Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

86%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
133 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
57 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
92 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
39 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
54 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
23 FPS
13.3ms Frame Time
20ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 44,573
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 23,021

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 23 31 36 54
1440p QHD 39 52 61 92
1080p Full HD 57 75 89 133

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 75
1920x1080 Low 133
1920x1080 Medium 89
1920x1080 Ultra 57
2560x1440 High 52
2560x1440 Low 92
2560x1440 Medium 61
2560x1440 Ultra 39
3840x2160 High 31
3840x2160 Low 54
3840x2160 Medium 36
3840x2160 Ultra 23

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D + Intel Arc B580 is a capable pairing for Rust, but its playability is strictly resolution-bound. At 1080p and 1440p, the combo delivers smooth, above-60 FPS experiences on medium-to-high presets, while 4K remains largely out of reach, with even Low settings failing to hold 60 FPS. Benchmark data confirms this system is best suited for 1440p gaming, where it hits a 61 FPS average at Medium settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

3840x2160 (4K): The data shows a steep performance cliff at 4K. At Low settings, the average FPS is 54, already below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Medium settings drop the average to 36 FPS, with minimums of 31 FPS and maximums of 42 FPS. High settings yield a 31 FPS average, and Ultra is nearly unplayable at 23 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 31 FPS, indicating that the GPU is heavily taxed at this resolution across all presets.

2560x1440 (1440p): Performance improves markedly at 1440p. Low settings produce a 92 FPS average, well above the 60 FPS threshold. Medium settings hold a 61 FPS average, with minimums at 52 FPS and maximums at 71 FPS. High settings drop to 52 FPS average, and Ultra falls to 39 FPS. The step from Low to Medium is a 31 FPS reduction, while the step from Medium to High is a smaller 9 FPS reduction, suggesting diminishing returns as settings rise.

1920x1080 (1080p): This resolution shows the strongest results. Low settings deliver a 133 FPS average, which is more than double the 4K Low score. Medium settings maintain an 89 FPS average, with minimums at 76 FPS and maximums at 103 FPS. High settings hold a 75 FPS average, and Ultra drops to 57 FPS, just under the 60 FPS threshold. The 1080p Medium result of 89 FPS is 28 FPS higher than the 1440p Medium result, highlighting the resolution scaling.

Across all resolutions, the pattern is consistent: Low settings offer the highest headroom, Medium provides the best balance of quality and performance, and Ultra is only viable at 1080p where it still falls short of 60 FPS. The measured data includes min/max figures only for Medium presets at each resolution, with 1080p Medium showing a 76-103 FPS range, 1440p Medium showing 52-71 FPS, and 4K Medium showing 31-42 FPS. These ranges indicate frame pacing is stable at 1080p and 1440p Medium, but 4K Medium suffers from significant drops.

Best Settings per Resolution

3840x2160: No preset achieves the 60 FPS threshold. The closest is Low at 54 FPS average, which is 6 FPS short of playable. Medium and High averages of 36 and 31 FPS respectively are far below target, and Ultra at 23 FPS is not viable. The verdict data lists no playable settings for 4K.

2560x1440: The most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Medium, with an average of 61 FPS. This is the best playable setting, as Low also clears the threshold at 92 FPS but offers lower visual quality. High at 52 FPS and Ultra at 39 FPS fall below the playable threshold. The 61 FPS average at Medium is a marginal pass, with minimums at 52 FPS indicating occasional dips below 60 FPS.

1920x1080: The most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is High, with an average of 75 FPS. This provides a comfortable margin above the threshold. Medium at 89 FPS and Low at 133 FPS also clear 60 FPS, but High offers the best visual fidelity while maintaining playability. Ultra at 57 FPS misses the threshold by 3 FPS, making it the only non-viable preset at this resolution.

The recommendation is clear: use High at 1080p and Medium at 1440p. At 4K, no setting is recommended for a 60 FPS experience.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark results indicate that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at 4K, while the CPU becomes more relevant at lower resolutions. At 4K, scaling from Low to Ultra reduces average FPS from 54 to 23, a 57% drop. This dramatic reduction shows the Intel Arc B580 is saturated by the high pixel count, regardless of the Ryzen 5 7500X3D's capabilities. The CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 25047 and single-thread score of 3494 suggest ample processing power, but the GPU cannot feed frames fast enough at 4K.

