Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Rust
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 21 | 27 | 32 | 48 |
| 1440p QHD | 35 | 46 | 54 | 81 |
| 1080p Full HD | 51 | 67 | 79 | 118 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G paired with the Intel Arc B570 presents a specific performance profile in Rust. This analysis uses measured data to determine exactly where this combination stands, what settings are viable, and what the components contribute to the final frame rates.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data for this combo reveals a clear scaling pattern across resolutions and presets. At 1920x1080, the system delivers its most playable results. With Low settings, the average frame rate is 118 FPS, which provides a substantial performance buffer. Moving to Medium settings, the average drops to 79 FPS, with a minimum of 67 FPS and a maximum of 91 FPS. The High preset still maintains an average of 67 FPS, keeping it above the 60 FPS playability threshold. However, the Ultra preset falls to an average of 51 FPS, placing it below the playable mark.
At 2560x1440, the performance picture changes significantly. The Low preset achieves an average of 81 FPS, which is the only playable option at this resolution. The Medium preset averages 54 FPS, with a minimum of 46 FPS and a maximum of 62 FPS, indicating noticeable dips below the 60 FPS threshold. High settings produce an average of 46 FPS, and the Ultra preset drops to 35 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium at this resolution is 27 FPS, showing that the extra visual fidelity comes at a steep cost.
At 3840x2160, this combo struggles to maintain playable frame rates. The Low preset achieves an average of 48 FPS, which is the highest result at this resolution. Medium settings average 32 FPS, with a minimum of 27 FPS and a maximum of 37 FPS. The High preset drops to 27 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 21 FPS. None of the 4K presets reach the 60 FPS threshold, making this resolution unsuitable for smooth gameplay with this hardware combination.
The data indicates that the performance drop from 1080p to 1440p is substantial, while the drop from 1440p to 4K is even more severe. At 1080p Low, the system runs at 118 FPS, but at 4K Low, it falls to 48 FPS, a reduction of 70 FPS or roughly 59%. This scaling pattern suggests that resolution is a primary performance limiter for this combo in Rust.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Rust at 60 FPS on a 1080p monitor?
A: Yes. At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers 118 FPS, Medium delivers 79 FPS, and High delivers 67 FPS. All three presets clear the 60 FPS threshold. Ultra falls short at 51 FPS.
Q: What is the best preset for 1440p gaming?
A: The Low preset is the only playable option at 2560x1440, achieving an average of 81 FPS. The Medium preset averages 54 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this hardware?
A: No. At 3840x2160, the best average FPS is 48 FPS on Low settings. The Medium preset achieves 32 FPS, High achieves 27 FPS, and Ultra achieves 21 FPS. No preset at this resolution reaches 60 FPS.
Q: How does the minimum FPS compare to the average at 1080p Medium?
A: At 1920x1080 Medium, the average FPS is 79, with a minimum of 67 FPS and a maximum of 91 FPS. The minimum stays above the 60 FPS threshold, indicating relatively stable performance.
Q: What are the most demanding settings for this combo?
A: The Ultra preset is the most demanding across all resolutions. At 1080p it averages 51 FPS, at 1440p it averages 35 FPS, and at 4K it averages 21 FPS. This preset is not playable at any resolution.
Q: Does the performance gap between Low and Medium stay consistent across resolutions?
A: No. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Medium is 39 FPS. At 1440p, the difference is 27 FPS. At 4K, the difference is 16 FPS. The gap narrows as resolution increases, suggesting the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data reveals a clear shift in component roles depending on the resolution. At 1920x1080, the system shows strong performance with 118 FPS on Low settings, suggesting that the CPU has enough headroom to feed the GPU. The Ryzen 5 5600G, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, provides sufficient processing power for Rust's simulation and world logic at this resolution. The GPU, however, begins to show its limits as settings increase, with Ultra dropping to 51 FPS.
At 2560x1440, the GPU becomes a more significant factor. The drop from 81 FPS on Low to 54 FPS on Medium is a 27 FPS reduction, which is steeper than the 39 FPS drop seen at 1080p. This pattern indicates that the Intel Arc B570 is working harder at this resolution, and its performance ceiling is being approached more quickly as settings are raised. The CPU's role diminishes here, as the frame rate is increasingly dictated by GPU rendering capabilities.
