Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

78%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
196 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
124 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
173 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
85 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
117 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
50 FPS
6.3ms Frame Time
9ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 20,733
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 54,247

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 50 66 79 117
1440p QHD 85 112 133 173
1080p Full HD 124 159 169 196

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 159
1920x1080 Low 196
1920x1080 Medium 169
1920x1080 Ultra 124
2560x1440 High 112
2560x1440 Low 173
2560x1440 Medium 133
2560x1440 Ultra 85
3840x2160 High 66
3840x2160 Low 117
3840x2160 Medium 79
3840x2160 Ultra 50

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

This combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 produces a wide spread of frame rates in Rust, depending heavily on the resolution and quality preset selected. The benchmark data shows that at 4K, the system is capable of smooth gameplay on Medium settings with an average of 79 FPS, while dropping to High yields 66 FPS. At 1440p, the results are significantly stronger, with the Ultra preset achieving 85 FPS and Medium reaching 133 FPS. The 1080p results are exceptionally high, with the Ultra preset still delivering 124 FPS and Low settings pushing the average to 196 FPS. This indicates a system that is clearly GPU-bound at higher resolutions, but the CPU becomes more relevant as resolution drops.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for Rust with this CPU/GPU combination provides a clear picture of performance scaling across three resolutions and four quality presets. At 3840x2160, the average frame rates are 66 FPS on High, 117 FPS on Low, 79 FPS on Medium, and 50 FPS on Ultra. The Medium preset is the only one at 4K that includes min and max readings, showing 67 FPS minimum and 90 FPS maximum, which indicates a relatively stable experience with only a 23 FPS spread between the lowest and highest measured values.

Moving to 2560x1440, the averages climb substantially. High settings produce 112 FPS, Low produces 173 FPS, Medium produces 133 FPS, and Ultra produces 85 FPS. The Medium preset again provides the only min/max data, with 113 FPS minimum and 153 FPS maximum. This 40 FPS range suggests more variance at this resolution, likely due to the CPU being able to feed frames faster while the GPU still has headroom to render complex scenes.

At 1920x1080, the frame rates reach their highest levels. Low settings average 196 FPS, Medium averages 169 FPS, High averages 159 FPS, and Ultra averages 124 FPS. The Medium preset shows a min of 143 FPS and max of 194 FPS, a 51 FPS spread that reflects the increased CPU workload at lower resolutions. The data suggests that the RTX 4080 is never the bottleneck at 1080p, as even the most demanding preset clears the 60 FPS threshold by more than double.

The scaling pattern across resolutions is telling. From 4K to 1440p, the average FPS increases by roughly 70% on High settings (66 to 112 FPS), while from 1440p to 1080p, the increase is about 42% (112 to 159 FPS). This diminishing return as resolution drops indicates that the CPU begins to limit performance at lower resolutions, particularly on the Ultra preset where the 4K-to-1440p jump is 70% (50 to 85 FPS) but the 1440p-to-1080p jump is only 46% (85 to 124 FPS).

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Rust at 4K with the Ultra preset?

A: No. The data shows an average of 50 FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The High preset is the best option at this resolution, delivering 66 FPS.

Q: What is the highest quality preset that maintains 60 FPS at 1440p?

A: The Ultra preset at 2560x1440 averages 85 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS threshold comfortably. All four presets — Low, Medium, High, and Ultra — are playable at this resolution according to the verdict data.

Q: How does the RTX 4080 compare to its nearest rival, the RTX 4080 SUPER?

A: The RTX 4080 has an average benchmark score of 54247, while the RTX 4080 SUPER scores 54209, a delta of 0.1%. This makes them effectively identical in performance, with the regular 4080 actually holding a marginal edge in the averaged data.

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 5600GT a bottleneck for the RTX 4080 in Rust?

A: The benchmark data suggests partial bottlenecking at lower resolutions. At 1080p, the Ultra preset averages 124 FPS while Low averages 196 FPS, a 72 FPS spread that indicates CPU limitations. At 4K, the spread between Low and Ultra is 67 FPS (117 to 50 FPS), showing the GPU is the primary constraint there.

