Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

73%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
151 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
108 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
135 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
95 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
111 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
60 FPS
8.3ms Frame Time
12ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 17,035
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 79,842

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 60 75 91 111
1440p QHD 95 106 112 135
1080p Full HD 108 121 131 151

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 121
1920x1080 Low 151
1920x1080 Medium 131
1920x1080 Ultra 108
2560x1440 High 106
2560x1440 Low 135
2560x1440 Medium 112
2560x1440 Ultra 95
3840x2160 High 75
3840x2160 Low 111
3840x2160 Medium 91
3840x2160 Ultra 60

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 presents an unusual combination in Rust: a last-generation mid-range CPU driving a flagship current-generation GPU. The measured data shows that this pairing delivers playable performance across all tested resolutions, but the balance between the two components shifts dramatically depending on the settings and resolution you choose. The recorded frames per second (FPS) figures, taken directly from the database, indicate that the RTX 5090 is often held back by the Ryzen 5 3600, particularly at 1080p and 1440p, where the CPU becomes the primary bottleneck.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160 (4K), the results show a clear scaling pattern tied to graphical presets. With Low settings, the average FPS is 111.2. Moving to Medium drops the average to 90.6. The High preset yields 74.8 FPS on average. The most demanding Ultra preset falls just below the playable threshold with an average of 59.9 FPS. The database records no minimum or maximum FPS values for this resolution, so the analysis relies solely on the average figures. The gap between Low and Ultra is 51.3 FPS, indicating that the GPU is doing substantial work at 4K, but the CPU still manages to keep up reasonably well at lower presets.

At 2560x1440 (1440p), the performance ceiling rises noticeably. Low settings produce an average of 135.1 FPS. Medium comes in at 111.6 FPS, which is nearly identical to the 4K Low result. The High preset averages 106.4 FPS. Interestingly, Ultra at 1440p averages 95.1 FPS, which is a substantial improvement over the 4K Ultra figure of 59.9 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra here is 40 FPS, suggesting that the GPU is still the primary driver of performance scaling, but the CPU has more headroom at this resolution.

At 1920x1080 (1080p), the results show the smallest spread across presets. Low settings average 150.6 FPS, the highest recorded figure in the entire dataset. Medium drops to 131 FPS. The High preset averages 120.9 FPS. Finally, Ultra at 1080p averages 107.9 FPS. The delta between Low and Ultra here is 42.7 FPS, which is similar to the 1440p spread. However, the absolute numbers are higher across the board, indicating that the CPU is becoming a limiting factor. The jump from 1440p Ultra (95.1) to 1080p Ultra (107.9) is only 12.8 FPS, a relatively modest gain compared to the resolution change, which hints at CPU saturation.

The data shows no min or max FPS values for any configuration, so the average FPS is the only metric available for judging smoothness. The pattern across all resolutions is consistent: Low settings always deliver the highest frame rates, followed by Medium, then High, with Ultra being the slowest. The 4K Ultra result is the only configuration that fails to reach the 60 FPS playable threshold, coming in at 59.9 FPS.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals a clear division of labor between the Ryzen 5 3600 and the RTX 5090, and that division changes with resolution. At 1080p, the CPU is the dominant constraint. The evidence is the relatively small FPS gain when moving from 1440p to 1080p. For example, the High preset goes from 106.4 FPS at 1440p to 120.9 FPS at 1080p, an increase of only 14.5 FPS. If the GPU were the limiting factor, the frame rate would scale much more aggressively with the resolution drop. The Ryzen 5 3600, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, simply cannot feed the RTX 5090 enough frames at 1080p to fully utilize the GPU's capacity.

At 1440p, the balance shifts slightly toward the GPU, but the CPU still plays a significant role. The Ultra preset at 1440p averages 95.1 FPS, which is a healthy figure, but the scaling from 1080p Ultra (107.9) to 1440p Ultra (95.1) shows a 12.8 FPS drop, or roughly 11.9%. This is a moderate penalty, indicating that the GPU is starting to take on more work, but the CPU is still preventing the combo from reaching its full potential. The Medium preset at 1440p (111.6) is nearly identical to the 4K Low preset (111.2), which further suggests that the CPU is setting a ceiling around the 110 to 135 FPS range at lower presets.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck. The evidence is the much larger FPS spread across presets. The difference between 4K Low (111.2) and 4K Ultra (59.9) is 51.3 FPS, which is the largest spread in the dataset. This indicates that the RTX 5090 is working much harder at 4K, and its performance scales significantly with the graphical load. The CPU has more headroom at 4K because the GPU is taking longer to render each frame, giving the Ryzen 5 3600 time to keep up. The fact that 4K Ultra drops below 60 FPS while all other configurations stay above it confirms that the GPU is the limiting factor at this resolution.

