Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Rust
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 23 | 31 | 36 | 54 |
| 1440p QHD | 39 | 52 | 61 | 92 |
| 1080p Full HD | 57 | 75 | 89 | 133 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 7 3700X paired with the Intel Arc B580 presents a compelling mid-range combination for Rust, but the recorded data shows that playability is heavily dependent on resolution and preset choices. The measured FPS figures across all three resolutions and four quality settings reveal a clear performance hierarchy, with the system comfortably handling 1080p and 1440p at moderate settings, while 4K remains a challenge.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The database contains measured average frame rates for this specific CPU and GPU combo across three resolutions and four preset levels. The minimum and maximum FPS recordings are only available for the Medium preset at each resolution, providing a partial view of frame time consistency.
At 1920x1080, the system delivers strong performance. The Low preset runs at an average of 133 FPS, which is more than double the 60 FPS playability threshold. Stepping up to Medium produces an average of 89 FPS, with a recorded minimum of 76 FPS and maximum of 103 FPS. The High preset remains above the threshold at 75 FPS average. Only the Ultra preset dips below 60 FPS, with an average of 57 FPS.
Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates drop noticeably. The Low preset averages 92 FPS, still comfortably above the threshold. Medium averages 61 FPS, with a minimum of 52 FPS and maximum of 71 FPS. This is a borderline result, as the average clears 60 FPS but the minimum falls short. High drops to 52 FPS, and Ultra falls further to 39 FPS.
At 3840x2160, the system struggles to maintain playable performance. Low averages 54 FPS, just under the threshold. Medium averages 36 FPS with a minimum of 31 FPS and maximum of 42 FPS. High averages 31 FPS, and Ultra averages 23 FPS. None of the 4K presets clear the 60 FPS playability line.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The CPU and GPU each have recorded nearest rivals based on average benchmark scores, which helps contextualize where this hardware sits in the broader landscape.
The AMD Ryzen 7 3700X has an average benchmark score of 34,260 points. Its closest rivals include the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, which scores 34,222 and is 0.1% behind, and the AMD EPYC 4244P at 34,220, also 0.1% behind. The Intel Core i5-13450HX scores 34,333, putting it 0.2% ahead of the Ryzen 7 3700X. The Intel Core Ultra 7 165H scores 34,083, a 0.5% margin behind. These rival CPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates in Rust when paired with the same GPU, as the performance deltas are negligible.
The Intel Arc B580 has an average benchmark score of 23,021. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP at 23,061, which is 0.2% ahead, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 at 22,895, which is 0.6% behind. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 scores 23,172, sitting 0.7% ahead, and the NVIDIA P106-100 scores 23,249, a 1% margin ahead. These GPU alternatives would produce nearly identical FPS in Rust when paired with the same Ryzen 7 3700X, so users with any of these cards can expect similar measured outcomes.
How This Combo Ranks
Within the database of tested hardware combinations for Rust, the Ryzen 7 3700X and Intel Arc B580 pairing ranks 2815 out of 3723 total combos. This places the system in the lower portion of tested configurations, meaning many other CPU and GPU pairings achieve higher frame rates in this game. The percentile positioning indicates that while this combo clears the playable threshold at 1080p and 1440p Medium, it does not represent a high-end configuration for Rust.
The rank of 2815 out of 3723 suggests that the combination is more capable than roughly a quarter of tested combos but falls behind the majority. This is consistent with the measured FPS numbers, which show strong performance at lower resolutions but a significant falloff at 4K.
The Verdict
The data provides a clear answer for whether this PC can run Rust at playable levels. The playable threshold is set at 60 FPS, and the verdict by resolution relies on which settings maintain at least that average.
At 1920x1080, the system is playable on three presets. Low runs at 133 FPS, Medium at 89 FPS, and High at 75 FPS. The best playable setting is High, with an average FPS of 75. Ultra is not playable, as it averages 57 FPS.
At 2560x1440, playable settings include Low, at 92 FPS, and Medium, at 61 FPS. The best playable setting is Medium, with an average of 61 FPS, though the recorded minimum of 52 FPS means some dips below 60 FPS will occur. High and Ultra are not playable, with 52 FPS and 39 FPS respectively.
At 3840x2160, there are no playable settings. Even the Low preset only averages 54 FPS, which is 6 FPS short of the threshold. All other presets fall further behind.
The conclusion is that this combo can run Rust well at 1080p and 1440p, but 4K is not viable while maintaining the 60 FPS threshold.
CPU and GPU Roles
The recorded data reveals which component drives performance at each resolution by examining the scaling between presets and resolutions. The FPS drop when moving from 1080p to 1440p to 4K is substantial, which indicates the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck as resolution increases.
At 1920x1080, the Low preset averages 133 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 57 FPS. The reduction from Low to Ultra, a factor of roughly 2.33, shows the GPU is heavily loaded by the higher presets. The CPU still has headroom at 1080p, as the frame rates remain high even at High settings.
When moving to 2560x1440, the Low preset drops from 133 to 92 FPS, a 31% reduction. This is a clear sign that the GPU is now more stressed. At 1440p Medium, the average is 61 FPS, which is exactly at the playable threshold. The CPU is still capable, but the GPU is now the limiting factor.
At 3840x2160, the Low preset drops to 54 FPS, and the Medium drops to 36 FPS. The GPU is heavily saturated, and the CPU has little influence on the frame rate at this resolution. The data implies that the Ryzen 7 3700X is sufficient for Rust at all settings, but the Arc B580 cannot keep up at 4K.
The CPU's role is more prominent at lower resolutions, where the frame rates are high enough that the CPU must feed the GPU. The GPU's role becomes dominant at 1440p and especially at 4K, where the shading and memory bandwidth demand exceeds what the B580 can provide.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC play Rust at 1080p with High settings?
A: Yes, the measured average FPS is 75, which clears the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: What is the best playable preset at 1440p?
A: The best playable setting is Medium, with an average FPS of 61. The Low preset also works at 92 FPS.
Q: Is 4K playable at any settings?
A: No, the Database shows no playable settings at 3840x2160. The highest average is 54 FPS on Low, which is below the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: Which is the more limiting component for this game?
A: The data suggests the GPU is the primary limiter at higher resolutions. The FPS drops significantly when moving from 1080p to 4K, while the CPU remains relatively constant.
Q: How does the Arc B580 compare to the RTX 2080?
A: The Arc B580 scores 23,021 versus the RTX 2080's 22,895, a 0.6% difference, so they are statistically similar.
Q: What is the average FPS at 1440p Low?
A: The measured average is 92 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold.
Best Settings per Resolution
Based on the measured data, the recommended settings for each resolution are the most demanding presets that still maintain an average FPS of 60 or higher.
At 1920x1080, the best settings are High, with an average FPS of 75. This is the highest preset that clears the playability threshold, and it delivers a solid frame rate. The Low and Medium presets also work, but High offers the best visual quality without sacrificing the 60 FPS target.
At 2560x1440, the best settings are Medium, with an average FPS of 61. This is exactly at the threshold, and it is the highest preset that remains playable. The Low preset runs at 92 FPS, but Medium provides a better balance of visual fidelity and performance.
At 3840x2160, there is no playable setting. The best performing preset is Low at 54 FPS, but it falls short of the 60 FPS requirement. The data indicates that this resolution is not recommended for this hardware combination in Rust.