Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Rust
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 61 | 80 | 95 | 141 |
| 1440p QHD | 103 | 136 | 161 | 202 |
| 1080p Full HD | 150 | 186 | 197 | 229 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D delivers a striking performance profile in Rust, combining a high-percentile GPU with a mid-range CPU to produce frame rates that range from playable at 4K Ultra to exceptionally high at 1080p. The data indicates that this combination is not merely sufficient for the survival title but is capable of pushing well beyond the 60 FPS threshold at every tested resolution and preset, with the most demanding 4K Ultra setting still averaging 61 FPS. The following analysis breaks down the measured FPS, answers common questions about the hardware pairing, and contextualizes its rank among other tested configurations.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The benchmark results for this specific CPU-GPU pairing in Rust reveal a clear pattern: performance scales predictably with resolution and settings, but the margins between presets vary significantly. At 3840x2160 (4K), the average frame rates are 80 FPS on High, 141 FPS on Low, 95 FPS on Medium, and 61 FPS on Ultra. The Medium preset provides the only full set of min/max data at this resolution, with a minimum of 81 FPS and a maximum of 109 FPS, indicating a stable frame delivery with only a 28 FPS variance between the lowest and highest recorded frames. The jump from Low to Medium at 4K costs 46 FPS on average, while the step from Medium to Ultra costs another 34 FPS, showing that the Ultra preset is disproportionately demanding at this resolution.
Moving to 2560x1440 (1440p), the averages climb substantially: 136 FPS on High, 202 FPS on Low, 161 FPS on Medium, and 103 FPS on Ultra. The Medium preset here shows a minimum of 136 FPS and a maximum of 185 FPS, a variance of 49 FPS that suggests slightly less consistency than at 4K, though still well within smooth gameplay territory. The delta between Low and Ultra at 1440p is 99 FPS, meaning the Ultra preset roughly halves the frame rate compared to Low, yet even the worst-case 103 FPS average is far above the playability threshold. At 1920x1080 (1080p), the combination reaches its peak output: 186 FPS on High, 229 FPS on Low, 197 FPS on Medium, and 150 FPS on Ultra. The Medium preset records a minimum of 167 FPS and a maximum of 226 FPS, a 59 FPS spread that represents the largest variance across all tested settings, likely due to CPU limitations at lower resolutions where the GPU is less constrained.
The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows an average FPS drop of roughly 34% across presets, while the drop from 1440p to 4K is steeper at approximately 41%, which is typical for a GPU-bound scenario. Interestingly, the Low preset at 1080p reaches 229 FPS, which is only 17 FPS below the 240 Hz ceiling commonly targeted by competitive players, suggesting that the CPU can feed the GPU adequately even at high frame rates. The data reveals that the RTX 5090 D is the dominant factor at 4K, where the GPU's raw compute (104.8 TFLOPS FP32) is fully utilized, but at 1080p the Ryzen 5 7600's single-thread performance (3dmark_single_thread score of 999) may start to cap the maximum achievable frames, as evidenced by the 31 FPS difference between High and Low at 1080p being smaller than the 61 FPS difference at 4K.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Rust at 4K Ultra settings above 60 FPS?
A: Yes, the data shows an average of 61 FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, which is exactly at the playable threshold. While this is the lowest average across all tested configurations, it still clears the 60 FPS requirement, making 4K Ultra technically playable, though with minimal headroom for frame drops.
Q: What is the maximum average FPS achievable with this combo?
A: The highest recorded average is 229 FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings. This is the peak throughput of the pairing, likely limited by the CPU's single-thread performance rather than the GPU, as the RTX 5090 D is capable of far higher frame rates in less CPU-bound titles.
Q: How does the RTX 5090 D compare to its nearest rivals in this game?
A: The GPU's nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT, has an average benchmark score of 76,904, which is 1.1% lower than the RTX 5090 D's 77,712 average. The AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT scores 78,940, which is 1.6% higher, indicating that the RTX 5090 D sits in a close performance band with these mobile-class graphics solutions, despite being a desktop flagship.
Q: Is the Ryzen 5 7600 a bottleneck for the RTX 5090 D in Rust?
A: The data suggests partial bottlenecking at lower resolutions. At 1080p, the difference between Low (229 FPS) and High (186 FPS) is 43 FPS, while at 4K the same preset gap is 61 FPS. This narrower spread at 1080p indicates the CPU limits frame output, as the GPU is less stressed and becomes increasingly dependent on the CPU's single-thread score of 999 in the 3dmark_single_thread test.
Q: What is the most stable setting for consistent frame times?
A: The Medium preset at 3840x2160 shows the tightest min/max range, with 81 FPS minimum and 109 FPS maximum, a 28 FPS variance. This suggests that Medium settings provide the most predictable frame delivery at 4K, which is valuable for maintaining smooth gameplay in a survival title where sudden frame drops can be disruptive.
Q: How does this combo rank among all tested combinations?
A: The combination ranks 62nd out of 3,723 tested combos, placing it in the top 1.7% of all configurations. This high percentile is driven by the GPU's 92nd percentile ranking among all GPUs, while the CPU's 78th percentile among all CPUs still contributes to a strong overall package.
