Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

78%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
175 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
74 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
120 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
51 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
69 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
28 FPS
10.4ms Frame Time
16ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 27,636
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 26,331

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 28 38 45 69
1440p QHD 51 66 78 120
1080p Full HD 74 96 116 175

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 96
1920x1080 Low 175
1920x1080 Medium 116
1920x1080 Ultra 74
2560x1440 High 66
2560x1440 Low 120
2560x1440 Medium 78
2560x1440 Ultra 51
3840x2160 High 38
3840x2160 Low 69
3840x2160 Medium 45
3840x2160 Ultra 28

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 ranks 1820th out of 3723 tested combos for Rust, placing it in the 49th percentile of the database. This mid-pack positioning indicates a balanced pairing that is neither at the bleeding edge nor struggling to keep up, with the data showing a clear path to playable frame rates at most settings.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's position at rank 1820 out of 3723 puts it just below the median for the entire tested field, which makes sense given the hardware's individual percentiles: the CPU sits at the 79th percentile against all processors, while the GPU lands at the 72nd percentile against all graphics cards. The pairing is well-matched in that neither component is dramatically stronger than the other, avoiding a significant bottleneck in either direction.

What this ranking means in practice is that the system will outperform roughly half of all tested configurations in Rust, but it is not in the top tier reserved for flagship hardware. The measured frame rates support this classification, showing a system that can handle the game comfortably at lower resolutions and presets, but one that will require setting compromises at higher demands. The rank is consistent with the hardware's synthetic benchmarks — the CPU's average benchmark score of 27636 and the GPU's average of 26331 both point to competent mid-to-upper-midrange performance that translates into solid, not spectacular, gaming results.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals how the workload shifts between the CPU and GPU as resolution and preset change. At 1920x1080, the system achieves 174.8 FPS on Low, 115.8 FPS on Medium, 96.2 FPS on High, and 74.3 FPS on Ultra. The progression from Low to Medium shows a 50.9 FPS drop (174.8 to 115.8), which is a substantial performance cost for the visual upgrade. The CPU's strong single-thread performance — a 3dmark_single_thread score of 1060 and passmark_single_thread score of 4135 — helps sustain high frame rates at this resolution where the GPU is not the primary constraint.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates drop to 120.1 FPS on Low, 77.5 FPS on Medium, 65.7 FPS on High, and 50.5 FPS on Ultra. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p at the same preset shows a reduction of 54.7 FPS at Low settings (174.8 to 120.1), which is a 31% decrease. This indicates that at lower presets, the resolution change has a significant impact, suggesting the GPU is becoming more relevant as pixel count rises, though the CPU still has headroom given the high achievable rates.

Moving to 3840x2160, the numbers fall to 69.4 FPS on Low, 45.2 FPS on Medium, 37.6 FPS on High, and 27.9 FPS on Ultra. The drop from 1440p to 4K at Low settings is 50.7 FPS (120.1 to 69.4), a 42% reduction. This steep decline points to the GPU being the limiting factor at 4K, as the RTX 5060's 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth becomes a constraint at higher pixel counts. The CPU's role diminishes at this resolution, as the frame rates are driven primarily by the GPU's ability to fill pixels.

The preset scaling within each resolution further clarifies the roles. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 100.5 FPS (174.8 to 74.3), while at 1440p it is 69.6 FPS (120.1 to 50.5), and at 4K it is 41.5 FPS (69.4 to 27.9). This narrowing gap at higher resolutions is a classic sign of the GPU becoming the primary bottleneck, as the CPU's work does not scale with resolution but the GPU's does.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the nearest rivals for the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X's average score of 27636 is closely matched by several other processors. The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and Intel Core i5-12600K both score 27578, a mere 0.2% difference, meaning either would deliver nearly identical CPU-bound performance in Rust. The AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE scores 27712, which is 0.3% higher, while the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 scores 27535, 0.4% lower. In a game like Rust that benefits from strong single-thread performance, swapping to any of these chips would produce almost indistinguishable frame rates in CPU-limited scenarios.

For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 with an average score of 26331 is bracketed by some unexpected names. The AMD Radeon 860M scores 26401 (0.3% higher) and the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 scores 26421 (0.3% higher), though these are integrated and entry-level mobile parts respectively, suggesting the benchmark averages may not fully capture gaming performance differences. More relevant for desktop gamers, the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary scores 26553 (0.8% higher) and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT scores 26011 (1.2% lower). These deltas are all within a few percent, indicating that users upgrading from these older cards would see similar frame rates in Rust, with the RTX 5060's advantage being modest.

