Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

94%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
216 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
97 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
155 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
67 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
91 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
39 FPS
7.9ms Frame Time
12ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 32,750
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 37,648

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 39 52 61 91
1440p QHD 67 88 104 155
1080p Full HD 97 127 151 216

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 127
1920x1080 Low 216
1920x1080 Medium 151
1920x1080 Ultra 97
2560x1440 High 88
2560x1440 Low 155
2560x1440 Medium 104
2560x1440 Ultra 67
3840x2160 High 52
3840x2160 Low 91
3840x2160 Medium 61
3840x2160 Ultra 39

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 combination delivers a strong performance profile for Rust, with benchmark results showing a clear scaling pattern across resolutions and presets. The data indicates that this system is capable of running the game smoothly at high frame rates on standard monitors, while 4K presents a more demanding scenario where settings must be adjusted to maintain playability. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS data, optimal settings, and component roles to provide a complete picture of what this hardware can achieve in Rust.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for this combo in Rust reveals a consistent pattern of performance degradation as resolution increases and as graphical settings are raised. At 1920x1080, the system demonstrates exceptional headroom, with the Low preset achieving an average of 216 FPS. Moving up the settings ladder, Medium delivers 151 FPS average (with a minimum of 128 and maximum of 174), High produces 127 FPS average, and Ultra still maintains a robust 97 FPS average. This resolution shows no signs of strain, indicating the CPU and GPU combination is well-balanced for 1080p gaming.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates remain highly playable but begin to show the increased pixel count's impact. The Low preset reaches 155 FPS average, while Medium delivers 104 FPS average (with a range of 88 to 120 FPS). High settings produce 88 FPS average, and Ultra drops to 67 FPS average. The minimum FPS figures at Medium (88) suggest that even during demanding scenes, the system maintains a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS playability threshold.

The 3840x2160 resolution presents the most challenging scenario. Here, the Low preset still manages 91 FPS average, which is impressive for 4K. Medium settings yield 61 FPS average (with minimum of 52 and maximum of 71), barely clearing the playability threshold. High settings fall to 52 FPS average, and Ultra drops to 39 FPS average. These numbers indicate that 4K gaming requires careful settings management, as the gap between Medium and High represents a significant 9 FPS difference that crosses the playability line.

Best Settings per Resolution

For 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which achieves an average of 97 FPS. This means users can max out all graphical options at 1080p while still enjoying a frame rate nearly 40 FPS above the playability threshold.

At 2560x1440, Ultra settings also remain playable, with an average of 67 FPS. This is the best settings choice for this resolution, as it provides the highest visual quality while still clearing the 60 FPS mark. The 67 FPS average leaves some headroom, though it is not as generous as the 1080p result.

For 3840x2160, the best settings that maintain playability are Medium, which achieves an average of 61 FPS. This is the only non-Low preset that clears 60 FPS at 4K, and it does so by a narrow margin. The minimum FPS of 52 at Medium settings does dip below the threshold, suggesting that 4K users may experience occasional stutters during intense moments, though the average remains acceptable.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F provide context for its CPU performance. The Intel Core i5-14600T scores 32,707 on average, which is 0.1% higher than the 7400F's 32,750. The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H scores 32,697, a 0.2% difference. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32,812, which is 0.2% lower than the 7400F. Finally, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 scores 32,662, a 0.3% difference. These rivals are all within a narrow performance band, meaning a system builder could expect nearly identical CPU-bound behavior in Rust from any of these processors.

For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070, the nearest rivals show similar tight clustering. The NVIDIA Tesla P4 scores 37,628 on average, just 0.1% below the RTX 4070's 37,648. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 scores 37,507, a 0.4% difference. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile scores 38,135, which is 1.3% higher, while the AMD Radeon PRO W6400 scores 37,157, a 1.3% lower score. These GPU rivals would produce nearly identical frame rates in Rust, with the RTX 4080 Mobile potentially offering a slight edge in GPU-bound scenarios.

The Verdict

The verdict data clearly shows that this PC can run Rust effectively at all three tested resolutions, though with varying levels of graphical freedom. At 1920x1080, all four presets (High, Low, Medium, Ultra) are playable, with the best settings being Ultra at 97 FPS average. At 2560x1440, the same four presets are playable, with Ultra delivering 67 FPS average. At 3840x2160, only Low and Medium are listed as playable, with Medium being the best choice at 61 FPS average.

The data indicates that this system is an excellent match for 1080p and 1440p gaming in Rust, offering full freedom to enable the highest settings without compromising frame rates. For 4K, the system can still run the game, but users must accept Medium settings to stay at or above the 60 FPS threshold. The 52 FPS average at High settings for 4K demonstrates that pushing beyond Medium at this resolution will result in performance that falls short of the playability standard.

CPU and GPU Roles

The scaling patterns across resolutions and presets reveal distinct roles for each component in Rust. The CPU's influence is most apparent at lower resolutions and lower settings, where frame rates are highest. At 1920x1080 Low, the system achieves 216 FPS, a figure that is far beyond what the GPU alone could sustain at higher settings. This suggests the CPU, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, is capable of feeding the GPU efficiently at high frame rates.

The GPU's role becomes more dominant as resolution increases. The transition from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 at Medium settings shows a drop from 151 FPS to 104 FPS, a 31% decrease. Moving from 2560x1440 to 3840x2160 at Medium settings further drops from 104 FPS to 61 FPS, a 41% decrease. These substantial reductions indicate that the RTX 4070's rendering capacity is the limiting factor at higher resolutions.

The settings scaling provides additional insight. At 1920x1080, the difference between Low and Ultra is 119 FPS (216 to 97), showing the GPU's workload increases significantly with visual quality. At 3840x2160, the same settings range shows only a 52 FPS difference (91 to 39), indicating that at 4K, the GPU is already heavily taxed even at Low settings, leaving less headroom for quality improvements.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Rust at 4K with playable frame rates?

A: Yes, but only at Low or Medium settings. Medium achieves 61 FPS average at 3840x2160, while High drops to 52 FPS and Ultra to 39 FPS.

Q: What is the best preset for 1440p gaming?

A: Ultra settings deliver 67 FPS average at 2560x1440, making it the highest quality preset that remains above the 60 FPS playability threshold.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F scores 32,750 on average, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i5-14600T and 0.2% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H.

Q: What frame rates can be expected at 1080p with medium settings?

A: Medium settings at 1920x1080 produce an average of 151 FPS, with a minimum of 128 FPS and a maximum of 174 FPS.

Q: Is the GPU or CPU more important at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the CPU shows its importance through high frame rates at Low settings (216 FPS), but the GPU's role grows as settings increase, with Ultra still achieving 97 FPS.

Q: Does the system maintain 60 FPS at 4K with High settings?

A: No, High settings at 3840x2160 average only 52 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playability threshold.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 combination ranks 888 out of 3723 tested combos in Rust. This places the system in the top 24% of all tested configurations, indicating a strong performance tier. The rank reflects the balanced nature of this pairing, where neither component significantly bottlenecks the other in this title.

The percentile data for the individual components supports this ranking. The CPU sits at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 81st percentile among all GPUs. This alignment means the system is well-matched, with both components performing at a similar level relative to their respective markets. The combination of a high-tier CPU and GPU results in a system that can handle Rust's demands across most resolutions, with only the most extreme 4K Ultra settings proving too demanding.