The preset scaling also tells a story. At 1080p, the drop from Low to Ultra is 42.7 FPS, while at 1440p it is 40 FPS, and at 4K it is 51.3 FPS. The 4K spread is notably larger, which reinforces the idea that the GPU has more influence on performance at higher resolutions. For practical purposes, the Ryzen 5 3600 is sufficient to keep the RTX 5090 busy at 4K, but at 1080p and 1440p, the CPU holds the system back from achieving the frame rates that the GPU could theoretically deliver on its own.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Rust at 4K with playable performance?

A: Yes, but only with the right settings. The database shows that 4K High averages 74.8 FPS, 4K Medium averages 90.6 FPS, and 4K Low averages 111.2 FPS. The 4K Ultra preset averages 59.9 FPS, which is just below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the best preset for 1440p to maintain high frame rates?

A: The Ultra preset at 1440p averages 95.1 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold. This is the most demanding preset that stays playable, and it offers the highest visual quality while still delivering smooth performance.

Q: At 1080p, which preset gives the highest frame rate?

A: The Low preset at 1080p delivers the highest recorded average in the entire dataset at 150.6 FPS. However, the Ultra preset at 1080p still averages 107.9 FPS, so you can use Ultra and remain comfortably above the playable threshold.

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 3600 holding back the RTX 5090?

A: Yes, particularly at lower resolutions. The FPS gains from 1440p to 1080p are relatively modest, which indicates a CPU bottleneck. For example, the High preset only improves from 106.4 FPS at 1440p to 120.9 FPS at 1080p.

Q: Does the game run better with lower settings at 4K?

A: Yes, the data shows a clear benefit to lowering settings at 4K. The Low preset averages 111.2 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 59.9 FPS. The difference is 51.3 FPS, so reducing settings has a substantial impact at this resolution.

Q: What is the playable threshold for this game?

A: The database defines playable performance as 60 FPS or higher. All configurations in the dataset meet this threshold except for 4K Ultra, which averages 59.9 FPS.

The Verdict

The recorded data confirms that this PC can run Rust successfully at all three tested resolutions, with one exception. At 3840x2160, the playable settings are High, Low, and Medium. The best setting at this resolution is High, which averages 74.8 FPS. The Ultra preset at 4K is not playable, as it averages 59.9 FPS, just below the 60 FPS threshold. At 2560x1440, all four presets are playable, with Ultra being the best option, averaging 95.1 FPS. At 1920x1080, all presets are also playable, with Ultra averaging 107.9 FPS. The verdict is straightforward: for 4K, stick to High or lower settings; for 1440p and 1080p, you can comfortably use Ultra.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database's ranking of tested CPU and GPU combinations for Rust, this pairing of the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 sits at rank 747 out of 3723 total combos. This puts it in the top 20% of all tested configurations. The rank reflects the overall performance across all resolutions and presets, and the relatively low CPU contribution likely prevents a higher placement. The GPU itself ranks in the 92nd percentile among all GPUs, while the CPU ranks in the 71st percentile among all CPUs. The combination of a top-tier GPU with a mid-tier CPU results in a solid, but not elite, overall ranking for Rust specifically.

Best Settings per Resolution

The most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS at each resolution, based on the measured data, is as follows:

  • 3840x2160: The High preset is the best choice, averaging 74.8 FPS. This is the highest preset that clears the playable threshold at 4K.
  • 2560x1440: The Ultra preset is the best choice, averaging 95.1 FPS. This provides maximum visual quality while maintaining a comfortable frame rate.
  • 1920x1080: The Ultra preset is the best choice, averaging 107.9 FPS. This is the most demanding setting available, and it still delivers well over 100 FPS.

These settings represent the optimal balance between visual fidelity and performance for this specific CPU and GPU combination. The data shows that the system is most capable at 1440p and 1080p, where the Ultra preset provides a smooth experience. At 4K, you will need to compromise with High settings to stay above the 60 FPS threshold, but the resulting frame rate is still solid for a survival game with large open-world environments.