Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

31%
Not Recommended Your system may struggle with this game.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
76 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
33 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
53 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
23 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
31 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
13 FPS
23.3ms Frame Time
35ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 21,771
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 1,482

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 13 18 21 31
1440p QHD 23 30 35 53
1080p Full HD 33 43 51 76

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 43
1920x1080 Low 76
1920x1080 Medium 51
1920x1080 Ultra 33
2560x1440 High 30
2560x1440 Low 53
2560x1440 Medium 35
2560x1440 Ultra 23
3840x2160 High 18
3840x2160 Low 31
3840x2160 Medium 21
3840x2160 Ultra 13

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600X paired with the Intel Arc B390 produces a highly constrained gaming experience in Rust, with the recorded data showing that only the most modest settings deliver a smooth frame rate. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS across resolutions and presets, examines the bottleneck, and places this combination in the broader context of the database.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for Rust reveals a clear pattern: the Intel Arc B390 struggles to maintain high frame rates at demanding resolutions and settings. At 3840x2160 (4K), the performance is consistently low across all presets. The Low preset averages 31 FPS, which is the best result at this resolution. Medium averages 21 FPS, with a minimum of 18 FPS and a maximum of 24 FPS. High drops to an 18 FPS average, and Ultra falls to 13 FPS. None of these figures approach the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Moving to 2560x1440, the situation improves slightly but remains far from smooth. The Low preset averages 53 FPS, a substantial jump from the 4K result. Medium averages 35 FPS, with a recorded range from 30 to 41 FPS. High averages 30 FPS, and Ultra averages 23 FPS. While Low is close to the 60 FPS target, it still falls short.

At 1920x1080, the combination finally achieves a playable result, but only at the lowest settings. The Low preset averages 76 FPS, which is the only preset across all resolutions to clear the 60 FPS threshold. Medium averages 51 FPS, with a minimum of 44 FPS and a maximum of 59 FPS, just missing the target. High averages 43 FPS, and Ultra averages 33 FPS. The scaling from 4K to 1080p is significant, but the GPU's overall capability limits the experience to Low settings for a consistent frame rate.

Best Settings per Resolution

The database shows that the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS at each resolution is as follows. At 3840x2160, no preset reaches 60 FPS, so there is no playable setting; the best average recorded is 31 FPS on Low. At 2560x1440, the situation is identical: no preset clears 60 FPS, and the best average is 53 FPS on Low. At 1920x1080, the Low preset is the only one that maintains an average of 76 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold. This means the answer for 1080p is Low, and for both 1440p and 4K, no settings are playable.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Rust at 4K resolution?

A: No. The measured data shows that at 3840x2160, the highest average FPS is 31 on Low settings, and the playable threshold is 60 FPS. All other presets, including Medium, High, and Ultra, fall below this, with averages of 21, 18, and 13 FPS respectively.

Q: What is the best FPS this combo can achieve at 1440p?

A: The best result at 2560x1440 is on Low settings, with an average of 53 FPS. This is below the 60 FPS playable threshold, and no other preset comes closer, as Medium averages 35 FPS, High averages 30 FPS, and Ultra averages 23 FPS.

Q: Is 1080p playable with this hardware?

A: Yes, but only on Low settings. The average FPS at 1920x1080 on Low is 76, which is above the 60 FPS threshold. Medium settings average 51 FPS, which is below the target, and High and Ultra are even lower at 43 and 33 FPS respectively.

Q: How does the GPU's performance compare to its rivals?

A: The Intel Arc B390 has an average benchmark score of 1482. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX with a score of 1463, which is 1.3% faster, and the NVIDIA GeForce 800M with a score of 1460, which is 1.5% faster. The GT 625 OEM is 2.5% faster with a score of 1446, and the GT 710 is 2.7% faster with a score of 1443.

