Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Rust
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 50 | 66 | 79 | 115 |
| 1440p QHD | 85 | 111 | 118 | 137 |
| 1080p Full HD | 114 | 126 | 133 | 155 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 3840x2160, Rust shows a clear performance hierarchy across the four presets. The Low preset delivers an average of 115 FPS, which is the highest recorded at this resolution. Medium drops to 79 FPS average, with a minimum of 67 and maximum of 90. High settles at 66 FPS average, while Ultra falls to 50 FPS average. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is substantial: 115 FPS versus 50 FPS, a 65 FPS difference. This indicates that the Ultra preset imposes a heavy rendering load that the combination cannot fully absorb at 4K resolution.
Moving to 2560x1440, all presets clear the 60 FPS threshold comfortably. Low leads with 137 FPS average, followed by Medium at 118 FPS (minimum 100, maximum 136). High reaches 111 FPS average, and Ultra still manages 85 FPS. The scaling from 4K to 1440p is particularly visible with Ultra: it jumps from 50 FPS to 85 FPS, a 35 FPS improvement. Medium also improves sharply, going from 79 to 118 FPS. The minimum frame rates at 1440p Medium (100 FPS) are higher than the average frame rates at 4K Medium (79 FPS), showing how resolution reduction relieves pressure on the system.
At 1920x1080, the combination posts its strongest numbers. Low hits 155 FPS average, Medium reaches 133 FPS (minimum 113, maximum 153), High delivers 126 FPS, and Ultra stays at 114 FPS. Every preset at 1080p exceeds the 60 FPS threshold by a wide margin. The difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 41 FPS, which is smaller than the 65 FPS gap seen at 4K. This suggests that at lower resolutions, the CPU becomes a more significant factor, narrowing the spread between presets.
The recorded data only includes min and max values for the Medium preset at each resolution. At 4K Medium, the minimum of 67 FPS stays above the playable threshold, while the maximum reaches 90 FPS. At 1440p Medium, the minimum is 100 FPS and the maximum is 136 FPS. At 1080p Medium, the minimum is 113 FPS and the maximum is 153 FPS. These figures indicate that frame pacing remains stable even in demanding scenes, with no dips below 60 FPS recorded for Medium at any resolution.
How This Combo Ranks
The database ranks this combination at 751 out of 3,723 tested system configurations for Rust. That places it in the top 20 percent of all recorded combos, which is a strong showing given the mix of a mid-range CPU and a high-end GPU. The rank reflects the overall performance across all resolutions and presets, weighted toward the playable settings.
For context, the AMD Ryzen 5 4600G sits at the 71st percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 17,507. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE (17,482 average score, 0.1 percent ahead), the AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE (17,614 average score, 0.6 percent behind), the Intel Core 7 150U (17,395 average score, 0.6 percent ahead), and the Intel Core i3-14100T (17,648 average score, 0.8 percent behind). These deltas are tiny, meaning the 4600G performs virtually identically to its closest competition in synthetic CPU tests. The CPU is not a bottleneck in general compute tasks, but Rust's engine relies heavily on single-thread performance, where the 4600G's 3dmark single-thread score of 726 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,919 are modest by modern standards.
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, by contrast, ranks at the 86th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 54,247. Its nearest rivals are the RTX 4080 SUPER (54,209 average score, 0.1 percent ahead), the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (54,828 average score, 1.1 percent behind), the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (55,698 average score, 2.6 percent behind), and the AMD Radeon 8060S (55,757 average score, 2.7 percent behind). The RTX 4080 is clearly a top-tier GPU, and its raw graphics power is what carries this combination to its strong ranking in Rust. The combo rank of 751 out of 3,723 suggests that while the GPU is exceptional, the CPU holds the system back from reaching the very top tiers, which would likely require a faster processor.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data reveals a clear division of labor between the Ryzen 5 4600G and the RTX 4080 depending on resolution. At 3840x2160, the GPU is the dominant factor. The RTX 4080's 16 GB of GDDR6X memory and 716.8 GB/s bandwidth provide ample headroom for high-resolution textures, but the Ultra preset at 4K drops to 50 FPS, indicating that even this GPU cannot fully overcome the rendering demands of Rust's highest settings at 4K. The fact that Low at 4K reaches 115 FPS while Ultra only reaches 50 FPS shows that the GPU's workload scales dramatically with preset quality at this resolution.
At 2560x1440, the balance shifts. The GPU still bears most of the load, but the CPU begins to matter more. The jump from 4K Ultra (50 FPS) to 1440p Ultra (85 FPS) is a 70 percent improvement, which is larger than what pure pixel-count reduction would predict. This suggests that at 1440p, the CPU is starting to keep pace more effectively with the GPU's output. The 118 FPS at 1440p Medium versus 79 FPS at 4K Medium reinforces this: the system gains 39 FPS from the resolution drop, a significant scaling factor.
