Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Rust
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 27 | 35 | 41 | 62 |
| 1440p QHD | 45 | 59 | 70 | 104 |
| 1080p Full HD | 65 | 86 | 102 | 151 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 5500 and AMD Radeon RX 9060 combination delivers a highly capable Rust experience, with benchmark data showing it can clear the 60 FPS playable threshold at every tested resolution, provided the right settings are selected. At 1920x1080, the combo achieves 65 FPS on Ultra settings, while 2560x1440 supports Medium at 70 FPS, and even 3840x2160 remains playable on Low at 62 FPS. The measured data reveals a system that scales predictably with resolution and preset changes, making it a versatile option for Rust players across a range of display configurations.
FAQ
Q: Can this AMD Ryzen 5 5500 + AMD Radeon RX 9060 system run Rust at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings?
A: Yes, the benchmark results show an average of 65 FPS at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold. All four tested presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) at this resolution are playable, with Ultra being the highest playable option.
Q: What is the best playable setting at 2560x1440 for this combination?
A: The best playable setting at 2560x1440 is Medium, which delivers an average of 70 FPS. While High achieves 59 FPS, it falls just below the 60 FPS playable threshold, so Medium is the recommended choice for sustained performance.
Q: Is 4K gaming possible with this hardware in Rust?
A: Yes, but only with Low settings. At 3840x2160, the Low preset produces an average of 62 FPS, which is just above the 60 FPS threshold. Medium (41 FPS), High (35 FPS), and Ultra (27 FPS) all fall below the playable threshold at this resolution.
Q: How does the RX 9060 compare to its nearest rival in terms of average benchmark score?
A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060 has an average benchmark score of 16014, while its closest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, scores 16129, representing a 0.7% difference. Other nearby rivals include the AMD Radeon R9 370X (15862, 1% difference) and AMD Radeon RX 7700 (15852, 1% difference).
Q: What is the FPS difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1920x1080?
A: At 1920x1080, the Low preset achieves 151 FPS on average, while Ultra achieves 65 FPS. This represents a 86 FPS difference, with Medium at 102 FPS and High at 86 FPS filling the gap between the extremes.
Q: Where does this CPU+GPU combo rank among all tested combinations for Rust?
A: This combo ranks 2190 out of 3723 tested combinations for Rust, placing it in the upper-middle portion of the database. The AMD Ryzen 5 5500 CPU sits in the 73rd percentile among all CPUs, while the RX 9060 GPU is in the 59th percentile among all GPUs.
Best Settings per Resolution
The measured FPS data defines clear optimal settings for each resolution, prioritizing presets that maintain at least 60 FPS average while maximizing visual quality.
At 3840x2160, the only playable option is Low, which delivers an average of 62 FPS. This just clears the playable threshold, making it a marginal but viable 4K experience. Medium (41 FPS), High (35 FPS), and Ultra (27 FPS) all fall significantly below the threshold, so players targeting 4K must accept reduced visual fidelity.
At 2560x1440, the best playable setting is Medium, producing an average of 70 FPS. This preset maintains a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold while offering better visual quality than Low (104 FPS). High (59 FPS) narrowly misses the threshold, while Ultra (45 FPS) is not viable for smooth gameplay.
At 1920x1080, the best playable setting is Ultra, achieving an average of 65 FPS. This resolution offers the most flexibility, as all four presets are playable: Low (151 FPS), Medium (102 FPS), High (86 FPS), and Ultra (65 FPS). Players with high-refresh-rate monitors can exploit the higher FPS of lower presets, while those prioritizing visuals can use Ultra.
CPU and GPU Roles
The scaling patterns across resolutions and presets reveal how the CPU and GPU contribute to performance in Rust with this combination.