At 1440p, the scaling from Low to Ultra is from 92 to 39 FPS, a 58% reduction. The Medium preset at 61 FPS shows the GPU is still the limiting factor, but the CPU's 96 MB shared L3 cache and 6 cores/12 threads help maintain frame pacing, as evidenced by the 52-71 FPS range at Medium. The 1440p results show less CPU sensitivity than 1080p, where the 133 FPS Low score indicates the CPU can push well beyond the GPU's limits at lower pixel counts.

At 1080p, the Low preset's 133 FPS average is more than double the 4K Low score, demonstrating that the GPU scales effectively with reduced resolution. The CPU's role becomes more apparent here: the 75 FPS High score and 57 FPS Ultra score suggest that at higher settings, the GPU load increases, but the CPU's 4.50 GHz boost clock and 12 threads are sufficient to avoid bottlenecking. The 1080p Medium range of 76-103 FPS shows tight frame times, indicating balanced CPU-GPU utilization.

The resolution scaling data confirms that the Ryzen 5 7500X3D is not the limiting factor at any resolution. The GPU's 13.67 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 456.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are the key constraints at 4K, while the CPU's 89th percentile ranking among all CPUs ensures it can feed the GPU adequately at 1080p and 1440p.

The Verdict

This PC can run Rust, but the experience depends entirely on the target resolution. At 1920x1080, the system is playable at High settings with a 75 FPS average, and also at Low and Medium with 133 and 89 FPS respectively. The only non-playable 1080p preset is Ultra at 57 FPS, which misses the 60 FPS threshold by a narrow margin. This makes 1080p the most versatile resolution for this combo.

At 2560x1440, the system is playable at Low and Medium settings, with Medium at 61 FPS being the best visual option. High at 52 FPS and Ultra at 39 FPS are below the threshold. The 61 FPS average at Medium is a marginal pass, so players should expect occasional dips to 52 FPS during intense scenes. For a smoother experience, Low at 92 FPS offers significant headroom.

At 3840x2160, the system cannot play Rust at 60 FPS on any preset. The best result is Low at 54 FPS, which is 6 FPS short of playable. Medium at 36 FPS, High at 31 FPS, and Ultra at 23 FPS are all unplayable. The verdict data confirms no playable settings at 4K.

The overall verdict is positive for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with the system delivering a solid 75 FPS average at 1080p High and a workable 61 FPS average at 1440p Medium. 4K is not viable for this game with this hardware combination.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Rust at 60 FPS on 1920x1080?

A: Yes, at High settings the average FPS is 75, which is above the 60 FPS threshold. Low and Medium settings also clear 60 FPS with 133 and 89 FPS averages respectively.

Q: What is the best playable setting at 2560x1440?

A: The most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Medium, with a 61 FPS average. This is the recommended setting for 1440p, as Low at 92 FPS is also playable but offers lower visual quality.

Q: Is 4K playable with the Intel Arc B580 and Ryzen 5 7500X3D?

A: No. At 3840x2160, the highest average FPS is 54 at Low settings, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Medium, High, and Ultra all score below 40 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500X3D has an average benchmark score of 44573, which is 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core i9-13950HX, and 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385. It trails the Intel Core i5-14600 by 0.7%.

Q: Does the GPU bottleneck the CPU at 1080p?

A: At 1080p Low, the 133 FPS average suggests the GPU is well-utilized, while the 57 FPS Ultra score indicates the GPU is the limiting factor at high settings. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking ensures it is not the primary bottleneck at this resolution.

Q: What frame rates can I expect at 1440p Medium?

A: The measured data shows a 61 FPS average, with minimums of 52 FPS and maximums of 71 FPS. This indicates stable performance with occasional dips below the 60 FPS threshold.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D + Intel Arc B580 combination ranks 2815 out of 3723 tested combos for Rust, placing it in the 76th percentile of all tested systems. This rank reflects the system's strong 1080p and 1440p performance but its weakness at 4K. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking among all CPUs and the GPU's 68th percentile ranking among all GPUs combine to produce a mid-tier result for this specific game.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 23021 places it near the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, which scores 22895 (0.6% lower), and slightly below the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP at 23061 (0.2% higher). The GPU also trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 by 0.7% and the NVIDIA P106-100 by 1%. This positioning explains why the combo cannot handle 4K Rust, as the GPU's performance is comparable to older high-end cards rather than current flagship models.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 44573 is competitive with recent mobile and desktop parts, but its ranking among all CPUs at 89th percentile is strong. The rank of 2815 out of 3723 combos suggests that while this specific pairing is capable for 1080p and 1440p gaming, it is not optimized for 4K. Players targeting 4K should consider a more powerful GPU, while those sticking to 1080p or 1440p will find this combo adequate for Rust at medium-to-high settings.