Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

59%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
131 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
57 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
92 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
40 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
51 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
24 FPS
13.3ms Frame Time
20ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 17,035
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 23,021

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 24 33 35 51
1440p QHD 40 52 63 92
1080p Full HD 57 75 88 131

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 75
1920x1080 Low 131
1920x1080 Medium 88
1920x1080 Ultra 57
2560x1440 High 52
2560x1440 Low 92
2560x1440 Medium 63
2560x1440 Ultra 40
3840x2160 High 33
3840x2160 Low 51
3840x2160 Medium 35
3840x2160 Ultra 24

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 paired with the Intel Arc B580 delivers a solid 1080p gaming experience in Rust, but struggles at higher resolutions. At 1920x1080, this combo achieves playable frame rates across Low, Medium, and High presets, with the best playable setting being High at 74.8 FPS average. At 2560x1440, only Low and Medium presets clear the 60 FPS threshold, with Medium hitting exactly 63 FPS. At 4K, no settings reach 60 FPS, with the best result being Low at 51.4 FPS. The data indicates this is a capable 1080p and entry-level 1440p machine for Rust, but not a 4K solution.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured frame rates for this combination show a clear performance curve across resolutions and settings. At 3840x2160, the results are underwhelming. With Ultra settings, the average FPS drops to 24.4, which is far below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Medium settings improve this to 35.4 FPS, while High settings reach 32.7 FPS. Interestingly, Low settings at 4K produce the best average at 51.4 FPS, but even this falls short of the playable mark. The gap between Low and Medium at 4K is substantial, with a 16 FPS difference, suggesting that the GPU memory bandwidth or shading capacity becomes a bottleneck as settings increase.

Moving to 2560x1440, the picture improves significantly. Low settings deliver 91.6 FPS, which is well above the threshold. Medium settings hit 63 FPS, just clearing the 60 FPS bar. High settings drop to 52.3 FPS, and Ultra falls to 39.9 FPS. The delta between Low and Ultra at this resolution is 51.7 FPS, indicating that the visual fidelity scaling has a heavy cost. The data shows that the 1440p experience is viable only if the user is willing to accept Medium settings as the ceiling.

At 1920x1080, the combo performs admirably. Low settings produce 130.5 FPS, which is more than double the playable threshold. Medium settings reach 88.2 FPS, and High settings deliver 74.8 FPS. Ultra settings drop to 56.8 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS mark but still close. The performance scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p is smooth, with each step costing roughly 20 to 30 FPS. This suggests that the CPU and GPU are balanced well for 1080p gaming, with the GPU being the limiting factor only at the highest preset.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database, this CPU and GPU combination ranks 2841 out of 3723 tested combos for Rust. This places it in the lower-middle tier of all possible configurations. The percentile ranking indicates that roughly 76% of tested combos perform better in this game, while about 24% perform worse. This is a significant consideration for users expecting high-end performance. The rank reflects the fact that while the GPU is capable, the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 5 3600, is a previous-generation part that holds back the overall frame rates in Rust, which is known to be CPU-intensive in certain scenarios.

The CPU itself sits at the 71st percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 17035. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-1260P, which scores 17007 (a 0.2% delta), and the Intel Core i5-11400, which scores 17067 (a 0.2% delta). These are very close scores, meaning the Ryzen 5 3600 performs nearly identically to these parts in general compute tasks. The GPU, the Intel Arc B580, is at the 68th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 23021. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP (23061, a 0.2% delta), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (22895, a 0.6% delta), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (23172, a 0.7% delta). These deltas are tiny, indicating that the B580 trades blows with much older and much newer hardware in raw GPU benchmarks.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Rust at 1080p with High settings?

A: Yes. The measured average FPS at 1920x1080 with High settings is 74.8, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold. This is the best playable preset at this resolution.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 2560x1440?

A: The best playable preset at 2560x1440 is Medium, with an average FPS of 63. Low settings also work at 91.6 FPS, but Medium offers a better visual experience while staying above the threshold.

Q: Is 4K gaming possible with this combo?

A: No. At 3840x2160, even Low settings only reach 51.4 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Ultra settings drop to 24.4 FPS. The verdict data shows no playable settings at this resolution.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B580 compare to the RTX 2080?

A: The B580 has an average benchmark score of 23021, while the RTX 2080 scores 22895. This makes the B580 0.6% faster in the database's average GPU benchmark, which is a negligible difference in real-world gaming.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, Low settings produce 130.5 FPS, while Ultra settings produce 56.8 FPS. The difference is 73.7 FPS, showing that Ultra settings cost more than half the frame rate compared to Low.

Q: Does the CPU bottleneck the GPU in Rust?

A: The ranking data suggests so. The combo ranks 2841 out of 3723, which is lower than the individual component percentiles would imply. The CPU's single-thread score of 696 in 3dmark and the game's CPU sensitivity indicate that the Ryzen 5 3600 limits the B580's potential in Rust.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU's nearest rivals in the database are the Intel Core i7-1260P and the Intel Core i5-11400. The i7-1260P scores 17007, which is 0.2% lower than the Ryzen 5 3600's 17035. The i5-11400 scores 17067, which is 0.2% higher. In practice, these three CPUs will produce nearly identical frame rates in Rust when paired with the same GPU. Users with any of these processors can expect the same measured FPS numbers within a margin of error.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080. The RX 580 2048SP scores 23061, just 0.2% above the B580. The RTX 2080 scores 22895, 0.6% below. The RTX 3080 scores 23172, 0.7% above. These deltas are all under 1%, meaning that swapping the B580 for any of these cards would yield almost identical performance in Rust. The RTX 3080 is a particularly interesting comparison, as it is a much more powerful card on paper in other games, but in Rust with this CPU, the data shows it would perform nearly the same.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is High, with an average FPS of 74.8. This provides a good balance of visual quality and performance. Ultra settings at 56.8 FPS are close but do not meet the threshold.

At 2560x1440, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Medium, with an average FPS of 63. This is a marginal pass, leaving little headroom for demanding scenes. Low settings at 91.6 FPS offer a safer margin but with reduced visuals.

At 3840x2160, no preset stays at or above 60 FPS. The best average FPS is 51.4 with Low settings, which is below the playable threshold. Therefore, the database records no playable settings for this resolution.

The Verdict

The data clearly shows that this PC can run Rust, but with significant caveats depending on the target resolution. At 1920x1080, the combo is fully playable at High settings with 74.8 FPS, and even Low settings produce 130.5 FPS for high refresh rate monitors. This is the sweet spot for this hardware. At 2560x1440, the system is playable only at Low and Medium presets, with Medium hitting exactly 63 FPS. This is a viable 1440p setup, but users should avoid High and Ultra settings, which drop to 52.3 and 39.9 FPS respectively. At 3840x2160, the system is not playable at any setting, as the best result is 51.4 FPS on Low. The verdict by resolution confirms this: playable settings are High, Low, and Medium at 1080p; Low and Medium at 1440p; and none at 4K. For users targeting 1080p, this is a strong performer. For 1440p, it is adequate with settings compromises. For 4K, this hardware is not suitable for Rust.