Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

99%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
172 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
126 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
151 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
88 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
121 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
52 FPS
7.2ms Frame Time
11ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 37,018
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 56,083

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 52 69 81 121
1440p QHD 88 116 130 151
1080p Full HD 126 139 147 172

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 139
1920x1080 Low 172
1920x1080 Medium 147
1920x1080 Ultra 126
2560x1440 High 116
2560x1440 Low 151
2560x1440 Medium 130
2560x1440 Ultra 88
3840x2160 High 69
3840x2160 Low 121
3840x2160 Medium 81
3840x2160 Ultra 52

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 delivers a robust performance profile in Rust, with benchmark results indicating that the combination is capable of handling the game at high refresh rates across all tested resolutions. The data shows a clear hierarchy of performance scaling, where the RTX 5080's substantial graphics throughput is modulated by the Ryzen 5 5500X3D's Zen 3 architecture, resulting in a system that prioritizes frame rate stability at lower presets and cedes some ground at the most demanding settings. Measured FPS data confirms that the combo ranks in the 85th percentile for CPUs and 87th percentile for GPUs respectively, placing this configuration in the upper echelon of tested hardware.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured frame rate data for this configuration in Rust spans three resolutions and four quality presets, providing a comprehensive view of its performance envelope. At 3840x2160, the combo averages 121 FPS on Low settings, dropping to 81 FPS on Medium, 69 FPS on High, and 52 FPS on Ultra. The Medium preset at 4K includes the only complete min/max data for this resolution, showing a minimum of 69 FPS and a maximum of 94 FPS, which indicates a frame time variance of 25 FPS during typical gameplay. The High preset's 69 FPS average sits exactly at the playable threshold of 60 FPS, while Ultra falls below that mark, making it the only non-playable configuration in the dataset.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance scales upward significantly. Low settings produce an average of 151 FPS, Medium reaches 130 FPS with a documented range of 111 to 150 FPS, High achieves 116 FPS, and Ultra maintains 88 FPS. The min/max spread at Medium (39 FPS) is wider than at 4K Medium (25 FPS), suggesting that the lower resolution allows the CPU to become more of a limiting factor in frame pacing, though the absolute numbers remain comfortably high. The Ultra preset at 1440p clears the 60 FPS threshold with a 28 FPS margin, demonstrating that this resolution is where the combo finds its best balance of visual fidelity and performance.

At 1920x1080, the results show the highest frame rates in the dataset. Low settings average 172 FPS, Medium averages 147 FPS with a range of 125 to 170 FPS, High averages 139 FPS, and Ultra averages 126 FPS. The scaling from Medium to High to Ultra at 1080p is remarkably linear, with each step down in preset costing roughly 8-11 FPS, indicating that the GPU remains the primary bottleneck even at this resolution. The min FPS at Medium (125 FPS) is still more than double the playable threshold, suggesting that even the most demanding moments in Rust will not produce stutter on this hardware at 1080p.

The overall trend across resolutions shows that the combo loses approximately 41-43% of its average FPS when moving from 1080p to 4K at the same preset (e.g., 172 to 121 FPS on Low, 147 to 81 FPS on Medium). This scaling is consistent with a GPU-bound scenario, where the RTX 5080's 960.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 56.28 TFLOPS compute are increasingly taxed by higher pixel counts.

Best Settings per Resolution

For 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is High, which produces an average of 69 FPS. This leaves a 9 FPS margin above the playable threshold, providing some headroom for scene complexity spikes without dropping below 60 FPS. The Medium preset at 4K also qualifies with an 81 FPS average, but High offers better visual quality while remaining playable. Ultra at 4K, with its 52 FPS average, falls short of the 60 FPS threshold and is not recommended for this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset is fully playable with an average of 88 FPS. This is the best visual quality setting available in the dataset, and it clears the 60 FPS threshold by a substantial 28 FPS margin. The data indicates that 1440p Ultra is the sweet spot for this combo, offering the highest settings without any playability concerns. The High preset at 116 FPS and Medium at 130 FPS are also viable options for users prioritizing frame rate over visual fidelity, but Ultra is the clear choice for those seeking maximum quality.

