Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

85%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
231 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
141 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
204 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
96 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
135 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
58 FPS
5.5ms Frame Time
8ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 26,324
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 79,842

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 58 75 93 135
1440p QHD 96 130 154 204
1080p Full HD 141 183 200 231

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 183
1920x1080 Low 231
1920x1080 Medium 200
1920x1080 Ultra 141
2560x1440 High 130
2560x1440 Low 204
2560x1440 Medium 154
2560x1440 Ultra 96
3840x2160 High 75
3840x2160 Low 135
3840x2160 Medium 93
3840x2160 Ultra 58

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 delivers a dominant Rust experience across all tested resolutions, with the data showing that every setting from Low to High clears the 60 FPS playable threshold at 4K, and the Ultra preset only falls short at that single resolution. This combination ranks in the top 2.4% of all tested configurations, placing it 88th out of 3,723 combos, and the benchmark results indicate that the system is heavily GPU-bound at higher resolutions while the CPU becomes a notable factor only at 1080p.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system produces exceptional frame rates that exceed the refresh rate of most standard monitors. The Low preset yields an average of 231.2 FPS, which is the highest recorded figure in the entire dataset. Moving to Medium drops the average to 200.1 FPS, a decrease of 31.1 FPS or roughly 13.4% from Low. The High preset further reduces performance to 183.4 FPS, while the Ultra preset delivers 141.1 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p represents a 90.1 FPS difference, indicating that the Ultra preset demands significantly more GPU resources but still maintains a massive performance cushion above the 60 FPS threshold.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates remain highly competitive. The Low preset achieves 204 FPS, which is 27.2 FPS lower than the 1080p Low result. Medium produces 153.6 FPS, High reaches 129.5 FPS, and Ultra settles at 96 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1440p is 108 FPS, slightly larger than at 1080p due to the increased pixel count amplifying the GPU workload. All four presets comfortably exceed 60 FPS, with the Ultra preset still maintaining a 36 FPS margin above the playable threshold.

At 3840x2160, the data reveals the first signs of strain. The Low preset delivers 135.2 FPS, which remains excellent for 4K gaming. Medium drops to 92.7 FPS, and High produces 75.2 FPS. The Ultra preset, however, falls below the playable threshold at 57.8 FPS, marking the only configuration in the entire dataset that fails to hit 60 FPS. The transition from 1440p to 4K at Ultra causes a 38.2 FPS reduction, demonstrating that the 4K Ultra preset is the breaking point for this combination.

Across all resolutions, the Low preset consistently shows the smallest performance penalty from resolution scaling. The 1080p to 4K drop for Low is 96 FPS, while the same resolution change at Ultra costs 83.3 FPS. This pattern indicates that the Ultra preset is more sensitive to resolution increases, likely due to the additional shading and post-processing effects that scale with pixel count.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Rust at 4K Ultra settings?

A: No. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 57.8 FPS, which falls 2.2 FPS below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The verdictByResolution data lists only High, Low, and Medium as playable at 4K.

Q: What is the best playable 4K preset?

A: The High preset is the best 4K option, delivering an average of 75.2 FPS. This provides a 15.2 FPS margin above the 60 FPS threshold while offering superior visual quality compared to the Medium preset at 92.7 FPS.

Q: How much performance is gained by dropping from High to Low at 1440p?

A: The Low preset at 2560x1440 produces 204 FPS, which is 74.5 FPS higher than the High preset at 129.5 FPS. This represents a 57.5% performance increase from High to Low at that resolution.

Q: Does the Ultra preset ever hit 60 FPS?

A: Yes, but only at 2560x1440 and 1920x1080. At 1440p, Ultra averages 96 FPS, and at 1080p, it averages 141.1 FPS. The Ultra preset fails to reach 60 FPS only at 3840x2160.

Q: What is the maximum FPS recorded in the dataset?

A: The highest measured average is 231.2 FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings. The lowest recorded average is 57.8 FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, giving a total range of 173.4 FPS across all tested configurations.

Q: How does the combo rank compare to other tested systems?

A: This configuration ranks 88th out of 3,723 tested combos, placing it in the top 2.4% of all systems. This high ranking reflects the combination's strong performance across the majority of tested settings.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data shows a clear division of labor between the Ryzen 5 7600 and the RTX 5090 depending on resolution. At 1080p, the CPU's influence becomes more apparent because the GPU has fewer pixels to process, allowing the processor to become a more significant factor in frame delivery. The Ryzen 5 7600's 6-core, 12-thread configuration with a 5.10 GHz boost clock provides enough headroom to feed the RTX 5090, as evidenced by the 231.2 FPS Low preset result at 1080p. However, the CPU's single-thread performance, reflected in its 3DMark single-thread score of 999, caps the maximum frame rate potential at lower resolutions.