Q: How does the CPU's performance compare to its rivals?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 5600X has an average benchmark score of 21771. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, scores 21749, which is 0.1% slower. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U scores 21874, which is 0.5% faster, and the Intel Core i7-11700 scores 21891, also 0.5% faster. The AMD EPYC 9554P scores 21899, which is 0.6% faster.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded for this combo?

A: The database records minimum FPS values only for Medium settings. At 3840x2160, the minimum is 18 FPS. At 2560x1440, the minimum is 30 FPS. At 1920x1080, the minimum is 44 FPS. For Low, High, and Ultra presets, minimum FPS values are not recorded.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X sits close to several other processors in the database. The AMD Ryzen 7 4800H has an average score of 21749, which is nearly identical with a 0.1% delta. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U and Intel Core i7-11700 are both slightly faster, with scores of 21874 and 21891 respectively, each showing a 0.5% delta. The AMD EPYC 9554P is also close, with a score of 21899 and a 0.6% delta. In practical terms, these CPUs would likely deliver very similar frame rates in Rust, meaning the CPU is not the primary limiting factor in this combo.

For the GPU, the Intel Arc B390 is in a very low performance tier. Its nearest rivals are all NVIDIA parts from older generations. The GT 520MX scores 1463, which is 1.3% faster, and the GT 800M scores 1460, which is 1.5% faster. The GT 625 OEM scores 1446, 2.5% faster, and the GT 710 scores 1443, 2.7% faster. These deltas are small, so any of these GPUs would behave almost identically in Rust, all struggling to reach high frame rates and all falling well short of the 60 FPS target at higher resolutions and settings.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations, this specific pairing of the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X and Intel Arc B390 ranks 3312 out of 3723 combos for Rust. This places it in the lower percentile of all tested systems, indicating that the majority of other hardware combinations deliver better performance. The rank reflects the GPU's severe limitation, as the CPU's percentile is 75 against all CPUs, while the GPU's percentile is only 9 against all GPUs. The recorded data suggests that the GPU is the dominant constraint, and the combo's low rank is primarily due to the Arc B390's inability to handle the game's graphical load.

The Verdict

The verdict from the database is clear: this PC can run Rust, but only under very specific conditions. At 1920x1080, the Low preset is playable, with an average FPS of 76, which clears the 60 FPS threshold. No other preset at 1080p achieves this, as Medium averages 51 FPS, High averages 43 FPS, and Ultra averages 33 FPS. At 2560x1440, no settings are playable, as the best average is 53 FPS on Low, which is below the threshold. At 3840x2160, the situation is worse, with the best average being 31 FPS on Low. Therefore, the system is only viable for 1080p gaming on the lowest settings. Users seeking higher visual quality or higher resolutions would need more powerful hardware.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data indicates that the GPU plays the dominant role in determining performance in Rust for this combo. The CPU, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X, has a high percentile rank of 75 and a strong benchmark score of 21771, which places it well above many other processors. Its nearest rivals, such as the Ryzen 7 4800H and Core i7-11700, have nearly identical scores, suggesting that swapping the CPU for a similar-tier part would not meaningfully change FPS. The GPU, however, has a percentile rank of only 9 and a benchmark score of 1482, which is extremely low. Its rivals, like the GT 710 and GT 520MX, are also very weak, confirming that the Arc B390 is the bottleneck.

The scaling between resolutions reinforces this conclusion. When moving from 3840x2160 to 2560x1440 on Low settings, the average FPS rises from 31 to 53, an increase of 22 FPS. From 2560x1440 to 1920x1080 on Low, the average rises from 53 to 76, another 23 FPS increase. This significant improvement as resolution drops is typical of a GPU-bound scenario, where the pixel count directly impacts the frame rate. The CPU's workload does not scale as heavily with resolution, so the consistent gains point to the GPU as the limiting factor. At higher presets, such as Medium and High, the FPS drops even further, again indicating that the GPU's shader and fill-rate capabilities are the primary constraint. The CPU is more than capable of feeding the GPU, but the Arc B390 cannot keep up, making it the component that dictates playability in Rust.