Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

42%
Not Recommended Your system may struggle with this game.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
76 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
33 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
53 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
23 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
31 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
13 FPS
23.3ms Frame Time
35ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 29,713
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 1,482

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 13 18 21 31
1440p QHD 23 30 35 53
1080p Full HD 33 43 51 76

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 43
1920x1080 Low 76
1920x1080 Medium 51
1920x1080 Ultra 33
2560x1440 High 30
2560x1440 Low 53
2560x1440 Medium 35
2560x1440 Ultra 23
3840x2160 High 18
3840x2160 Low 31
3840x2160 Medium 21
3840x2160 Ultra 13

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X paired with the Intel Arc B390 is a combination that ranks near the bottom of the database for Rust. Out of 3,723 tested combos, this setup places at rank 3,312, placing it in the lower 11% of all recorded configurations. Benchmark results indicate that this pairing struggles to deliver smooth gameplay at higher settings, and only at 1080p with the lowest preset does it cross the 60 FPS threshold. The data shows a system that is heavily constrained by its graphics component, with the CPU's strong single-thread performance unable to compensate for the GPU's limited throughput in this title.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank of 3,312 out of 3,723 tested configurations places this AMD and Intel pairing in the bottom tier for Rust performance. This rank reflects the recorded FPS data across all resolutions and presets, which shows a consistent pattern of sub-60 FPS performance except for the single case of 1080p Low. The percentile standing for the GPU alone is 9, meaning it performs better than only 9% of all GPUs in the database, while the CPU sits at the 81st percentile. This stark contrast highlights the imbalance: the processor is a capable mid-range part, but the integrated graphics solution drags the overall gaming experience down significantly.

The measured FPS figures confirm this ranking. At 4K Ultra, the combo manages only 13 FPS average, which is far below any playable threshold. Even at 1080p Medium, the average sits at 51 FPS, just under the 60 FPS target. The only configuration that clears the playable mark is 1080p Low with an average of 76 FPS. These numbers show that the GPU is the limiting factor in nearly every scenario, as the CPU's benchmark scores (such as a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17,528.5 and a single-core score of 2,183.5) indicate enough processing power for modern games, but the Arc B390's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1,482 points is among the lowest recorded.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data from Rust shows a clear division of labor between the CPU and GPU, with the graphics component dominating performance at all tested resolutions. The Arc B390, with its 1,536 shading units and 24 ROPs, delivers a pixel rate of 60.00 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 120.0 GTexel/s. These specifications, combined with the measured FPS, suggest that the GPU is the bottleneck even at 1080p. For example, moving from 1080p Low (76 FPS) to 1080p Ultra (33 FPS) represents a 57% drop in average frame rate, which is a typical GPU-bound scaling pattern.

The CPU's role becomes more apparent when examining the scaling between resolutions at the same preset. At High settings, the average FPS drops from 43 at 1080p to 30 at 1440p, and further to 18 at 4K. This scaling is nearly linear with pixel count, indicating that the GPU is saturated at each step. The Ryzen 5 9600X, with 6 cores and 12 threads boosting up to 5.40 GHz, provides sufficient single-thread performance for Rust's game logic, but it does not become the limiting factor until the GPU load decreases, which does not happen in this data set. At 1080p Low, the CPU's influence is more visible, as the 76 FPS average is likely closer to the GPU's maximum output rather than a CPU cap.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the worst-case scenario for this combo, the recorded data shows an average of 18 FPS on High, 21 FPS on Medium, 31 FPS on Low, and 13 FPS on Ultra. The Medium preset includes min and max figures of 18 and 24 FPS respectively, showing a narrow band of performance. None of these 4K settings approach the 60 FPS playable threshold, and even the best case at Low is roughly half of the target.

At 2560x1440, performance improves but remains below playable levels. The High preset averages 30 FPS, Medium averages 35 FPS with a range from 30 to 41 FPS, and Low reaches 53 FPS. The Ultra preset drops to 23 FPS. The 1440p Low result of 53 FPS is the closest this resolution comes to the 60 FPS threshold, but it still falls short by 7 FPS.

