Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

44%
Not Recommended Your system may struggle with this game.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
150 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
103 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
133 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
70 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
102 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
43 FPS
8.1ms Frame Time
12ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 17,035
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 13,745

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 43 59 64 102
1440p QHD 70 95 111 133
1080p Full HD 103 123 131 150

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 123
1920x1080 Low 150
1920x1080 Medium 131
1920x1080 Ultra 103
2560x1440 High 95
2560x1440 Low 133
2560x1440 Medium 111
2560x1440 Ultra 70
3840x2160 High 59
3840x2160 Low 102
3840x2160 Medium 64
3840x2160 Ultra 43

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT delivers a strong performance profile for Rust, with measured results showing that the combination handles the game comfortably across most modern resolutions. The data indicates a system that is capable of high refresh rate play at 1080p and 1440p, with 4K requiring some settings adjustments to maintain smooth gameplay.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The database contains measured average FPS for this specific CPU and GPU combination across three resolutions and four quality presets. Minimum and maximum FPS values were not recorded, so the analysis relies on average frame rates.

At 1920x1080, the combination is exceptionally fast. The Low preset hits 150.3 FPS average, making it the highest recorded frame rate for this combo. Medium is close behind at 130.9 FPS, and High reaches 122.5 FPS. Even the Ultra preset, which is the most demanding setting available, maintains an average of 102.9 FPS. All four presets at 1080p clear the 60 FPS playable threshold by a wide margin, with Low being nearly 90 FPS above that mark.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance remains strong but scales down as expected. Low runs at 132.9 FPS average, Medium at 111.1 FPS, and High at 95.3 FPS. Ultra still delivers 70 FPS average, which is 10 FPS above the playable threshold. The gap between Medium and High at 1440p is only about 16 FPS, but the jump from High to Ultra is more significant, dropping from 95.3 to 70 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the RX 7900 XT and Ryzen 5 3600 start to show their limits. Low is very playable at 102 FPS average, and Medium clears the threshold at 63.6 FPS. High drops to 58.5 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target. Ultra is the weakest at 42.5 FPS, making it unsuitable for smooth play. The scaling from Low to Medium at 4K is notable, with a 38 FPS difference. From Medium to High the drop is small, roughly 5 FPS, but High to Ultra loses another 16 FPS.

The data shows the CPU is sufficient to feed the GPU at lower resolutions, as the 1080p and 1440p numbers are consistently high. The 4K results are where the GPU becomes the limiting factor, particularly on Ultra settings.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the nearest rivals in the database, this combo sits close to several other hardware pairings. The Ryzen 5 3600 has an average benchmark score of 17035. Its closest competitor is the Intel Core i5-11400 with a score of 17067, which is a 0.2 percent difference. The Intel Core i7-1260P scores 17007, also a 0.2 percent gap below. Two AMD EPYC parts, the 7573X and 7742, sit at 17070 and 16998 respectively, both within 0.2 percent of the Ryzen 5 3600. For gaming in Rust, these chips would behave similarly in terms of CPU headroom, meaning the GPU is still the primary driver of frame rate differences.

On the GPU side, the RX 7900 XT has an average benchmark score of 13745. The closest match is the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile at 13821, a 0.5 percent difference. The AMD Radeon 660M scores 13812, also a 0.5 percent gap, and the AMD Radeon RX 570X is 0.9 percent ahead at 13871. Interestingly, the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT scores 13543, which is 1.5 percent lower. These deltas are small, suggesting that swapping in any of these GPUs would produce broadly similar frame rates in Rust, although the RX 9070 XT would be slightly slower and the RX 570X slightly faster.

For a builder, the takeaway is that the CPU is in the middle of a tight pack. Upgrading to an i5-11400 or i7-1260P would not change Rust performance meaningfully, because the GPU is the dominant factor. Similarly, the GPU sits close to several alternatives, but the RX 7900 XT is the strongest performer among its nearest rivals in the database.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database, this specific combination ranks 1090th out of 3723 tested combos for Rust. That places it in the upper third of all systems tested. The percentile data for the individual components puts the CPU in the 71st percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 55th percentile among all GPUs. The combined rank is logical: the CPU is a capable mid-range part, and the GPU is a high-end part that is still below top-tier models.

