Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

86%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
172 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
93 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
148 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
64 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
88 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
38 FPS
8.2ms Frame Time
12ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 37,018
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 23,172

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 38 50 59 88
1440p QHD 64 84 100 148
1080p Full HD 93 122 145 172

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 122
1920x1080 Low 172
1920x1080 Medium 145
1920x1080 Ultra 93
2560x1440 High 84
2560x1440 Low 148
2560x1440 Medium 100
2560x1440 Ultra 64
3840x2160 High 50
3840x2160 Low 88
3840x2160 Medium 59
3840x2160 Ultra 38

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 combination produces a wide spread of frame rates in Rust, ranging from 38 FPS at 4K Ultra to 172 FPS at 1080p Low. The data indicates that this pairing is heavily resolution-dependent, with the GPU becoming the limiting factor at higher pixel counts while the CPU’s large 96 MB shared L3 cache helps sustain high averages at lower resolutions. Below is a detailed breakdown of the measured performance.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the RTX 3080 and Ryzen 5 5500X3D deliver an average of 50 FPS on High settings, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Dropping to Medium improves the average to 59 FPS, with a minimum of 50 FPS and a maximum of 68 FPS — still not consistently smooth. Low settings raise the average to 88 FPS, a significant jump that clears the threshold comfortably. Ultra settings, however, pull the average down to 38 FPS, the lowest figure in the entire dataset. The gap between Low and Ultra at this resolution is 50 FPS, illustrating how much headroom the GPU has when settings are reduced.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance picture improves markedly. High settings produce an average of 84 FPS, while Medium hits 100 FPS with a minimum of 85 FPS and a maximum of 115 FPS. Low settings reach 148 FPS, and Ultra maintains an average of 64 FPS, just above the 60 FPS line. The spread from Ultra to Low is 84 FPS, showing that the combo scales well with setting changes at this resolution. The minimum recorded value at Medium (85 FPS) is higher than the average at 4K High (50 FPS), indicating that resolution has a stronger impact than preset changes.

At 1920x1080, the combination excels across all presets. Low settings yield 172 FPS, Medium averages 145 FPS with a minimum of 123 FPS and a maximum of 166 FPS, High reaches 122 FPS, and Ultra still maintains 93 FPS. Every preset clears the 60 FPS threshold with substantial margin. The minimum FPS at 1080p Medium (123 FPS) exceeds the maximum FPS at 4K Medium (68 FPS), demonstrating how resolution dominates the performance envelope. The data shows a consistent pattern: each resolution step down from 4K to 1440p to 1080p adds roughly 30-40 FPS to the average at equivalent settings, with the largest absolute gains occurring at Low settings.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combo in Rust?

A: The highest average FPS is 172, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings. The next highest is 148 FPS at 2560x1440 Low, followed by 145 FPS at 1080p Medium.

Q: Does this system hit 60 FPS at 4K with any preset?

A: Yes, but only with Low settings, which produce an average of 88 FPS. Medium averages 59 FPS (just below 60), High averages 50 FPS, and Ultra averages 38 FPS, so none of those meet the playable threshold.

Q: Which preset at 2560x1440 provides the best visual quality while staying above 60 FPS?

A: Ultra settings at 2560x1440 average 64 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold. This is the most demanding preset that remains playable at that resolution.

Q: How does the minimum FPS at 1080p Medium compare to the average at 4K High?

A: The minimum FPS at 1080p Medium is 123 FPS, which is 73 FPS higher than the 50 FPS average at 4K High. This highlights how much more consistent performance is at lower resolutions.

Q: What is the rank of this combo among all tested systems in Rust?

A: The combo ranks 1156 out of 3723 tested combinations, placing it in the upper third of all systems evaluated for this game.

Q: Are there any settings where the average FPS drops below 40?

A: Yes, at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average FPS is 38, which is the only preset and resolution combination in the data that falls below 40 FPS.

Best Settings per Resolution

For 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Low, which delivers an average of 88 FPS. Medium falls short at 59 FPS, so Low is the only viable option for smooth gameplay at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, Ultra settings achieve an average of 64 FPS, clearing the 60 FPS threshold. This is the highest quality preset available at this resolution that remains playable, with High (84 FPS), Medium (100 FPS), and Low (148 FPS) all also exceeding the threshold.