At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly the dominant bottleneck. The best result is 48 FPS on Low, and even the Medium preset only manages 32 FPS. The scaling from 1440p to 4K shows a dramatic performance loss, indicating that the Arc B570's 10 GB of GDDR6 memory and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for the pixel workload at 4K. The CPU's contribution becomes negligible at this resolution, as the GPU cannot produce enough frames to stress the processor.
The performance scaling between presets also highlights the component balance. At 1080p, going from Low to Medium reduces FPS by 39 FPS, but going from Medium to High only reduces it by 12 FPS. This nonlinear scaling suggests that certain settings have a more significant impact on GPU load than others. The same pattern appears at 1440p, where Low to Medium drops 27 FPS and Medium to High drops 8 FPS.
How This Combo Ranks
This specific combination of AMD Ryzen 5 5600G and Intel Arc B570 ranks 2996 out of 3723 tested combos in Rust. This places it in the lower portion of the database, indicating that a significant number of other hardware combinations produce better results in this game. The ranking reflects the measured frame rates across all tested settings and resolutions.
The combo's percentile placement suggests it is not a top-tier setup for Rust. The CPU sits at the 74th percentile among all CPUs based on its average benchmark score of 21088, while the GPU sits at the 65th percentile among all GPUs with an average score of 20556. Despite these respectable individual percentile ranks, the combined performance in Rust falls short of many other configurations.
The nearest rival CPUs to the Ryzen 5 5600G include the Intel Core i3-1220P with a deltaPct of 0.1, the Intel Core Ultra 7 256V with a deltaPct of -0.1, and the AMD Ryzen 5 7530U with a deltaPct of -0.2. These differences are minimal, indicating that the 5600G's processing power is comparable to these alternatives. On the GPU side, the nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile with a deltaPct of 0.1 and the Intel Arc A750 with a deltaPct of -0.1. The Arc B570's performance is essentially neck-and-neck with these cards in synthetic benchmarks.
The rank of 2996 out of 3723 means that about 80% of tested combos perform better in Rust. This is a notable data point for builders considering this hardware pairing, as it suggests the combination is better suited for less demanding titles or lower resolutions.
The Verdict
The verdict by resolution is clear: this PC can run Rust at playable frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, but not at 4K. At 1920x1080, the system clears 60 FPS on Low, Medium, and High presets, with the best playable preset being High at 67 FPS. At 2560x1440, only the Low preset achieves playable performance at 81 FPS. At 3840x2160, no preset reaches the 60 FPS threshold, making 4K gaming impractical with this hardware.
For a 1080p gamer, this combo offers a solid experience with room to adjust settings. The 79 FPS average on Medium is a balanced choice, while High at 67 FPS provides better visuals with a smaller performance cushion. The 51 FPS average on Ultra is a clear indication that the highest settings are beyond this system's capabilities.
For 1440p gaming, the system is limited to Low settings for a consistent 60 FPS experience. The 54 FPS average on Medium with a 46 FPS minimum shows that this preset will experience noticeable dips during intense gameplay. The 81 FPS on Low provides a comfortable margin above the threshold.
The 4K results are straightforward: this hardware is not suited for 4K Rust. The 48 FPS on Low is the maximum achievable, and even that falls well below the playable threshold. The 21 FPS on Ultra is a slideshow by comparison.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is High, which delivers an average of 67 FPS. This provides a playable experience with higher visual quality than Medium's 79 FPS or Low's 118 FPS. The High preset is the recommended choice for 1080p, as it balances visual fidelity with performance.
At 2560x1440, the only preset that maintains 60 FPS or higher is Low, with an average of 81 FPS. This is the recommended setting for 1440p gaming. The Medium preset at 54 FPS falls short of the threshold, so players seeking smooth performance must use Low.
At 3840x2160, there is no playable preset. The best result is 48 FPS on Low, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. The verdict data confirms that no settings at this resolution are recommended for playable frame rates.
For players prioritizing performance, the 1080p Low preset at 118 FPS offers the highest frame rate of any tested configuration. This is ideal for competitive play or for users with high refresh rate monitors. The 1080p Medium preset at 79 FPS is a strong middle ground, while High at 67 FPS is the best visual option that remains playable.