Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

59%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
137 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
60 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
96 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
42 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
55 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
21 FPS
13.2ms Frame Time
20ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 25,005
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 16,129

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 21 32 41 55
1440p QHD 42 56 66 96
1080p Full HD 60 76 93 137

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 76
1920x1080 Low 137
1920x1080 Medium 93
1920x1080 Ultra 60
2560x1440 High 56
2560x1440 Low 96
2560x1440 Medium 66
2560x1440 Ultra 42
3840x2160 High 32
3840x2160 Low 55
3840x2160 Medium 41
3840x2160 Ultra 21

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti combination delivers a sharply tiered performance profile in Rust, one that is fully playable at mainstream resolutions but falls short of the 60 FPS bar at 4K. The measured data shows a clear pattern: the combo is comfortably capable at 1080p, adequate at 1440p with settings compromises, and not viable at 2160p. This analysis breaks down exactly where this pairing stands.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The benchmark results for this combo in Rust are recorded across three resolutions and four quality presets, with average frame rates provided for each configuration. The data reveals a steep performance curve as resolution scales.

At 3840x2160 (4K), the RTX 3060 Ti is clearly overextended. On the Ultra preset, the average FPS drops to 21.3. The High preset nearly doubles that figure, reaching 31.9 FPS, but remains well below the playability threshold. Medium improves further to 41.1 FPS, while the Low preset delivers 54.7 FPS — the best 4K result but still under the 60 FPS target. None of the 4K configurations clear the playable bar, and the spread between Low and Ultra is a substantial 33.4 FPS, indicating that even aggressive quality reductions cannot rescue this resolution.

Moving to 2560x1440 (1440p), the situation improves markedly. The Low preset hits 96 FPS, a strong result that clears the 60 FPS threshold with considerable headroom. Medium follows at 65.7 FPS, still above the target. High drops to 55.9 FPS, just under the line, while Ultra falls to 42 FPS. The delta between Low and Ultra here is 54 FPS, showing that settings choices have an outsized impact at this resolution. The transition from 4K to 1440p yields significant gains: Low improves from 54.7 to 96 FPS, a 41.3 FPS jump, while High improves from 31.9 to 55.9 FPS.

At 1920x1080 (1080p), the combo is at its strongest. The Low preset produces 136.5 FPS, an excellent result for fast-paced play. Medium delivers 93.4 FPS, and High reaches 75.7 FPS. The Ultra preset, the most demanding configuration tested, still manages to clear the 60 FPS threshold with an average of 60.1 FPS. The resolution scaling from 1440p to 1080p is substantial: Ultra improves from 42 to 60.1 FPS, Medium from 65.7 to 93.4 FPS, and Low from 96 to 136.5 FPS. At 1080p, every preset is playable, and even the heaviest settings remain above the bar.

Best Settings per Resolution

The verdict data identifies the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS for each resolution. At 3840x2160, no settings configuration achieves playable performance, so there is no recommended preset — the best average FPS, 54.7 on Low, still misses the target.

At 2560x1440, the best playable settings are Medium, which produces an average of 65.7 FPS. This is the highest quality preset that clears the 60 FPS line at this resolution. The High preset, at 55.9 FPS, falls short, making Medium the optimal choice for balancing visual quality and smoothness. The Low preset, at 96 FPS, is also playable but leaves performance on the table.

At 1920x1080, the best playable settings are Ultra, with an average of 60.1 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that remains at or above the playable threshold. Every preset at 1080p is playable, from Low at 136.5 FPS to High at 75.7 FPS, but Ultra offers the full visual experience while still clearing the bar, albeit narrowly. The 60.1 FPS result on Ultra is only 0.1 FPS above the threshold, indicating that this configuration is right at the edge of playability.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance scaling across resolutions and presets indicates that the GPU is the dominant constraint for this combo in Rust, particularly at higher resolutions. The data shows that as resolution increases, frame rates drop sharply at every preset, which is characteristic of GPU-bound workloads where pixel throughput becomes the limiting factor.

At 1080p, the relatively high frame rates across all presets — from 60.1 FPS on Ultra to 136.5 FPS on Low — suggest that the GPU has enough headroom to handle the workload at this resolution, and the CPU is likely not the primary bottleneck. The Ryzen 5 8400F, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, provides sufficient single-thread performance for Rust's simulation and game logic, as evidenced by its 3DMark single-thread score of 951 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2943.