Best Settings per Resolution
For players prioritizing visual fidelity while maintaining at least 60 FPS, the most demanding preset that stays at or above the threshold is Ultra at every resolution. At 3840x2160, Ultra settings deliver an average of 61 FPS, which is the bare minimum for playability, so this is the only resolution where players might consider dropping to High (80 FPS) for additional headroom. The data shows that High settings at 4K provide a 31% FPS buffer over the threshold, making it a safer choice for uneven gameplay moments. At 2560x1440, Ultra settings average 103 FPS, providing a comfortable 43 FPS cushion above the 60 FPS threshold, which allows for full graphical fidelity without worrying about dips below playability. At 1920x1080, Ultra settings reach 150 FPS, which is 150% above the threshold, meaning players can enable every visual option and still enjoy frame rates that are suitable for high-refresh-rate monitors. The Medium preset is also worth noting at 1080p, offering 197 FPS with a 167 FPS minimum, which could be preferable for those who want a higher frame rate floor than the 150 FPS average of Ultra.
The Verdict
This PC can absolutely run Rust, and the benchmark data confirms that it exceeds the 60 FPS playable threshold at every resolution and setting combination tested. The verdict by resolution is unambiguous: at 3840x2160, all four presets (High, Low, Medium, Ultra) are playable, with Ultra averaging 61 FPS and Low reaching 141 FPS. At 2560x1440, the same four presets are playable, with Ultra averaging 103 FPS and Low hitting 202 FPS. At 1920x1080, all presets are playable, with Ultra at 150 FPS and Low at 229 FPS. The only caveat is 4K Ultra, where the 61 FPS average leaves no margin for error, but even that setting technically clears the bar. The combination of the Ryzen 5 7600 (12 threads, 32 MB L3 cache) and the RTX 5090 D (32 GB GDDR7, 512-bit bus) proves capable of running Rust at maximum settings in all resolutions, making it a versatile system for both competitive and immersive play. Data shows the GPU's 92nd percentile ranking and the CPU's 78th percentile ranking combine to place this system well above the median for gaming performance in this title.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Based on the nearestRivals data for both components, several alternative configurations would behave similarly in Rust. For the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX has an average benchmark score of 26,274, which is 0.2% higher than the Ryzen 5 7600's 26,324, making it a nearly identical performer for this game. The AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS scores 26,402, which is 0.3% higher, while the Intel Core i9-11900KF scores 26,212, 0.4% lower, and the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U scores 26,187, 0.5% lower. These results indicate that any of these CPUs would produce within 0.5% of the Ryzen 5 7600's frame rates, meaning the choice between them has negligible impact on Rust performance. For the GPU, the AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT has an average score of 76,904, which is 1.1% higher than the RTX 5090 D's 77,712, so it would deliver nearly identical FPS in Rust. The AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT scores 78,940, 1.6% higher, and the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB scores 79,396, 2.1% higher, while the 16 GB version scores 79,605, 2.4% higher. These deltas are all within a 3.5% band, so swapping the RTX 5090 D for any of these GPUs would result in frame rates that are statistically indistinguishable in practical gameplay. A user considering a build with any of these rival components can expect similar Rust performance, with the caveat that the Tesla P100 variants are data-center cards without display outputs, making them unsuitable for direct gaming use despite their benchmark proximity.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D ranks 62nd out of 3,723 tested combos in Rust, placing it in the 98.3rd percentile of all configurations. This high rank is attributable to the GPU's exceptional 92nd percentile performance among all GPUs, which drives the majority of the frame rate in this title, especially at higher resolutions. The CPU's 78th percentile ranking is less influential but still contributes to the overall score, as Rust's simulation and physics workloads (reflected in the passmark_physics score of 1776) benefit from the 6-core, 12-thread design. The rank implies that this system outperforms the vast majority of tested configurations, with only 61 other combos delivering higher average frame rates. Given that the GPU's nearest rivals are within 2.4% in benchmark scores, the ranking is likely sensitive to the CPU pairing; swapping the Ryzen 5 7600 for a higher-scoring CPU could push the combo higher, while a weaker CPU would drop it. The data suggests that this rank is primarily GPU-driven, as the RTX 5090 D's 32 GB of GDDR7 memory and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth provides ample headroom for Rust's large world streaming, which is a known performance factor in survival games.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark data reveals a shifting balance between CPU and GPU influence across resolutions. At 3840x2160, the GPU is the clear dominant component, as the frame rates drop sharply with increased settings: from 141 FPS on Low to 61 FPS on Ultra, a 57% reduction. This steep scaling indicates that the RTX 5090 D's computational resources (104.8 TFLOPS FP32) are the primary determinant of performance, and the CPU's role is minimized because the GPU is fully saturated at this resolution. The Medium preset at 4K shows a min/max of 81 to 109 FPS, suggesting the GPU handles the workload with consistent timing. At 2560x1440, the balance shifts slightly toward the CPU, as the frame rate scaling from Low (202 FPS) to Ultra (103 FPS) is a 49% drop, which is less severe than at 4K. This indicates that the CPU begins to exert more influence, as the GPU has more spare capacity at this resolution. The Medium preset's min/max of 136 to 185 FPS shows a wider variance, which is a sign of CPU involvement in frame pacing. At 1920x1080, the CPU becomes the limiting factor, particularly at lower settings where the GPU is barely stressed. The difference between Low (229 FPS) and Ultra (150 FPS) is only 34%, the smallest relative drop across all resolutions, which suggests the Ryzen 5 7600's single-thread performance (3dmark_single_thread score of 999) caps the maximum frame rate. The Medium preset at 1080p has the widest min/max spread (167 to 226 FPS), indicating that the CPU's thread scheduling and memory bandwidth (83.2 GB/s) are the bottlenecks at this resolution. The data implies that for 4K gaming, users should focus on GPU settings, while at 1080p, CPU performance is equally important for achieving the highest possible frame rates. The Ryzen 5 7600's 65 W TDP and 32 MB L3 cache provide sufficient throughput for most scenarios, but the 229 FPS ceiling at 1080p Low suggests that a higher-clocked CPU could extract more performance from the RTX 5090 D in this title.