As resolution increases, the GPU workload scales disproportionately. The transition from 1080p to 1440p at High settings results in a 53.9 FPS drop (from 183.4 to 129.5), and the further transition to 4K at High costs another 54.3 FPS (from 129.5 to 75.2). This consistent decline of roughly 54 FPS per resolution step indicates that the RTX 5090's fill rate and memory bandwidth are the primary constraints at higher resolutions. The GPU's 32 GB of GDDR7 memory and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth, however, prevent any memory capacity-related bottlenecks, allowing the system to maintain playable frame rates at 4K High.

The settings scaling further illuminates the GPU's dominant role. At 4K, the difference between Low and Ultra presets is 77.4 FPS (135.2 vs 57.8), while at 1080p, the same preset difference is 90.1 FPS (231.2 vs 141.1). The larger absolute gap at 1080p suggests that the CPU can keep the GPU busy even at Low settings, but the Ultra preset introduces enough additional GPU work to reduce frame rates substantially. The data indicates that the Ryzen 5 7600 is sufficient for this game at all tested resolutions, as frame rates scale predictably with GPU load rather than showing CPU-limited plateaus.

The Verdict

This PC can absolutely run Rust, with the data showing playable performance in 11 out of the 12 tested configurations. At 1920x1080, all four presets clear 60 FPS, with the Ultra preset achieving 141.1 FPS, providing a smooth experience on high-refresh-rate monitors. At 2560x1440, all four presets also exceed 60 FPS, with Ultra at 96 FPS offering both visual fidelity and performance. At 3840x2160, the High preset at 75.2 FPS is the recommended choice, as it balances visual quality with a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold. The only configuration that fails to meet the playable threshold is 4K Ultra at 57.8 FPS, which is 2.2 FPS short. Users targeting 4K should select the High preset to avoid the sub-60 FPS dip, while those at 1080p or 1440p can freely use any preset without concern. The verdictByResolution data confirms this assessment, listing High, Low, and Medium as playable at 4K, and all four presets as playable at both 1440p and 1080p.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the nearest rivals to the Ryzen 5 7600, based on average benchmark scores, include the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX with a score of 26,274 and a delta of 0.2%, meaning it performs within a negligible margin. The Intel Core i9-11900KF scores 26,212 with a delta of 0.4%, while the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U scores 26,187 with a delta of 0.5%. The AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS comes in slightly higher at 26,402 with a delta of -0.3%. These processors would behave nearly identically to the Ryzen 5 7600 in Rust, given that they all fall within a 0.8% performance band. The Ryzen 7 7435HS is the closest match, being 0.3% faster, while the other three are between 0.2% and 0.5% slower.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals to the RTX 5090 include the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB with a score of 79,605 and a delta of 0.3%, the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB at 79,396 with a delta of 0.6%, and the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT at 78,940 with a delta of 1.1%. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X is slightly faster at 80,959 with a delta of -1.4%. These alternative GPUs would deliver similar frame rates in Rust, with the Tesla P100 models being the closest analogues to the RTX 5090 in raw compute terms. The RX 6850M XT, while 1.1% slower, would still produce nearly identical results in this game.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 combination ranks 88th out of 3,723 tested combos in Rust, placing it in the 97.6th percentile of all configurations. This is an exceptionally high ranking that reflects the system's ability to deliver high frame rates across most settings and resolutions. The ranking is somewhat surprising given that the CPU's 78th percentile ranking among all processors is lower than the GPU's 92nd percentile among all GPUs, suggesting that the GPU carries the performance load in this game. The data shows that the combo's strength lies in its consistency: it achieves playable frame rates at every resolution except 4K Ultra, and even that failure is marginal at 57.8 FPS. The top-2.4% ranking indicates that very few tested systems can outperform this configuration, and those that do likely employ even more powerful CPUs or more optimized memory configurations. For Rust specifically, this combo represents a high-end solution that will satisfy almost any user, with the only caveat being the 4K Ultra preset. The benchmark results indicate that users seeking the absolute highest visual quality at 4K would need to either accept the 57.8 FPS average or reduce the resolution to 1440p, where Ultra delivers 96 FPS with a 38.2 FPS margin over the 4K Ultra result.