At 1920x1080, the system shows substantial headroom in both components. The jump from Low (151 FPS) to Ultra (65 FPS) represents a 86 FPS drop, indicating the GPU becomes more stressed as visual complexity increases. However, even at Ultra, the system maintains 65 FPS, suggesting the CPU is not a limiting factor at this resolution. The Ryzen 5 5500, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, provides sufficient processing power for Rust's simulation and physics at 1080p.
Moving to 2560x1440, the impact of increased resolution becomes apparent. The Low preset drops to 104 FPS (from 151 FPS at 1080p), a 47 FPS reduction, while Medium drops to 70 FPS (from 102 FPS), a 32 FPS reduction. This indicates the GPU is now more heavily loaded, as pixel count increases by approximately 78% from 1080p to 1440p. The CPU's role diminishes relative to the GPU, as the rendering workload takes precedence.
At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the dominant constraint. The Low preset at 4K (62 FPS) is less than half the FPS of the same preset at 1080p (151 FPS), representing a 89 FPS reduction. This dramatic scaling confirms that the RX 9060's 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are stretched thin at 4K resolution. The CPU's influence is minimal here, as even the most demanding preset (Ultra, 27 FPS) does not suggest CPU bottlenecking.
The data reveals a system where the GPU is the primary performance driver at higher resolutions, while the CPU remains a capable partner at 1080p and 1440p. The Ryzen 5 5500's Zen 3 architecture, with a boost clock of 4.20 GHz, provides solid single-threaded performance for Rust's game logic, while the RX 9060's RDNA 4.0 architecture handles rendering duties effectively up to 1440p.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The nearest rivals for both components provide context for what other hardware would behave similarly in Rust.
For the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 5 5500 has an average benchmark score of 19593. The closest alternatives are:
- AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 (avgScore 19617, deltaPct -0.1%): Nearly identical performance, differing by only 0.1% from the Ryzen 5 5500.
- Intel Core i5-12500 (avgScore 19668, deltaPct -0.4%): Slightly higher average score, but the 0.4% difference is negligible in real-world gaming.
- Intel Core i7-10700F (avgScore 19499, deltaPct 0.5%): Within 0.5% of the Ryzen 5 5500, making it a direct substitute.
- Intel Core i5-11600KF (avgScore 19723, deltaPct -0.7%): The highest-scoring rival, but still only 0.7% above the Ryzen 5 5500.
For the GPU, the AMD Radeon RX 9060 has an average benchmark score of 16014. The nearest alternatives are:
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (avgScore 16129, deltaPct -0.7%): The closest rival, with performance within 0.7% of the RX 9060.
- AMD Radeon R9 370X (avgScore 15862, deltaPct 1%): A 1% difference, making it a viable lower-cost alternative.
- AMD Radeon RX 7700 (avgScore 15852, deltaPct 1%): Also 1% lower in score, offering similar performance characteristics.
- AMD Radeon Pro W5500 (avgScore 15679, deltaPct 2.1%): A workstation card with 2.1% lower performance, still close enough for comparable gaming behavior.
In practical terms, swapping the Ryzen 5 5500 for any of its nearest rivals would produce nearly identical FPS in Rust, as the sub-1% differences in benchmark scores translate to sub-1 FPS differences at most settings. Similarly, replacing the RX 9060 with an RTX 3060 Ti would yield almost identical frame rates, while the R9 370X or RX 7700 would produce marginally lower but still comparable results.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The complete FPS data for this combination across all tested resolutions and presets is presented below.
