Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

80%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
133 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
57 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
92 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
39 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
54 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
23 FPS
13.3ms Frame Time
20ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 32,750
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 23,021

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 23 31 36 54
1440p QHD 39 52 61 92
1080p Full HD 57 75 89 133

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 75
1920x1080 Low 133
1920x1080 Medium 89
1920x1080 Ultra 57
2560x1440 High 52
2560x1440 Low 92
2560x1440 Medium 61
2560x1440 Ultra 39
3840x2160 High 31
3840x2160 Low 54
3840x2160 Medium 36
3840x2160 Ultra 23

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F paired with the Intel Arc B580 presents a compelling mid-range combination for Rust, but the game’s demanding nature means visual fidelity comes at a steep performance cost. Benchmark data shows this pairing is highly capable at mainstream resolutions, yet struggles to maintain fluid frame rates when pushing 4K Ultra settings. The measured results reveal a clear hierarchy: 1080p offers the most headroom, 1440p remains comfortably playable with tuned settings, and 4K is only viable on lower presets.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its strongest performance. The Low preset produces an average of 133 FPS, providing an exceptionally smooth experience for competitive play. Moving to Medium drops the average to 89 FPS, with a minimum of 76 FPS and a maximum of 103 FPS—still far above the playability threshold. The High preset yields 75 FPS on average, which remains fluid and responsive. However, Ultra settings pull the average down to 57 FPS, dipping below the 60 FPS target and indicating the GPU’s limits under maximum load.

At 2560x1440, performance scales predictably downward. The Low preset maintains a strong 92 FPS average, keeping the experience smooth. Medium averages 61 FPS, with a minimum of 52 FPS and a maximum of 71 FPS—this is the most demanding setting that still clears the 60 FPS threshold. The High preset falls to 52 FPS, which is playable but noticeably less fluid. Ultra drops further to 39 FPS, making it unsuitable for consistent gameplay.

The 3840x2160 results show significant strain. Low settings average 54 FPS, just shy of the 60 FPS mark. Medium drops to 36 FPS (minimum 31 FPS, maximum 42 FPS), while High manages only 31 FPS. Ultra is the weakest performer at 23 FPS. None of these presets achieve a playable 60 FPS average at 4K, confirming that the Arc B580 lacks the raw throughput for this resolution in Rust.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data indicates that the Intel Arc B580 is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions, while the Ryzen 5 7400F provides ample headroom at lower settings. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a performance drop of roughly 30-45% across presets—for example, High falls from 75 FPS to 52 FPS, and Medium from 89 FPS to 61 FPS. This steep decline suggests the GPU’s memory bandwidth and shading units become saturated as pixel count increases.

At 4K, the situation becomes more critical. The gap between Low (54 FPS) and Ultra (23 FPS) widens dramatically compared to 1080p, where the same settings span from 133 FPS to 57 FPS. This indicates that at 4K, the GPU is fully utilized, and the CPU’s Zen 4 architecture (with 6 cores and 12 threads) is no longer the limiting factor. The Ryzen 5 7400F’s strong single-thread performance, reflected in its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3072, is sufficient to feed the GPU at 1080p and 1440p, but the Arc B580’s 13.67 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for 4K Ultra.

The CPU’s role is more evident at 1080p Low, where the 133 FPS average suggests the processor can drive frame rates well beyond the GPU’s capabilities at higher presets. The fact that 1080p Ultra (57 FPS) is much closer to 1440p Ultra (39 FPS) than to 1080p Medium (89 FPS) further supports that GPU-bound scaling dominates once settings increase. In contrast, the CPU’s 32 MB shared L3 cache and DDR5 memory support (83.2 GB/s bandwidth) likely help maintain consistent frame pacing, as evidenced by the tight minimum/maximum ranges at 1440p Medium (52-71 FPS).

Best Settings per Resolution

For 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is High, with an average of 75 FPS. This delivers strong visual quality while maintaining fluid gameplay. The Ultra preset’s 57 FPS average is just below the threshold, so High represents the optimal balance of fidelity and performance.