For 1920x1080, Ultra delivers an average of 126 FPS, which is more than double the playable threshold. This makes 1080p Ultra the best settings choice, as it provides the highest visual quality while maintaining excellent frame rates. The dataset shows no playability issues at any preset for this resolution, with even the most demanding setting staying well above 60 FPS. The 1080p results suggest that this combo is overqualified for standard HD gaming, as the RTX 5080 is capable of pushing well beyond typical 60 Hz display refresh rates even at Ultra settings.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination ranks 549th out of 3,723 tested combos in Rust, placing it in the 85.3rd percentile of all configurations. This rank reflects the overall performance of the CPU-GPU pairing, which is dominated by the RTX 5080's strong showing in the 87th percentile of all GPUs. The Ryzen 5 5500X3D's 85th percentile ranking among all CPUs is slightly lower, but the combination still lands in the top 15% of all tested hardware. The rank of 549 out of 3,723 means that approximately 3,174 other combos perform worse, while 548 perform better, placing this setup firmly in the upper tier of gaming PCs.

The data indicates that the combo's rank is primarily driven by the GPU's performance, as the RTX 5080's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 8,637 and Passmark G3D score of 36,565 are exceptionally high. The CPU's Passmark multithread score of 20,363 and single-thread score of 2,941 are solid mid-range numbers, but they do not match the GPU's elite status. This asymmetry suggests that in Rust, which is known for its CPU-intensive server and world simulation, the Ryzen 5 5500X3D may hold back the RTX 5080 in certain scenarios, particularly at lower resolutions where the CPU becomes more of a bottleneck.

The rank of 549th also implies that there are 548 combinations that achieve better FPS in Rust, likely featuring higher-end CPUs such as the Intel Core i9-12900T, which appears in the CPU's nearest rivals list with a benchmark score of 37,112. The gap between this combo and the top performers is likely due to the CPU's 6-core/12-thread configuration, which may limit performance in Rust's many-threaded workloads, despite the generous 96 MB of shared L3 cache.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the nearest rivals for the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F scores 36,945, which is 0.2% lower than the Ryzen 5 5500X3D's 37,018 average. This means the 5600F would behave nearly identically in Rust, with benchmark differences well within the margin of error. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 scores 37,093, a 0.2% difference in the opposite direction, making it a slightly faster alternative that would produce marginally higher frame rates. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 scores 36,938, again 0.2% slower, while the Intel Core i9-12900T scores 37,112, which is 0.3% faster than the Ryzen 5 5500X3D. These four CPUs all fall within a 0.5% performance band, meaning any of them would yield effectively identical results in Rust when paired with the RTX 5080.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals present a more varied picture. The AMD Radeon 8060S scores 55,757, which is 0.6% lower than the RTX 5080's 56,083 average, indicating nearly identical performance. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55,698, a 0.7% deficit, while the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54,828, a 2.3% gap. On the faster side, the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE scores 57,367, which is 2.2% higher than the RTX 5080, making it the only rival that would produce noticeably better frame rates in Rust. All other GPU rivals are within 2.3% of the RTX 5080's performance, so swapping to any of them would yield very similar FPS numbers in the measured scenarios.

When considering a combination of these rivals, the closest overall alternative would be pairing the Ryzen 5 5600F with the Radeon 8060S, which would produce results within 0.8% of this combo. The Intel Core i9-12900T paired with the Radeon RX 9070 GRE would be the fastest nearby alternative, potentially delivering 2.5% higher performance, though this would still result in the same playability verdicts across all resolutions and presets.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals a clear division of labor between the Ryzen 5 5500X3D and the RTX 5080 in Rust. At 3840x2160, the performance scaling from Low to Medium to High to Ultra shows a consistent drop of roughly 33-36% at each step (121 to 81 to 69 to 52 FPS), which indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck. The RTX 5080's 52 FPS at 4K Ultra suggests that the GPU's 16 GB of GDDR7 memory and 960.0 GB/s bandwidth are being fully utilized, while the CPU has headroom to spare. The min/max data at 4K Medium (69 to 94 FPS) shows a 25 FPS variance, which is relatively tight, suggesting that the CPU is keeping up with frame generation demands.