For 1920x1080, Ultra settings produce an average of 93 FPS, making it the best visual preset while maintaining a comfortable margin above 60 FPS. All other presets — High (122 FPS), Medium (145 FPS), and Low (172 FPS) — also clear the threshold with even higher averages.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the CPU’s nearest rivals, the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D scores an average benchmark of 37018, which is within 0.2% of the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F (36945) and Intel Core Ultra 5 225 (36938). The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 scores slightly higher at 37093 (0.2% above), and the Intel Core i9-12900T is 0.3% ahead at 37112. In practice, these processors would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Rust, so swapping to any of them would not meaningfully change the measured FPS values.

For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 has an average benchmark score of 23172. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA P106-100 (23249, 0.3% higher), AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 (23250, 0.3% higher), AMD Radeon RX 6600M (23273, 0.4% higher), and AMD Radeon R9 M290X (23276, 0.4% higher). These deltas are all under half a percent, so any of these GPUs would produce essentially the same frame rates as the RTX 3080 in Rust, despite their different architectures and market positions.

When considering both components together, the CPU and GPU are each surrounded by rivals within 0.4% of their benchmark scores. This means the overall performance profile of this combo — its 4K limitations and 1080p strengths — would be replicated closely by systems using any of these adjacent parts.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals a clear shift in bottleneck behavior across resolutions. At 3840x2160, the GPU is the dominant constraint: lowering settings from High to Low increases the average FPS from 50 to 88, a 76% improvement. This large scaling factor indicates the RTX 3080 is fully saturated at 4K, and the CPU has ample headroom. In contrast, at 1920x1080, the same setting change only moves the average from 122 to 172 FPS, a 41% gain — still significant, but the smaller relative improvement suggests the CPU begins to matter more as pixel count drops.

The Ryzen 5 5500X3D’s role becomes more apparent at 1080p, where even Ultra settings hold 93 FPS. The CPU’s 96 MB shared L3 cache and 6 cores / 12 threads are sufficient to feed the GPU at this resolution, as evidenced by the fact that the minimum FPS at 1080p Medium (123 FPS) is higher than the maximum FPS at 4K Medium (68 FPS). Resolution scaling from 1440p to 1080p at Medium settings yields a 45% FPS increase (100 to 145), which is larger than the 69% increase from 4K to 1440p (59 to 100) — this non-linear scaling points to the GPU being the primary limiter at 4K, with the CPU taking on a more balanced role at lower resolutions.

At 2560x1440, the combo behaves as a midpoint: Ultra averages 64 FPS, and the gap between Low (148 FPS) and Ultra (64 FPS) is 84 FPS, indicating that both components are being exercised. The verdict data confirms this interpretation: at 4K, only Low is playable, while at 1440p and 1080p, all four presets clear 60 FPS. This pattern is consistent with a system where the GPU dictates performance at high pixel counts, and the CPU provides sufficient throughput to avoid becoming a bottleneck at mainstream resolutions.

The Verdict

This PC can run Rust, but the experience depends heavily on the chosen resolution. At 3840x2160, only Low settings (88 FPS average) clear the 60 FPS playable threshold; Medium (59 FPS), High (50 FPS), and Ultra (38 FPS) all fall short. For 2560x1440, the system is fully playable across all presets, with Ultra achieving 64 FPS and Low reaching 148 FPS. At 1920x1080, every preset exceeds 60 FPS by a wide margin, including Ultra at 93 FPS and Low at 172 FPS.

The data shows that this combination is best suited for 1080p or 1440p gaming in Rust, where it can handle maximum settings without issue. At 4K, users would need to accept Low settings for a smooth experience, or accept frame rates in the 38-59 FPS range at higher presets. The playable threshold of 60 FPS is met at 4K only with the least demanding preset, making 4K a compromise scenario rather than a strength.

How This Combo Ranks

In the benchmark database, this AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 combination ranks 1156 out of 3723 tested combos for Rust. This places it in the 69th percentile of all systems evaluated — meaning roughly 31% of tested combos perform better, while about 69% perform worse. Given that the CPU sits at the 85th percentile among all CPUs and the GPU at the 68th percentile among all GPUs, the combo’s ranking aligns closely with the GPU’s standing, reinforcing that the RTX 3080 is the performance ceiling in this pairing.

The rank is respectable for a mid-range CPU paired with an upper-mid-range GPU, and the measured data confirms that the system delivers playable performance at 1080p and 1440p across all presets. At 4K, the combo’s ranking would be lower in practice due to the GPU’s limitations, but the overall position of 1156 out of 3723 reflects a capable gaming machine for most users, particularly those targeting 1440p or higher refresh rates at 1080p.