Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

83%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
226 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
107 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
165 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
74 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
101 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
44 FPS
7.2ms Frame Time
11ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 24,964
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 40,377

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 44 58 65 101
1440p QHD 74 97 115 165
1080p Full HD 107 139 165 226

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 139
1920x1080 Low 226
1920x1080 Medium 165
1920x1080 Ultra 107
2560x1440 High 97
2560x1440 Low 165
2560x1440 Medium 115
2560x1440 Ultra 74
3840x2160 High 58
3840x2160 Low 101
3840x2160 Medium 65
3840x2160 Ultra 44

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 delivers a strong performance profile for Rust, with benchmark data showing playable frame rates across all tested resolutions, though the headroom varies significantly between 4K and 1080p. The measured FPS data indicates that this combination excels at 1440p and 1080p, where even the most demanding preset clears the 60 FPS threshold with substantial margin, while 4K requires a compromise on settings to maintain smooth gameplay. The following analysis breaks down the measured results, component roles, and how this combo stacks against other tested configurations.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that maintains an average of at least 60 FPS is Medium, which produces an average of 64.6 FPS. The High preset falls just short of the playable threshold at 58.4 FPS average, while Ultra drops to 43.7 FPS and is not recommended for 4K gameplay. Low settings at this resolution deliver 101 FPS average, providing a comfortable margin for competitive play if visual fidelity is less of a priority.

At 2560x1440, the data shows that all four tested presets clear the 60 FPS bar, allowing the Ultra preset to be the best choice with an average of 73.8 FPS. This gives players the full visual experience without dropping below the playable threshold. The High preset achieves 96.6 FPS, Medium reaches 115 FPS, and Low peaks at 165.4 FPS, showing that the RTX 5070 has considerable headroom at this resolution for higher refresh rate monitors.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the most demanding option that stays above 60 FPS, delivering an average of 106.9 FPS. This is the optimal choice for players prioritizing visual quality at 1080p. The High preset reaches 138.6 FPS, Medium hits 165.1 FPS, and Low produces 226.2 FPS, all of which are well above the playable threshold and suitable for high-refresh-rate displays. The verdict data confirms that 1080p and 1440p support all presets, while 4K is limited to Low and Medium for playable performance.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance scaling across resolutions indicates that the GPU becomes the dominant factor as resolution increases, while the CPU's role is more pronounced at lower resolutions where frame rates are higher. At 1920x1080, the difference between Low and Ultra settings is 119.3 FPS (226.2 vs 106.9), showing that the GPU has enough headroom to be heavily influenced by graphical settings. The Ryzen 5 7500F, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, provides sufficient processing power to keep up with the RTX 5070 at this resolution, as evidenced by the high frame rates achieved even at Ultra settings.

Moving to 2560x1440, the gap between Low and Ultra narrows to 91.6 FPS (165.4 vs 73.8), indicating that the GPU is beginning to become more of a limiting factor as pixel count increases. The CPU's influence diminishes slightly, but the 7500F still holds up well, with the Ultra preset maintaining 73.8 FPS. At 3840x2160, the gap between Low and Ultra shrinks further to 57.3 FPS (101 vs 43.7), and the GPU is clearly the primary bottleneck. The CPU's role is less critical at this resolution, since the frame rates are lower and the GPU is working harder to render each frame.

The scaling from 1080p to 4K at the same settings shows a consistent pattern: the GPU becomes more dominant at higher resolutions. For example, the Ultra preset drops from 106.9 FPS at 1080p to 73.8 FPS at 1440p, a 31% reduction, and then to 43.7 FPS at 4K, a further 41% reduction. This indicates that the RTX 5070's 12 GB of GDDR7 memory and 192-bit bus are the key factors at 4K, while the CPU's Zen 4 architecture plays a larger role at 1080p where frame rates are highest.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the measured average FPS values are as follows: Low settings produce 101 FPS, Medium reaches 64.6 FPS, High achieves 58.4 FPS, and Ultra drops to 43.7 FPS. The step from Low to Medium represents a 36.4 FPS decrease, while the step from Medium to High is just 6.2 FPS, and the step from High to Ultra is 14.7 FPS. This suggests that the jump from Medium to High is relatively modest in performance cost, but moving to Ultra imposes a significant penalty.

At 2560x1440, the measured averages are: Low at 165.4 FPS, Medium at 115 FPS, High at 96.6 FPS, and Ultra at 73.8 FPS. The differences between consecutive settings are 50.4 FPS (Low to Medium), 18.4 FPS (Medium to High), and 22.8 FPS (High to Ultra). This shows a more gradual performance curve compared to 4K, with each settings tier taking a more predictable toll on frame rate.