At 1920x1080, the results are more mixed. The Low preset achieves an average of 76 FPS, which is the only configuration in the entire data set that exceeds the 60 FPS playable threshold. The Medium preset averages 51 FPS with a min of 44 and max of 59 FPS, meaning it never quite reaches 60 FPS in the recorded measurements. The High preset averages 43 FPS, and Ultra drops to 33 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is 25 FPS, which is a significant jump and suggests that the Medium preset introduces rendering features that heavily tax the GPU.

The Verdict

Based on the verdict data, this PC can run Rust, but only at 1080p with the Low preset. The recorded data shows that at 1920x1080, the Low settings produce an average of 76 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold with a 16 FPS margin. At 1440p and 4K, there are no playable settings recorded, meaning no preset at these resolutions reaches the 60 FPS target. The best 1440p result is 53 FPS on Low, and the best 4K result is 31 FPS on Low, both well below the threshold.

For users who prioritize higher resolutions, this combo will not deliver a smooth experience. The data indicates that even at 1440p Medium, the average FPS drops to 35, which is nearly half of the playable target. The system is effectively a 1080p Low machine for Rust, and any attempt to increase graphical fidelity or resolution will result in frame rates that are not suitable for competitive or immersive play. The 60 FPS threshold is only met in that single configuration, so the recommendation is clear: run at 1080p Low for the only playable experience.

FAQ

Q: What is the best average FPS this combo can achieve in Rust?

A: The highest recorded average FPS is 76, achieved at 1920x1080 with the Low preset.

Q: Can this system run Rust at 1440p?

A: No, the verdict data shows no playable settings at 2560x1440. The best result is 53 FPS on Low, which is below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Arc B390 has an average benchmark score of 1,482, which is 1.3% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX (1,463) and 2.5% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM (1,446). It outperforms the GeForce GT 710 (1,443) by 2.7%.

Q: What is the performance difference between 1080p Medium and 1080p Low?

A: The Medium preset averages 51 FPS with a range of 44 to 59 FPS, while the Low preset averages 76 FPS. This represents a 25 FPS difference in favor of Low.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more responsible for the performance issues?

A: The GPU is the limiting factor. The CPU ranks in the 81st percentile with a strong single-thread score of 2,183.5 in Cinebench R23, while the GPU ranks in the 9th percentile. The FPS scaling across resolutions follows GPU-bound patterns.

Q: What are the minimum FPS values at 1080p Medium?

A: The recorded minimum FPS at 1080p Medium is 44, with a maximum of 59 FPS. This means the frame rate never reaches the 60 FPS threshold during the measurement.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, no preset achieves the 60 FPS playable threshold. The highest average FPS recorded at this resolution is 31 on Low, which is below the target. Therefore, there is no recommended setting for 4K.

At 2560x1440, the same conclusion applies. The best average FPS is 53 on Low, which falls short of 60 FPS. No preset is recommended for 1440p.

At 1920x1080, the Low preset is the only playable option. It delivers an average of 76 FPS, which is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS. The Medium preset averages 51 FPS and does not meet the threshold, so Low is the clear choice for a smooth experience.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X has an average benchmark score of 29,713, which is closely matched by several rivals. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE scores 29,656, a 0.2% difference. The AMD Ryzen 7 7840H scores 29,868, placing it 0.5% higher. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT scores 29,879, which is 0.6% above the 9600X, and the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS scores 29,955, a 0.8% advantage. These CPUs would likely produce similar results in Rust when paired with the same GPU, as the differences in average scores are minimal.

For the GPU, the Intel Arc B390 has an average benchmark score of 1,482. Its nearest rivals are all older NVIDIA parts: the GeForce GT 520MX scores 1,463 (1.3% lower), the GeForce 800M scores 1,460 (1.5% lower), the GeForce GT 625 OEM scores 1,446 (2.5% lower), and the GeForce GT 710 scores 1,443 (2.7% lower). These GPUs would behave similarly in Rust, with the Arc B390 holding a slight edge over each of them. The performance delta is small enough that the gaming experience would be nearly identical across this group.