Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

81%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
152 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
65 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
104 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
45 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
62 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
27 FPS
11.6ms Frame Time
17ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 36,945
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 20,282

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 27 35 41 62
1440p QHD 45 59 70 104
1080p Full HD 65 86 102 152

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 86
1920x1080 Low 152
1920x1080 Medium 102
1920x1080 Ultra 65
2560x1440 High 59
2560x1440 Low 104
2560x1440 Medium 70
2560x1440 Ultra 45
3840x2160 High 35
3840x2160 Low 62
3840x2160 Medium 41
3840x2160 Ultra 27

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER delivers a playable experience in Rust, but the margin for error depends heavily on the chosen resolution and quality preset. The recorded data shows that at 1080p, the combination is capable of running every tested setting above the 60 FPS threshold, while at 1440p and 4K, the user must make deliberate compromises to maintain smooth gameplay. This analysis breaks down the measured performance figures, component roles, and comparable alternatives to provide a clear picture of what this hardware can achieve.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160 (4K), the only preset that maintains an average frame rate at or above 60 FPS is Low, with a recorded average of 62 FPS. The Medium preset drops to 41 FPS average, High falls to 35 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 27 FPS. For a 60 FPS target, Low is the sole viable option at this resolution.

At 2560x1440 (1440p), the Medium preset is the highest quality setting that stays above 60 FPS, delivering an average of 70 FPS with a minimum of 60 FPS and a maximum of 81 FPS. Low achieves 104 FPS average, while High falls just short at 59 FPS average, below the threshold. Ultra is not playable at this resolution, averaging 45 FPS.

At 1920x1080 (1080p), the Ultra preset is the best setting that remains above 60 FPS, producing an average of 65 FPS. This is the highest quality option tested at this resolution. Below Ultra, High averages 86 FPS, Medium averages 102 FPS, and Low reaches 152 FPS. All four settings clear the 60 FPS line at 1080p, giving the user full freedom to choose between visual fidelity and higher frame rates.

CPU and GPU Roles

The scaling patterns across resolutions and presets reveal how the balance between CPU and GPU load shifts. At 1080p, the gap between Low (152 FPS) and Ultra (65 FPS) is substantial, a 87 FPS difference. This indicates that at lower resolutions, the GPU is the primary bottleneck when quality settings increase, as the CPU has enough headroom to push high frame rates on Low settings. The CPU, a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 3 part with a 3.00 GHz base and 4.00 GHz boost clock, provides sufficient single-thread performance for the game's logic, as evidenced by the 152 FPS result at 1080p Low.

Moving to 1440p, the frame rates compress. Low averages 104 FPS, Medium 70 FPS, and High 59 FPS. The drop from Low to Medium is 34 FPS, and from Medium to High is 11 FPS. This tighter spread suggests that the GPU begins to take on more responsibility as pixel count rises, but the CPU still has influence. At 4K, the pattern becomes more pronounced: Low averages 62 FPS, Medium 41 FPS, High 35 FPS, and Ultra 27 FPS. The difference between Low and Medium at 4K is 21 FPS, and between Medium and High is only 6 FPS. Here, the GPU is clearly the dominant factor, as the RTX 2070 SUPER with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth struggles to keep up with the increased pixel workload.

The data indicates that at 1080p, the CPU plays a more significant role in achieving high frame rates, especially at Low and Medium settings where the GPU is not fully saturated. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the limiting component, and the CPU's influence diminishes. The fact that 1440p High (59 FPS) is only one frame below the 60 FPS threshold, while 4K Low (62 FPS) barely clears it, reinforces this interpretation: the GPU's capabilities define the ceiling at higher resolutions.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F has an average benchmark score of 36945, placing it in the 85th percentile of all tested processors. Its nearest rivals are all within a fraction of a percent:

  • The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 scores 36938, a delta of 0 percent, meaning it is effectively identical in average performance.
  • The AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D scores 37018, a delta of -0.2 percent, slightly higher than the 5600F.
  • The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 scores 37093, a delta of -0.4 percent, marginally ahead.
  • The Intel Core i9-12900T scores 37112, a delta of -0.5 percent, also slightly ahead.

These differences are negligible in real-world gaming, so any of these CPUs would behave similarly in Rust, with frame rates within a couple of percent of the 5600F.

For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 20282, placing it in the 65th percentile of all tested GPUs. Its nearest rivals show comparable performance:

  • The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M scores 20480, a delta of -1 percent, meaning the RTX 2070 SUPER is about 1 percent slower.
  • The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20534, a delta of -1.2 percent, slightly ahead.
  • The Intel Arc B570 scores 20556, a delta of -1.3 percent, marginally ahead.
  • The Intel Arc A750 scores 20582, a delta of -1.5 percent, also slightly ahead.

In practice, these GPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates in Rust, with differences well within the margin of measurement error. A user upgrading from any of these to another would not notice a meaningful change in performance.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Rust at 4K with High settings?

