 FPS, which represents the performance cost of enabling maximum visual fidelity at this resolution.
Moving to 2560x1440, the averages remain strong. Low settings hit 138 FPS. Medium settings achieve 121 FPS. High settings deliver 110.5 FPS. Ultra settings drop to 82.6 FPS. The spread between Low and Ultra here is 55.4 FPS. Notably, even the most demanding preset at 1440p stays well above 60 FPS, meaning players can enable maximum settings without worrying about playability. The step from High to Ultra is the largest single drop at this resolution, a 25.3% reduction from 110.5 to 82.6 FPS.
At 3840x2160, the picture changes. Low settings still deliver a comfortable 114.7 FPS. Medium settings fall to 79.9 FPS. High settings remain playable at 63.9 FPS. Ultra settings, however, drop below the 60 FPS threshold, averaging only 49.2 FPS. The delta between Low and Ultra at 4K is 65.5 FPS, the largest spread of any resolution. This demonstrates that 4K Ultra is simply too demanding for this combination to maintain smooth gameplay. The difference between Medium and High at 4K is 16 FPS, while the drop from High to Ultra is 14.7 FPS.
The Verdict
The question of whether this PC can run Rust is answered affirmatively for most scenarios. According to the verdict data, at 1920x1080, all four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable, with the best playable setting being Ultra at 113.6 FPS average. At 2560x1440, all four presets also clear the 60 FPS bar, with Ultra being the best playable setting at 82.6 FPS.
At 3840x2160, the situation becomes more nuanced. The playable settings are High, Low, and Medium. High is the best playable setting at 63.9 FPS, which just barely exceeds the 60 FPS threshold. Medium runs at 79.9 FPS and Low at 114.7 FPS. Ultra at 4K is not playable, as its 49.2 FPS average falls below the playable threshold. For players with a 4K display, the recommendation is to cap settings at High or consider dropping to Medium for additional headroom.
This system is clearly capable of delivering a smooth Rust experience at 1080p and 1440p with no compromises. At 4K, it requires a moderate settings reduction to maintain 60 FPS. The 49.2 FPS at 4K Ultra is not a failure, but it is below the standard playability target.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 113.6 FPS. This is the optimal choice for players prioritizing visual quality, as it provides a 53.6 FPS buffer above the playability threshold.
At 2560x1440, Ultra is again the best choice, averaging 82.6 FPS. This leaves a 22.6 FPS margin above 60 FPS, which should accommodate most in-game scenes without dipping below playable levels.
At 3840x2160, the best playable setting is High, with an average of 63.9 FPS. This is only 3.9 FPS above the threshold, so players who want more safety margin might prefer Medium at 79.9 FPS. However, for those willing to accept occasional dips near 60 FPS, High offers the best visual fidelity while remaining technically playable.
How This Combo Ranks
In the database of 3,723 tested CPU and GPU combinations for Rust, this pairing of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER ranks 749th. This places it in the top 20.1% of all tested combinations. The rank reflects the strong performance of the RTX 4080 SUPER, offset by the Ryzen 7 3700X which, while capable, is not among the newest or fastest CPUs in the database. The 84th percentile CPU ranking and 86th percentile GPU ranking combine to produce a system that outperforms roughly 80% of tested combos in this specific game. The gap between the CPU and GPU percentiles suggests that upgrading the processor would yield some benefit in CPU-limited scenarios, but the current setup is well balanced for Rust's demands.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Rust at 60 FPS on a 4K monitor?
A: Yes, at 4K with High settings it averages 63.9 FPS. Medium settings run at 79.9 FPS, and Low settings hit 114.7 FPS. Ultra settings at 4K only reach 49.2 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: What is the best settings preset at 1440p for this combo?
A: Ultra settings at 2560x1440 average 82.6 FPS, making it the most demanding preset that stays above 60 FPS. High runs at 110.5 FPS, Medium at 121 FPS, and Low at 138 FPS.
Q: How does the RTX 4080 SUPER compare to its closest GPU rivals?
A: The RTX 4080 SUPER scores 54,209 in average benchmarks. The standard RTX 4080 is 0.1% faster, while the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X is 1.1% faster. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB and AMD Radeon 8060S are 2.7% and 2.8% faster respectively.
Q: Is the Ryzen 7 3700X a bottleneck for the RTX 4080 SUPER in Rust?
A: At 1080p and 1440p, the CPU keeps up well, as shown by the high frame rates across all presets. At 4K, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, especially at Ultra settings where the average drops to 49.2 FPS.
Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1080p with High settings?
A: The average FPS at 1920x1080 with High settings is 125.7 FPS. This is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold and leaves considerable headroom for demanding scenes.
Q: Does this system rank well among all tested combos for Rust?
A: It ranks 749th out of 3,723 tested combinations, placing it in the top 20.1%. This is a strong result, driven by the high-performing RTX 4080 SUPER GPU.