The rank of 1090 out of 3723 means there are many systems that outperform this one, but also a substantial majority that do not. For Rust specifically, the game is known to be CPU-sensitive, but the measured FPS shows the Ryzen 5 3600 is not holding back the 7900 XT seriously at most settings. The combo rank reflects a balanced pairing, where the GPU does most of the heavy lifting and the CPU stays out of the way.

The Verdict

The data shows that this system can run Rust effectively. At 1920x1080, all presets from Low to Ultra clear the 60 FPS threshold. The best setting is Ultra with an average of 102.9 FPS, which is far above the playable target. At 2560x1440, all four presets are also playable, with Ultra at 70 FPS being the most demanding option that still holds 60 FPS. The 4K results are mixed: Low and Medium are playable at 102 and 63.6 FPS respectively, but High drops to 58.5 FPS and Ultra to 42.5 FPS. The verdict is clear: for 1440p and below, this system handles Rust at maximum settings without issues. For 4K, players should stick to Medium or Low to maintain 60 FPS. The playable settings at 4K are Low and Medium, with Medium being the best choice at 63.6 FPS.

For a practical recommendation, the Ryzen 5 3600 and RX 7900 XT is a strong pairing for Rust at mainstream resolutions. The 1440p Ultra result of 70 FPS is particularly impressive, as it offers high visual quality with headroom above the 60 FPS target. At 1080p, the 102.9 FPS on Ultra makes this system suitable for high refresh rate monitors. The 4K compromise is the only caveat, where High settings fall just short of the target.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Rust at 60 FPS on Ultra settings?

A: At 1920x1080 and 2560x1440, yes. The measured average is 102.9 FPS at 1080p Ultra and 70 FPS at 1440p Ultra. At 3840x2160, Ultra averages 42.5 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: What is the best setting for 4K gameplay?

A: Medium is the best playable preset at 4K, delivering an average of 63.6 FPS. Low is also playable at 102 FPS, but High at 58.5 FPS and Ultra at 42.5 FPS are not recommended.

Q: How does this CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 3600 has an average benchmark score of 17035. It is within 0.2 percent of the Intel Core i5-11400, Intel Core i7-1260P, AMD EPYC 7573X, and AMD EPYC 7742, so performance in Rust would be nearly identical.

Q: Is the RX 7900 XT significantly faster than similar GPUs?

A: The RX 7900 XT scores 13745 on average. Its closest rival, the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile, scores 13821, which is 0.5 percent higher. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT scores 13543, which is 1.5 percent lower, so the differences are minimal.

Q: How many tested systems does this combo beat?

A: This combination ranks 1090th out of 3723 tested combos for Rust, meaning it outperforms roughly two-thirds of all systems in the database.

Q: Can this system handle high refresh rate monitors at 1440p?

A: Yes. The measured average FPS at 1440p is 132.9 on Low, 111.1 on Medium, 95.3 on High, and 70 on Ultra, so even the most demanding setting stays above the typical 60 Hz refresh floor.

Best Settings per Resolution

For each resolution, the most demanding preset that maintains an average of at least 60 FPS is as follows:

At 3840x2160, the Medium preset is the best option. It averages 63.6 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold. Low is also viable at 102 FPS, but Medium offers higher visual quality while still staying smooth.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset is the best choice. It averages 70 FPS, proving that this system can run the game at maximum quality with a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS target. High at 95.3 FPS is also excellent for those who prefer higher frame rates, but Ultra is the most demanding that remains playable.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is again the best. It averages 102.9 FPS, which is more than 40 FPS above the target. This means the system is not stressed at all, and there is significant headroom for any background tasks or gameplay spikes. The data shows this combination is well suited for Rust at all mainstream resolutions, with the only compromise being required at 4K, where users must choose Medium or Low settings.