Q: What is the percentile ranking of this CPU among all CPUs?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600GT sits in the 74th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 20733. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-12490F, scores 20802, a delta of -0.3%.

Q: Does the game run better at 1440p Ultra or 1080p Ultra with this hardware?

A: The 1080p Ultra preset averages 124 FPS, while 1440p Ultra averages 85 FPS. Both are well above the 60 FPS threshold, but 1080p offers nearly 46% higher frame rates, making it the smoother experience.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the nearest rivals for both components provides context for how this combo would behave relative to other hardware pairings. The Ryzen 5 5600GT has an average benchmark score of 20733, placing it in the 74th percentile. Its closest competitors include the Intel Core i5-12490F with an average score of 20802 (-0.3% delta), the Intel Xeon 6325P at 20821 (-0.4% delta), the Intel Core Ultra 5 125U at 20826 (-0.4% delta), and the AMD EPYC 7J13 at 20845 (-0.5% delta). These deltas are all under one percent, meaning any of these CPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates in Rust when paired with the RTX 4080.

For the GPU side, the RTX 4080 has an average benchmark score of 54247, ranking in the 86th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER with a score of 54209 (0.1% delta), making them statistically indistinguishable. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54828 (-1.1% delta), the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55698 (-2.6% delta), and the AMD Radeon 8060S scores 55757 (-2.7% delta). These deltas are small enough that users swapping between these GPUs would observe minimal FPS differences in Rust, though the RTX 4080 would sit slightly below the AMD options in raw benchmark terms.

When considering alternative pairings, a system with the Intel Core i5-12490F instead of the Ryzen 5 5600GT would perform almost identically, as the 0.3% score difference translates to less than one frame per second in most scenarios. Similarly, swapping the RTX 4080 for a RTX 4080 SUPER would yield no measurable change, given the 0.1% delta. The more interesting comparison is the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB, which despite being a lower-tier card in name, actually scores 2.6% higher in average benchmarks, suggesting it could match or slightly exceed the RTX 4080 in some Rust workloads.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 ranks 409th out of 3723 tested combos in Rust. This places it in the top 11% of all tested systems, which is a strong showing given the wide variety of hardware configurations that exist. The rank is determined by the measured FPS data across all resolutions and settings, weighted by the game's playability threshold of 60 FPS.

Being in the 409th position means this combo outperforms roughly 89% of all tested configurations in Rust. The ranking reflects the fact that the RTX 4080 is a high-end GPU capable of maintaining 60 FPS at 4K on High settings, which many systems cannot achieve. However, the Ryzen 5 5600GT, while competent, is not a top-tier CPU, which likely holds the combo back from a higher rank. The 74th percentile CPU score combined with the 86th percentile GPU score creates a system that is greater than the sum of its parts in Rust, thanks to the game's moderate CPU demands at higher resolutions.

What this rank suggests is that the combo sits in a performance tier where most users would find the experience smooth and enjoyable. The gap between the 409th and higher-ranked combos would primarily come from CPUs with stronger single-thread performance, as Rust does show sensitivity to CPU speed at lower resolutions based on the FPS scaling data.

The Verdict

The verdict data is unambiguous: this PC can run Rust at all three tested resolutions, but not at every preset. At 3840x2160, the playable settings are High, Low, and Medium, with the best being High at 66 FPS average. The Ultra preset falls short at 50 FPS, so 4K gamers should stick to High or lower. At 2560x1440, all four presets are playable, with Ultra achieving 85 FPS, making it the best choice for visual quality without sacrificing smoothness. At 1920x1080, every preset clears 60 FPS, with Ultra averaging 124 FPS and Low reaching 196 FPS.

