Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

53%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
123 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
54 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
84 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
38 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
50 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
24 FPS
13.9ms Frame Time
21ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 21,771
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 15,290

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 24 32 36 50
1440p QHD 38 48 56 84
1080p Full HD 54 72 85 123

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 72
1920x1080 Low 123
1920x1080 Medium 85
1920x1080 Ultra 54
2560x1440 High 48
2560x1440 Low 84
2560x1440 Medium 56
2560x1440 Ultra 38
3840x2160 High 32
3840x2160 Low 50
3840x2160 Medium 36
3840x2160 Ultra 24

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 pairing is a proven mid-range combination, and the recorded data for Rust shows a clear picture of what this system can deliver. The CPU holds a 75th percentile ranking against all processors, while the GPU sits at the 58th percentile, meaning the pair is balanced but leans on the processor to carry demanding scenes. The benchmark results are measured, not estimated, so the FPS figures below reflect actual database runs.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the database's nearest rival lists, several other components would produce nearly identical behavior in Rust. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600X has an average benchmark score of 21771. The closest competitor is the AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, which scores 21749, a delta of just 0.1% slower. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U scores 21874, which is 0.5% faster, and the Intel Core i7-11700 scores 21891, also 0.5% faster. The AMD EPYC 9554P scores 21899, 0.6% faster, though that is a server-class chip and not a typical desktop choice. For practical purposes, any of these CPUs would deliver essentially the same frame rates in Rust, with differences well under a single percentage point.

On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 has an average benchmark score of 15290. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 scores 15283, a 0% delta, making it a statistical tie. The AMD Radeon 680M scores 15270, 0.1% slower, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 15199, 0.6% slower, and the AMD Radeon RX 7600 scores 15171, 0.8% slower. These rivals are all within 1% of the RTX 2060, so swapping to any of them would not meaningfully change the FPS numbers in this article. Builders with any of these GPUs paired with any of those CPUs should expect very similar Rust performance to what is documented here.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Rust at 60 FPS at 1920x1080?

A: Yes. The recorded data shows playable settings at 1080p include High, Low, and Medium, with the best playable preset being High at an average of 71.7 FPS. Ultra does not reach 60 FPS, averaging 53.5 FPS.

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo?

A: The highest resolution that maintains a playable frame rate is 2560x1440, but only on Low settings, which averages 83.7 FPS. At 1920x1080, you get more flexibility with High, Medium, and Low all clearing the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: Is 4K playable with the RTX 2060 and Ryzen 5 5600X?

A: No. At 3840x2160, none of the tested settings (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) reach 60 FPS. The best result is Low at 49.5 FPS, which falls short of the playable threshold.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals in raw benchmarks?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600X scores 21771 on average. The Ryzen 7 4800H is 0.1% slower, the Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U and Core i7-11700 are each 0.5% faster, and the EPYC 9554P is 0.6% faster. These are negligible differences for gaming.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 2060 scores 15290. The GTX 580 is exactly 0% different, the Radeon 680M is 0.1% slower, the RTX 3050 OEM is 0.6% slower, and the RX 7600 is 0.8% slower. All are effectively equivalent in performance.

Q: What is the combo's overall ranking for Rust?

A: This pairing ranks 2969 out of 3723 tested combos in the database for Rust. That places it in the lower portion of all possible configurations, but the measured FPS still shows it is capable at 1080p and 1440p with adjusted settings.

How This Combo Ranks

The database ranks this specific CPU and GPU combination at 2969 out of 3723 combos tested for Rust. That places it in the 20th percentile of all configurations, meaning roughly 80% of tested combos deliver higher frame rates. However, the ranking is heavily influenced by the fact that the database includes many high-end and current-generation parts. The measured FPS data shows this combo is not a weak performer for the game itself. At 1920x1080, it clears 60 FPS on three out of four presets, and at 2560x1440, it clears 60 FPS on the Low preset. The low rank is more a reflection of the competitive field than a verdict of unusability. For a mid-range system from the RTX 20-series era, the recorded numbers are solid. The CPU's 75th percentile ranking and the GPU's 58th percentile ranking both indicate above-average hardware, and the combination behaves accordingly in Rust, even if it does not compete with top-tier rigs.

The Verdict

This PC can run Rust, but the experience depends entirely on resolution and settings. At 1920x1080, the system is fully playable: High settings average 71.7 FPS, Medium averages 85.2 FPS, and Low averages 123.2 FPS. The only 1080p preset that misses the 60 FPS mark is Ultra, which averages 53.5 FPS. At 2560x1440, the system drops to a single playable preset: Low averages 83.7 FPS, while Medium falls to 55.7 FPS, High drops to 47.5 FPS, and Ultra is 37.9 FPS. At 3840x2160, no preset reaches 60 FPS; the best is Low at 49.5 FPS, with Medium at 35.5 FPS, High at 31.6 FPS, and Ultra at 24 FPS. The clear verdict is that 1080p is the sweet spot for this combo, with 1440p viable only at the lowest visual fidelity.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The database recorded average FPS values for each resolution and settings preset. No minimum or maximum FPS values were captured, so the analysis relies on averages only.

At 3840x2160, the results are as follows: Low settings produce an average of 49.5 FPS, Medium produces 35.5 FPS, High produces 31.6 FPS, and Ultra produces 24 FPS. None of these reach the 60 FPS playable threshold.

At 2560x1440, Low settings average 83.7 FPS, which is the only playable result at this resolution. Medium averages 55.7 FPS, High averages 47.5 FPS, and Ultra averages 37.9 FPS.

At 1920x1080, the system performs best. Low settings average 123.2 FPS, Medium averages 85.2 FPS, High averages 71.7 FPS, and Ultra averages 53.5 FPS. The first three presets all clear the 60 FPS threshold, while Ultra falls short by 6.5 FPS.

The data shows a clear scaling pattern: dropping from High to Medium at 1080p gains roughly 13.5 FPS, and dropping from Medium to Low gains another 38 FPS. At 1440p, the jump from Medium to Low is 28 FPS, which is enough to cross the playable line. At 4K, even Low cannot reach 60 FPS, indicating the GPU is the limiting factor at that resolution.

Best Settings per Resolution

For each resolution, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is the recommended choice.

At 1920x1080, the best playable preset is High, with an average of 71.7 FPS. This is the highest visual quality that maintains 60 FPS. Medium and Low also work, but High offers the best balance of fidelity and performance. Ultra is not recommended since it averages 53.5 FPS, below the threshold.

At 2560x1440, the best playable preset is Low, with an average of 83.7 FPS. This is the only preset that clears 60 FPS. While the visual quality is reduced, the frame rate headroom is substantial, making this a viable option for players who prioritize smoothness over detail.

At 3840x2160, there is no playable preset. The best average FPS is 49.5 on Low, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. Players who insist on 4K will need to either lower the resolution or accept sub-60 FPS performance. The database records no settings that meet the playable standard at this resolution.

The practical takeaway is to run Rust at 1080p with High settings for the best experience. If you prefer higher resolution, 1440p on Low is the only way to keep the frame rate above 60 FPS. The system is not capable of 4K playable performance in this game.