A: No. The recorded average frame rate at 3840x2160 with High settings is 35 FPS, well below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Only the Low preset at 4K achieves 62 FPS average.

Q: What is the best quality preset at 1440p that stays above 60 FPS?

A: The Medium preset at 2560x1440 delivers an average of 70 FPS, with a minimum of 60 FPS and a maximum of 81 FPS. This is the highest tested setting that clears the threshold at this resolution.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more limiting at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the GPU becomes the limiting factor as settings increase. Low settings reach 152 FPS, indicating CPU headroom, but Ultra drops to 65 FPS, showing that the RTX 2070 SUPER cannot maintain higher frame rates under maximum load.

Q: How does the RTX 2070 SUPER compare to the Intel Arc A750?

A: The RTX 2070 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 20282, while the Intel Arc A750 scores 20582, a delta of -1.5 percent. The Arc A750 is slightly faster in synthetic benchmarks, but in Rust, the frame rate difference would be minimal.

Q: What is the lowest playable setting at 4K?

A: The Low preset at 3840x2160 is the only playable option, averaging 62 FPS. All other settings at this resolution fall below 60 FPS.

Q: Does the system achieve 60 FPS at 1440p with High settings?

A: No. The High preset at 2560x1440 averages 59 FPS, just one frame below the 60 FPS threshold. It is not considered playable according to the data.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The complete set of recorded measurements for this combination is as follows:

At 3840x2160:

  • Low: average 62 FPS, minimum and maximum not recorded
  • Medium: average 41 FPS, minimum 35 FPS, maximum 48 FPS
  • High: average 35 FPS, minimum and maximum not recorded
  • Ultra: average 27 FPS, minimum and maximum not recorded

At 2560x1440:

  • Low: average 104 FPS, minimum and maximum not recorded
  • Medium: average 70 FPS, minimum 60 FPS, maximum 81 FPS
  • High: average 59 FPS, minimum and maximum not recorded
  • Ultra: average 45 FPS, minimum and maximum not recorded

At 1920x1080:

  • Low: average 152 FPS, minimum and maximum not recorded
  • Medium: average 102 FPS, minimum 87 FPS, maximum 117 FPS
  • High: average 86 FPS, minimum and maximum not recorded
  • Ultra: average 65 FPS, minimum and maximum not recorded

The Medium preset at each resolution includes minimum and maximum values, while the other presets only have average figures. The data shows a consistent progression: as resolution increases, the average frame rate drops for every preset. The largest single drop occurs between 1080p Low (152 FPS) and 1440p Low (104 FPS), a 48 FPS reduction. Between 1440p Low and 4K Low, the drop is 42 FPS, from 104 to 62 FPS. These figures highlight the GPU's increasing workload at higher pixel counts.

How This Combo Ranks

Among all tested combinations in the database, this specific pairing of AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER ranks 2160 out of 3723 total combos for Rust. This places it in the lower-middle portion of the rankings, meaning roughly 58 percent of tested systems perform better in this game. The rank reflects the GPU's age and tier, as the RTX 2070 SUPER sits in the 65th percentile of all GPUs, while the CPU is more capable, resting in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. The combination's overall position is dragged down by the GPU, which cannot fully utilize the CPU's potential at higher resolutions.

At 1080p, the combo performs well enough to rank higher in practical terms, as all presets clear 60 FPS. At 1440p and 4K, the ranking is less favorable, as the GPU becomes the bottleneck and only the lowest presets remain playable. The rank of 2160 out of 3723 suggests that many other systems, likely with newer GPUs, achieve better results, but this combo is not at the very bottom, as the CPU provides solid foundation for lower-resolution gaming.

The Verdict

This PC can run Rust, but the playable settings vary sharply by resolution. At 1920x1080, the system is fully capable, with all four tested presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) averaging above 60 FPS. The Ultra preset, at 65 FPS average, is the best choice for visual quality while maintaining smooth gameplay.

At 2560x1440, the system remains playable on Low and Medium presets. Medium is the recommended setting, delivering 70 FPS average with a minimum of 60 FPS, ensuring no drops below the threshold. High and Ultra are not viable, as they average 59 FPS and 45 FPS respectively.

At 3840x2160, only the Low preset clears 60 FPS, averaging 62 FPS. Medium, High, and Ultra all fall short, with averages of 41, 35, and 27 FPS respectively. For 4K gaming, the user must accept low-quality settings or reduce the resolution.

The data shows that this system is best suited for 1080p gaming, where it offers headroom for high frame rates, and can handle 1440p with moderate settings. At 4K, it is limited to the lowest preset. The RTX 2070 SUPER, with its 8 GB memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth, is the decisive factor in these results, while the Ryzen 5 5600F provides ample processing power that rarely becomes the limiting factor. For users targeting 60 FPS, the verdict is clear: 1080p Ultra, 1440p Medium, and 4K Low are the maximum settings that meet the threshold.