Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Roblox
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 42 | 52 | 59 | 64 |
| 1440p QHD | 74 | 92 | 104 | 114 |
| 1080p Full HD | 111 | 137 | 155 | 171 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Roblox on Your System
The Intel Core i7-14700KF paired with the Intel Arc B390 presents a peculiar combination for Roblox: a high-end desktop processor driving an integrated graphics solution. The recorded data shows that this combo is playable, but only under specific conditions depending on the target resolution. At 1920x1080, the system is comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold across all presets. At 2560x1440, it also clears 60 FPS on every setting, including Ultra. The situation changes at 3840x2160, where only the Low preset maintains playability, with Medium just missing the mark.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data is complete for the Medium preset across all three resolutions, providing average, minimum, and maximum values. For other presets, only the average FPS was recorded. At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers the highest average at 171 FPS, followed by Medium at 155 FPS (minimum 132, maximum 179), High at 137 FPS, and Ultra at 111 FPS. The spread between Low and Ultra is 60 FPS, indicating that the graphical preset has a substantial impact on performance at this resolution.
Moving to 2560x1440, the averages scale down noticeably. Low still leads with 114 FPS, while Medium produces 104 FPS (minimum 88, maximum 119). High drops to 92 FPS, and Ultra falls to 74 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra here is 40 FPS, a smaller absolute difference than at 1080p, but the relative penalty for Ultra is steeper. At 3840x2160, the performance curve compresses further. Low averages 64 FPS, Medium averages 59 FPS (minimum 50, maximum 67), High averages 52 FPS, and Ultra averages 42 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is only 22 FPS, but the system is clearly straining to maintain fluid frame rates.
The minimum FPS data, available only for Medium, shows that 1920x1080 stays well above the playable threshold with a minimum of 132 FPS. At 2560x1440, the minimum of 88 FPS remains solid. At 3840x2160, the minimum drops to 50 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold, even though the average is 59 FPS. This suggests that 4K Medium will experience occasional stutters or frame drops during demanding scenes. The maximum FPS values for Medium are 179 at 1080p, 119 at 1440p, and 67 at 4K, showing a consistent reduction in headroom as resolution increases.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data indicates that the Intel Arc B390 is the primary bottleneck in this configuration. The CPU, an Intel Core i7-14700KF with 20 cores and 28 threads, is a desktop-class processor with a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. Its benchmark scores are very high, including a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 44167 and a Passmark single-thread score of 4480. The GPU, however, is an integrated solution based on the Panther Lake chip with 1536 shading units and a boost clock of 2500 MHz. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1482 places it in the 9th percentile of all GPUs, which is quite low.
The scaling between resolutions confirms this analysis. When moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440, the average FPS for Ultra drops from 111 to 74, a reduction of about 33%. Moving from 2560x1440 to 3840x2160, the Ultra average drops from 74 to 42, a reduction of about 43%. This steep decline as resolution increases is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario. If the CPU were the limiting factor, the frame rate would remain relatively flat across resolutions, as the same number of draw calls and game logic updates would be processed regardless of pixel count.
The preset scaling also points to the GPU as the primary constraint. At 1920x1080, the difference between Low and Ultra is 60 FPS, which is a 35% reduction in performance. At 3840x2160, the same preset comparison yields only a 22 FPS difference, which is a 34% reduction. While the absolute numbers shrink, the relative penalty is consistent, further indicating that the GPU's fill rate and shading capabilities are the limiting factors. The CPU has ample headroom, as evidenced by its high multi-threaded and single-threaded scores, and is unlikely to cause any frame pacing issues in Roblox.
How This Combo Ranks
The database places this specific combination at rank 3289 out of 3711 tested combos for Roblox. This places it in the lower 12% of all tested systems, which is consistent with the GPU's low percentile ranking. The combo rank is a holistic measure that accounts for both the CPU and GPU performance in the context of this specific game. Given that the GPU sits at the 9th percentile of all GPUs, while the CPU sits at the 94th percentile of all CPUs, the overall ranking is dragged down significantly by the graphics component.
This rank means that the vast majority of tested combos will deliver higher frame rates in Roblox. However, it is important to note that the rank does not tell the whole story. The measured FPS data shows that this combo is perfectly capable of running the game at high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p. The low rank is a reflection of the GPU's absolute performance level, not a statement that the system is unusable. In fact, for a game as lightweight as Roblox, the combination of a very fast CPU and a modest GPU can still produce playable results, as the CPU can help compensate for the GPU's limitations in CPU-bound scenarios.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The nearest rivals for the Intel Arc B390, based on average benchmark scores, are all NVIDIA integrated or entry-level desktop GPUs. The GeForce GT 520MX scores 1463, which is 1.3% lower than the Arc B390's 1482. The GeForce 800M scores 1460, a 1.5% deficit. The GeForce GT 625 OEM scores 1446, a 2.5% deficit, and the GeForce GT 710 scores 1443, a 2.7% deficit. These alternatives would behave very similarly in Roblox, producing frame rates within a few percentage points of the Arc B390. Users with any of these GPUs should expect comparable performance levels.
