Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

66%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
195 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
91 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
151 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
67 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
89 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
39 FPS
8.1ms Frame Time
12ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 21,771
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 23,172

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 39 52 58 89
1440p QHD 67 82 102 151
1080p Full HD 91 123 147 195

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 123
1920x1080 Low 195
1920x1080 Medium 147
1920x1080 Ultra 91
2560x1440 High 82
2560x1440 Low 151
2560x1440 Medium 102
2560x1440 Ultra 67
3840x2160 High 52
3840x2160 Low 89
3840x2160 Medium 58
3840x2160 Ultra 39

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 delivers a robust Rust experience, but the outcome depends heavily on resolution and settings. At 1080p and 1440p, this combo clears the 60 FPS threshold at every preset, while 4K gaming requires dropping to Low settings to maintain smooth gameplay. The data below walks through the measured performance, component roles, and optimal configurations.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Rust at 60 FPS on a 4K monitor?

A: Yes, but only at Low settings. The measured average at 3840x2160 Low is 89.4 FPS, while Medium drops to 58 FPS and High falls to 51.9 FPS. Ultra is not viable at 4K, averaging 39.3 FPS.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gaming?

A: Ultra is fully playable at 2560x1440, with an average of 67 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that stays at or above the 60 FPS playable threshold at this resolution.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 5600X compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600X scores 21,771 in average benchmark scores, placing it 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (21,749) and 0.5% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U (21,874). It trails the Intel Core i7-11700 (21,891) and AMD EPYC 9554P (21,899) by 0.5% and 0.6%, respectively.

Q: Is the RTX 3080 significantly faster than its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The RTX 3080's average benchmark score is 23,172, which is nearly identical to its nearest rivals. It sits 0.3% behind the NVIDIA P106-100 (23,249) and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 (23,250), and 0.4% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6600M (23,273) and AMD Radeon R9 M290X (23,276).

Q: At 1080p, which resolution shows the biggest FPS jump from Ultra to Low?

A: At 1920x1080, the jump from Ultra (91.3 FPS) to Low (195.1 FPS) represents a 103.8 FPS increase. This is the largest absolute swing across all tested resolutions and presets.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested PC configurations for Rust?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600X + RTX 3080 combination ranks 1,035 out of 3,723 tested combos for Rust, placing it in the top 27.8% of all configurations.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance scaling across resolutions reveals a clear pattern: the GPU becomes the dominant bottleneck as resolution increases, while the CPU's influence is most visible at lower resolutions. At 1920x1080, the difference between Low and Ultra settings is 103.8 FPS (195.1 vs 91.3), indicating the GPU is heavily stressed by higher presets even at this resolution. The CPU's single-thread score of 917 in 3dmark and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,541 provide ample headroom for Rust's simulation-heavy gameplay.

At 2560x1440, the same settings progression shows a compressed range: Low hits 150.9 FPS while Ultra drops to 67 FPS. The 83.9 FPS gap between Low and Ultra at 1440p suggests the GPU is now the primary limiter, as the resolution increase demands more pixel throughput. The CPU's multi-threaded performance (11,838 in Cinebench R23) remains sufficient, but the RTX 3080's 10 GB GDDR6X memory and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth are being pushed harder.

The 3840x2160 results confirm the GPU's dominance. Low settings produce 89.4 FPS, but Medium crashes to 58 FPS and High to 51.9 FPS. Ultra bottoms out at 39.3 FPS. The RTX 3080's 29.77 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 164.2 GPixel/s pixel rate are simply insufficient for high-fidelity 4K rendering in Rust. The CPU's role diminishes at this resolution, as the frame rate becomes entirely GPU-bound; even the 65 W TDP Ryzen 5 5600X with its 32 MB L3 cache is not the constraining factor.

The scaling between 1440p and 4K at identical settings illustrates this shift. At Low, the drop from 150.9 to 89.4 FPS (a 40.7% reduction) is less severe than the Medium drop from 101.7 to 58 FPS (a 43% reduction). High settings show a similar decline from 81.6 to 51.9 FPS (36.4% reduction). The data indicates that the RTX 3080's memory bandwidth of 760.3 GB/s becomes a limiting factor at 4K, particularly on Medium and High presets that require more texture data.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest CPU rivals to the Ryzen 5 5600X all hover within 0.6% of its average benchmark score, meaning any of these would deliver nearly identical Rust performance. The AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (21,749, 0.1% slower) and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U (21,874, 0.5% faster) are the closest matches. The Intel Core i7-11700 (21,891, 0.5% faster) and AMD EPYC 9554P (21,899, 0.6% faster) offer marginally better synthetic scores but would not produce a measurable FPS difference in Rust.

