Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Rust
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 20 | 28 | 33 | 44 |
| 1440p QHD | 33 | 45 | 51 | 76 |
| 1080p Full HD | 51 | 66 | 77 | 111 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Rust at 1080p?
A: Yes. At 1920x1080, the combination of an AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 delivers playable frame rates on Low, Medium, and High presets. The High preset averages 65.8 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold. Ultra falls short at 51.4 FPS.
Q: What is the best playable setting at 1440p?
A: At 2560x1440, the only preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Low, which averages 76.4 FPS. Medium drops to 50.7 FPS, High to 44.6 FPS, and Ultra to 33.3 FPS, making them unplayable under the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: Is 4K playable with this hardware?
A: No. At 3840x2160, even the Low preset only reaches 43.7 FPS. Medium averages 33 FPS, High 27.8 FPS, and Ultra 19.9 FPS. None of these meet the 60 FPS playable threshold, so 4K is not recommended for this game with this combo.
Q: How much performance difference is there between Low and Ultra at 1080p?
A: The gap is substantial. Low averages 110.7 FPS, while Ultra averages 51.4 FPS. That is a difference of 59.3 FPS, or roughly 2.2 times higher frame rates on Low compared to Ultra.
Q: Which component is the stronger part of this pairing?
A: The CPU is significantly stronger than the GPU in relative terms. The Ryzen 5 7600 sits at the 78th percentile among all CPUs, while the GTX 1070 sits at the 47th percentile among all GPUs. This suggests the GPU is the limiting factor in most scenarios.
Q: How does this combo rank among tested systems?
A: The combination ranks 3077th out of 3723 tested combos for Rust, placing it in the lower portion of the database. This reflects the aging GPU paired with a modern mid-range CPU.
CPU and GPU Roles
The recorded data shows a clear pattern: the GPU is the dominant constraint at higher resolutions and settings, while the CPU has enough headroom to keep up with most demands. The Ryzen 5 7600, with 6 cores and 12 threads, sits at the 78th percentile among all CPUs, which indicates strong single-threaded and multi-threaded capability. The GTX 1070, however, sits at just the 47th percentile among all GPUs, meaning roughly half of all GPUs in the database outperform it.
At 1920x1080, the frame rates scale steeply with preset quality. Low averages 110.7 FPS, Medium 76.7 FPS, High 65.8 FPS, and Ultra 51.4 FPS. The drop from Low to Ultra is 59.3 FPS, or 53.6 percent of the Low value. This scaling pattern suggests that at 1080p, the GPU is doing most of the work, and lowering settings directly relieves its load. The CPU is not the bottleneck here, as even the most demanding preset stays above 50 FPS.
Moving to 2560x1440, the same preset ladder shows a similar but compressed curve. Low averages 76.4 FPS, Medium 50.7 FPS, High 44.6 FPS, and Ultra 33.3 FPS. The percentage drop from Low to Ultra is 56.4 percent of the Low value, which is slightly worse than at 1080p. The higher pixel count increases the GPU load, and the GTX 1070 begins to struggle beyond the Low preset.
At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly the limiting factor. Low averages 43.7 FPS, Medium 33 FPS, High 27.8 FPS, and Ultra 19.9 FPS. Even the least demanding preset fails to reach 60 FPS. The CPU's performance percentile suggests it is not the bottleneck at 4K, as the frame rates are driven almost entirely by the GPU's rendering capability. The data indicates that the Ryzen 5 7600 can feed the GTX 1070 adequately, but the GPU simply cannot sustain playable frame rates at this resolution.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combination delivers a wide range of performance depending on the preset. The Low preset averages 110.7 FPS, which is the highest recorded value across all resolutions and settings. Medium averages 76.7 FPS, High averages 65.8 FPS, and Ultra averages 51.4 FPS. The minimum and maximum frame rates are not recorded in the data, so only the averages can be cited.
At 2560x1440, the frame rates drop across the board. Low averages 76.4 FPS, Medium averages 50.7 FPS, High averages 44.6 FPS, and Ultra averages 33.3 FPS. The difference between Low and Medium is 25.7 FPS, which is the largest single-step drop at this resolution. The gap between Medium and High is smaller at 6.1 FPS, while the gap between High and Ultra is 11.3 FPS.