The Verdict

The data shows this system can run Rust at playable frame rates across most resolutions, with the definition of "playable" being 60 FPS per the database's threshold. At 1920x1080, all four tested presets — Low, Medium, High, and Ultra — clear the 60 FPS bar, with Ultra averaging 74.3 FPS, providing the best visual quality without sacrificing smoothness. This makes 1080p the sweet spot for this combo, where the CPU's strong single-thread scores and the GPU's capabilities combine effectively.

At 2560x1440, the verdict is more nuanced: Low (120.1 FPS), Medium (77.5 FPS), and High (65.7 FPS) all remain above 60 FPS, but Ultra drops to 50.5 FPS, which is below the playable threshold. Users at this resolution should stick to High settings for a comfortable experience, as the 15.7 FPS gap between High and Ultra (65.7 to 50.5) is too costly for the visual gains.

At 3840x2160, only Low settings (69.4 FPS) remain playable. Medium (45.2 FPS), High (37.6 FPS), and Ultra (27.9 FPS) all fall well short of 60 FPS, making 4K gaming a compromise that requires significant visual sacrifices. The system is technically capable of running Rust at 4K, but only at the lowest preset, and even then the 9.4 FPS headroom above the threshold is minimal.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the measured average frame rates are as follows: Low settings deliver 174.8 FPS, Medium 115.8 FPS, High 96.2 FPS, and Ultra 74.3 FPS. The step from Low to Medium represents a 33.7% reduction, Medium to High is a 16.9% reduction, and High to Ultra is a 22.8% reduction. These numbers indicate diminishing returns at higher presets, where the visual improvements cost progressively more performance.

At 2560x1440, the averages are 120.1 FPS on Low, 77.5 FPS on Medium, 65.7 FPS on High, and 50.5 FPS on Ultra. The gap between Low and Medium here is 42.6 FPS (a 35.5% drop), which is steeper than at 1080p, showing the GPU's increasing workload. The Medium to High drop is 11.8 FPS (15.2%), and High to Ultra is 15.2 FPS (23.1%).

At 3840x2160, the frame rates are 69.4 FPS on Low, 45.2 FPS on Medium, 37.6 FPS on High, and 27.9 FPS on Ultra. The Low to Medium drop is 24.2 FPS (34.9%), Medium to High is 7.6 FPS (16.8%), and High to Ultra is 9.7 FPS (25.8%). The 4K data shows the RTX 5060 struggling to maintain playable rates even at Medium, with the 8 GB VRAM likely being a contributing factor at this resolution.

The minimum and maximum frame rates are not reported in the data, so the analysis relies solely on averages. This is worth noting, as Rust's dynamic world can produce frame time spikes, but the average values are sufficiently high at playable settings to suggest a generally smooth experience.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Rust at 60 FPS at 1080p?

A: Yes, at all tested presets. The lowest average frame rate at 1080p is 74.3 FPS on Ultra, which is 14.3 FPS above the playable threshold.

Q: What is the highest preset that maintains 60 FPS at 1440p?

A: High settings average 65.7 FPS, which clears the threshold. Ultra drops to 50.5 FPS, so it is not recommended for a 60 FPS target.

Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this hardware in Rust?

A: Marginal. Only Low settings achieve 69.4 FPS on average, while Medium and above fall below 60 FPS. The GPU's 8 GB memory and 128-bit bus are limiting factors at this resolution.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 7600X's average benchmark score of 27636 is within 0.4% of the Ryzen 7 5800 (27535) and within 0.2% of the Ryzen 7 5700X and Core i5-12600K (both 27578). Performance differences in Rust would be negligible.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the RX 6750 XT?

A: The RTX 5060 averages 26331, which is 1.2% higher than the RX 6750 XT's 26011. In Rust, this translates to a small but consistent advantage.

Q: What resolution offers the best balance of quality and performance?

A: 1080p with Ultra settings (74.3 FPS) provides the highest visual quality while staying well above 60 FPS. 1440p with High (65.7 FPS) is also viable, but with less headroom.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 74.3 FPS. This gives 14.3 FPS of headroom above the threshold, making it the recommended choice for users who prioritize visual fidelity at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the best playable setting is High, averaging 65.7 FPS. This provides 5.7 FPS of headroom, which is sufficient but closer to the limit than at 1080p. Medium (77.5 FPS) offers more margin, but High is the optimal balance.

At 3840x2160, the only playable preset is Low, with an average of 69.4 FPS. This is 9.4 FPS above the threshold, leaving little room for performance dips in demanding scenes. Users at 4K should ensure they use Low settings and be prepared for occasional frame rate fluctuations given the 8 GB VRAM limitation.