As resolution climbs to 1440p and 2160p, the frame rate penalties become more pronounced. At 4K, even the Low preset only reaches 54.7 FPS, a massive drop from the 136.5 FPS seen at 1080p Low. This 81.8 FPS reduction is far larger than what would be expected if the CPU were the limiting factor, confirming that the RTX 3060 Ti's GPU resources are the binding constraint at high pixel counts. The GPU's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p and 1440p, but the 16.20 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is insufficient for 4K in Rust.

The preset scaling also points to GPU dominance. At 1440p, dropping from Ultra to Low yields a 54 FPS improvement, while at 1080p the same preset change yields a 76.4 FPS improvement. This disproportionate gain at lower resolutions indicates that the GPU has more spare capacity at 1080p, allowing settings reductions to translate into larger frame rate gains. The CPU's role becomes more relevant at lower resolutions where the GPU is less stressed, but the data does not show a scenario where the CPU is the clear limiting factor — the 8400F's performance, including a PassMark multithread score of 24389 and a 3DMark max threads score of 6165, appears sufficient for this game at the tested settings.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Rust at 1920x1080 with maximum settings?

A: Yes. The Ultra preset at 1080p produces an average of 60.1 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold. It is the best playable settings configuration at this resolution, though the margin is narrow.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 2560x1440?

A: The Medium preset is the best playable option at 1440p, delivering 65.7 FPS. The High preset falls short at 55.9 FPS, so Medium is the highest quality that stays above the 60 FPS bar.

Q: Is this combo capable of 4K gaming in Rust?

A: No. At 3840x2160, the best average FPS is 54.7 on the Low preset, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset drops to 21.3 FPS, and no 4K configuration is listed as playable.

Q: How does the RTX 3060 Ti compare to its nearest rivals in GPU benchmarks?

A: The RTX 3060 Ti's average benchmark score is 16129, placing it in the 59th percentile of all GPUs. It is 0.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 9060 and 1.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon R9 370X, while trailing the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M by 1.4% and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT by 1.4%.

Q: What is the CPU's benchmark standing relative to similar processors?

A: The Ryzen 5 8400F has an average benchmark score of 25005, putting it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs. It is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F, 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i7-11850H, and 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13620H, while trailing the AMD EPYC 9474F by 0.4%.

Q: Does lowering settings from Ultra to Low provide a significant FPS boost at 1080p?

A: Yes. At 1920x1080, the Low preset achieves 136.5 FPS compared to 60.1 FPS on Ultra, representing a 76.4 FPS improvement. This is the largest settings-driven gain across all tested resolutions.

The Verdict

The data is clear: this PC can run Rust, but the experience depends heavily on resolution and settings. At 1920x1080, the combo is fully capable, with all four presets — Low, Medium, High, and Ultra — clearing the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset at 60.1 FPS is the best playable configuration, offering maximum visual quality while remaining just above the playable bar.

At 2560x1440, the system is partially capable. The Low preset at 96 FPS and Medium at 65.7 FPS are both playable, but High at 55.9 FPS and Ultra at 42 FPS fall short of the target. The best playable settings at 1440p are Medium, delivering 65.7 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the combo is not capable of playable performance. No settings configuration reaches 60 FPS, with the best result being 54.7 FPS on Low. The verdict data confirms that no playable settings exist at 4K, and the system should be paired with a lower-resolution display or a more powerful GPU for 4K gaming.

Overall, this combination is a solid 1080p performer and a reasonable 1440p option with settings adjustments, but it is not a 4K-capable configuration for Rust.

How This Combo Ranks

In the benchmark database for Rust, this specific combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti ranks 2589 out of 3723 tested combos. This places it in the lower-middle portion of the ranking distribution, which is consistent with its measured performance: strong at 1080p, acceptable at 1440p with compromises, and inadequate at 4K.

The ranking reflects the combo's overall standing across all tested configurations in this game. The 8400F's 77th percentile CPU standing and the RTX 3060 Ti's 59th percentile GPU standing combine to produce a mid-tier result. The GPU's relatively lower percentile is the more influential factor in the ranking, as Rust's performance scaling in the measured data is heavily GPU-dependent. The combo's rank of 2589 out of 3723 suggests that while it is not a top-tier configuration, it is also not among the worst performers — it sits comfortably in the middle, capable of handling the game at mainstream resolutions but not pushing into high-end territory.