The playable threshold of 60 FPS is met with significant headroom at 1440p and 1080p. Even the most demanding preset at 1440p (Ultra at 85 FPS) leaves 25 FPS of margin above the threshold, while 1080p Ultra has 64 FPS of margin. The 4K situation is tighter, with only 6 FPS of margin on the High preset. This indicates that 4K gaming is possible but leaves little room for performance drops during intense moments, which the Medium preset's min FPS of 67 confirms is still safe.

For users prioritizing a locked 60 FPS experience, the data suggests 4K High is the boundary, while 1440p Ultra offers a comfortable buffer. The 1080p results are so far above the threshold that even the lowest recorded minimum (143 FPS on Medium) is more than double the playable threshold.

Best Settings per Resolution

The most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS at each resolution defines the optimal configuration. At 3840x2160, the High preset is the best choice, averaging 66 FPS. This is the highest quality option that maintains playability, as the Ultra preset drops to 50 FPS. The Medium preset at 4K averages 79 FPS with a 67 FPS minimum, which is also viable, but High offers better visuals with only a 13 FPS penalty.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset is the clear winner, averaging 85 FPS. This represents the maximum visual quality available in the game while still delivering frame rates well above the 60 FPS threshold. The fact that Ultra at 1440p outperforms High at 4K by 19 FPS (85 vs 66) highlights the resolution scaling advantage of this combo.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset averages 124 FPS, making it the best choice for players who want the highest fidelity without sacrificing smoothness. The gap between Ultra and the next tier (High at 159 FPS) is 35 FPS, but both are far above the playable threshold. The data shows that at 1080p, even the most demanding settings leave substantial performance headroom, making this resolution the sweet spot for this hardware combination.

CPU and GPU Roles

The division of labor between the Ryzen 5 5600GT and the RTX 4080 shifts predictably across resolutions. At 3840x2160, the GPU is the dominant factor. The frame rate differences between Low (117 FPS) and Ultra (50 FPS) show a 67 FPS swing that is almost entirely GPU-driven, as the resolution puts massive pressure on the graphics card while the CPU can feed frames relatively easily. The GPU's 86th percentile ranking and 54247 average benchmark score support its capability at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the balance starts to tilt. The Low preset averages 173 FPS, while Ultra averages 85 FPS, a 88 FPS spread. The increased frame rates at Low settings indicate the CPU is beginning to play a larger role, as the GPU has more headroom to render quickly but the CPU must keep up with game logic and draw calls. The Ryzen 5 5600GT's 74th percentile ranking suggests it is adequate but not exceptional for this task, which explains why the Low-to-Ultra gap grows compared to 4K.

At 1920x1080, the CPU becomes the limiting factor. The Low preset hits 196 FPS, but the Ultra preset only reaches 124 FPS, a 72 FPS gap that narrows compared to 1440p. This narrowing indicates that the CPU is hitting its ceiling even at Low settings, preventing the GPU from pushing frame rates higher. The 51 FPS spread between the Medium min (143 FPS) and max (194 FPS) at 1080p further suggests that CPU-bound scenarios cause more frame time variance, as the processor struggles to maintain consistent frame delivery during complex scenes.

The scaling between resolutions provides additional insight. At High settings, the FPS drops from 159 at 1080p to 112 at 1440p to 66 at 4K, showing the GPU's workload increasing disproportionately with resolution. The CPU's influence is most visible when comparing the Ultra preset across resolutions: 124 FPS at 1080p, 85 FPS at 1440p, and 50 FPS at 4K. The 39 FPS drop from 1080p to 1440p is larger than the 35 FPS drop from 1440p to 4K, which is counterintuitive if the GPU were the only constraint. This suggests the CPU is doing more work relative to the GPU at 1440p than at 4K, where the GPU's rendering load dominates.

For players using this combo, the practical implication is that at 4K, the RTX 4080 is doing nearly all the heavy lifting, while at 1080p, the Ryzen 5 5600GT's 6 cores and 12 threads become the bottleneck. The 1440p resolution represents the sweet spot where both components contribute meaningfully, with the CPU able to feed the GPU enough frames for the Ultra preset to hit 85 FPS.