At 2560x1440, the scaling pattern changes. The drop from Low to Medium is 21 FPS (151 to 130), from Medium to High is 14 FPS (130 to 116), and from High to Ultra is 28 FPS (116 to 88). The larger drop from High to Ultra indicates that the GPU is becoming more stressed at this resolution, but the overall performance is still high enough that the CPU's limitations are less apparent. The min/max spread at 1440p Medium (111 to 150 FPS) is 39 FPS, which is wider than at 4K, suggesting that the CPU is now contributing to frame time variability as it works harder to feed the GPU at higher frame rates.

At 1920x1080, the pattern shifts further toward CPU limitation. The scaling from Low to Medium is 25 FPS (172 to 147), from Medium to High is 8 FPS (147 to 139), and from High to Ultra is 13 FPS (139 to 126). The relatively small differences between Medium, High, and Ultra suggest that the GPU is not the primary constraint at 1080p; instead, the Ryzen 5 5500X3D's 6-core/12-thread configuration is limiting the frame rate. The min FPS at 1080p Medium (125 FPS) is still very high, but the 45 FPS spread between min and max (125 to 170) indicates that CPU-bound scenarios are causing more frame time variation. The data supports the conclusion that the GPU matters more at 4K, while the CPU matters more at 1080p, with 1440p representing a balanced midpoint.

The Verdict

This PC can run Rust at 60 FPS or higher across all but one configuration tested. At 3840x2160, the High preset achieves 69 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS threshold, and both Low (121 FPS) and Medium (81 FPS) also qualify as playable. The Ultra preset at 4K, with its 52 FPS average, does not meet the playable threshold and should be avoided. At 2560x1440, all four presets are playable, with Ultra delivering 88 FPS, High at 116 FPS, Medium at 130 FPS, and Low at 151 FPS. At 1920x1080, all presets are playable, with Ultra achieving 126 FPS, High at 139 FPS, Medium at 147 FPS, and Low at 172 FPS. The best settings for each resolution are High at 4K (69 FPS), Ultra at 1440p (88 FPS), and Ultra at 1080p (126 FPS). The only non-playable configuration in the dataset is 4K Ultra, which falls 8 FPS short of the 60 FPS threshold.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo run Rust at 4K with maximum settings?

A: No. At 3840x2160 Ultra, the average FPS is 52, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The highest playable preset at 4K is High, which averages 69 FPS.

Q: What is the best preset for 1440p gaming?

A: The Ultra preset at 2560x1440 achieves an average of 88 FPS, making it the most demanding playable setting at that resolution. All four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable at 1440p.

Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1080p to 4K?

A: At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 172 at 1080p to 121 at 4K, a 51 FPS decrease. At Medium settings, the drop is from 147 to 81 FPS, a 66 FPS decrease. At High settings, the drop is from 139 to 69 FPS, a 70 FPS decrease.

Q: Which component is more limiting at 1080p?

A: The CPU. At 1920x1080, the differences between Medium (147 FPS), High (139 FPS), and Ultra (126 FPS) are relatively small, indicating that the Ryzen 5 5500X3D's 6-core/12-thread configuration is the primary constraint rather than the RTX 5080.

Q: Is the RTX 5080's performance similar to other GPUs in this test?

A: Yes. The nearest GPU rivals are all within 2.3% of the RTX 5080's average benchmark score of 56,083. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE is 2.2% faster, while the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X is 2.3% slower.

Q: What is the minimum frame rate recorded for this combo?

A: The lowest documented minimum FPS is 69, recorded at 3840x2160 Medium settings. At 2560x1440 Medium, the minimum is 111 FPS, and at 1920x1080 Medium, the minimum is 125 FPS. All other presets lack min/max data in the dataset.