On the CPU side, the Intel Core i7-14700KF has an average benchmark score of 70163. Its nearest rivals are all high-end desktop or mobile processors. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F scores 69996, a 0.2% difference. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX scores 69875, a 0.4% difference. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X scores 69515, a 0.9% difference. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K scores 70879, which is 1% higher. When paired with the same Intel Arc B390 GPU, these CPUs would yield nearly identical FPS in Roblox, as the game is unlikely to be CPU-limited with any of these processors. The choice between them would have no meaningful impact on the measured frame rates.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the best choice, delivering an average of 111 FPS. This is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold, and there is no need to lower the settings. The Medium preset offers 155 FPS and Low offers 171 FPS, but these higher frame rates come at the cost of visual fidelity. Since Ultra is already smooth, it is the recommended setting for this resolution.
At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset again provides the best balance, with an average of 74 FPS. This clears the 60 FPS threshold by a comfortable margin. The High preset delivers 92 FPS and Medium delivers 104 FPS, but the visual improvement of Ultra is worth the modest frame rate reduction. The system has enough headroom at this resolution that Ultra is the sensible default.
At 3840x2160, the situation changes. The Low preset is the only option that stays at or above 60 FPS, averaging 64 FPS. The Medium preset falls just short at 59 FPS, and its minimum FPS of 50 means it will dip below the playable threshold. High and Ultra are not viable, averaging 52 FPS and 42 FPS respectively. For a stable experience at 4K, Low is the only recommended preset, and even then, users should be prepared for occasional frame drops during intense scenes.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Roblox at 1080p with maximum settings?
A: Yes. At 1920x1080 with the Ultra preset, the combo achieves an average of 111 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold. The Medium preset runs at 155 FPS, and Low runs at 171 FPS.
Q: What is the highest preset that maintains 60 FPS at 1440p?
A: The Ultra preset at 2560x1440 delivers an average of 74 FPS, making it the most demanding preset that stays above the playable threshold. All other presets (High, Medium, Low) also exceed 60 FPS at this resolution.
Q: Is the system capable of 4K gaming in Roblox?
A: Yes, but only at the Low preset, which averages 64 FPS at 3840x2160. The Medium preset averages 59 FPS with a minimum of 50 FPS, so it is not recommended for a consistent 60 FPS experience. High and Ultra fall short at 52 FPS and 42 FPS.
Q: How does the Intel Arc B390 compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The Arc B390 has a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1482. The NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX is 1.3% slower, the GeForce 800M is 1.5% slower, the GeForce GT 625 OEM is 2.5% slower, and the GeForce GT 710 is 2.7% slower.
Q: What is the overall ranking of this CPU and GPU combination for Roblox?
A: The combo is ranked 3289 out of 3711 tested combinations in the database. This places it in the lower portion of all tested systems, primarily due to the GPU's low performance percentile.
Q: Does the CPU hold back the GPU in this game?
A: No. The Intel Core i7-14700KF has a Passmark single-thread score of 4480 and a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 44167. The recorded FPS scaling between resolutions indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor, not the CPU.
The Verdict
The data shows that the Intel Core i7-14700KF and Intel Arc B390 combination can run Roblox, but the experience depends heavily on the chosen resolution. At 1920x1080, the system is fully capable, running the Ultra preset at an average of 111 FPS. At 2560x1440, it also clears the 60 FPS bar on Ultra with an average of 74 FPS, making this resolution a viable option for high-quality play. The system is therefore fully playable at both 1080p and 1440p across all presets.
At 3840x2160, the verdict is more nuanced. The Low preset is the only one that maintains an average above 60 FPS, hitting 64 FPS. The Medium preset averages 59 FPS, which is just below the threshold, and its minimum of 50 FPS indicates that frame drops will occur. High and Ultra are not playable at this resolution. Therefore, users with a 4K display should stick to the Low preset for a smooth experience, or consider lowering the resolution to 2560x1440 for significantly better visual quality and frame rates. The verdict by resolution is clear: 1080p and 1440p are fully playable, while 4K is only playable at the lowest settings.