Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Rust
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 32 | 43 | 50 | 75 |
| 1440p QHD | 55 | 72 | 85 | 127 |
| 1080p Full HD | 80 | 105 | 124 | 172 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 combination presents a clear picture for Rust: this is a 1080p and 1440p machine, with 4K viability only at the lowest settings. The data shows a system that hits the 60 FPS playable threshold across most settings at 1440p and all settings at 1080p, but struggles to maintain smooth gameplay at 4K with higher presets. The pairing of a 6-core, 12-thread CPU with a substantial 96 MB L3 cache alongside an 8 GB Ampere GPU creates a balanced setup where Rust's demanding nature is met with enough headroom for competitive play at mainstream resolutions.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Rust at 4K resolution?
A: Yes, but only at Low settings. The measured data shows an average of 75 FPS at 3840x2160 with Low settings. At Medium settings, the average drops to 50 FPS, and at Ultra, it falls to 32 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Rust?
A: The verdict data lists 1920x1080 as the best resolution, where all four tested settings (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable. Ultra settings at 1080p yield an average of 80 FPS, making it the only resolution where the highest preset clears the 60 FPS bar.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The Ryzen 5 5500X3D has an average benchmark score of 37018, placing it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. Its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F, scores 36945, a delta of only 0.2%. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 also sits within 0.2%, while the Intel Core i9-12900T is 0.3% ahead.
Q: Is the RTX 3070's performance close to any other GPUs?
A: The RTX 3070's average benchmark score is 17208, placing it in the 61st percentile of all GPUs. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is its nearest rival with a score of 17083, just 0.7% behind. The NVIDIA Tesla K40c is 1.5% ahead with a score of 17468.
Q: What are the minimum FPS numbers for Medium settings?
A: The measured FPS data includes min/max values for Medium settings only. At 1920x1080 Medium, the minimum is 106 FPS with a max of 143 FPS. At 2560x1440 Medium, the minimum is 73 FPS and the max is 98 FPS. At 3840x2160 Medium, the minimum drops to 43 FPS with a max of 58 FPS.
Q: Does the GPU's launch MSRP affect its current standing?
A: The RTX 3070 had a launch MSRP of 499 USD. This figure is historical context; the production status is listed as end-of-life, and the measured FPS data indicates current performance capability independent of that original pricing.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark data reveals a clear shift in bottleneck behavior as resolution increases. At 1920x1080, the CPU's role is paramount. The Ryzen 5 5500X3D, with its 96 MB shared L3 cache, keeps frame rates high across all presets, from 172 FPS at Low to 80 FPS at Ultra. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p shows only a 92 FPS drop, suggesting the CPU can feed the GPU efficiently even at lower graphical loads where draw calls dominate.
Moving to 2560x1440, the GPU begins to assert more influence. The average FPS at High drops from 105 at 1080p to 72 at 1440p, a 31% reduction. This indicates the RTX 3070's 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are becoming more critical. At Ultra settings, the 1440p average of 55 FPS falls below the 60 FPS threshold, showing that the GPU's compute resources (20.31 TFLOPS FP32) are insufficient for the highest preset at this resolution. The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads are still sufficient, evidenced by the smaller delta between Low (127 FPS) and High (72 FPS) at 1440p compared to the 4K jump.
At 3840x2160, the GPU is the definitive limiting factor. The RTX 3070's pixel rate of 165.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 317.4 GTexel/s are overwhelmed by 4K's pixel count. The average FPS at High plummets to 43, and at Ultra to 32. The CPU is effectively sidelined here; even with the 5500X3D's strong single-thread score of 2941 in Passmark, it cannot compensate for the GPU's inability to render 4K scenes. The Low preset at 4K (75 FPS) shows the GPU can handle the load when shader complexity is reduced, but any graphical fidelity increase causes immediate frame rate collapse.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The nearest rivals for the CPU and GPU provide useful context for builders considering alternative hardware. The Ryzen 5 5500X3D's average benchmark score of 37018 is nearly identical to three other chips: the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F (36945, 0.2% slower), the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 (37093, 0.2% faster), and the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 (36938, 0.2% slower). The Intel Core i9-12900T is 0.3% faster with a score of 37112. In Rust, these differences are negligible, meaning any of these CPUs would produce very similar frame rates when paired with the same GPU.