At 3840x2160:
- Low: Average 62 FPS (min/max not provided)
- Medium: Average 41 FPS, min 35 FPS, max 47 FPS
- High: Average 35 FPS (min/max not provided)
- Ultra: Average 27 FPS (min/max not provided)
At 2560x1440:
- Low: Average 104 FPS (min/max not provided)
- Medium: Average 70 FPS, min 59 FPS, max 80 FPS
- High: Average 59 FPS (min/max not provided)
- Ultra: Average 45 FPS (min/max not provided)
At 1920x1080:
- Low: Average 151 FPS (min/max not provided)
- Medium: Average 102 FPS, min 86 FPS, max 117 FPS
- High: Average 86 FPS (min/max not provided)
- Ultra: Average 65 FPS (min/max not provided)
The Medium presets across all resolutions include min/max data, revealing the frame time consistency. At 1920x1080 Medium, the range spans 86-117 FPS, a 31 FPS spread. At 2560x1440 Medium, the range tightens to 59-80 FPS, a 21 FPS spread. At 3840x2160 Medium, the range narrows further to 35-47 FPS, a 12 FPS spread. This pattern indicates that frame pacing becomes more consistent as resolution increases, likely due to the GPU being the sole bottleneck at higher resolutions.
The absence of min/max data for other presets suggests either stable performance or incomplete measurement, but the average values provide sufficient basis for the playability assessments.
The Verdict
This PC combination can run Rust at all three tested resolutions, though with varying degrees of flexibility.
At 1920x1080, the system fully delivers. All four presets—Low (151 FPS), Medium (102 FPS), High (86 FPS), and Ultra (65 FPS)—clear the 60 FPS playable threshold. Players can choose between maximum visual quality at 65 FPS or competitive frame rates exceeding 100 FPS on Medium. The Ultra preset's 65 FPS average provides a comfortable margin above the threshold, making this resolution the ideal target for this hardware.
At 2560x1440, the system remains playable but with fewer options. The Low (104 FPS) and Medium (70 FPS) presets both clear the threshold, with Medium being the recommended choice for balanced quality and performance. The High preset (59 FPS) narrowly misses the threshold, while Ultra (45 FPS) is not suitable for smooth gameplay. Players with 1440p monitors should use Medium settings for the best experience.
At 3840x2160, the system is only marginally playable. The Low preset (62 FPS) just clears the 60 FPS threshold, but with minimal visual quality. The Medium (41 FPS), High (35 FPS), and Ultra (27 FPS) presets all fall significantly below the threshold. This resolution is only recommended for players who prioritize resolution over visual fidelity and can tolerate the reduced settings.
Overall, the verdict is that this combo is best suited for 1920x1080 gaming, where it offers full preset flexibility. It handles 2560x1440 adequately with Medium settings, and 3840x2160 only with Low settings. The playable threshold of 60 FPS is consistently met or exceeded at the recommended settings for each resolution.
How This Combo Ranks
Among all tested combinations in the Rust benchmark database, this AMD Ryzen 5 5500 + AMD Radeon RX 9060 setup ranks 2190 out of 3723 total combinations. This places it in the upper-middle tier of the ranking distribution, reflecting its position between the low end and high end of tested hardware.
The ranking is consistent with the component-level percentiles. The Ryzen 5 5500 CPU sits in the 73rd percentile among all CPUs, indicating it outperforms roughly three-quarters of tested processors. The RX 9060 GPU is in the 59th percentile among all GPUs, placing it slightly above the median. The combination of a strong CPU with a mid-tier GPU results in a system that excels in CPU-bound scenarios (like lower resolution gaming) but struggles in GPU-bound scenarios (like 4K Ultra).
In practical terms, the combo's rank of 2190 means that approximately 41% of tested combinations perform better in Rust, while 59% perform worse. This aligns with the measured FPS data: the system is clearly capable of smooth gameplay at mainstream resolutions, but it is not a high-end performer. The 73rd percentile CPU ranking suggests that pairing the Ryzen 5 5500 with a more powerful GPU could yield significantly better results, as the CPU has headroom to drive higher frame rates.
Conversely, the 59th percentile GPU ranking indicates that the RX 9060 is the limiting factor in this combination, particularly at higher resolutions. The data shows that the combo's performance ceiling is determined by the GPU's ability to render at higher pixel counts, while the CPU's stronger relative standing ensures it rarely bottlenecks the system. This ranking provides useful context for potential upgrades: replacing the GPU would offer the most significant performance gains in Rust, especially for players targeting 1440p or 4K gaming.