At 1920x1080, the measured averages are: Low at 226.2 FPS, Medium at 165.1 FPS, High at 138.6 FPS, and Ultra at 106.9 FPS. The gaps are 61.1 FPS (Low to Medium), 26.5 FPS (Medium to High), and 31.7 FPS (High to Ultra). The high frame rates at this resolution highlight the combo's ability to drive fast-paced gameplay, with even the Ultra preset maintaining over 100 FPS average. All measured FPS values are averages, with no separate minimum or maximum data provided in the benchmark results.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Rust at 4K resolution?

A: Yes, but only with Low or Medium settings. The Medium preset maintains an average of 64.6 FPS, while High drops to 58.4 FPS and Ultra to 43.7 FPS, both below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the best preset for 1440p gameplay?

A: The Ultra preset is the best choice at 2560x1440, delivering 73.8 FPS average. All four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) clear the 60 FPS threshold at this resolution, so players can choose based on visual preference.

Q: How much performance is gained by lowering settings from Ultra to Low at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, dropping from Ultra to Low increases the average frame rate from 106.9 FPS to 226.2 FPS, a gain of 119.3 FPS. This provides a significant boost for competitive play on high-refresh-rate monitors.

Q: Is the GPU or CPU more important for this game at 4K?

A: The data indicates the GPU is the dominant factor at 3840x2160, as the frame rate drops substantially with higher settings. The CPU, while important for maintaining frame pacing, has less influence at this resolution compared to 1080p.

Q: Which resolution provides the best balance of visual quality and performance?

A: The 2560x1440 resolution with Ultra settings offers 73.8 FPS average, which is above the playable threshold while providing high visual fidelity. This is the highest resolution where Ultra settings remain comfortably playable.

Q: Does this combo support 144 Hz gaming at 1080p?

A: Yes, at 1920x1080 with Medium settings, the average frame rate is 165.1 FPS, which exceeds 144 Hz. High settings at 138.6 FPS are close but slightly below the 144 Hz mark, while Low settings reach 226.2 FPS.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU's nearest rivals, based on average benchmark scores, include the Intel Core i7-11850H with a delta of 0.1%, the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F with a delta of -0.2%, the Intel Core i7-13620H with a delta of 0.2%, and the Intel Core 5 210H with a delta of 0.4%. These processors would produce nearly identical CPU-bound performance in Rust, with the Ryzen 5 7500F sitting at a 77th percentile ranking among all CPUs. The Intel Core i7-11850H and Core i7-13620H are particularly close in score, meaning users switching between these CPUs would see negligible differences in frame rates.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon Pro 580 with a delta of 0.1%, the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 with a delta of 0.8%, the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 with a delta of -1.2%, and the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile with a delta of 2%. The RTX 5070 ranks at the 82nd percentile among all GPUs, placing it well above average. The Radeon Pro 580 is the closest match in terms of average score, suggesting that it would deliver nearly the same FPS in Rust at the same settings and resolutions. The RTX A500 Mobile is slightly further behind at 2% delta, which would translate to a minor reduction in frame rates.

When considering the full combo, these rival components would produce similar overall performance in Rust, though the GPU differences would be more noticeable at higher resolutions. The CPU rivals would have minimal impact on frame rates, as the game's performance at 1440p and 4K is primarily GPU-bound based on the measured scaling data.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 combination ranks 630th out of 3,723 tested combos in Rust, placing it in the top 16.9% of all configurations. This ranking reflects the combo's strong performance across the board, particularly at 1080p and 1440p where it exceeds the playable threshold with significant headroom. The rank is influenced by both the CPU's 77th percentile standing and the GPU's 82nd percentile standing, which together produce a well-balanced system for this game.

The fact that this combo ranks in the 630th position out of over 3,700 combos indicates that it outperforms the majority of tested systems, but there are still many configurations that deliver higher frame rates in Rust. The ranking suggests that this is a solid mid-to-high tier setup, with the GPU being the stronger component relative to the CPU. Users looking to improve upon this ranking would likely see the most benefit from upgrading the GPU, given that the CPU is already performing at a high level relative to its peers.

The Verdict

This PC can run Rust effectively across all tested resolutions, with the verdict data confirming playable settings for each. At 3840x2160, the playable settings are Low and Medium, with Medium being the best option at 64.6 FPS average. At 2560x1440, all four presets are playable, and Ultra is the best choice at 73.8 FPS. At 1920x1080, all presets are playable, and Ultra leads with 106.9 FPS.

The system comfortably clears the 60 FPS playable threshold at 1080p and 1440p for every settings preset, providing flexibility for players who prioritize either visual quality or high frame rates. At 4K, the system requires a settings compromise, but the Medium preset still delivers a playable experience. The data shows that this combo is best suited for 1440p gaming, where it offers the full Ultra experience while maintaining a frame rate above 60 FPS. For 1080p users, the performance is exceptional, with even Ultra settings providing over 100 FPS average. The 4K experience is viable but limited to lower presets, making it a secondary option for players with 4K displays. Overall, this hardware combination provides a capable and versatile experience for Rust, with the strongest results at 1440p and 1080p.