Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Rust
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 56 | 73 | 87 | 129 |
| 1440p QHD | 94 | 124 | 147 | 198 |
| 1080p Full HD | 137 | 180 | 193 | 224 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 is a high-end combination that delivers a wide range of performance in Rust, depending on resolution and preset. The data shows this system is capable of exceeding the 60 FPS playable threshold at every tested resolution, though the margin of comfort varies significantly from the entry-level 1080p to the demanding 4K Ultra preset.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data covers three resolutions and four quality presets, providing a clear picture of how the system scales. At 1920x1080, the performance is exceptionally high across the board. The Low preset delivers an average of 224 FPS, which is the highest average recorded in the entire dataset. Moving up to High, the average drops to 180 FPS, still a massive frame rate for competitive play. The Medium preset averages 193 FPS, with a minimum of 164 FPS and a maximum of 222 FPS, showing a tight and consistent frame time distribution. The most demanding preset, Ultra, still averages a very strong 137 FPS, ensuring smooth gameplay even with maximum visual fidelity.
At 2560x1440, the performance remains impressive but begins to show the expected scaling from the increased pixel count. The Low preset averages 198 FPS, which is only a modest reduction from the 1080p result. High settings average 124 FPS, while Medium averages 147 FPS, with a minimum of 125 FPS and a maximum of 169 FPS. The Ultra preset continues to hold above the 60 FPS threshold comfortably, averaging 94 FPS. This indicates that at 1440p, the RTX 4090 has ample headroom to run the game at maximum settings without any concern for playability.
At 3840x2160, the system still performs admirably, but the strain of 4K resolution is evident. The Low preset averages 129 FPS, which is still highly playable. Medium settings average 87 FPS, with a minimum of 74 FPS and a maximum of 100 FPS, indicating that even in demanding scenes, the frame rate stays well above the playable threshold. High settings average 73 FPS, which is the best playable preset according to the verdict data. The Ultra preset at 4K drops to an average of 56 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS playability threshold and is the only tested configuration that fails to hit the target.
Best Settings per Resolution
For each resolution, there is a clear "best" preset that maximizes visual quality while maintaining an average FPS of at least 60. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the clear winner, delivering an average of 137 FPS. This means users can enable every visual enhancement Rust offers without sacrificing smoothness, as the frame rate remains far above the playable threshold.
At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset also takes the top spot. The data shows an average of 94 FPS, which is significantly above the 60 FPS target. This provides a substantial safety margin for demanding scenes or when many players are on screen, making it the recommended choice for a high-refresh-rate 1440p monitor.
The situation changes at 3840x2160. The most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is High, which averages 73 FPS. While Ultra is technically rendered, its 56 FPS average falls short of the playable threshold. Therefore, for a 4K experience, High settings are the best option to ensure consistent performance, providing a visually rich experience that remains fluid and responsive.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Rust at 4K with maximum settings?
A: No. The data shows that at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average FPS is 56, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The highest playable preset at this resolution is High, which averages 73 FPS.
Q: What is the best resolution and preset combination for the highest frame rate?
A: The highest average FPS recorded is 224 at 1920x1080 with Low settings. For a balance of visual quality and performance, the Ultra preset at 1440p, averaging 94 FPS, is a strong choice.
Q: How much of a performance drop is there from 1080p to 4K on the same preset?
A: At High settings, the average FPS drops from 180 at 1920x1080 to 73 at 3840x2160. This represents a significant reduction of approximately 59%, highlighting the heavy load that 4K rendering places on the GPU.
Q: Is the Medium preset a good option for 4K gaming?
A: Yes, the Medium preset at 3840x2160 averages 87 FPS, with a minimum of 74 FPS. This provides a smoother experience than High settings and is well above the playable threshold, making it a viable option for those who prioritize frame rate stability.
Q: Does this system ever drop below 60 FPS in the tested configurations?