On the GPU side, the RTX 3070's score of 17208 is bracketed by several cards with near-identical performance. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT scores 17083, which is 0.7% lower, making it a direct substitute for the RTX 3070 in this context. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 (17037, 1% lower) and AMD Radeon HD 7970M (17019, 1.1% lower) are also within a single percentage point, though their older architectures may lack modern feature support. The NVIDIA Tesla K40c is 1.5% faster at 17468, but its workstation focus means it would not be a practical gaming choice. For Rust specifically, the RX 7600 XT would behave almost identically to the RTX 3070 across all tested resolutions and settings.
The Verdict
This PC can run Rust, and it does so comfortably at 1080p and 1440p with the right settings. At 1920x1080, all four presets are playable: Low (172 FPS), Medium (124 FPS), High (105 FPS), and Ultra (80 FPS). This is the clear sweet spot, with Ultra settings clearing the 60 FPS threshold by a 20 FPS margin. At 2560x1440, three of four presets are playable: Low (127 FPS), Medium (85 FPS), and High (72 FPS). Ultra at 1440p hits an average of 55 FPS, just below the playable mark.
At 3840x2160, the situation is restrictive. Only Low settings are playable, with an average of 75 FPS. Medium (50 FPS), High (43 FPS), and Ultra (32 FPS) all fall short of the 60 FPS threshold. The verdict data confirms this: the best playable settings at 4K are Low, with an average FPS of 75. For a smoother 4K experience, users would need to accept lower visual quality or consider this combination primarily for 1080p and 1440p gaming. The data shows this system is a capable Rust machine for the vast majority of players using standard monitors.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides exact numbers across three resolutions and four settings, though min/max values are only available for Medium presets.
At 3840x2160, the averages are as follows: Low settings produce 75 FPS, Medium averages 50 FPS with a min of 43 and max of 58, High averages 43 FPS, and Ultra averages 32 FPS. The frame time consistency at Medium (43-58 range) indicates noticeable stuttering potential, as the gap between minimum and average is 7 FPS.
At 2560x1440, performance improves significantly: Low averages 127 FPS, Medium averages 85 FPS with a min of 73 and max of 98, High averages 72 FPS, and Ultra averages 55 FPS. The Medium preset's min of 73 FPS shows that even in demanding scenes, the system maintains playable frame rates at this resolution.
At 1920x1080, the numbers are strong across the board: Low averages 172 FPS, Medium averages 124 FPS with a min of 106 and max of 143, High averages 105 FPS, and Ultra averages 80 FPS. The Medium preset's minimum of 106 FPS is higher than the average FPS of the 1440p High preset, demonstrating how resolution scaling impacts this hardware combination. The margin between 1080p Ultra (80 FPS) and 1440p Ultra (55 FPS) is a 25 FPS drop, reinforcing that the RTX 3070's memory bandwidth becomes a limiting factor as pixel count increases.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 ranks 1621 out of 3723 tested combinations for Rust. This places it in the 56th percentile of all tested hardware pairings, meaning it outperforms more than half of all systems in the database but is not at the top tier. The rank reflects the balanced nature of the pairing: the CPU's 85th percentile standing is offset by the GPU's more modest 61st percentile, resulting in a mid-pack overall position.
This ranking makes practical sense given the measured data. The combo clears 60 FPS at every preset in 1080p and at three of four presets in 1440p, which is sufficient for most players. However, the 4K performance is limited to Low settings, and the 8 GB VRAM of the RTX 3070 may become a concern in Rust's larger servers with many entities. The rank of 1621 suggests that while this system is far from the slowest, there are 1620 other combinations that deliver better overall performance in Rust. For perspective, a system with a higher-ranking GPU would likely push 4K Medium or High settings into playable territory, while a stronger CPU would primarily benefit 1080p low-detail scenarios where the 5500X3D's 6 cores are sufficient but not exceptional.