At 1920x1080, the CPU becomes the limiting factor. The RTX 4080 is capable of far more than 155 FPS at Low settings, but the Ryzen 5 4600G's single-thread performance, as indicated by its 3dmark single-thread score of 726 and Geekbench single-core score of 1,460, caps the frame rate. The spread between Low (155 FPS) and Ultra (114 FPS) at 1080p is only 41 FPS, compared to the 65 FPS spread at 4K. This narrowing indicates that at 1080p, the CPU is the bottleneck, and preset changes have less impact because the CPU cannot feed the GPU fast enough to realize the full benefit of lower graphics load.
The recorded data shows that the CPU's multi-thread capabilities are respectable, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13,593 and a Passmark multi-thread score of 15,992. However, Rust is known to be sensitive to single-thread performance, and the 4600G's single-core scores are modest. This explains why the combination performs well at higher resolutions where the GPU dominates, but leaves performance on the table at 1080p where the CPU's limitations become apparent.
The Verdict
Yes, this PC can run Rust, and it does so across the majority of tested configurations. The verdict by resolution is clear: at 3840x2160, the playable settings are High, Low, and Medium, with High being the best playable preset at 66 FPS average. The Ultra preset at 4K falls short at 50 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. At 2560x1440, all four presets are playable, with Ultra as the best option at 85 FPS average. At 1920x1080, all four presets are also playable, with Ultra as the best option at 114 FPS average.
For gamers targeting 4K, the data suggests using High settings for a smooth experience at 66 FPS, or dropping to Medium for a more comfortable margin at 79 FPS. The Low preset at 115 FPS is available for those who prioritize frame rate over visual fidelity. At 1440p, Ultra at 85 FPS is the clear recommendation, as it provides the best visual quality while staying well above the 60 FPS threshold. At 1080p, Ultra at 114 FPS is the obvious choice, offering high visual fidelity with a substantial frame rate buffer.
The minimum frame rates recorded for Medium at each resolution further support the playability verdict. At 4K Medium, the minimum is 67 FPS, which stays above the threshold. At 1440p Medium, the minimum is 100 FPS, and at 1080p Medium, the minimum is 113 FPS. No recorded frame rate dips below 60 FPS in any playable configuration, indicating consistent performance without severe stutters.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Rust at 4K with maximum settings?
A: No. At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average frame rate is 50 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The best playable setting at 4K is High, which averages 66 FPS.
Q: What is the best preset for 1440p gaming?
A: Ultra is the best playable preset at 2560x1440, delivering an average of 85 FPS. This provides the highest visual quality while maintaining a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for Rust at 1080p?
A: At 1920x1080, the CPU is the limiting factor. The frame rate spread between Low (155 FPS) and Ultra (114 FPS) is only 41 FPS, indicating that the Ryzen 5 4600G's single-thread performance caps the system before the RTX 4080 can reach its full potential.
Q: How does the RTX 4080 compare to its closest competitor in this database?
A: The RTX 4080 has an average benchmark score of 54,247, which is 0.1 percent ahead of the RTX 4080 SUPER (54,209) and 1.1 percent ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (54,828). It sits at the 86th percentile among all GPUs.
Q: Does the system maintain stable frame rates at Medium settings?
A: Yes. At 4K Medium, the minimum recorded frame rate is 67 FPS. At 1440p Medium, the minimum is 100 FPS. At 1080p Medium, the minimum is 113 FPS. All minimums stay above the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: What is the overall ranking of this combination for Rust?
A: The combination ranks 751 out of 3,723 tested system configurations in the database, placing it in the top 20 percent of all recorded combos for this game.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is High, with an average frame rate of 66 FPS. While Medium offers a higher average of 79 FPS, High provides better visual quality while still clearing the threshold. The Low preset at 115 FPS is available for maximum performance, but High is the best balance of fidelity and frame rate at 4K.
At 2560x1440, Ultra is the most demanding playable preset, averaging 85 FPS. This is the recommended choice for 1440p, as it delivers the full visual experience without sacrificing smoothness. The 85 FPS average leaves a 25 FPS buffer above the 60 FPS threshold, providing headroom for demanding in-game scenes.
At 1920x1080, Ultra is also the best choice, averaging 114 FPS. This is a strong result, as it combines the highest settings with a frame rate that exceeds the threshold by 54 FPS. The system has no trouble maintaining high performance at 1080p, and the Ultra preset is the clear recommendation for this resolution.