At 2560x1440, the Medium preset is the highest playable option, averaging 61 FPS. This provides a good compromise between detail and smoothness, though users seeking higher visual quality may accept the 52 FPS of High with some frame rate variability.

For 3840x2160, no preset achieves a 60 FPS average. The closest is Low at 54 FPS, which is technically below the playable threshold but may be tolerable for less demanding play. The data shows that 4K gaming is not viable with this combo for Rust, and users should target 1440p or 1080p for consistent performance.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Rust at 60 FPS on Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: No. At 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the average FPS is 57, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The highest playable preset at 1080p is High, averaging 75 FPS.

Q: What is the best preset for 1440p gaming?

A: The Medium preset at 2560x1440 is the most demanding option that maintains a playable frame rate, averaging 61 FPS (minimum 52 FPS, maximum 71 FPS). High and Ultra fall short at 52 FPS and 39 FPS, respectively.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B580 compare to its closest rivals in benchmark scores?

A: The Arc B580’s average benchmark score is 23021, placing it within 0.6% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (score 22895) and 0.7% ahead of the RTX 3080 (score 23172). It trails the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP by 0.2% (score 23061).

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 7400F a strong performer relative to other CPUs?

A: Yes. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 32750, ranking it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. It is 0.1% faster than the Intel Core i5-14600T (score 32707) and 0.2% faster than the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (score 32697).

Q: What frame rates can I expect at 4K with Low settings?

A: At 3840x2160 with Low settings, the average FPS is 54, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. No 4K preset achieves a playable average, with Medium at 36 FPS, High at 31 FPS, and Ultra at 23 FPS.

Q: Does the combo’s performance vary significantly between minimum and maximum FPS?

A: At 1080p Medium, the range spans 76 FPS to 103 FPS (a 27 FPS spread). At 1440p Medium, it spans 52 FPS to 71 FPS (a 19 FPS spread). These ranges indicate moderate frame time variance, but the averages remain stable enough for smooth gameplay.

How This Combo Ranks

In the benchmark database, this AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + Intel Arc B580 combination ranks 2815 out of 3723 tested combos for Rust. This places it in the lower half of all tested systems, reflecting the game’s demanding nature and the GPU’s mid-range positioning. The Arc B580’s percentile ranking against all GPUs is 68th, while the CPU sits in the 83rd percentile—the processor is clearly the stronger component in this pairing.

The rank suggests that while this combo is competent for 1080p and 1440p gaming, it is not among the top performers for Rust. The GPU’s 12 GB GDDR6 memory and 192-bit bus help with texture-heavy scenes, but the overall compute throughput (13.67 TFLOPS) limits high-refresh or high-resolution play. Compared to the GPU’s nearest rivals, the Arc B580 performs similarly to an RTX 2080 or RTX 3080 in synthetic benchmarks, yet Rust’s specific workload characteristics—likely CPU-bound in certain areas and GPU-bound in others—mean the combo’s real-world rank is modest.

The Verdict

This PC can run Rust, but with significant caveats depending on resolution and settings. At 1920x1080, the system is fully capable, clearing the 60 FPS threshold on Low (133 FPS), Medium (89 FPS), and High (75 FPS). Ultra just misses at 57 FPS. At 2560x1440, only Low (92 FPS) and Medium (61 FPS) are playable, with High at 52 FPS and Ultra at 39 FPS falling short. At 3840x2160, no preset achieves 60 FPS—the best is Low at 54 FPS—making 4K effectively unplayable for smooth experience.

The verdict is clear: for 1080p and 1440p gaming, this AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + Intel Arc B580 combo delivers solid, playable performance across most settings, with High at 1080p being the sweet spot. For 4K, users would need to accept lower frame rates or reduce resolution. The CPU’s strong multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21765) ensures it won’t bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios, but the Arc B580’s mid-range compute capabilities define the system’s limits. This is a dependable mid-tier gaming rig for Rust, best suited to 1080p and 1440p play.