Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

90%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
268 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
124 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
198 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
85 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
117 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
50 FPS
6.1ms Frame Time
9ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 29,713
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 54,247

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 50 66 79 117
1440p QHD 85 112 133 198
1080p Full HD 124 163 193 268

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 163
1920x1080 Low 268
1920x1080 Medium 193
1920x1080 Ultra 124
2560x1440 High 112
2560x1440 Low 198
2560x1440 Medium 133
2560x1440 Ultra 85
3840x2160 High 66
3840x2160 Low 117
3840x2160 Medium 79
3840x2160 Ultra 50

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 delivers a compelling 4K gaming experience in Rust, with the data showing that the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS at 3840x2160 is High, averaging 66 FPS. At 2560x1440, the combination reaches an average of 85 FPS on Ultra settings, while at 1920x1080 it hits 124 FPS on Ultra, making this combo a strong candidate for high-refresh-rate survival gameplay across all tested resolutions.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160 (4K), the highest preset that maintains an average of at least 60 FPS is High, which delivers an average of 66 FPS. The Medium preset runs at 79 FPS average, with a minimum of 67 FPS and a maximum of 90 FPS, but High is the most demanding playable option. Low settings at this resolution produce 117 FPS average, while Ultra falls below the playable threshold at 50 FPS average, so it is not recommended for 4K.

At 2560x1440 (1440p), the most demanding preset that clears 60 FPS is Ultra, averaging 85 FPS. This is a significant jump from the 4K result, as the lower pixel count allows the RTX 4080 to push higher frame rates. Medium settings at 1440p run at 133 FPS average, with a minimum of 113 FPS and a maximum of 153 FPS, while High reaches 112 FPS average. Low settings produce 198 FPS average, showing that even the most demanding preset is comfortably above the playable threshold.

At 1920x1080 (1080p), the best settings are also Ultra, averaging 124 FPS. This resolution is where the combo truly shines, as the CPU and GPU have ample headroom. Medium settings at 1080p run at 193 FPS average, with a minimum of 164 FPS and a maximum of 222 FPS, while High reaches 163 FPS average. Low settings produce 268 FPS average, which is more than four times the 60 FPS playable threshold, making this setup ideal for competitive play on high-refresh-rate monitors.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Rust at 4K Ultra settings?

A: No. At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average FPS is 50, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The most demanding playable preset at 4K is High, which averages 66 FPS.

Q: What is the best preset for 1440p gaming?

A: Ultra settings at 2560x1440 average 85 FPS, making it the most demanding preset that stays above 60 FPS. This provides the best visual quality while maintaining smooth gameplay.

Q: How does the RTX 4080 perform at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, Ultra settings average 124 FPS, and Low settings reach 268 FPS. The combo is more than capable of handling high refresh rates at this resolution, with all presets well above the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: What are the minimum FPS figures for Medium settings?

A: For Medium settings, the minimum FPS values are 67 at 3840x2160, 113 at 2560x1440, and 164 at 1920x1080. These numbers indicate that even during demanding scenes, the frame rate stays above the playable threshold.

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 9600X a bottleneck for the RTX 4080 in Rust?

A: The benchmark data does not indicate a bottleneck, as the combo achieves high average FPS across all resolutions. The CPU's single-thread score of 2183.5 in Cinebench R23 and its 81st percentile ranking among all CPUs suggest it keeps pace with the GPU in this game.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested configurations?

A: The combo ranks 187th out of 3723 tested combinations for Rust, placing it in the top 5% of all tested systems. This indicates strong overall performance for this specific game.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 combination ranks 187th out of 3723 tested combos for Rust, putting it in the top 5 percent of all configurations tested. This ranking reflects the balance between the CPU and GPU, as both components are strong performers individually. The CPU has an 81st percentile ranking among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 86th percentile among all GPUs, indicating that neither component significantly drags down the overall performance.

The combo's ranking is particularly impressive given the game's demanding nature. Rust is a survival title that often stresses both the CPU and GPU, especially at higher resolutions and settings. The data shows that the combo handles 4K High settings at 66 FPS average, which is a demanding workload, and still delivers 85 FPS at 1440p Ultra. The rank of 187 out of 3723 suggests that there are only 186 tested configurations that perform better, which is a small fraction of the total. This places the combo in the upper echelon of systems for this game, making it a strong choice for players who want high frame rates at high settings.