For the GPU, the RTX 3080's nearest rivals are strikingly close in average benchmark scores. The NVIDIA P106-100 (23,249, 0.3% faster), AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 (23,250, 0.3% faster), AMD Radeon RX 6600M (23,273, 0.4% faster), and AMD Radeon R9 M290X (23,276, 0.4% faster) all sit within a 0.4% band of the RTX 3080. In practical terms, a system with any of these GPUs paired with a similar-tier CPU would produce FPS numbers within a rounding error of the measured results. The RTX 3080's 68 RT cores and 272 tensor cores do not provide any meaningful advantage in Rust, which does not rely on ray tracing or DLSS.

A user considering an upgrade from the RTX 3080 to the AMD Radeon RX 6600M would see essentially identical frame rates, as the 0.4% delta translates to less than 1 FPS at most settings. Similarly, swapping the Ryzen 5 5600X for the Intel Core i7-11700 would not change the playable settings at any resolution, as the CPU is not the bottleneck in any measured scenario.

The Verdict

This PC can run Rust at 60 FPS across all tested resolutions, but with important caveats at 4K. At 1920x1080, every settings preset clears the threshold: Low averages 195.1 FPS, Medium 147.4 FPS, High 122.9 FPS, and Ultra 91.3 FPS. The 2560x1440 results are equally strong, with Low at 150.9 FPS, Medium at 101.7 FPS, High at 81.6 FPS, and Ultra at 67 FPS, all above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

The 3840x2160 verdict is more restrictive. Only the Low preset (89.4 FPS) stays above 60 FPS. Medium (58 FPS), High (51.9 FPS), and Ultra (39.3 FPS) all fall below the playable threshold. The verdict data confirms that 4K gaming requires sacrificing visual fidelity to maintain smooth performance, while 1080p and 1440p users can enable the highest settings without concern.

The combo's rank of 1,035 out of 3,723 tested configurations places it in the upper third of all systems tested for Rust. The RTX 3080's 68th percentile ranking among all GPUs and the Ryzen 5 5600X's 75th percentile among all CPUs indicate a well-balanced pairing, though the CPU's higher percentile suggests it has more headroom than the GPU.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the full settings sweep produces a wide range of frame rates. Low settings deliver 195.1 FPS average, Medium drops to 147.4 FPS, High reaches 122.9 FPS, and Ultra settles at 91.3 FPS. The 103.8 FPS gap between Low and Ultra demonstrates the substantial GPU load increase from higher presets.

The 2560x1440 results show a compressed range. Low averages 150.9 FPS, Medium 101.7 FPS, High 81.6 FPS, and Ultra 67 FPS. The 83.9 FPS spread between extremes indicates the GPU is working harder at this resolution, but still maintains comfortable margins above the 60 FPS threshold.

At 3840x2160, performance drops significantly. Low is the only playable preset at 89.4 FPS. Medium averages 58 FPS, just 2 FPS below the playable threshold. High falls to 51.9 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 39.3 FPS. The 50.1 FPS difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is the smallest absolute gap across all resolutions, indicating the GPU is nearing its limits on the highest preset.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 combination ranks 1,035 out of 3,723 tested combos for Rust, placing it in the top 27.8% of all configurations tested. This rank reflects the balanced pairing of a strong mid-range CPU with a high-end GPU from the Ampere generation.

The CPU's 75th percentile ranking among all CPUs (average benchmark score 21,771) is notably higher than the GPU's 68th percentile (average benchmark score 23,172). This suggests the RTX 3080 is the limiting component in Rust, particularly at higher resolutions and presets. The Ryzen 5 5600X's 6 cores and 12 threads with a 4.60 GHz boost clock provide sufficient processing power for Rust's simulation, while the RTX 3080's 10 GB VRAM becomes a constraint at 4K with higher texture settings.

The rank of 1,035 also implies that a significant number of tested combos outperform this pairing, likely featuring newer GPUs with more VRAM or higher memory bandwidth. However, the data shows this combo still delivers playable performance at all tested resolutions with appropriate settings, justifying its position in the upper third of the rankings.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Low, with an average of 89.4 FPS. Medium (58 FPS) falls just below the threshold, making Low the only viable option for 4K gaming. Users who prioritize smoothness over visual quality should stick with Low; those who cannot tolerate the visual downgrade may consider reducing resolution instead.

At 2560x1440, Ultra is fully playable with an average of 67 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that clears the 60 FPS threshold at this resolution. High (81.6 FPS), Medium (101.7 FPS), and Low (150.9 FPS) all provide additional headroom for users who prefer higher frame rates over maximum visual fidelity.

At 1920x1080, Ultra delivers 91.3 FPS average, making it the best settings choice. This is the only resolution where the highest preset not only clears the threshold but does so with comfortable margin. All four presets at 1080p exceed 90 FPS, giving users complete freedom to choose between maximum visuals and maximum frame rates.