At 3840x2160, the performance is consistently below the playable threshold. Low averages 43.7 FPS, Medium averages 33 FPS, High averages 27.8 FPS, and Ultra averages 19.9 FPS. The scaling from Low to Medium is a drop of 10.7 FPS, from Medium to High a drop of 5.2 FPS, and from High to Ultra a drop of 7.9 FPS. The data shows a relatively linear degradation as settings increase, with no preset able to reach 60 FPS.
The overall pattern across all resolutions is that the Low preset offers the highest frame rates, followed by Medium, High, and finally Ultra. The gaps between presets vary by resolution, but the ordering is consistent.
The Verdict
The data shows that this PC can run Rust at 1080p and 1440p, but only under specific conditions. At 1920x1080, the playable presets are Low, Medium, and High, with High being the most demanding playable option at 65.8 FPS. Ultra is not playable at 51.4 FPS, which falls short of the 60 FPS threshold. At 2560x1440, only the Low preset is playable, averaging 76.4 FPS. Medium, High, and Ultra all fail to reach 60 FPS, with values of 50.7, 44.6, and 33.3 FPS respectively.
At 3840x2160, there are no playable presets. The best result is Low at 43.7 FPS, which is still 16.3 FPS below the playable threshold. Medium, High, and Ultra are progressively worse, with the Ultra preset averaging just 19.9 FPS. The verdict is clear: this hardware is suitable for 1080p gaming on high settings, and for 1440p only if the player is willing to use Low settings. 4K is not viable for this game with this combination.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Looking at the nearest rivals for the CPU, the Ryzen 5 7600 is closely matched by several other processors. The AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX has an average benchmark score of 26274, which is 0.2 percent higher than the Ryzen 5 7600's score of 26324. The AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS scores 26402, which is 0.3 percent higher. The Intel Core i9-11900KF scores 26212, which is 0.4 percent lower, and the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U scores 26187, which is 0.5 percent lower. These deltas are all within one percent, meaning any of these CPUs would deliver nearly identical performance in Rust when paired with the same GPU.
For the GPU, the GTX 1070 has an average benchmark score of 9780. Its nearest rivals are the AMD FirePro W5000 with a score of 9803 (0.2 percent higher), the NVIDIA Quadro M2000M with a score of 9832 (0.5 percent higher), the NVIDIA Tesla M10 with a score of 9724 (0.6 percent lower), and the NVIDIA Tesla C2070 with a score of 9716 (0.7 percent lower). These alternatives would produce frame rates within a similar range to the GTX 1070, though the professional-grade cards may lack gaming-specific optimizations.
The practical implication is that swapping the Ryzen 5 7600 for any of its nearest CPU rivals would result in negligible frame rate differences in Rust. Similarly, swapping the GTX 1070 for one of its nearest GPU rivals would not meaningfully change the playable settings or resolutions identified in the verdict.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is High, which averages 65.8 FPS. This is the recommended setting for players who want the best visual quality while maintaining smooth gameplay. Medium and Low are also playable, but they offer lower visual fidelity without a significant frame rate advantage over High.
At 2560x1440, the only preset that clears the 60 FPS threshold is Low, averaging 76.4 FPS. This is the best playable setting for this resolution, as Medium drops to 50.7 FPS, which is below the playable threshold. Players at 1440p must accept Low settings to maintain playable frame rates with this hardware.
At 3840x2160, there is no applicable best setting, as no preset reaches 60 FPS. The data records no playable settings and no best settings for this resolution, meaning the hardware is not suitable for 4K gaming in Rust. Players should lower the resolution to 1440p or 1080p to achieve playable performance.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 ranks 3077th out of 3723 tested combos for Rust. This places it in the lower 17.4 percent of all tested systems, meaning roughly 646 combos perform worse and about 3076 perform better. The rank reflects the significant imbalance between a modern mid-range CPU and an older mid-range GPU.
The CPU's 78th percentile standing among all CPUs suggests it is not the reason for the low rank. The GPU's 47th percentile standing among all GPUs, combined with the game's demanding rendering requirements, is the primary factor. The data indicates that players with this combo will get playable performance at 1080p on high settings and 1440p on low settings, but the system is not positioned to handle higher resolutions or more demanding presets. For Rust specifically, this combo is a capable 1080p machine that can be pushed to 1440p only by sacrificing visual quality.