Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Rust
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 31 | 45 | 50 | 73 |
| 1440p QHD | 54 | 73 | 87 | 130 |
| 1080p Full HD | 81 | 108 | 127 | 187 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 5600 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 delivers a range of performance in Rust that scales predictably across resolutions and quality presets. Measured data shows this combination is comfortably playable at 1080p and 1440p with high settings, while 4K requires a significant settings compromise to maintain fluid frame rates. The following analysis breaks down the exact measured FPS figures, identifies the best settings for each resolution, and contextualizes this hardware pairing against other tested combos and nearby rivals.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The benchmark results for Rust with this AMD Ryzen 5 5600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 combination span three resolutions and four quality settings, providing a clear picture of performance scaling. At 1920x1080, the lowest tested resolution, the combo delivers its strongest results. With Low settings, the average frame rate reaches 186.7 FPS, which is the highest measured figure across the entire test matrix. Moving to Medium settings drops the average to 127 FPS, while High settings yield 107.6 FPS. The most demanding preset at 1080p, Ultra, still maintains an average of 80.8 FPS. This progression shows a loss of roughly 32 FPS from Low to Medium, then another 19.4 FPS from Medium to High, and finally a further 26.8 FPS drop when enabling Ultra. The scaling is not perfectly linear, but the trend is consistent: each step up in quality costs a meaningful chunk of performance.
At 2560x1440, the picture shifts toward more moderate frame rates. Low settings produce an average of 130 FPS, which is still well above the 60 FPS playability threshold. Medium settings reduce the average to 86.9 FPS, and High settings come in at 72.9 FPS. Ultra at 1440p falls to 53.5 FPS, which dips below the 60 FPS threshold and indicates that the most demanding preset is not viable at this resolution for smooth gameplay. The gap between Low and Medium at 1440p is 43.1 FPS, while the gap between Medium and High is 14 FPS. The drop from High to Ultra is 19.4 FPS, showing that Ultra carries a particularly heavy penalty at this resolution.
The 3840x2160 results are the most constrained. At 4K, Low settings yield an average of 73 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS bar. Medium settings fall to 50.2 FPS, High settings drop to 45.1 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 31.3 FPS. The delta between Low and Medium at 4K is 22.8 FPS, between Medium and High is 5.1 FPS, and between High and Ultra is 13.8 FPS. Notably, the difference between Medium and High at 4K is small, suggesting that the GPU is heavily bottlenecked at these settings, while the jump to Ultra imposes a much larger relative cost. Across all resolutions, the data shows that the RTX 3070’s 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth become a limiting factor as resolution increases, particularly at 4K where even Medium settings struggle to hold 60 FPS.
Min and max FPS values are not provided in the measured data, so the analysis relies solely on average frame rates. This means the consistency of frame delivery cannot be assessed directly, but the average figures still offer a solid basis for comparing settings and resolutions. The data is measured, not estimated, which adds confidence to the results.
Best Settings per Resolution
Determining the best settings for each resolution requires identifying the most demanding preset that still maintains an average of at least 60 FPS, the playability threshold specified in the data. At 1920x1080, all four settings—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—clear this bar. The best settings are therefore Ultra, which delivers an average of 80.8 FPS. This is the highest quality preset tested, and it stays comfortably above 60 FPS, giving the user headroom for occasional dips without falling below playable levels. The 80.8 FPS average at 1080p Ultra is 20.8 FPS above the threshold, indicating that this resolution is the sweet spot for this combo when visual fidelity is the priority.
At 2560x1440, the playable settings are High, Medium, and Low, as each maintains an average above 60 FPS. Ultra falls short at 53.5 FPS, so it is excluded. The best settings are High, which produces an average of 72.9 FPS. This is 12.9 FPS above the threshold, providing a reasonable margin for demanding scenes. Choosing High over Medium sacrifices some visual quality but gains 14 FPS on average, which is a worthwhile trade-off for smoother gameplay. Low settings would yield 130 FPS, but that is unnecessary headroom when High already clears the bar.
At 3840x2160, only Low settings are playable, with an average of 73 FPS. Medium and above all fall below 60 FPS: Medium at 50.2 FPS, High at 45.1 FPS, and Ultra at 31.3 FPS. The best settings at 4K are therefore Low, which delivers 73 FPS. This is 13 FPS above the threshold, but the margin is slimmer than at lower resolutions. The data indicates that 4K gaming with this combo requires significant compromises, and even Low settings do not leave much room for frame rate fluctuations. Users targeting 4K would need to accept reduced visual fidelity or consider lowering the resolution.
For all resolutions, the measured FPS at the best settings reflects the underlying hardware capabilities. The Ryzen 5 5600, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, provides sufficient CPU performance for Rust, while the RTX 3070’s 5888 shading units and 20.31 TFLOPS FP32 throughput drive the frame rates. The data shows that 1080p and 1440p are the viable targets for high-quality play, while 4K is limited to the lowest preset.
How This Combo Ranks
Within the benchmark database, this combination of AMD Ryzen 5 5600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 holds a rank of 1535 out of 3723 tested combos for Rust. This places it in the top 41.2% of all tested configurations, based on the rank and total count. The percentileVsAllCpus for the CPU is 74, meaning the Ryzen 5 5600 outperforms 74% of all CPUs in the database, while the percentileVsAllGpus for the RTX 3070 is 61, indicating it beats 61% of all GPUs. These percentile figures suggest that the CPU is a stronger relative performer than the GPU, which influences how the combo scales across settings.