The percentile rankings of the individual components support this conclusion. The Ryzen 5 9600X achieves an average benchmark score of 29713, which is comparable to rivals like the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE (29656, 0.2% delta), the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H (29868, -0.5% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT (29879, -0.6% delta). The RTX 4080 has an average benchmark score of 54247, with nearest rivals including the RTX 4080 SUPER (54209, 0.1% delta), the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (54828, -1.1% delta), and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (55698, -2.6% delta). These small deltas indicate that the combo sits among similarly performing hardware, but the overall rank of 187 suggests that the specific pairing works well for Rust.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the Ryzen 5 9600X has an average benchmark score of 29713, and its nearest rivals are all within a 1 percent performance delta. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE scores 29656, which is 0.2% lower, making it nearly identical in performance. The AMD Ryzen 7 7840H scores 29868, which is 0.5% higher, and the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT scores 29879, 0.6% higher. The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS scores 29955, which is 0.8% higher. In practice, any of these processors would deliver very similar frame rates in Rust, as the differences are within the margin of measurement error.

For the GPU, the RTX 4080 has an average benchmark score of 54247, and its nearest rivals are also closely matched. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER scores 54209, which is 0.1% lower, meaning it would perform essentially the same in Rust. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54828, which is 1.1% higher, while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55698, which is 2.6% higher, and the AMD Radeon 8060S scores 55757, which is 2.7% higher. These deltas are small enough that users would not notice a significant difference in gameplay, though the RX 6750 GRE and Radeon 8060S might offer a slight edge in some scenarios.

When building a system, choosing a CPU or GPU from these nearest rivals would result in a very similar experience in Rust. The Ryzen 7 8845HS, for example, is a mobile chip, but its performance profile matches the Ryzen 5 9600X closely enough that a desktop system with that CPU would produce comparable frame rates. Similarly, the RTX 4080 SUPER is a direct replacement for the RTX 4080, with a negligible performance difference. For users looking to save money or find availability, these alternatives represent viable options without sacrificing measurable performance.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a detailed look at how the combo performs across all resolutions and settings.

At 3840x2160:

  • Low settings: average 117 FPS, no min or max reported
  • Medium settings: average 79 FPS, minimum 67 FPS, maximum 90 FPS
  • High settings: average 66 FPS, no min or max reported
  • Ultra settings: average 50 FPS, no min or max reported

At 2560x1440:

  • Low settings: average 198 FPS, no min or max reported
  • Medium settings: average 133 FPS, minimum 113 FPS, maximum 153 FPS
  • High settings: average 112 FPS, no min or max reported
  • Ultra settings: average 85 FPS, no min or max reported

At 1920x1080:

  • Low settings: average 268 FPS, no min or max reported
  • Medium settings: average 193 FPS, minimum 164 FPS, maximum 222 FPS
  • High settings: average 163 FPS, no min or max reported
  • Ultra settings: average 124 FPS, no min or max reported

The Medium settings data is notable because it includes min and max values, which offer insight into frame time consistency. At 4K Medium, the minimum of 67 FPS stays above the playable threshold, while the maximum of 90 FPS shows headroom. At 1440p Medium, the minimum of 113 FPS and maximum of 153 FPS indicate a very smooth experience, with no dips below the 60 FPS threshold. At 1080p Medium, the minimum of 164 FPS and maximum of 222 FPS demonstrate that the combo is never stressed at this resolution, even in demanding scenes.

The absence of min and max values for most settings suggests that the benchmark focused on average performance, but the available data for Medium at each resolution shows that frame pacing is stable. The jump from 4K Ultra (50 FPS) to 4K High (66 FPS) is a 16 FPS improvement, which is substantial and makes the difference between unplayable and smooth gameplay. Similarly, the jump from 1440p High (112 FPS) to 1440p Ultra (85 FPS) is a 27 FPS drop, but Ultra remains well above the playable threshold, making it a worthwhile trade-off for better visuals.

The Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 combo can run Rust with strong performance across all tested resolutions, according to the verdict data.

At 3840x2160, the playable settings are High, Low, and Medium, with the best settings being High at an average of 66 FPS. This means users can enjoy 4K gaming with high visual quality while staying above the 60 FPS playable threshold. Ultra is not playable at this resolution, as it drops to 50 FPS average.

At 2560x1440, all four settings are playable, and the best settings are Ultra at an average of 85 FPS. This is the sweet spot for the combo, as it delivers the highest visual quality while maintaining a comfortable frame rate. The data shows that even Ultra settings are not a challenge for this hardware at 1440p.

At 1920x1080, all four settings are playable, with the best settings being Ultra at an average of 124 FPS. This resolution provides the highest frame rates, making the combo ideal for competitive play or high-refresh-rate monitors. Even at 1080p Ultra, the average FPS is more than double the playable threshold, ensuring a smooth experience.

The verdict is clear: this PC is fully capable of running Rust at 60 FPS or higher at 1080p and 1440p on the most demanding presets, and at 4K on High settings. The only limitation is 4K Ultra, which falls short of the 60 FPS threshold, but the High preset at 4K still offers a high level of visual fidelity. For users who prioritize frame rate over visual quality, 4K Low delivers 117 FPS average, which is excellent for a 4K panel. Overall, this combo is a strong choice for Rust players who want high performance at any resolution, with the caveat that 4K Ultra is the only setting that requires compromise.