A: Yes, only in one instance. The 3840x2160 Ultra preset averages 56 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. All other tested presets and resolutions maintain an average of at least 73 FPS.
Q: What is the frame time consistency like at Medium settings?
A: The data for Medium settings shows a minimum FPS of 164 at 1080p, 125 at 1440p, and 74 at 4K. The gap between average and minimum FPS is relatively small, indicating stable frame pacing with no severe stutters or drops.
The Verdict
The benchmark data clearly indicates that this system can run Rust effectively at all three tested resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system is exceptionally powerful, clearing the 60 FPS threshold with ease on every preset, including Ultra which averages 137 FPS. This makes it an ideal setup for high-refresh-rate 1080p monitors.
At 2560x1440, the performance is still outstanding. The system not only clears the 60 FPS threshold on all presets but does so with significant headroom, as the most demanding Ultra preset averages 94 FPS. This is a sweet spot for the combination, offering a great balance between visual fidelity and high frame rates.
At 3840x2160, the system remains playable but requires a compromise. The High preset, averaging 73 FPS, is the recommended choice for a smooth 4K experience. While the Ultra preset is technically rendered, its 56 FPS average falls below the playable threshold, so users seeking maximum visual quality at 4K will need to accept a sub-60 FPS experience.
Overall, this PC can run Rust exceptionally well. The only configuration that fails to meet the 60 FPS standard is 4K Ultra. For all other scenarios, the system provides a fluid and responsive experience, making it a top-tier choice for this game.
CPU and GPU Roles
Analyzing the scaling across resolutions reveals the distinct roles of the CPU and GPU in this game. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are extremely high across all presets. The jump from Low (224 FPS) to Ultra (137 FPS) shows a performance difference of 87 FPS. This relatively large gap, combined with the high absolute numbers, suggests that at this resolution, the GPU is not always the primary bottleneck. The CPU, with its strong single-thread performance, is likely keeping up well, but the workload is balanced between the two components.
As the resolution increases to 2560x1440, the frame rates decrease across the board. The Low preset falls from 224 to 198 FPS, and the Ultra preset falls from 137 to 94 FPS. This scaling pattern is a clear indicator that the GPU is becoming more of a limiting factor, as the increased pixel count demands more from the rendering hardware. The CPU's role remains important, but its performance headroom is less critical as the GPU takes on more work.
At 3840x2160, the GPU's dominance becomes even more pronounced. The frame rates drop significantly, with the Low preset averaging 129 FPS and the Ultra preset averaging 56 FPS. The substantial reduction in performance, particularly when comparing 1080p Low (224 FPS) to 4K Low (129 FPS), shows that the RTX 4090 is heavily taxed at this resolution. The CPU is still capable of feeding the GPU, but the overall performance is dictated by the GPU's ability to render the high-resolution frames. In this title, the data shows that at 1080p the CPU has a larger relative impact, while at 4K the GPU is the clear bottleneck.
How This Combo Ranks
Within the database of tested hardware combinations for Rust, this specific pairing holds a strong position. The combo ranks 130th out of 3723 tested combinations. This places it in the top 3.5% of all systems tested, highlighting its high performance level in this specific game. The high rank reflects the system's ability to maintain high frame rates across the board, with the only significant weakness being the 4K Ultra preset.
The CPU itself, the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F, performs at the 77th percentile when compared to all other CPUs. Its performance is very close to several rivals, with a negligible delta of 0.1% compared to the Intel Core i7-11850H and a -0.2% delta against the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F. This shows that the CPU's processing power is well within the expected range for modern mid-range hardware.
Similarly, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 performs at the 88th percentile among all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is 60347, which is nearly identical to the Intel Arc Pro A60, showing a delta of 0%. The combination of a highly capable, upper-percentile GPU with a solid, mid-range CPU results in a system that is well-optimized for Rust. The data confirms that this is a very strong pairing for this game, ranking near the top of the tested charts and providing a high-quality experience at all but the most extreme settings.