The combo rank of 1535 indicates that there are 1534 tested combinations that deliver better performance in Rust, while 2188 combinations rank lower. This is a mid-to-upper tier result, reflecting the fact that the RTX 3070, while capable, is not a top-end GPU by the database’s standards. The CPU’s higher percentile (74) compared to the GPU (61) suggests that in Rust, which can be CPU-intensive in certain scenarios, the Ryzen 5 5600 holds up its end of the bargain, but the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions and settings. This is consistent with the measured FPS data, where the combo struggles to maintain 60 FPS at 4K Medium and above.
The rank also implies that users with this combo can expect playable performance at most settings below 4K, but they will not be at the forefront of the performance leaderboard. For context, the combo sits in the same performance tier as many other mid-range pairings, and the measured FPS figures align with what the percentile scores would predict. The data shows that this is a solid, balanced setup for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K being a stretch goal that requires reduced settings.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Looking at the nearest rivals for each component provides insight into what other hardware would behave similarly to this combo. For the AMD Ryzen 5 5600, the closest rival in terms of average benchmark score is the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, which has an average score of 20454 compared to the Ryzen’s 20468, a delta of 0.1%. This means the two CPUs are nearly identical in synthetic performance, so swapping one for the other would have a negligible impact on Rust frame rates. The AMD Ryzen 5 8500G follows closely with an average score of 20425 and a delta of 0.2%, again indicating near-parity. The AMD EPYC 9454P and AMD EPYC 7713 are also within 0.2% and 0.5% respectively, though these are server-class chips that would not be typical gaming choices.
For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, the nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT, which has an average score of 17083 versus the RTX 3070’s 17208, a delta of 0.7%. This suggests that the RX 7600 XT would deliver very similar frame rates in Rust, making it a viable alternative for users considering AMD’s lineup. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 and AMD Radeon HD 7970M are also listed as near rivals, with deltas of 1% and 1.1% respectively, but these are much older architectures and would likely lack modern feature support. The NVIDIA Tesla K40c has a higher score of 17468, a delta of -1.5%, but it is a compute-focused card without display outputs, so it is not a practical gaming alternative.
In practice, if a user were to pair the Ryzen 5 5600 with an RX 7600 XT instead of the RTX 3070, the measured FPS in Rust would likely be within a few frames per second, given the 0.7% difference in average GPU score. Similarly, swapping the CPU to an Intel Core Ultra 7 258V would produce nearly identical results, as the 0.1% delta is within measurement noise. These alternatives confirm that the tested combo sits in a well-populated performance tier, and users have multiple options for achieving similar gameplay experiences.
FAQ
Q: What is the highest quality preset that maintains at least 60 FPS at 1920x1080?
A: At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset maintains an average of 80.8 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold. All four presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—are playable at this resolution.
Q: Can this combo run Rust at 2560x1440 with Ultra settings?
A: No. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset delivers an average of 53.5 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS playability threshold. The highest playable preset at this resolution is High, with an average of 72.9 FPS.
Q: What is the performance at 3840x2160 with Medium settings?
A: At 3840x2160, Medium settings produce an average of 50.2 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. Only Low settings are playable at 4K, with an average of 73 FPS.
Q: How does the Ryzen 5 5600 compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V?
A: The Ryzen 5 5600 has an average benchmark score of 20468, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V scores 20454, a delta of 0.1%. This indicates nearly identical CPU performance, so frame rates in Rust would be very similar with either processor.
Q: Which GPU is the closest alternative to the RTX 3070 in terms of benchmark score?
A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT has an average score of 17083, compared to the RTX 3070’s 17208, a delta of 0.7%. This makes it the closest rival, with expected performance differences in Rust being minimal.
Q: What is the overall rank of this combo among tested configurations for Rust?
A: This combo ranks 1535 out of 3723 tested combinations, placing it in the top 41.2% of all tested setups for Rust.
The Verdict
Based on the measured FPS data and the verdictByResolution information, this PC can run Rust, but the experience varies significantly by resolution. At 1920x1080, the system is fully capable of running the game at Ultra settings with an average of 80.8 FPS, clearing the 60 FPS threshold by a wide margin. This is the best-case scenario, offering high visual quality with smooth frame rates. At 2560x1440, the combo can handle High settings with an average of 72.9 FPS, which is still comfortably playable, but Ultra is not viable as it drops to 53.5 FPS. At 3840x2160, the system is limited to Low settings, which deliver 73 FPS on average; Medium, High, and Ultra all fall below 60 FPS, making them unsuitable for smooth gameplay.
The data shows that this hardware pairing is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it can deliver high-quality visuals without compromising frame rates. For 4K, users would need to accept Low settings, which sacrifices much of the visual fidelity that makes higher presets appealing. The Ryzen 5 5600’s strong relative performance (74th percentile) and the RTX 3070’s solid mid-range showing (61st percentile) combine to create a balanced setup that excels at mainstream resolutions. The overall combo rank of 1535 out of 3723 confirms that this is a capable configuration, though not a top-tier one. If the goal is to play Rust at 1080p or 1440p with high settings, this PC delivers. If 4K gaming is the target, the results will be underwhelming, and users should consider a more powerful GPU or stick to lower resolutions.